Vol. 139, No. 9 — February 26, 2005

COMMISSIONS

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Model Class Screening Report for Aquatic-based Commercial Guiding Activities in the Mountain National Parks of Canada — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) declares the report entitled Model Class Screening Report for Aquatic-based Commercial Guiding Activities in the Mountain National Parks of Canada (the MCSR) to be a model class screening report pursuant to the provisions of subsection 19(1) and paragraph 19(2)(b) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act).

Public consultations on the MCSR took place from October 26 to November 24, 2004. The Agency received one written submission from the public concerning the MCSR. The public comment was subsequently forwarded to Parks Canada and addressed, where appropriate, in the MCSR. In making the declaration proposed by the Parks Canada Agency, the Agency has reviewed the MCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, will meet the requirements of the Act for the environmental assessment of the class of projects. It is also the opinion of the Agency that the class of projects described in the MCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The declaration is effective February 26, 2005, and is subject to the following terms and conditions:

• Subject to subsection 19(8) of the Act, the declaration period is valid until February 26, 2008.
• The Parks Canada Agency will notify the Agency, in writing, a minimum of six months prior to the date on which the declaration expires, of its intention to renew the MCSR, to renew the MCSR with modifications or additions, or not to renew the MCSR and thereby allow the declaration to expire.
• To renew the MCSR, the Parks Canada Agency will submit the proposed class screening report to the Agency not less than three months prior to the expiration date of this declaration so that the Agency may initiate a new declaration process.
• The Parks Canada Agency and the Agency will ensure that the MCSR, and subsequent Class Screening Project Reports, are made available to the public in accordance with the requirements of the Act, as it may be amended from time to time. As such, the Parks Canada Agency will place the MCSR, and subsequent Class Screening Project Reports, in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the CEAR) project file of its Regional Office. The Parks Canada Agency will also post a statement of the projects in respect of which the MCSR was used on the CEAR Internet site, on a quarterly basis, as required under paragraph 55.1(2)(d) of the Act.
• Any amendments to the report will be developed and implemented in accordance with the provisions for amendment contained in section 7.1 of the MCSR.

For further information, contact Robyn-Lynne Virtue, Class Screening Advisor, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, (613) 957-0826 (telephone), (613) 957-0941 (facsimile), robyn-lynne. virtue@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (electronic mail).

[9-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

COMMENCEMENT OF INQUIRY

Laminate flooring

Notice was received by the Secretary of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) on February 16, 2005, from the Director General of the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate at the Canada Border Services Agency, stating that a preliminary determination had been made respecting the dumping of laminate flooring in thickness ranging from 5.5 mm to 13 mm (other than laminate hardwood flooring where the hardwood component exceeds 2 mm in thickness) originating in or exported from Austria, Belgium, the People's Republic of China, France, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Poland and the subsidization of laminate flooring in thickness ranging from 5.5 mm to 13 mm (other than laminate hardwood flooring where the hardwood component exceeds 2 mm in thickness) originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China.

Pursuant to section 42 of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), the Tribunal has initiated an inquiry (Inquiry No. NQ-2004-006) to determine whether the dumping and subsidizing of the above-mentioned goods have caused injury or retardation or are threatening to cause injury, and to determine such other matters as the Tribunal is required to determine under that section.

The Tribunal's Guide to Making Requests for Product Exclusions, which can be found on the Tribunal's Web site, describes the procedure for filing requests for specific product exclusions. The Guide includes a form for filing requests for product exclusions and a form for any party that opposes a request to respond to such requests. This does not preclude parties from making submissions in a different format if they so wish, provided that all of the information and supporting documentation requested in the forms are included. Requests to exclude goods from the finding shall be filed by interested parties no later than May 2, 2005. Parties opposed or consenting or not opposed to the request for exclusion shall file written reply submissions no later than May 11, 2005. Should the request for a specific product exclusion be opposed, and if the interested party wishes to reply, it must do so within a period determined by the Tribunal in advance of the hearing.

Under section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must submit to the Tribunal, at the time the information is provided, a statement designating the information as confidential, together with an explanation as to why that information is designated as confidential. Furthermore, the person must submit a non-confidential summary of the information designated as confidential or a statement indicating why such a summary cannot be made.

Public hearing

A public hearing relating to this inquiry will be held in the Tribunal Hearing Room, Standard Life Centre, 18th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario, commencing May 18, 2005, at 9:30 a.m.

Each person or government wishing to participate in the inquiry and at the hearing as a party must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before March 7, 2005. Each counsel who intends to represent a party in the inquiry and at the hearing must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before March 7, 2005.

To allow the Tribunal to determine whether simultaneous interpretation will be required for the hearing, each interested party and each counsel filing a notice of participation or representation must advise the Secretary, at the same time that they file the notice, whether they and their witnesses will be using French or English or both languages at the hearing.

In the event of an injury finding, a request for a public interest inquiry conducted pursuant to subsection 45(1) of SIMA may be made by any party to the injury inquiry or by any other group or person affected by the injury finding. Such a request must be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the injury finding. A public interest inquiry is completely separate from an injury inquiry. However, the Tribunal invites all persons who anticipate that they will have public interest concerns in the event of an injury finding to simply notify the Tribunal by March 7, 2005. The Tribunal is not seeking and does not expect submissions on public interest issues during the injury inquiry.

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules govern these proceedings.

In order to observe and understand production processes, the Tribunal, accompanied by its staff, may conduct plant visits.

Along with the notice of commencement of inquiry, the Secretary has sent a letter to the domestic producer, importers, foreign producers and certain purchasers with a known interest in the inquiry providing details on the procedures, as well as the schedule for the inquiry. The letter specifies, among other things, the date for filing replies to Tribunal questionnaires, the date on which the information on record will be made available by the Tribunal to interested parties and counsel that have filed notices of participation or representation, and the dates for the filing of submissions by interested parties. Copies of all the questionnaires issued can be downloaded from the Tribunal's Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca/question/index_e.asp.

Preliminary determination on classes of goods

In its reasons for the preliminary determination of injury issued on December 3, 2004, the Tribunal indicated that the question of whether there should be more than one class of goods merited further consideration.

In order to facilitate the conduct of the inquiry, the Tribunal is seeking submissions on the issue of classes of goods. Parties wishing to make submissions are therefore requested to file them, as well as any evidence, no later than noon on March 16, 2005. Parties wishing to file reply submissions are to do so no later than noon on March 23, 2005. The parties are requested to serve each other, as well as the Tribunal. The service list will be provided to parties at a later date.

In considering the issue of classes of goods, the Tribunal typically looks at a number of factors, including the physical characteristics of the goods, their method of manufacture, their market characteristics (such as substitutability, pricing and distribution) and whether the goods fulfill the same customer needs. In making submissions, parties are directed to address these factors.

The Tribunal will issue its ruling with respect to classes of goods on April 11, 2005.

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (telephone), (613) 990-2439 (facsimile), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (electronic mail).

Written and oral communication with the Tribunal may be in English or in French.

Ottawa, February 17, 2005

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[9-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

EXPIRY REVIEW OF ORDERS

Refined sugar

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice that it will, pursuant to subsection 76.03(3) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), initiate an expiry review (Expiry Review No. RR-2004-007) of its orders made on November 3, 2000, in Review No. RR-99-006, continuing, with amendment, its findings made on November 6, 1995, in Inquiry No. NQ-95-002, concerning the dumping of refined sugar, refined from sugar cane or sugar beets, in granulated, liquid and powdered form, originating in or exported from the United States of America, Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, and the subsidizing of refined sugar, refined from sugar cane or sugar beets, in granulated, liquid and powdered form, originating in or exported from the European Union.

Notice of Expiry No. LE-2004-009, issued on December 23, 2004, informed interested persons and governments of the impending expiry of the orders. On the basis of available information, including representations requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review and responses to these representations received by the Tribunal in reply to the notice, the Tribunal is of the opinion that a review of the orders is warranted. The Tribunal has notified the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), as well as other interested persons and governments, of its decision.

The Tribunal has issued a Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews that can be found on the Tribunal's Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca. In this expiry review, the CBSA must determine whether the expiry of the orders in respect of refined sugar is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing of the goods.

If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the orders in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing, the CBSA will provide the Tribunal with the information that is required under the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules. The Tribunal will then conduct an inquiry to determine if the continued or resumed dumping and subsidizing is likely to result in injury or retardation.

If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the orders in respect of any goods is unlikely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing, the Tribunal will not consider those goods in its subsequent determination of the likelihood of injury or retardation and will issue an order rescinding the orders with respect to those goods.

The CBSA must provide notice of its determination within 120 days after receiving notice of the Tribunal's decision to initiate an expiry review, that is, no later than June 17, 2005. The CBSA will also notify all persons or governments that were notified by the Tribunal of the commencement of an expiry review, as well as any others that participated in the CBSA's investigation.

Letters have been sent to parties with a known interest in the expiry review providing them with the schedule respecting both the CBSA's investigation and the Tribunal's inquiry, should the CBSA determine that the expiry of the orders in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing.

The CBSA's investigation

The CBSA will conduct its investigation pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and the administrative guidelines set forth in the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate's publication entitled Guidelines on the Conduct of Expiry Review Investigations under the Special Import Measures Act. Any information submitted to the CBSA by interested persons concerning this investigation is deemed to be public information unless clearly designated as confidential. Where the submission is confidential, a non-confidential edited version or summary of the submission must also be provided which will be disclosed to interested parties upon request.

With respect to the CBSA's investigation, the schedule specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies to the expiry review questionnaires, the date on which the CBSA exhibits will be available to parties to the proceeding, the date on which the administrative record will be closed and the dates for the filing of submissions by parties in the proceeding. The expiry review questionnaires for exporters, importers and domestic producers are posted on CBSA's Web site at www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/sima/expiry-eng.html.

Tribunal's inquiry

Should the CBSA determine that the expiry of the orders in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing, the Tribunal will conduct its inquiry, pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and its Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews, to determine if there is a likelihood of injury or retardation. The schedule for the Tribunal's inquiry specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies by the domestic producers to Part E of the expiry review questionnaire, the date on which information on the record will be made available by the Tribunal to interested parties and counsel that have filed notices of participation and the dates for the filing of submissions by interested parties.

The Tribunal's Guide to Making Requests for Product Exclusions, which can be found on the Tribunal's Web site, describes the procedure for filing requests for specific product exclusions. The Guide includes a form for filing requests for product exclusions and a form for any party that opposes a request to respond to such requests. This does not preclude parties from making submissions in a different format if they so wish, provided that all of the information and supporting documentation requested in the forms are included. Requests to exclude goods from the orders shall be filed by interested parties no later than August 17, 2005. Parties opposed or consenting or not opposed to the request for exclusion shall file written reply submissions no later than August 29, 2005. Should the request for a specific product exclusion be opposed, and if the interested party wishes to reply, it must do so within a period determined by the Tribunal in advance of the hearing.

Under section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must submit to the Tribunal, at the time the information is provided, a statement designating the information as confidential, together with an explanation as to why the information is designated as confidential. Furthermore, the person must submit a non-confidential edited version or non-confidential summary of the information designated as confidential or a statement indicating why such an edited version or summary cannot be made.

Public hearing

The Tribunal will hold a public hearing relating to this expiry review in the Tribunal Hearing Room, 18th Floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario, commencing on September 12, 2005, at 9:30 a.m., to hear evidence and representations by interested parties.

Each interested person or government wishing to participate at the hearing as a party must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before June 30, 2005. Each counsel who intends to represent a party at the hearing must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before June 30, 2005.

To allow the Tribunal to determine whether simultaneous interpretation will be required for the hearing, each interested person or government filing a notice of participation and each counsel filing a notice of representation must advise the Secretary, at the same time that they file the notice, whether they and their witnesses will be using English or French or both languages at the hearing.

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules govern these proceedings.

In order to observe and understand production processes, the Tribunal, accompanied by its staff, may conduct plant visits.

Communication

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding the CBSA's investigation should be addressed to Ms. Karen Humphries, Canada Border Services Agency, Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs, Urbandale Building, 11th Floor, 100 Metcalfe Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L8, (613) 954-7176 (telephone), (613) 948-4844 (facsimile), Karen.Humphries@cbsaasfc.gc.ca (electronic mail).

A copy of the CBSA's investigation schedule and the expiry review investigation guidelines are available on the CBSA's Web site at www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/sima/expiry-eng.html.

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding the Tribunal's inquiry should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (telephone), (613) 990-2439 (facsimile), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (electronic mail).

Written and oral communication with the CBSA and the Tribunal may be in English or in French.

Ottawa, February 17, 2005

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[9-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

INQUIRY

Scientific instruments

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) has received a complaint (File No. PR-2004-051) from ProSpect Scientific, of Orangeville, Ontario, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. 31241-046192/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC) on behalf of the National Research Council of Canada. The solicitation is for the provision of a Raman spectroscopy system. Pursuant to subsection 30.13(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act and subsection 7(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations, notice is hereby given that the Tribunal has decided to conduct an inquiry into the complaint.

It is alleged that PWGSC awarded the contract to a non-compliant bidder.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (telephone), (613) 990-2439 (facsimile).

Ottawa, February 17, 2005

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[9-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room G-5, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, (819) 997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), (819) 994-0218 (facsimile);

— Bank of Commerce Building, Suite 1007, 1809 Barrington Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K8, (902) 426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), (902) 426-2721 (facsimile);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, (204) 983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), (204) 983-6317 (facsimile);

— 530-580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, (604) 666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), (604) 666-8322 (facsimile);

— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 405 De Maisonneuve Boulevard E, 2nd Floor, Suite B2300, Montréal, Quebec H2L 4J5, (514) 283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), (514) 283-3689 (facsimile);

— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, (416) 952-9096 (telephone), (416) 954-6343 (facsimile);

— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, (306) 780-3422 (telephone), (306) 780-3319 (facsimile);

— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, (780) 495-3224 (telephone), (780) 495-3214 (facsimile).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2005-50 February 14, 2005

591989 B.C. Ltd.
Kingston, Ontario

Denied — Addition of a low-power FM transmitter in Kingston.

2005-51 February 14, 2005

Natotawin Broadcasting Inc.
La Ronge, Saskatchewan

Approved — Increase of the effective radiated power from 50 watts to 216 watts and increase of the antenna height from 21 metres to 46 metres of the radio programming undertaking CJLR-FM La Ronge.

2005-52 February 14, 2005

Natotawin Broadcasting Inc.
Prince Albert, Saskatchewan

Approved — Increase of the effective radiated power from 50 watts to 249 watts and decrease of the antenna height from 40 metres to 21 metres of its transmitter CJLR-FM-3 Prince Albert.

2005-53 February 14, 2005

Town of Coronach
Coronach, Saskatchewan

The Commission revokes the broadcasting licence issued to the Town of Coronach for the undertaking serving Coronach.

2005-54 February 14, 2005

Rogers Broadcasting Limited
Ottawa, Ontario

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the transitional digital radio undertaking associated with CIWW, until August 31, 2005.

2005-55 February 14, 2005

Rogers Broadcasting Limited
Ottawa, Ontario

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the transitional digital radio undertaking associated with CISS-FM (formerly CKBY-FM), until August 31, 2005.

2005-56 February 14, 2005

Russel C. Cook, on behalf of a non-profit corporation to be incorporated
Opaskwayak Cree Nation (The Pas), Manitoba

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the radio programming undertaking to serve Opaskwayak Cree Nation near The Pas, until October 25, 2005.

2005-57 February 14, 2005

CTV Television Inc.
Sudbury and Huntsville, Ontario

Approved — New transmitter in Hunstville for the television programming undertaking CICI-TV Sudbury.

2005-58 February 14, 2005

Glassbox Television Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking, until June 20, 2005.

2005-59 February 14, 2005

Radio Nord Communications Inc.
La Sarre, Val-d'Or and Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec

Renewed — Renewal of the broadcasting licences for the radio programming undertakings CJGO-FM La Sarre; CHGO-FM Val-d'Or and its transmitter CHGO-FM-1 Rouyn-Noranda; and CHOA-FM Rouyn-Noranda and its transmitters CHOA-FM-1 Val-d'Or and CHOA-FM-2 La Sarre, from March 1, 2005, to June 30, 2005.

2005-60 February 14, 2005

Thendrel TV Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking, until September 11, 2005.

2005-61 February 14, 2005

Rogers Broadcasting Limited
Ottawa, Ontario

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the transitional digital radio undertaking associated with CHEZ-FM, until August 31, 2005.

2005-62 February 14, 2005

Open Learning Agency
Burnaby, British Columbia

Renewed — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for the satellite-to-cable programming undertaking known as Knowledge Network offering educational programming to British Columbia, from March 1, 2005, to August 31, 2005.

2005-63 February 15, 2005

Rogers Cable Communications Inc.
Orangeville, Erin and Grand Valley, Ontario

Approved — Inclusion of Erin and surrounding areas, and Grand Valley and surrounding areas within the authorized service area of the cable broadcasting distribution undertaking serving Orangeville.

2005-64 February 15, 2005

Rogers Cable Communications Inc.
Oshawa and Ajax, Ontario

Approved — Inclusion of the town of Ajax and surrounding areas within the authorized service area of the cable broadcasting distribution undertaking serving Oshawa (including Pine Ridge, Bowmanville, Whitby and Hampton).

2005-65 February 15, 2005

Videon Cablesystems Inc.
Okotoks, Alberta

Approved — Inclusion of the Ravenscourt subdivision, a new residential development adjacent to the eastern boundary within the authorized service area of the cable broadcasting distribution undertaking serving Okotoks.

2005-66 February 15, 2005

Shaw Cablesystems Limited
Calgary, Alberta

Approved — Inclusion of the Cochrane Lakes subdivision, a new residential development located approximately six kilometres north of Cochrane within the authorized service area of the cable broadcasting distribution undertaking serving Calgary (including Airdrie, Cochrane, Crossfield, Strathmore and Chestermere Lake).

2005-67 February 17, 2005

Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation
Port Elgin, Ontario

Approved — New English-language commercial FM radio station in Port Elgin, Ontario, operating in an Adult Contemporary music format. The licence will expire August 31, 2011.

2005-68 February 17, 2005

Brian Cooper and Daniel McCarthy, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Kincardine, Goderich and Port Elgin, Ontario

Approved in part — New English-language commercial FM radio station in Kincardine, with transmitters in Goderich and Port Elgin, Ontario, expiring August 31, 2011.

[9-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC HEARING 2004-11-3

Further to its Broadcasting Notices of Public Hearing CRTC 2004-11, 2004-11-1 and 2004-11-2 dated December 22, 2004, and January 7 and 11, 2005, relating to a public hearing which will be held on February 28, 2005, at 9:30 a.m., at the Fairmont Hotel Vancouver, 900 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, the Commission announces the following:

Correction to item 10

At the request of the applicant, the following item is withdrawn from this public hearing and the application will be returned to the applicant.

Newcap Inc.
Kamloops, British Columbia

For a licence to operate an English-language commercial FM radio programming undertaking in Kamloops.

Correction to item 23

The following item is withdrawn from the public hearing and rescheduled at a later date.

Norm Wright & Brian Perkin (OBCI)
Perth, Ontario

For a licence to operate an English-language commercial FM radio programming undertaking at Perth.

February 17, 2005

[9-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC HEARING 2005-2

The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on April 18, 2005, at 9 a.m., at the Commission headquarters, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, to consider the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is March 24, 2005.

1. Andrei Moskvitch (OBCI)
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a Category 2 national English- and French-language specialty programming undertaking to be known as TeleDance.

2. Jim Pattison Broadcast Group Ltd. (the general partner) and Jim Pattison Industries Ltd. (the limited partner), carrying on business as Jim Pattison Broadcast Group Limited Partnership
Medicine Hat, Alberta

To convert radio station CHAT Medicine Hat from the AM band to the FM band.

3. Standard Radio Inc.
Summerland, British Columbia

To convert radio station CHOR Summerland from the AM band to the FM band.

4. Société radio communautaire Victoria
Victoria, British Columbia

For a licence to operate a French-language FM Type A community radio programming undertaking in Victoria.

February 16, 2005

[9-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2005-14

The Commission has received the following application. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is March 22, 2005.

1. Aboriginal Voices Radio Inc.
Toronto, Ontario

To broadcast predominantly Vietnamese-language programming using a Subsidiary Communications Multiplex Operations (SCMO) channel, relating to the licence of radio programming undertaking CFIE-FM Toronto.

February 15, 2005

[9-1-o]

(Erratum)

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions and orders on claims for exemption

In the notice of decisions and orders on claims for exemption published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, Vol. 138, No. 48, dated Saturday, November 27, 2004, on page 3436, the claimant for the claim assigned registry No. 5203 was identified as Baker Petrolite Corp.

Notice is hereby given that the claimant was in fact Shlumberger.

R. BOARDMAN
Chief Screening Officer

[9-1-o]

(Erratum)

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Filing of a claim for exemption

The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 5, 2001, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry No. 4987 to be the chemical name, common name, generic name, trade name or brand name of a controlled product and information which could be used to identify the supplier of a controlled product of one ingredient. It also identified the claim as being filed by Schlumberger of Sugar Land, Texas, as seeking exemption from the disclosure of employer confidential information in respect of a controlled product which would otherwise be required to be disclosed by the provisions of the applicable provincial legislation relating to occupational health and safety.

It has since been established that the subject of the claim is the chemical identity of one ingredient and the claim is filed by Schlumberger Canada Limited of Calgary, Alberta, who is seeking exemption from the disclosure of supplier confidential business information in respect of a controlled product; such disclosure would otherwise be required under the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act. The product identifier as shown on the MSDS has been changed to ClearFRAC * LT J551.

Subsection 12(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act requires that this notice contain a statement offering every affected party the opportunity to make written representations to the screening officer with respect to the claim for exemption and the material safety data sheet to which it relates.

Under the provisions of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, "affected party," for purposes of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, means, in respect of a controlled product that is the subject of a claim for exemption, a person who is not a competitor of the claimant and who uses, supplies or is otherwise involved in the use or supply of the controlled product at a work place, and includes

(a) a supplier of the controlled product;

(b) an employee at the work place;

(c) an employer at the work place;

(d) a safety and health professional for the work place;

(e) a safety and health representative or a member of a safety and health committee for the work place; and

(f) a person who is authorized in writing to represent

(i) a supplier referred to in paragraph (a) or an employer referred to in paragraph (c), or

(ii) an employee referred to in paragraph (b), except where that person is an official or a representative of a trade union that is not certified or recognized in respect of the work place.

Written representations respecting a claim for exemption cited in the present notice, or the material safety data sheet to which the claim relates, must cite the appropriate Registry Number, state the reasons and evidence upon which the representations are based and be delivered within 30 days of the date of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Screening Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3.

R. BOARDMAN
Chief Screening Officer

[9-1-o]

NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).