Canada Gazette
www.gazette.gc.ca
Common menu bar links
Vol. 134, No. 30 — July 22, 2000
COMMISSIONS
CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY
INCOME TAX ACT
Revocation of Registration of Charities
Following a request from the charities listed below to have their status as a charity revoked, the following notice of proposed revocation was sent:
"Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(a) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette."
| Business Number | Name/Address |
|---|---|
| 100007046RR0001 | ABBA HOUSE INC., REGINA, SASK. |
| 101945871RR0001 | GARDERIE L'ENFANFRELUCHE II, MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.) |
| 107396905RR0034 | NORTH BATTLEFORD FOURSQUARE GOSPEL CHURCH, REGINA, SASK. |
| 107406316RR0021 | LAKESHORE FREE METHODIST CHURCH MISSISSAUGA, COBOURG, ONT. |
| 107497943RR0001 | HUMPTY DUMPTY PLAYSCHOOL, RICHMOND, B.C. |
| 107951618RR0215 | THE SALVATION ARMY FAMILY SERVICES, SASKATOON, SASK. |
| 118810357RR0001 | BIRTHRIGHT OF HUNTSVILLE, HUNTSVILLE, ONT. |
| 118821891RR0001 | BURRARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, VANCOUVER, B.C. |
| 118882414RR0001 | DARTMOUTH FIREFIGHTERS LADIES AUXILIARY, DARTMOUTH, N.S. |
| 118882844RR0001 | DAVIDSON AND DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL INC., DAVIDSON, SASK. |
| 118932441RR0001 | FRIENDS OF BUKASA/AMIS DU BUKASA, MONTRÉAL, QUE. |
| 118956176RR0001 | HERBERT MARSHALL MCLUHAN FOUNDATION, ANTIGONISH, N.S. |
| 118997659RR0001 | LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE ST-ROCH, QUÉBEC (QUÉ.) |
| 119023315RR0001 | LOISIRS JOLI-CŒUR, MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.) |
| 119030468RR0001 | MANITOBA LANGUAGE ARTS FESTIVAL CHARITABLE TRUST, WINNIPEG, MAN. |
| 119063402RR0001 | NOVA SCOTIA FEDERATION OF THE COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, BEDFORD, N.S. |
| 119064343RR0001 | OAKVILLE ALLIANCE CHURCH, PORTAGE LA PRAIRIE, MAN. |
| 119100782RR0001 | PRESBYTERIAN WOMEN'S MISSIONARY SOCIETY, WESTERN DIVISION, EVENING AUXILIARY, BETHEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, ILDERTON, ONT. |
| 119107332RR0001 | QUEENS COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTRE AND RECREATION SOCIETY, LIVERPOOL, N.S. |
| 119159762RR0001 | THE SPIRITUAL ASSEMBLY OF THE BAHA'IS OF KINGSTON TOWNSHIP, KINGSTON, ONT. |
| 119209427RR0001 | TELECARE BELLEVILLE, BELLEVILLE, ONT. |
| 119209641RR0001 | TELECARE YORK, NOBLETON, ONT. |
| 119216042RR0001 | THE BIRTLE AND DISTRICT HEALTH AUXILIARY, BIRTLE, MAN. |
| 119298388RR0001 | THE WILLAHOME FOUNDATION, DUNDAS, ONT. |
| 131580862RR0001 | EASTERN ONTARIO HEALTH PROMOTION FOUNDATION, CORNWALL, ONT. |
| 132037136RR0001 | TULLIBY LAKE HISTORY BOOK SOCIETY, MARWAYNE, ALTA. |
| 132328253RR0001 | SISTERS OF CHARITY (GREY NUNS) OF SASKATCHEWAN, EDMONTON, ALTA. |
| 132708041RR0001 | RIVER EAST ADVOCACY COALITION FOR THE HANDICAPPED (REACH), WINNIPEG, MAN. |
| 133059774RR0001 | NORTH DORCHESTER OUTREACH SOCIETY INCORPORATED, LONDON, ONT. |
| 133898262RR0001 | CONTACT ATAXIE, VERDUN (QUÉ.) |
| 135473304RR0001 | METATHEATRE INC. /MÉTATHÉÂTRE INC., TORONTO, ONT. |
| 138852710RR0001 | EVERGREEN COVENANT REFORMED CHURCH OF AGASSIZ, AGASSIZ, B.C. |
| 139061246RR0001 | INSTITUT DES CONFÉRENCES ÉCONOMIQUES/ INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC CONFERENCES, KNOWLTON (QUÉ.) |
| 139321160RR0001 | CHILD FIND BC-KELOWNA BRANCH, KELOWNA, B.C. |
| 140913476RR0001 | SEVEN OAKS ALLIANCE CHURCH, REGINA, SASK. |
| 871986675RR0001 | MINDS IN MOTION, CALGARY, ALTA. |
| 886169838RR0001 | COVENANT CHRISTIAN CHURCH, LISTOWEL, SEAFORTH, ONT. |
| 886366798RR0001 | PARENT TRAINING ASSOCIATION OF CALGARY, CALGARY, ALTA. |
| 888004447RR0001 | LES ŒUVRES DE MARIE-LOUISE ÉLIZABETH, LÉVIS (QUÉ.) |
| 888669660RR0001 | NEIGHBOURLINK CAMBRIDGE, MISSISSAUGA, ONT. |
| 889123030RR0001 | COMITÉ DES ŒUVRES CHARITABLES DU CONSEIL NOTRE-DAME-DE-LOURDES 8837, MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.) |
| 889662771RR0001 | KELOWNA FRIENDS OF THE SYMPHONY, KELOWNA, B.C. |
| 889849790RR0001 | FAITH FUNDAMENTAL BAPTIST CHURCH, STELLARTON, N.S. |
| 889890372RR0001 | MCCUTCHEON MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY, BURNABY, B.C. |
| 889993374RR0001 | LE REFUGE CONTRE-TOXIE, CHICOUTIMI (QUÉ.) |
| 890104995RR0001 | THUNDER BAY SCHIZOPHRENIA SUPPORT GROUP, THUNDER BAY, ONT. |
| 890106040RR0001 | LAKE ERIE STEEL COMPANY LTD. EMPLOYEES' CHARITY TRUST, NANTICOKE, ONT. |
| 890217979RR0001 | THEODORE AND DISTRICT UKRAINIAN DANCE CLUB INC., THEODORE, SASK. |
| 890268790RR0001 | COMITÉ DES ŒUVRES CHARITABLES DU CONSEIL ST-PAMPHILE NO 3075, MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.) |
| 890509243RR0001 | PRESBYTERIAN WOMEN'S MISSIONARY SOCIETY, WESTERN DIVISION, KNOX-PAISLEY BLOCK WOMEN'S AFTERNOON AUXILIARY, KNOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, GUELPH, ONT. |
| 890772544RR0001 | FAMILY TABERNACLE OF JESUS CHRIST OF CALGARY ALBERTA, CALGARY, ALTA. |
| 890791346RR0001 | GULL LAKE FOOD SERVICES, GULL LAKE, SASK. |
| 891197048RR0001 | FIDUCIE TESTAMENTAIRE OLIVE B. LERICHE, MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.) |
| 891259541RR0001 | LE COMITÉ SOCIO-CULTUREL DU MOYEN ORIENT, DOLLARD-DES-ORMEAUX (QUÉ.) |
| 891327546RR0001 | TRILLIUM FOREST RETREAT FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES INC., ST. CATHARINES, ONT. |
| 891399248RR0001 | GRIEF INSTITUTE OF LONDON, LONDON, ONT. |
| 891433641RR0001 | THE CHURCH OF GOD OF PROPHECY, EDMONTON, ALTA. |
| 891716045RR0001 | THE VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION OF BEACON HILL LODGE WINNIPEG MANITOBA, WINNIPEG, MAN. |
| 892263781RR0001 | INDIAN HEAD ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP INC., INDIAN HEAD, SASK. |
| 892392788RR0001 | SPRINGS OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP, MILLET, ALTA. |
| 892588682RR0001 | MYER SAMUELS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION, MONTRÉAL, QUE. |
| 892739962RR0001 | FONDATION CENTRAP INC., MONT-JOLI (QUÉ.) |
| 893420364RR0001 | PRESBYTERIAN WOMEN'S MISSIONARY SOCIETY, WESTERN DIVISION, NEW CENTURY CHEE-LI AUXILIARY KNOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, GUELPH, ONT. |
| 893670729RR0001 | PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA GERMAN BRANCH MANITOBA DISTRICT, STEINBACH, MAN. |
| 894574458RR0001 | SENTIERS SPIRITUELS QUÉBEC, QUÉBEC (QUÉ.) |
| 896609187RR0001 | NORTH ISLAND ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, PORT HARDY, B.C. |
| 898692462RR0001 | OASIS ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY, BEDFORD, N.S. |
ENIKÖ VERMES
Acting Director General
Charities Directorate
[30-1-o]
CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY
SPECIAL IMPORT MEASURES ACT
Stainless Steel Round Bar — Decision
On June 29, 2000, pursuant to subsection 38(1) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), the Commissioner of Customs and Revenue made a preliminary determination respecting the alleged injurious dumping into Canada of certain stainless steel round bar from Brazil and the alleged injurious subsidizing of these goods originating in or exported from Brazil and India.
The Commissioner has determined that there is evidence that discloses a reasonable indication that the dumping and subsidizing have caused injury to the Canadian industry.
The subject goods are normally imported into Canada under the following Harmonized System classification numbers:
| Harmonized System classification numbers | Harmonized System classification numbers |
|---|---|
| 7222.11.00.11 | 7222.20.90.11 |
| 7222.11.00.21 | 7222.20.90.21 |
| 7222.20.10.11 | 7222.30.00.11 |
| 7222.20.10.21 | 7222.30.00.21 |
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal will now conduct an inquiry into the question of injury to the domestic industry in Canada. The Tribunal will make an order or finding within 120 days following the receipt of the notice of the preliminary determination. Pursuant to section 8 of SIMA, provisional duty is payable on the subject goods which are released from customs during the period commencing on the date the preliminary determination is made and ending the earlier of the date on which the investigation, or portion thereof, is terminated by the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (CCRA), and the date on which the Tribunal makes its decision. The amount of provisional duty payable on the goods is not greater than the estimated margin of dumping and the amount of the subsidy. The payment of such duty is hereby demanded.
Information
A statement of reasons explaining these decisions has been provided to persons directly interested in the proceedings. It is available on the CCRA's Web site at: http://www.ccra-adrc. gc.ca/customs/business/sima/index-eng.html or by contacting Vera Hutzuliak, Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate, 191 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5, (613) 954-0689 (Telephone), (613) 954-3750 (Facsimile).
Ottawa, June 29, 2000
R. A. SÉGUIN
Acting Director General
Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
INQUIRY
Operation of Government-owned Facilities
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) has received a second complaint (File No. PR-2000-021) from Brookefield LePage Johnson Controls Facility Management Services, of Markham, Ontario, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. 6 NS 00 RS R1) by Canada Post Corporation. The solicitation is for the provision of facility management and project management services. Pursuant to subsection 30.13(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act and subsection 7(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations, notice is hereby given that the Tribunal has decided to conduct an inquiry into this complaint.
It is alleged that the Canada Post Corporation has violated a number of provisions under the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Further information may be obtained from: The Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (Telephone), (613) 990-2439 (Facsimile).
Ottawa, July 13, 2000
MICHEL P. GRANGER
Secretary
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES
The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:
— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, 1 Promenade du Portage, Ground Floor, Hull, Quebec K1A 0N2, (819) 997-2429 (Telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), (819) 994-0218 (Facsimile);
— Bank of Commerce Building, Suite 1007, 1809 Barrington Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K8, (902) 426-7997 (Telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), (902) 426-2721 (Facsimile);
— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, (204) 983-6306 (Telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), (204) 983-6317 (Facsimile);
— 530-580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, (604) 666-2111 (Telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), (604) 666-8322 (Facsimile);
— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 405 De Maisonneuve Boulevard E, 2nd Floor, Suite B2300, Montréal, Quebec H2L 4J5, (514) 283-6607 (Telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), (514) 283-3689 (Facsimile);
— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, (416) 952-9096 (Telephone), (416) 954-6343 (Facsimile);
— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, (306) 780-3422 (Telephone), (306) 780-3319 (Facsimile);
— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, Scotia Place Tower Two, 19th Floor, Suite 1909, 10060 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3R8, (780) 495-3224 (Telephone), (780) 495-3214 (Facsimile).
Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.
Secretary General
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
DECISIONS
The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.
2000-253 July 11, 2000
Bea-Ver Communications Inc.
Chatham, Ontario
Approved — Addition of a low-power FM transmitter at Chatham.
2000-254 July 11, 2000
Native Communication Inc.
Thompson and Sherridon, Manitoba
Approved — Addition of a low-power transmitter at Sherridon.
2000-255 July 11, 2000
Image Wireless Communications Inc.
Warmley, Saskatchewan
Approved — Increase in power for the MDS undertaking serving Warmley from 13 watts to 25 watts.
2000-256 July 11, 2000
Lake Louise Community Association
Lake Louise, Alberta
Approved — Addition of the transmitters CFLL-TV-1 and CFLL-TV-2.
2000-257 July 11, 2000
Acadian Communications Limited
Chéticamp, Nova Scotia
Approved — Addition of transmitters to distribute, in encrypted (scrambled) mode, the signals of Country Music Television, The Discovery Channel and WGN-TV Chicago, Illinois.
2000-258 July 11, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Halifax and Middleton, Nova Scotia
Approved — Addition of transmitter CBH-FM-1 Middleton.
2000-259 July 11, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Vancouver and Kelowna, British Columbia
Approved — Addition of a transmitter at Kelowna.
2000-260 July 11, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
St. John's and Grand Falls, Newfoundland
Approved — Addition of a transmitter at Grand Falls.
2000-261 July 12, 2000
Joel Virtanen, on behalf of a company to be incorporated and to be known as
JR Radio
New Liskeard; and North Bay, Ontario
Denied — Broadcasting licences for two English-language low-power FM radio programming undertakings, one at New Liskeard and the other at North Bay.
2000-262 July 12, 2000
Tri-Tel Communications Inc.
Timmins, Ontario
Denied — Broadcasting licence for an English-language low-power FM radio programming undertaking at Timmins.
2000-263 July 12, 2000
Global Communications Limited
Halifax, Truro, etc., Nova Scotia; Saint John, Fredericton, etc., New
Brunswick, and Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island
Renewed — Broadcasting licences for the television programming undertakings CIHF-TV Halifax, CIHF-TV-2 Saint John and their respective transmitters, from September 1, 2000, to August 31, 2001.
2000-264 July 12, 2000
Canwest Television Inc.
Vancouver and Courtenay, British Columbia
Renewed — Broadcasting licence for the television programming undertaking CKVU-TV Vancouver and its transmitter, from September 1, 2000, to August 31, 2001.
2000-265 July 12, 2000
Newfoundland Broadcasting Company Limited
St. John's, Argentia, etc., Newfoundland
Renewed — Broadcasting licence for the television programming undertaking CJON-TV St. John's and its transmitters, from September 1, 2000, to August 31, 2001.
2000-266 July 12, 2000
TVA Group Inc.
Montréal, Quebec
Renewed — Broadcasting licences for CFTM-TV Montréal (the originating station) and the TVA television network, from September 1, 2000, to August 31, 2001.
2000-267 July 12, 2000
CTV Television Inc.
Ottawa, Deseronto, Cornwall and Pembroke, Ontario
Renewed — Broadcasting licence for the television programming undertaking CJOH-TV Ottawa and its transmitters, from September 1, 2000, to August 31, 2001.
2000-268 July 12, 2000
CTV Television Inc.
Across Canada
Renewed — Television network licence issued to CTV Television Network Ltd., from September 1, 2000, to August 31, 2001.
2000-269 July 14, 2000
University of Toronto Community Radio Inc.
Toronto, Ontario
Renewed — Broadcasting licence for radio programming undertaking CIUT-FM Toronto, from September 1, 2000, to February 28, 2001.
2000-270 July 14, 2000
The Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVOntario)
Toronto, Ontario
Renewed — Broadcasting licences for CICA-TV Toronto and its transmitters, TFO and its associated transmitters, and the television programming undertaking broadcasting coverage of the Ontario Legislative Assembly, from September 1, 2000, to February 28, 2001.
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING 2000-5-2
Further to its Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2000-5 dated May 26, 2000, relating to its Public Hearing to be held on August 14, 2000, at 9 a.m., at the Conference Centre, Phase IV, 140 Promenade du Portage, Hull, Quebec, the Commission announces that at the request of the applicant, the following items are withdrawn from the public hearing:
Item 8
Alliance Atlantis Broadcasting Inc. (Food Network Canada)
Toronto, Ontario
Item 115
Alliance Atlantis Broadcasting Inc. (OBI) [Food Network Canada]
Toronto, Ontario
July 13, 2000
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING 2000-6
The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on August 15, 2000, at 9 a.m. (Issue No. 1), at the Commission Headquarters, 1 Promenade du Portage, Hull, Quebec, to consider the following:
Western Canada and Territories Region
1. Cameron Bell Consultancy Ltd.
Burnaby (Broadway/Lougheed Highway), British Columbia
Broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power FM radio programming undertaking at Burnaby (Broadway/Lougheed Highway). The new station would operate on frequency 88.9 MHz (channel 205LP) with an effective radiated power of 50 watts.
Deadline for intervention: August 7, 2000
July 11, 2000
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING 2000-7
The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on September 18, 2000, at 9 a.m. (Issue No. 1) at the Conference Centre, Portage IV, 140 Promenade du Portage, Hull, Quebec, to consider the following:
1. 1406236 Ontario Inc.
Across Canada
To effect a change in the effective control of the licensed broadcasting undertakings currently under CTV.
2. Canwest Global Communications Corp.
Across Canada
To acquire the 24 percent partnership interest of Canadian Satellite Communications Inc. (CANCOM) in Report on Business Television (ROBTv), a general partnership.
3. Suite Systems Inc.
Across Canada
For a broadcasting licence to carry on a national Class 1 broadcasting distribution undertaking.
4. Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc.
British Columbia, Ontario, New Brunswick and Quebec
To transfer effective ownership and control of cable distribution undertakings operating in New Brunswick, Southern Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia.
5. Câble-Axion Québec inc.
Biencourt, Quebec
To acquire the assets of the cable distribution undertaking serving Biencourt currently held by Gestion L.S. Tardif inc.
6. Câble-Axion Québec inc.
Lac-des-Aigles, Quebec
To acquire the assets of the cable distribution undertaking serving Lac-des-Aigles currently held by Gestion L.S. Tardif inc.
7. 9063-0104 Québec inc.
Lac-Mégantic, Quebec
For a broadcasting licence to carry on a French-language FM radio programming undertaking at Lac-Mégantic.
8. 3649091 Canada Ltd.
Montréal, Quebec
To acquire the assets of the television programming undertaking CJNT-TV Montréal currently held by Raymond Chabot inc., trustee of the Estate of CTEQ Télévision inc., in bankruptcy, and for a broadcasting licence to continue the operation of this undertaking.
9. Communications Quebecor inc., Cogeco inc., Radio Nord inc., Gestion Baripra
inc., and Télévision MBS inc., limited partners, and Commandité
TQS inc.
Montréal, Rimouski and Québec, Quebec
To acquire the assets and for broadcasting licences to continue the operation of the television programming undertakings CFJP-TV Montréal and its transmitter CJPC-TV Rimouski, CFAP-TV Québec, and for the French-language television network, all under the same terms and conditions as the current licences and any terms and conditions that may be imposed in the context of the licence renewal applications which were heard at the June 27, 2000 public hearing in Montréal, Quebec.
10. Mario Lacombe
Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines, Quebec
For a broadcasting licence to carry on a French-language developmental community radio programming undertaking at Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines.
11. Câble-Axion Québec inc.
Saint-Cyprien, Quebec
To acquire the assets of the cable distribution undertaking serving Saint-Cyprien currently held by Gestion L.S. Tardif inc.
12. Câble-Axion Québec inc.
Squatec, Quebec
To acquire the assets of the cable distribution undertaking serving Squatec currently held by Gestion L.S. Tardif inc.
13. Câble-Axion Québec inc.
Saint-Léon-le-Grand, Quebec
To acquire the assets of the cable distribution undertaking serving Saint-Léon-le-Grand currently held by Gestion L.S. Tardif inc.
14. The Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVOntario)
Province of Ontario
To renew the broadcasting licences to carry on the following television programming undertakings expiring February 28, 2001:
— TVOntario English-language television programming undertaking incorporating CICA-TV Toronto, its originating station;
— TFO (formerly La Chaîne française); and
— Ontario Legislative Assembly.
15. 1333598 Ontario Limited
Thunder Bay, Ontario
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power FM radio programming undertaking at Thunder Bay.
16. Big Pond Communications 2000 Inc.
Thunder Bay, Ontario
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power FM radio programming undertaking at Thunder Bay.
17. University of Toronto Community Radio Inc.
Toronto, Ontario
To renew the broadcasting licence for CIUT-FM Toronto, expiring February 28, 2001.
18. The Communication Systems Design Engineer of Manitoba Hydro, Mr.
Gordon D. Waldmo
Gillam, Jenpeg and Limestone, Manitoba
To acquire the assets of the radiocommunication distribution undertakings serving Gillam, Jenpeg and Limestone.
19. Corey Lascelle
Estevan, Saskatchewan
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power FM radio programming undertaking at Estevan.
20. Corey Lascelle
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power FM radio programming undertaking at Moose Jaw.
21. Corey Lascelle
North Battleford, Saskatchewan
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power FM radio programming undertaking at North Battleford.
22. Corey Lascelle
Swift Current, Saskatchewan
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power FM radio programming undertaking at Swift Current.
23. Corey Lascelle
Weyburn, Saskatchewan
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power FM radio programming undertaking at Weyburn.
24. Spirit Broadcasting
Lethbridge, Alberta
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power (specialty) FM radio programming undertaking at Lethbridge.
25. Tag Broadcasting
Wetaskiwin, Alberta
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low power (specialty) FM radio programming undertaking at Wetaskiwin.
26. Rogers Broadcasting Limited
Hope, British Columbia
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language FM radio programming undertaking at Hope.
27. Likely Community School Association
Likely and Moorehead, British Columbia
To acquire the assets of the radiocommunication distribution undertakings serving Likely and Moorehead.
28. Radio Lillooet Society
Lillooet, British Columbia
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language (Type A) developmental community radio programming undertaking at Lillooet.
29. Whistlerweb.Net Internet Service Inc.
Whistler, British Columbia
To acquire the assets of the radiocommunication distribution undertaking serving Whistler.
Deadline for intervention: August 24, 2000
July 14, 2000
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-81-1
Revised policy concerning inside wire regime: Call for comments on proposed amendments to section 10 of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations
In this notice, the Commission announces its revised policy concerning the inside wire regime. This policy emerges from the Commission's consideration of comments received in response to Public Notice CRTC 1999-124. The Commission also calls for comments on proposed regulatory amendments necessary to give effect to the revised policy.
Introduction
Section 10 of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations (the Regulations) issued in December 1997 provides for a transfer of ownership model with respect to inside wire. This was part of a broader Commission policy intended to remove barriers to competitive access that could result from cable ownership of inside wire (see Public Notice CRTC 1997-150, which introduced the new Regulations).
Section 10 of the Regulations currently stipulates the following:
(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), if a licensee owns the inside wire, it shall offer it for purchase to a customer when the customer's oral or written notice to terminate basic service is received.
(2) In the case of a single-unit dwelling, the licensee's offer under subsection (1) shall be at a price of not more than $5.
(3) If the customer is the owner or operator of a multiple-unit dwelling, the licensee shall offer to the customer for purchase the inside wire of each subscriber residing in the multiple-unit dwelling.
(4) If a customer decides not to purchase the inside wire, the licensee owning the wire may remove it within seven days after the date of the termination of service.
(5) If a licensee decides not to remove the inside wire under subsection (4), the licensee shall not later interfere with the ability of any person to use the wire.
As announced in Public Notice 1997-150, the Commission subsequently established a working group of the CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee (CWCISC) for the purpose of resolving any issues associated with the implementation of the new transfer of ownership regime, including such matters as:
— processes for customer transfer between competitive distributors, including such things as development of service intervals, process maps, ordering and billing, and information exchange standards; and
— agreement on alternative demarcation points, with particular reference to multiple-unit dwelling (MUDs), and on a valuation of inside wire and other related equipment in MUDs.
Following some months of discussion by the working group, and after the expenditure of considerable time and resources by all parties to develop effective implementation procedures for the new Regulations, the Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) announced that its members were not offering up the inside wire for sale to customers, as required by section 10, in either single- or multiple-unit dwellings.
On February 1, 1999, in response to the position taken by the incumbent licensees, a number of new entrant licensees filed an application pursuant to section 12 of the Broadcasting Act (the Act). The application requested that the Commission reach a determination that the CCTA's members were in deliberate non-compliance with section 10 of the Regulations, and that it take various forms of action in response to such non-compliance.
The Commission notes that it was not for some time following the filing of this application that the incumbent licensees, through the CCTA, proposed an alternative means to achieve the objectives of section 10 of the Regulations. Specifically, on May 19, 1999, the CCTA filed a request that the Commission amend section 10 of the Regulations. Among other things, the CCTA contended that, contrary to the intended purpose of the current rules, section 10 causes unnecessary confusion for customers cancelling service with a licensee and creates inconvenience for existing customers. The CCTA also submitted that owners of MUDs have expressed concern and dissatisfaction with the current Regulations.
The Commission views the apparent non-compliance with the current transfer regime by certain, if not all, incumbent cable licensees to be an extremely serious matter. The Commission emphasizes that licensees are required to comply with the Regulations pertaining to their broadcasting activities at all times, and it expects them to comply with all applicable policies and regulatory frameworks governing them.
In its approach to the issues surrounding inside wire, the Commission's intention has always been to enable customers to use the service provider of their choice. This has been a fundamental element of the Commission's efforts in both broadcasting and telecommunications and is a linchpin in its efforts to promote the competitive provision of all communications services. The Commission remains committed to end-user choice.
Notwithstanding the very serious nature of the Commission's concerns, because the CCTA proposal sought to explore an alternative method of attaining the objective described above, the Commission decided that it would be appropriate to initiate a proceeding to consider whether it could better meet its regulatory goal in all the circumstances. Accordingly, on July 29, 1999, the Commission issued Public Notice CRTC 1999-124 calling for comments on the CCTA's proposal.
Under the CCTA's proposal, one that it characterizes as a "non-interference model," section 10 of the Regulations would be amended to read as follows:
(1) A licensee shall not restrict or otherwise interfere with a customer's use of the inside wire.
(2) A licensee that owns the inside wire of a single-unit dwelling shall not charge for use of the wire.
(3) A licensee that owns the inside wire of a multiple-unit dwelling may charge for the use of that wire in accordance with such terms as may be agreed to by the parties or determined by the CRTC.
In support of its proposed amendments, the CCTA enunciated four principles that, in its view, should be used in interpreting and implementing a new transfer regime. The four proposed principles are:
— where the licensee owns the inside wire, it shall retain ownership of it, i.e., there is no transfer of ownership of the inside wire;
— the licensee that owns the inside wire will be prohibited by regulation from interfering with a customer's use of it;
— there will be no charge for use by another licensee of the inside wire in single-unit dwellings; in circumstances to be identified by the CRTC through the CISC process, there will be a charge (also to be determined by the Commission) for use by another licensee of the inside wire in multiple-unit dwellings; and
— all licensees will refrain from damaging another licensee's distribution system, cable drops, customer service enclosures and panel boxes.
Positions of the parties
Twenty-seven comments were submitted in response to Public Notice 1999-124. The incumbent cable distributors argued that the Commission should accept the CCTA's proposal to establish a non-interference regime for inside wire, and that the elimination of ownership issues would significantly improve the practicality of the inside wire regime. They also stated that customers would be able to receive service from the distributor of their choice, and that ownership of the inside wire would remain with a party that is regulated by the Commission.
The incumbent cable distributors further submitted that it would now be appropriate for the Commission to direct the CISC to consider the circumstances under which charges should apply for the use of inside wire in MUDs and the amount of such charges. The incumbents believe that progress by the CWCISC working group on the matters of facility access, network integrity and customer service intervals would be significantly enhanced if the Commission were to make an express policy determination in respect of access to the demarcation point in MUDs. The incumbents believe that no licensee should be required to grant another licensee access to its panel box. They further submitted that the CISC should be directed to complete its work on disconnection procedures and service intervals within four months of the Commission's decision on the CCTA's application.
The new entrants opposed the CCTA's application. Generally, the new entrants suggested that subsection 10(3) of the Regulations should be given a plain language interpretation, and that the landlord or owner of a MUD should be the party who purchases the wire. They submitted that the CCTA's proposal that there be no ownership transfer represents an attempt by incumbents to retain control of a facility that has bottleneck characteristics.
They further submitted that the CCTA's proposal should be rejected since it ignores the industry trend towards customer ownership. They also argued that it leaves the issue of assigning value in MUDs unresolved; is based on a leased access model previously rejected by the Commission; makes no business sense; leaves open the possibility of the cable company reclaiming the wire; and increases risk of cable companies signing exclusive contracts.
The new entrants further submitted that the Commission must ensure their efficient and non-discriminatory access to the incumbent cable distributors' panel boxes or other facilities located where the inside wire connects to the demarcation point. They argued that the Commission must also extend the winback restrictions to make these restrictions effective in a MUD environment.
The building owners and building managers who offered comments on this matter submitted that the CCTA had failed to provide justification for the amendments and that its application should be dismissed. They proposed that section 10 be amended to require that the inside wire be offered for purchase by the owner of the property at a reasonable price.
Friends of Canadian Broadcasting strongly opposed the CCTA's request. This organization urged the Commission to take the opportunity afforded by this review to reaffirm its commitment to end-user choice, including specifically the option to purchase the inside wire.
Commission's position with respect to the CCTA's non-interference model
The Commission considers that the CCTA's proposal has merit. The Commission has reached this determination, notwithstanding the arguments raised by interveners, and despite the Commission's very serious concerns about the apparent non-compliance by the CCTA's membership with existing Regulations. In the Commission's view, the proposal represents a clear acknowledgement by the cable industry of the Commission's underlying concern that continued control by incumbents of inside wiring constitutes a major barrier to competition and consumer choice.
The Commission suggests that considerable time and resources might have been saved had the CCTA come forward with its non-interference proposal as part of the process that led to the creation of the new Regulations in 1997. While late in coming, the cable industry's willingness to accept a requirement not to interfere with or restrict a subscriber's use of the inside wire would achieve the Commission's purpose of ensuring access to inside wiring by competing broadcasting distributors. It would also eliminate what the cable industry contends, and the Commission agrees, is a transfer regime that can lead to unnecessary inconvenience and annoyance for subscribers and providers alike.
The Commission sees further benefit in a non-interference model, in that it would eliminate the need, in single-unit dwellings, to ascertain whether the homeowner or the licensee owns the inside wire. As noted by the CCTA, the non-interference model would also be preferable to the transfer regime currently in place because it would address concerns respecting legal liability for abandoned wiring.
Accordingly, the Commission proposes to amend section 10 of the Regulations by replacing the current text with that set out in the appendix to this notice. In a later section of this notice, the Commission announces the procedures to be followed by those wishing to submit written comments on the proposed amendment.
The proposed amendment to the Regulations would permit a charge for the use of inside wire. The Commission notes in this regard that the cable industry has generally advocated a charge only for the wiring installed within MUDs, and even then, only for wiring that is new or is less than five years old. The cable industry proposal specifically excludes any request for compensation for the wiring installed in single-unit dwellings. The Commission further notes that the CWCISC was negotiating a rate for the wiring newly or recently installed in MUDs just before the suspension of the group's activities. Accordingly, the Commission requests that the CISC cable working group meet to develop an appropriate rate, and that such a rate be in place within two months of the coming into effect of the regulatory amendment proposed herein. Alternatively, if consensus is not reached within that period, the Commission requests that the CISC submit any dispute to the Commission for resolution. The Commission considers that the value proposed by the CCTA in the proceedings leading to Public Notice 1997-150 (i.e. $15 per suite) is a reasonable basis for commencing negotiations on an acceptable lease rate.
The Commission notes that, in light of this proposed amendment and of the other determinations discussed above, further consideration of the application by various new entrant licensees for relief, filed pursuant to section 12 of the Act, is unnecessary.
Other matters
The Commission notes that a number of other matters were raised during the course of this proceeding relating to the broader issue of customer access and the promotion of effective competition in broadcast distribution. These are discussed below.
Access to customer service enclosures
A number of parties claimed that the lack of access to the customer service enclosures (CSEs) and distribution panels owned by the incumbent distributors poses a significant barrier to entry and permits incumbent distributors to frustrate the new entrants' effective servicing of newly acquired customers.
CSEs are secured (locked) metal boxes that are usually attached to the exterior of a single-unit dwelling and serve as the point of interconnection between the inside wire and the serving company's external distribution plant. They serve the same purpose as the larger distribution panels housed in MUDs. Access to these locked enclosures is a highly contentious issue and is among the matters addressed in the fourth of the principles enunciated by the CCTA in its proposal.
In Public Notice 1997-150 that accompanied the new Regulations, the Commission noted that these enclosures belong to the cable licensees. Although the Commission has not compelled these licensees to offer new entrants access to these panels and enclosures, it agrees that such access is sometimes necessary. It is possible that the CCTA's fourth principle is necessitated by incidents where these enclosures have been opened without authorization, either as a matter of course or where the incumbent has failed to appear at a pre-arranged appointment.
The Commission understands that, in the case of some undertakings, licensees permit access to their CSEs without requiring a co-ordinated visit by a member of their staff. The Commission expects licensees to ensure that this practice continues where it has been implemented. At the same time, the Commission reminds all parties that they must respect the integrity of property they neither own nor control. In light of the importance of respecting the integrity of this equipment, but also with a view to ensuring expedient transfer of service in a competitive environment, the Commission considers that further measures are required.
Accordingly, in order to facilitate timely joint visits for transferring service, all licensees are required to accommodate requests by other distributors for access to CSEs or distribution panels within 24 hours of receiving such a request and to provide them with a 2-hour appointment window. In reaching its decision to introduce this policy requirement, the Commission has taken into consideration the requirement's impact on distribution undertakings of differing size and resources.
Winback restrictions
A second collateral issue raised in this proceeding relates to the allegation that incumbent providers are able to circumvent the Commission's winback policy, particularly in the case of MUDs. The new entrants argued that when they claim a customer in a MUD and notify the incumbent provider to cancel service, other tenants or occupants of the building are often mass marketed by the incumbent.
In the Commission's view, this tactic does not involve the direct marketing of the customer who has cancelled service, and thus falls outside the scope of the winback restrictions. Nevertheless, given the state of competition in broadcast distribution, the Commission considers that measures are necessary to prohibit the use of customer information for sales and marketing purposes following a cancellation. The Commission notes that, in the telecommunications context, it has required the establishment of carrier services groups (CSGs) in order to prevent the use of competitive information in a manner that would confer an unfair and ultimately anti-competitive advantage on incumbents. The Commission recently required cable companies to establish CSGs for handling information with respect to Internet services and Internet service providers.
Consistent with that approach, each of Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc., Vidéotron ltée and Cogeco Câble Canada inc. is required to establish a services group that isolates competitively sensitive customer/competitor information from the sales and marketing function. The Commission considers that the following information, at least, should be handled through the services group when received from a competing licensee or its agent:
— billing name and address;
— choice of licensee;
— date of request; and
— transfer date.
All other incumbent cable licensees are required to develop and have in place, within two months of the coming into effect of the regulatory amendment proposed herein, a non-disclosure agreement that the licensee shall enter into with all competing licensees in respect of the handling of such information. The Commission requests parties, through the CISC process, to develop a standardized form for such agreements.
Call for comments
The Commission invites written comments on the proposed amendment to the Regulations appended to this notice. The Commission will accept comments that it receives on or before Monday, August 21, 2000.
The Commission will not formally acknowledge written comments. It will, however, fully consider all comments and they will form part of the public record of the proceeding, provided that the procedures for filing set out below have been followed.
PROPOSED REGULATORY TEXT
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to subsection 10(3) of the Broadcasting Act (see footnote a), that the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, pursuant to subsection 10(1) of that Act, proposes to make the annexed Regulations Amending the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations.
Licensees and other interested persons may make representations with respect to the proposed Regulations within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. All such representations must cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, and the date of publication of this notice, and be addressed to the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2.
Hull, July 17, 2000
URSULA MENKE
Secretary General
REGULATIONS AMENDING THE BROADCASTING DISTRIBUTION REGULATIONS
AMENDMENT
1. Section 10 of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations (see footnote 1) and the heading before it are replaced by the following:
Inside Wire
10. (1) A licensee that owns an inside wire shall, on request, permit the inside wire to be used by a subscriber, by another licensee, or by a broadcasting undertaking in respect of which an exemption has been granted, by order under subsection 9(4) of the Act, from the requirement to obtain a licence.
(2) The licensee that owns an inside wire may charge a just and reasonable fee for the use of the wire.
(3) The licensee that owns an inside wire must not remove it from a building if a request for the use of the wire has been made and is pending under subsection (1), or while the wire is being used in accordance with that subsection.
COMING INTO FORCE
2. These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-86-1
Call for comments — Proposed regulatory amendments to implement a revised definition of a Canadian program
In Public Notice CRTC 1999-135, the Commission called for comments on proposed clarifications and revisions to the definition of a Canadian program for the purpose of giving effect to the new television policy set out in Public Notice CRTC 1999-97. The Commission's decision on these revisions was set out in Public Notice CRTC 2000-42. The regulatory amendments proposed herein are intended to give effect to those revisions.
The Commission seeks comments from the public on proposed amendments to the Television Broadcasting Regulations, 1987; Pay Television Regulations, 1990; and Specialty Services Regulations, 1990, which would implement the changes contemplated by the above-noted proceedings. The proposed amendments are appended to the current notice.
Call for comments
The Commission invites interested parties to present their comments as to whether the proposed amendments accurately reflect the Commission's decision as set out in Public Notice 2000-42. The purpose of this process is to seek comment on the proposed regulatory amendments and not on the issues which were considered in those proceedings. The Commission will accept comments that it receives on or before Monday, August 21, 2000 (new deadline for comments).
July 14, 2000
PROPOSED REGULATORY TEXT
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to subsection 10(3) of the Broadcasting Act (see footnote b), that the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, pursuant to subsection 10(1) of that Act, proposes to make the annexed Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (Definition "Canadian Program").
Licensees and other interested persons may make representations with respect to the proposed Regulations within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. All such representations must cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, and the date of publication of this notice and be addressed to the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2.
Hull, July 14, 2000
URSULA MENKE
Secretary General
REGULATIONS AMENDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS MADE BY THE CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (DEFINITION "CANADIAN PROGRAM")
TELEVISION BROADCASTING REGULATIONS, 1987
1. The definition "Canadian program"(see footnote 2) in section 2 of the Television Broadcasting Regulations, 1987(see footnote 3) is replaced by the following:
"Canadian program" means a program that qualifies as a Canadian program in accordance with the criteria established by the Commission in Appendices I and II to Public Notice CRTC 2000-42 dated March 17, 2000, entitled Certification for Canadian Programs - A Revised Approach and published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 20, 2000; (émission canadienne)
PAY TELEVISION REGULATIONS, 1990
2. The definition "Canadian program" in subsection 2(1) of the Pay Television Regulations, 1990 (see footnote 4) is replaced by the following:
"Canadian program" means a program that qualifies as a Canadian program in accordance with the criteria established by the Commission in Appendices I and II to Public Notice CRTC 2000-42 dated March 17, 2000, entitled Certification for Canadian Programs - A Revised Approach and published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 20, 2000; (émission canadienne)
SPECIALTY SERVICES REGULATIONS, 1990
3. The definition "Canadian program" in section 2 of the Specialty Services Regulations, 1990 (see footnote 5) is replaced by the following:
"Canadian program" means a program that qualifies as a Canadian program in accordance with the criteria established by the Commission in Appendices I and II to Public Notice CRTC 2000-42 dated March 17, 2000, entitled Certification for Canadian Programs - A Revised Approach and published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 20, 2000; (émission canadienne)
COMING INTO FORCE
4. These Regulations come into force on September 1, 2000.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
(This note is not part of the Regulations.)
The purpose of these amendments is to replace the definition of a "Canadian program."
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-100
Câblo Distribution G. inc.
Saint-Donat-de-Montcalm, etc., Quebec
The Commission announces that it has approved, by Letter of Authority A00-0058 dated June 27, 2000, the transfer of control of Câblo Distribution G. inc., licensee of the cable distribution undertakings serving the communities noted above. The change in control is effected through the transfer of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Câblo Distribution G. inc. to Cogeco Câble Canada inc.
July 14, 2000
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-101
Télécâble Provincial inc.
Beaulac, etc., Quebec
The Commission announces that it has approved, by Letter of Authority A00-0059 dated June 27, 2000, the transfer of control of Télécâble Provincial inc., licensee of the cable distribution undertakings serving the communities noted above. The change in control is effected through the transfer of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Télécâble Pronvincial inc. to Cogeco Câble Canada inc.
July 14, 2000
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-102
Lindsay CATV Systems Inc.
Lindsay, Ontario
The Commission announces that it has approved, by Letter of Authority A00-0049 dated June 14, 2000, a change to the effective control of Lindsay CATV Systems Inc. (Lindsay CATV), licensee of the cable distribution undertaking serving Lindsay.
July 14, 2000
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-103
Centario Communications Inc.
Lindsay, Ontario
The Commission announces that it has approved, by Letter of Authority A00-0066 dated July 7, 2000, a change to the effective control of Centario Communications Inc., licensee of radio station CKLY-FM Lindsay. The transfer is effected through the transfer of 2 500 Class E shares (71.43 percent) from eight individuals to Frank Rogers (in trust) and three of the original shareholders retaining 1 000 Class E shares or 28.57 percent of Centario Communications Inc.
July 14, 2000
[30-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-104
CJRN 710 Inc.
Niagara Falls and Fort Erie, Ontario
The Commission announces that it has approved, by Letter of Authority A00-0065 dated July 7, 2000, a change to the ownership and control of CJRN 710 Inc., through the transfer of all the issued and outstanding shares held by Niagara Broadcasting Corporation to 1405396 Ontario Ltd. CJRN 710 Inc. is the licensee of CJRN Niagara Falls and CKEY-FM Fort Erie/Niagara Falls, including its rebroadcasting transmitter CKEY-FM-1 St. Catharines.
July 14, 2000
[30-1-o]
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT
Decisions and Orders on Claims for Exemption
Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decision of the Screening Officer, respecting each claim for exemption, and the relevant Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs), listed below.
| Claimant | Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS) |
Registry Number | MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS) |
Date of Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio |
Anglamol(r) 6043 formerly Lubrizol 6043 |
3122 | 04/01/1997 | June 12, 2000 le 12 juin 2000 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio |
Anglamol(r) 6043U formerly Lubrizol 6043U |
3123 | 01/31/1997 | June 12, 2000 le 12 juin 2000 |
| Akzo Nobel Chemicals Limited, Mississauga, Ontario |
REDICOTE(r) E - 5 |
3744 | January 2000 | May 16, 2000 le 16 mai 2000 |
| Akzo Nobel Chemicals Limited, Mississauga, Ontario |
REDICOTE(r) E - 11 |
3745 | January 2000 | May 16, 2000 le 16 mai 2000 |
| Akzo Nobel Chemicals Limited, Mississauga, Ontario |
REDICOTE(r) E - 64R |
3746 | August 1999 | May 16, 2000 le 16 mai 2000 |
| Nalco/Exxon Energy Chemicals Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
EC9225A | 3791 | 11/11/1999 | May 2, 2000 le 2 mai 2000 |
| Nalco/Exxon Energy Chemicals Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
A262 formerly AI-500 |
3792 | 11/11/1999 | May 2, 2000 le 2 mai 2000 |
| Xypex Chemical Corporation, Richmond, British Columbia |
Xypex Cementitious Sealants (Concentrate) |
3886 | December 3, 1996 | January 11, 2000 le 11 janvier 2000 |
| Xypex Chemical Corporation, Richmond, British Columbia |
Xypex Cementitious Sealants (Modified) |
3887 | December 3, 1996 | January 11, 2000 le 11 janvier 2000 |
| Xypex Chemical Corporation, Richmond, British Columbia |
Xypex Cementitious Sealants (Patch'n Plug) |
3888 | December 3, 1996 | January 11, 2000 le 11 janvier 2000 |
| Morton International, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio |
Pave Bond(R) T-Lite Asphalt Additive |
3926 | 12/18/96 (English/ anglaise) le 21 août 1996 (French/ française) |
April 17, 2000 le 17 avril 2000 |
| Baker Petrolite, formerly Baker Performance Chemicals, Calgary, Alberta |
CRW9939 formerly CRONOX(r) CT-9939 |
3946 | 02/27/97 | May 18, 2000 le 18 mai 2000 |
| Baker Petrolite, formerly Baker Performance Chemicals, Calgary, Alberta |
FMW3915 formerly AQUASURF(r) SF-3915 |
3948 | 02/27/97 | May 8, 2000 le 8 mai 2000 |
| Baker Petrolite, formerly Baker Performance Chemicals, Calgary, Alberta |
FMW3910 formerly AQUASURF(r) SF-3910 |
3949 | 02/27/97 | May 8, 2000 le 8 mai 2000 |
| Baker Petrolite, formerly Baker Performance Chemicals, Calgary, Alberta |
SCW4406 formerly CALNOX(r) SI-4406 |
3950 | 02/27/97 | May 8, 2000 le 8 mai 2000 |
| Baker Petrolite, formerly Baker Performance Chemicals, Calgary, Alberta |
SCW4407 formerly CALNOX(r) SI-4407 |
3951 | 01/14/99 | May 8, 2000 le 8 mai 2000 |
| Baker Petrolite, formerly Baker Performance Chemicals, Calgary, Alberta |
SCW4460 formerly CALNOX(r) SI-4460 |
3952 | 01/14/99 | May 8, 2000 le 8 mai 2000 |
| Baker Petrolite, formerly Baker Performance Chemicals, Calgary, Alberta |
SCW4461 formerly CALNOX(r) SI-4461 |
3953 | 01/14/99 | May 8, 2000 le 8 mai 2000 |
| Baker Petrolite, formerly Baker Performance Chemicals, Calgary, Alberta |
DMO8866 formerly AQUANOX(r) BE-8866 |
3954 | 01/16/97 | March 27, 2000 le 27 mars 2000 |
| Rhodia Canada Inc., formerly Rhône-Poulenc Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
LYNDCOAT BR18M-GY |
3980 | 3/26/98 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| Rhodia Canada Inc., formerly Rhône-Poulenc Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
LYNDCOAT BR601-RTU |
3981 | 3/26/98 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| Rhodia Canada Inc., formerly Rhône-Poulenc Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
LYNDCOAT BR790-RTU |
3982 | 3/26/98 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| Rhodia Canada Inc., formerly Rhône-Poulenc Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
LYNDCOAT BR800-RTU |
3983 | 3/26/98 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| Rhodia Canada Inc., formerly Rhône-Poulenc Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
LYNDCOAT BR880-RTU |
3984 | 3/26/98 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| Rhodia Canada Inc., formerly Rhône-Poulenc Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
LYNDCOAT RAC-470/LEC |
3985 | 3/25/98 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| Rhodia Canada Inc., formerly Rhône-Poulenc Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
LYNDCOAT 15RTU |
3986 | 3/25/98 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| Fuji Photo Film Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
FN-1P ChemPact Fountain Solution |
3993 | 30.04.1997 | April 5, 2000 le 5 avril 2000 |
| Fuji Photo Film Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
EnviroChemTM Odor Free Neg ULF Superflo |
3994 | May 5, 1997 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| Degussa-Hüls Canada Inc., formerly Hüls Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario |
COLORTREND (R) UNI-PEARL COLORANTS 835-0131 Pearlescent Silver |
4034 | 12/06/96 | March 31, 2000 le 31 mars 2000 |
| Degussa-Hüls Canada Inc., formerly Hüls Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario |
COLORTREND (R) UNI-PEARL COLORANTS 835-1231 Pearlescent Gold |
4035 | 12/06/96 | March 31, 2000 le 31 mars 2000 |
| Rhodia Canada Inc., formerly Rhône- Poulenc Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario |
LYNDCOAT BR1670-RTU formerly LYNDCOAT BR1500-RTU |
4054 | 3/26/98 | March 30, 2000 le 30 mars 2000 |
| The Butcher Company, Marlborough, Massachusetts |
GROUND OUT Static Dissipative Floor Cleaner |
4117 | 04/29/1997 | January 18, 2000 le 18 janvier 2000 |
| The Butcher Company, Marlborough, Massachusetts |
DISCHARGE Static Dissipative Floor Finish |
4118 | 05/27/1997 | January 18, 2000 le 18 janvier 2000 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada, Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
DRYCRYLTM DP-2903 |
4218 | 08/27/98 | June 30, 2000 le 30 juin 2000 |
| Morton International, Inc., Chicago, Illinois |
Thixon 547S | 4225 | 6/17/98 | March 7, 2000 le 7 mars 2000 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
SCOTCH BRAND THERMO- SETTABLE SEALING TAPES - #5230, #5231, #5232 |
4266 | 10/13/98 | May 12, 2000 le 12 mai 2000 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada, Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
PARALOID(r) KM-346 Modifier |
4279 | 11/02/98 | June 30, 2000 le 30 juin 2000 |
Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on April 10, 1997, incorrectly listed the product identifier for the controlled product associated with the claim bearing Registry Number 3986 as LYNDCOAT 1SRTU. The correct product identifier is LYNDCOAT 15RTU.
2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 12, 1994, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 3122 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. It has since been established that the subject of the claim is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 12, 1994, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 3123 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. It has since been established that the subject of the claim is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 1, 1996, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 3791 and 3792 to be the chemical identity of twelve ingredients. It has since been established that the subject of the claims is the chemical identity of seven ingredients.
5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 25, 1997, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 3886, 3887 and 3888 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients and the concentration of five ingredients. It has since been established that the subject of the claims is the chemical identity of four ingredients and the concentration of five ingredients.
6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on April 5, 1997, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 3926 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. It has since been established that the subject of the claim is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on April 5, 1997, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 3946 to be the chemical identity of six ingredients. It has since been established that the subject of the claim is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 8, 1997, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 4054 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. It has since been established that the subject of the claim is the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients.
There were no submissions from affected parties to the Screening Officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs.
Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The Screening Officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. After consultation with officials of the Department of Health, and having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the Screening Officer found that the MSDS relating to the claim bearing Registry Number 4218 complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.
After consultation with officials of the Department of Health, and having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the Screening Officer found that the respective MSDS relating to the remaining claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.
Registry Numbers 3122 and 3123
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDSs-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with copies of revised versions. These revised versions of the MSDSs were not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Numbers 3744 to 3746, inclusive
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with alkali or alkaline earth metals, strong acids and acid anhydrides, aluminum, phosgene and potassium-t-butoxide;
2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;
3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals in the absence of maternal toxic effects;
4. Disclose that grounded equipment be used when handling large quantities of the controlled product;
5. Registry Number 3744:
(a) Disclose the value of an upper bound for an LD50 value for the confidential hazardous ingredient;
(b) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity;
6. Registry Number 3745:
(a) If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D-1B and D-2A;
(b) Disclose an LD50 value for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;
7. Registry Number 3746: Disclose that the controlled product possesses an aspiration hazard;
8. Registry Numbers 3744 and 3746: If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.
Registry Numbers 3791 and 3792
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of more than one confidential business ingredient which can be characterized by the generic chemical identity oxyalkylated alkyl alcohol;
2. Disclose that the controlled product possesses an aspiration hazard;
3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals;
4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in in vivo screening tests for mutagenicity;
5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on reproductive potency in laboratory animals;
6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 20-30 minutes or until the chemical is removed;
7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration and repeat administration of water;
8. Disclose a lower LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 54 mg/kg and an LC50 (1 hour, rat) value of 1 040 ppm for propargyl alcohol;
9. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) range of 1.6-2.0 mL/kg for 1-octyn -3-ol, 4-ethyl;
10. Disclose an LD50 value for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
11. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value, a lower bound to the dermal LD50 value and a lower bound to the LC50 value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
12. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value and a upper bound to the dermal LD50 value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
13. Disclose an LC50 (8 hours, rat) value of 12 000 ppm for isopropanol.
Registry Numbers 3886 to 3888, inclusive
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose an LD50 value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;
2. Disclose that acute exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product can be corrosive to the eyes;
3. Disclose that acute exposure to ingredients in the controlled product can be corrosive to the skin;
4. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the lymph nodes and kidneys and auto-immune disease;
5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);
6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity;
7. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
8. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV-TWA = 0.1 mg/m3 (respirable) for silica sand;
9. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that material should be quickly and gently brushed away before flushing with water;
10. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 20-60 minutes, contaminated clothing, footwear and leather goods should be removed under running water, and medical attention obtained immediately;
11. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement "Drink large amounts of water," and replace it with a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 250-300 mL of water. Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, or is unconscious or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;
12. Registry Number 3888: Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;
13. Registry Numbers 3886 and 3887: Correct the implication that carbonate is an ingredient of the controlled product.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 3926
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and wording of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. On the French version of the MSDS, disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL (TWA, 8 hours) = 10 mg/m3 (aerosol) for the polyalkylene glycol mixture.
Registry Number 3946
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence in the controlled product of the two hazardous ingredients, isopropanol with its CAS Registry Number 67-63-0 and ethanol with its CAS Registry Number 64-17-5, together with their respective percent concentration, and any undisclosed exposure limit values;
2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is considered to be a fetotoxin and a teratogen and that another ingredient has been shown to be a fetotoxin (by inhalation), in laboratory animals;
3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in in vivo and in vitro screening tests for mutagenicity;
4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that immediate medical attention should be sought in all cases;
5. In addition to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose that flushing should continue for at least 15 minutes;
6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 3948
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that a second ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and teratogenic effects;
2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity.
Registry Number 3949
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause hypothermia in laboratory animals.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Numbers 3950 and 3951
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused neurological impairment;
2. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause bladder stones and liver damage in laboratory animals;
3. Disclose the lower LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 4 000 mg/kg for ethylene glycol;
4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, add that medical attention should be sought in cases where adverse symptoms develop.
Registry Numbers 3952 and 3953
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause hypothermia in laboratory animals;
2. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused neurological impairment;
3. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause bladder stones and liver damage in laboratory animals;
4. Disclose the lower LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 4 000 mg/kg for ethylene glycol;
5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that medical attention should be sought in all cases;
6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 15 minutes or until the chemical is removed, contaminated clothing should be removed under running water, and medical attention obtained in cases where irritation persists or adverse symptoms develop;
7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.
Registry Number 3954
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the percent concentrations of xylene, solvent naphtha (petroleum), heavy aromatic and naphtha (petroleum), heavy catalytic reformed in an acceptable manner;
2. Add phosgene and potassium t-butoxide to the list of incompatible materials;
3. Disclose that subchronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the lungs of laboratory animals;
4. Disclose a lower bound to the LD50 (dermal, rabbit) of 6.0 g/kg for naphtha (petroleum), heavy catalytic reformed;
5. Disclose that the time frame for the skin irritancy test on naphtha (petroleum), heavy catalytic reformed was 24 hours;
6. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause hypothermia in laboratory animals;
7. In relation to the first aid information for eye contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that medical attention be obtained immediately;
8. In relation to the first aid information for eye contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that medical advice be obtained immediately;
9. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, or is unconscious or convulsing. Have casualty drink 250-300 mL of water to dilute the ingested material. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.
Registry Numbers 3980 to 3986, inclusive and 4054
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Registry Number 3980:
(a) When applicable, disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS Registry Number and percent concentration;
(b) Disclose the concentration of mica in an acceptable manner;
(c) If crystalline silica is present at disclosable levels, remove the statement that the controlled product does not contain any carcinogens;
2. Registry Number 3983: In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement in words having the following effect: The skin should be flushed with gently flowing, lukewarm water for at least five minutes and contaminated footwear and leather goods should be removed. Launder contaminated clothing prior to reuse. Medical advice should be sought in all cases which require first aid;
3. Registry Number 4054: Delete the statement that the ingredient disclosed as acrylic latex emulsion is not WHMIS regulated;
4. Registry Numbers 3982, 3983, 3985, 3986 and 4054: Disclose LD50 values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.
Registry Number 3993
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that human ingestion of large quantities of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause dizziness, vomiting, fatigue, shock with respiratory distress pallor or cyanosis and coma and that ingestion of 2-4 grams of nitrate can be fatal;
2. Disclose that ingestion of large doses of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause depression and gastrointestinal corrosion in laboratory animals;
3. Disclose that ingestion of large doses of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause diarrhea, lethargy and body tremors in laboratory animals;
4. Disclose that acute dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause anorexia, adverse CNS effects and death in laboratory animals;
5. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause vomiting and kidney damage in laboratory animals;
6. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause blood effects and adverse liver and kidney effects in laboratory animals;
7. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause kidney damage in laboratory animals;
8. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 900 mg/kg for the phosphonic acid derivative;
9. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 4 640 mg/kg for potassium phosphate monobasic;
10. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rabbit) value of 78.5 mg/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 565 mg/kg for 1-(3-chloroallyl)-3,5,7-triaza-1-azoniaadamantane;
11. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetal injury in laboratory animals;
12. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause chromosomal aberrations in the bone marrow cells of laboratory animals.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 3994
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;
2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;
3. Disclose that ingestion of large doses of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause CNS effects in laboratory animals;
4. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse gastrointestinal, vision and CNS effects, prolonged coma and respiratory failure;
5. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse gastrointestinal, vision and CNS effects;
6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 250-300 mL of water to dilute the ingested material;
7. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV-TWA = 200 ppm (skin) and ACGIH TLV-STEL = 250 ppm (skin) for methanol;
8. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, female rat) value of 3 129 mg/kg for 1.2.4-triazole;
9. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 15 800 mg/kg and an LC50 (8 hours, rat) value of >32 000 ppm for methanol;
10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetal injury;
11. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and teratogenicity in laboratory animals and has been shown to cause behavioural abnormalities in offspring of laboratory animals.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Numbers 4034 and 4035
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;
2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value OSHA PEL = 20 mppcf for mica;
3. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;
4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause severe eye irritation in laboratory animals;
5. Disclose a lower LD50 (oral, rat) value of 4 140 mg/kg and an LC50 (1 hour, rat) value of >200 mg/L for diethylene glycol methyl ether;
6. Disclose that diethylene glycol methyl ether has been shown to cause teratogenic effects via oral exposure in laboratory animals;
7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with gently flowing, lukewarm water for at least 15 minutes or until the chemical is removed.
Registry Number 4117
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose a lower bottom limit to the dermal LD50 range value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
2. Add skin absorption as a primary route of entry;
3. Disclose that skin absorption of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause lung damage in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 4118
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the thymus in laboratory animals;
2. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause effects on the testes and liver of laboratory animals;
3. Disclose that subchronic absorption of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the liver and spleen of laboratory animals.
Registry Number 4228
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity in laboratory animals;
2. Disclose that ingestion of alcohol potentiates the liver damage effects of an ingredient in the controlled product;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;
4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to induce vomiting and replace it with a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 250-300 mL of water to dilute the material in the stomach;
5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, male rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of >5 mL/kg for xylene;
6. Disclose an LC50 (1 hour, rat) value of 27 000 mg/m3 for carbon black;
7. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause loss of hearing in laboratory animals;
8. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be mutagenic, in vivo.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 4266
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.
Registry Number 4279
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose a recommended Exposure Limit Value for the controlled product as a whole.
Having regard to the foregoing, and pursuant to section 17 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, notice is hereby given that the Screening Officer has, for each of the above-noted claims, with the exception of the one bearing Registry Number 4218, directed the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the Screening Officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.
Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the Screening Officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS.
Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.
Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal any decision or order of a Screening Officer. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 200 Kent Street, Suite 9000, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0M1, (613) 993-4472.
W. A. LOWE
Chief Screening Officer
[30-1-o]
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT
Filing of a Claim for Exemption
Pursuant to paragraph 12(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the receipt of the claims for exemption listed below.
| Claimant | Subject of the Claim for Exemption |
Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS) |
Registry Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOWSCO-FRACMASTER COMPANY/A DJ Services Company, Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient |
HS-2 | 4667 |
| NOWSCO-FRACMASTER COMPANY/A DJ Services Company, Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients; Chemical name, common name, generic name, trade name or a brand name of a controlled product; Information that could be used to identity a supplier of a controlled product | CI-27 | 4693 |
The above claims seek exemption from the disclosure of employer confidential information in respect of a controlled product which would otherwise be required to be disclosed by the provisions of the applicable provincial legislation relating to occupational health and safety.
| Claimant | Subject of the Claim for Exemption |
Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS) |
Registry Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients |
FC-100 "FLUORAD" BRAND FLUORO- CHEMICAL SURFACTANT |
4568 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient |
NIAX Silicone Y-10762/Silicone NIAX Y-10762 |
4569 |
| Hercules Canada, Mississauga, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient |
PROSOFT(r) TQ 1003 SOFTENER |
4570 |
| UCB Chemicals Corporation, Smyrna, Georgia |
Chemical identity of two ingredients |
Ebecryl(r) 830 | 4571 |
| Borden Chemical-Canada, Division of the Borden Company Limited, Toronto, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient |
StructuralFast (TM) FC-33DS |
4572 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | NIAX CATALYST A-200/ CATALYSEUR NIAX A-200 |
4573 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | NIAX Silicone L-603/Silicone NIAX L-603 |
4574 |
| Nalco/Exxon Energy Chemicals Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | ACTRENE EC3056A |
4575 |
| Nalco/Exxon Energy Chemicals Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | ACTRENE EC3081A |
4576 |
| Dow Chemical Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | GAS/SPEC (R) IC 110 FORMULATED IRON CHELATE MIXTURE |
4577 |
| Morton International Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio |
Chemical identity of eight ingredients | ADVASTAB (R) TM- 694 OM Methyltin Mercaptide |
4578 |
| Buckeye International Inc., Maryland Heights, Missouri |
Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients |
BUCKEYE BLUE | 4579 |
| Liquid Metal Products Inc., Council Bluffs, Iowa |
Concentration of five ingredients |
FSM1 Furnace Flux |
4580 |
| Union Carbide Canada Inc., Anjou, Québec |
Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients |
UCARSOL HS Solvent 111 /UCARSOL HS 111 Solvant |
4581 |
| Dow Chemical Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | GAS/SPEC (R) IC 210 GAS CONDITIONING CHELANT |
4582 |
| Dow Chemical Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | GAS/SPEC (R) CS-2000 GAS TREATING SOLVENT |
4583 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4806V BLUE |
4584 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4814V ORANGE |
4585 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4901V BLUE |
4586 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) ROLL COAT COLOUR 4902V DARK RED |
4587 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4903V GREEN |
4588 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4906V MAGENTA |
4589 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4911V CLEAR TONER |
4590 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4900V SERIES SPECIAL COLOUR CF 4900- 001 BLUE |
4591 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4812V WHITE |
4592 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4913V DARK GREEN |
4593 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M "SCOTCHLITE" (TM) ROLL COAT COLOUR 4909V RED |
4594 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4912V YELLOW TONER |
4595 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4914V MAROON |
4596 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COAT PASTE 4805V BLACK |
4597 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" ROLL COATING CLEAR 265 |
4598 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" PROTECTIVE CLEAR OVERCOAT 744 |
4599 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "SCOTCHLITE" PROCESS COLOUR 840 CLEAR |
4600 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 900 CLEAR/TONER |
4601 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 905 BLACK |
4602 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 906 ORANGE |
4603 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 908 GREEN |
4604 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 910 BLUE |
4605 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 912 RED |
4606 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 914 YELLOW |
4607 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | SCOTCHLITE TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 922 LEMON YELLOW |
4608 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) TRANSPARENT SCREEN PRINTING INK 923 MAGENTA |
4609 |
| Henkel Canada, Cognis Division, Mississauga, Ontario |
Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient |
TRYLUBE 7638-A |
4610 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | FOA-14 | 4611 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | FOA-11 | 4612 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | FUEL OIL ADDITIVE NO. 6 |
4613 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | DDA-3500 D | 4614 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | DCI-11 | 4615 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "VALVE MASTER" CONCENTRATE LEAD SUBSTITUTE |
4616 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | "Ortholeum" 162 Lubricant Assistant |
4617 |
| Neste Resins Corporation, Eugene, Oregon |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | IB-392 | 4618 |
| Neste Resins Corporation, Eugene, Oregon |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | IB-390 | 4619 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | FUEL OIL ADDITIVE NO. 2 |
4620 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) PROCESS COLOUR 990-00 TONER |
4621 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) PROCESS COLOUR 990-03 BLUE |
4622 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) PROCESS COLOUR 990-04 YELLOW |
4623 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) PROCESS COLOUR 990-06 ORANGE |
4624 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) PROCESS COLOUR 990-08 GREEN |
4625 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) PROCESS COLOUR 990-13 VIOLET |
4626 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) PROCESS COLOUR 990-14 LEMON YELLOW |
4627 |
| Tri-Tex co. inc., Saint-Eustache, Québec |
Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient |
TRIREZ 755 | 4628 |
| Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia |
Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients |
HiTEC 388 Performance Additive |
4629 |
| Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia |
Chemical identity and concentration of five ingredients |
HiTEC 6311 Performance Additive |
4630 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | SCOTCHGARD (TM) CARPET 7 UPHOLSTERY PROTECTOR CONCENTRATE |
4631 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | 3M BRAND CARPET PROTECTOR |
4632 |
| Akzo Nobel Chemicals Inc., Chicago, Illinois |
Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients |
ARMOFLO ( 689 |
4633 |
| Taylor Technologies Inc., Sparks, Maryland |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | DPD REAGENT #2 |
4634 |
| Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., Performance Polymers, Mississauga, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | Matting Agent DT 3329-1 |
4635 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | PRIMAL ( CB Emulsion |
4636 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | PARALOID ( K-415 Modifier |
4637 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | NIAX Catalyst A-400/Catalyseur NIAX A-400 |
4638 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | SILQUEST PC-1A Silane/Silane SILQUEST PC-1A |
4639 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | PARALOID (TM) 9869D-XP Powder |
4640 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | PARALOID (TM) 9869E-XP Powder |
4641 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 5037 STRUCTURAL ADHESIVE, PART A |
4642 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Lubrizol ( 9606 |
4643 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Lubrizol ( 9675 |
4644 |
| Raybo Chemical Company, Huntington, West Virginia |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | Raybo 82 AntiStat |
4645 |
| Raybo Chemical Company, Huntington, West Virginia |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | Raybo 41 Spangle |
4646 |
| Morton International Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio |
Chemical identity of six ingredients | ADVASTAB (R) TM- 283 IMOM Methyltin Mercaptide |
4647 |
| Union Carbide Canada Inc., Anjou, Québec |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | SELEXOL (TM) SOLVENT RD2/SOLVANT SELEXOL (TM) RD2 |
4648 |
| Union Carbide Canada Inc., Anjou, Québec |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | UCARSOL (TM) HS SOLVENT 133/SOLVANT UCARSOL (MC) HS 133 |
4649 |
| Brine-Add Fluids Ltd., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient |
CAN-OIL FLC | 4650 |
| Henkel Canada, Cognis Division, Mississauga, Ontario |
Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient |
VERSAMINE EH-50 |
4651 |
| Henkel Canada, Cognis Division, Mississauga, Ontario |
Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient |
FOAMASTER H |
4652 |
| Hilti, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | HSE 2421 High Strength Epoxy, Part A |
4653 |
| Hilti, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | HSE 2421 High Strength Epoxy, Part B |
4654 |
| Akzo Nobel Chemicals Inc., Chicago, Illinois |
Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients |
ARMEEN ( PF-1 |
4655 |
| Akzo Nobel Chemicals Inc., Chicago, Illinois |
Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients |
ARMEEN ( PF-3 |
4656 |
| Nalco Canada Inc., Burlington, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | NALKLEEN(r) 2606 |
4657 |
| Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia |
Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients |
HiTEC 6421 Fuel Additive |
4658 |
| Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia |
Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients |
HiTEC 6423 Fuel Additive |
4659 |
| Solutia Inc., St. Louis, Missouri |
Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient; Concentration of two ingredients |
SKYDROL ( 5 FIRE RESISTENT HYDRAULIC FLUID |
4660 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | Niax Silicone L-618 |
4661 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | Octel Starreon DDA-1858 |
4662 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Paraloid ( BTA-715 Modifier |
4663 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE (TM) PROCESS COLOUR 990-07 BROWN |
4664 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | Niax Catalyst C-316 |
4665 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | Niax Catalyst C-317 |
4666 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Octel Starreon OLI-9055 |
4668 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Octel Starreon OLI-9000 |
4669 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | Octel Starreon DDA 2000 |
4670 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Octel Starreon DDA 3500 |
4671 |
| Nalco/Exxon Energy Chemicals Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | EC9179A | 4672 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | Lubrizol( 6589G | 4673 |
| Nalco/Exxon Energy Chemicals Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | EC3205A | 4674 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Octel Starreon OCI 4701 |
4675 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Octel Starreon OCI 4701D |
4676 |
| Octel Starreon, L.L.C., Newark, Delaware |
Chemical identity of four ingredients | Octel Starreon Octimax 4804 |
4677 |
| Diversity Technologies Corp., Edmonton, Alberta |
Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients |
TC101 | 4678 |
| Henkel Canada, Cognis Division, Mississauga, Ontario |
Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients |
SYNTERGENT DTW |
4679 |
| Henkel Canada, Cognis Division, Mississauga, Ontario |
Concentration of one ingredient; Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient |
STABILOL HCN |
4680 |
| Henkel Canada, Cognis Division, Mississauga, Ontario |
Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient |
ADASIL ESF | 4681 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | FM+ 641 Verifilm |
4682 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | FM+ 643 Verifilm |
4683 |
| Borden Chemical- Canada, Division of the Borden Company, Limited, Toronto, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | BETASET ( 2000 |
4684 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M TM SCOTCHLITE TM PROCESS COLOUR 990-15 MAGENTA |
4685 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | SILWET 800 | 4686 |
| Enthone-OMI Inc., New Haven, Connecticut |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | Enplate TM DSR-3241A |
4687 |
| Chevron Chemical (Canada) Ltd., Burlington, Ontario |
Chemical identity of four ingredients | OLOA 55001 (CANADA) | 4688 |
| Chevron Chemical (Canada) Ltd., Burlington, Ontario |
Chemical identity of three ingredients | OLOA 9063 | 4689 |
| Infineum USA LP, Linden, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | PARATORQ 4520 |
4690 |
| Infineum USA LP, Linden, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | PARATORQ 4522 |
4691 |
| Infineum USA LP, Linden, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | PARATORQ 4522 |
4692 |
| Le Joint Français, Bezons, France |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | TOTAL SEAL SRP 180 HV AUTO GLASS POLYURETHANE |
4694 |
| Le Joint Français, Bezons, France |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | TOTAL SEAL SRP 185 AUTOMOTIVE GLASS POLYURETHANE |
4695 |
| Le Joint Français, Bezons, France |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | TOTAL SEAL SRP 200 (B component) AUTOMOTIVE GLASS POLYURETHANE ADHESIVE |
4696 |
| Le Joint Français, Bezons, France |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | TOTAL SEAL SRP 200 (A component) AUTOMOTIVE GLASS POLYURETHANE ADHESIVE |
4697 |
| Le Joint Français, Bezons, France |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | TOTAL SEAL SRP 5025 (PAINT PRIMER) |
4698 |
| Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario |
Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients |
TENLO 70 | 4699 |
| Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | ARMOHIB( 31 | 4700 |
| Nalco Canada Inc., Burlington, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | TST-896 | 4701 |
| Nalco Canada Inc., Burlington, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | TST-602 | 4702 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | LUBRIZOL (R) 5706 |
4703 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | Thixon 5125 | 4704 |
| AVECIA Limited, Blackley, Manchester, England |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | SOLSPERSE 27000 |
4705 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of nine ingredients | FC-203 LIGHT WATER TM AFFF 3% |
4706 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of nine ingredients | FC-600 LIGHT WATER TM ATC TM AR-AFFF 3% OR 6% |
4707 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of seven ingredients | FC-783F 3M TM AFFF 3% |
4708 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of nine ingredients | FC-602 LIGHT WATER TM ATC PLUS TM AR-AFF 4% OR 6% |
4709 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of six ingredients | FC-603F 3M BRAND ALCOHOL TYPE AFFF |
4710 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of seven ingredients | FC-203CF LIGHT WATER (TM) AFFF 3% |
4711 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of seven ingredients | FC-206F "LIGHT WATER" BRAND AQUEOUS FILM FORMING FOAM |
4712 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | BR+ 225 Primer | 4713 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | BR+ 227 Primer | 4714 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | BR+ 227 Pour Coat 30% Solids |
4715 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | BR+ 227A Primer |
4716 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | BR+1009-8 Tack Primer |
4717 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | BR+1009-49 Tack Primer |
4718 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | SCOTCHWELD 3584 ACCELERATOR |
4719 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | NuWet 237 | 4720 |
| Nalco/Exxon Energy Canada Inc., Calgary, Alberta |
Chemical identity of one ingredient | FLEXSORB SE CE EC9016A |
4721 |
| Union Carbide Canada Inc., Anjou, Québec |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | TRITON DF-20 Surfactant |
4723 |
| Liquid Metal Products Inc., Council Bluffs, Iowa |
Concentration of four ingredients |
LM-5 Tundish Insulator |
4724 |
| Witco Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario |
Chemical identity of two ingredients | Niax Silicone L-560 |
4725 |
The above claims seek exemption from the disclosure of supplier confidential business information in respect of a controlled product; such disclosure would otherwise be required under the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act.
Subsection 12(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act requires that this notice contain a statement offering every affected party the opportunity to make written representations to the screening officer with respect to the claim for exemption and the material safety data sheet to which it relates.
Under the provisions of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, "affected party," for purposes of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, means, in respect of a controlled product that is the subject of a claim for exemption, a person who is not a competitor of the claimant and who uses, supplies or is otherwise involved in the use or supply of the controlled product at a work place, and includes
(a) a supplier of the controlled product;
(b) an employee at the work place;
(c) an employer at the work place;
(d) a safety and health professional for the work place;
(e) a safety and health representative or a member of a safety and health committee for the work place; and
(f) a person who is authorized in writing to represent
(ii) an employee referred to in paragraph (b), except where that person is an official or a representative of a trade union that is not certified or recognized in respect of the work place.
Written representations respecting a claim for exemption cited in the present notice, or the material safety data sheet to which the claim relates, must cite the appropriate Registry Number, state the reasons and evidence upon which the representations are based and be delivered within 30 days of the date of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Screening Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 200 Kent Street, Suite 9000, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0M1.
W. A. LOWE
Chief Screening Officer
[30-1-o]
S.C., 1991, c. 11
SOR/97-555
S.C., 1991, c. 11
SOR/88-415
SOR/87-49
SOR/90-105
SOR/90-106
NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).
