Vol. 139, No. 43 — October 22, 2005

COMMISSIONS

CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of a charity

The following notice of proposed revocation was sent to the charity listed below revoking it for failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act as listed in this notice:

"Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charity listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(b) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette."

Business Number	Name/Address
893166686RR0001	ÉGLISE DU CENTRE-VILLE, MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.)

ELIZABETH TROMP 
Director General 
Charities Directorate 

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Replacement Class Screening Report for Small Scale Farm Infrastructure Projects — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) declares the report entitled Replacement Class Screening Report for Small Scale Farm Infrastructure Projects (the RCSR) to be a replacement class screening report pursuant to the provisions of subsection 19(1) and paragraph 19(2)(a) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act).

Public consultations on the RCSR took place from June 23 to July 22, 2005. The Agency received no written submissions from the public concerning the RCSR. In making the declaration proposed by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), the Agency has reviewed the RCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, will meet the requirements of the Act for the environmental assessment of the class of projects. It is also the opinion of the Agency that the class of projects described in the RCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The declaration is effective October 22, 2005, and is subject to the following terms and conditions:

• Subject to subsection 19(8) of the Act, the declaration period is valid until October 22, 2010.
• AAFC will notify the Agency, in writing, a minimum of six months prior to the date on which the declaration expires, of its intention to renew the RCSR, to renew the RCSR with modifications or additions, or not to renew the RCSR and thereby allow the declaration to expire.
• To renew the RCSR, AAFC will submit the proposed class screening report to the Agency not less than three months prior to the expiration date of this declaration so that the Agency may initiate a new declaration process.
• AAFC and the Agency will ensure that the RCSR is made available to the public in accordance with the requirements of the Act, as it may be amended from time to time. As such, AAFC will place the RCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the CEAR) project file of its regional offices. AAFC will also post a statement of the projects in respect of which the RCSR was used on the CEAR Internet site, on a quarterly basis, as required under paragraph 55.1(2)(d) of the Act.
• Any amendments to the report will be developed and implemented in accordance with the provisions for amendment contained in section 6.0 of the RCSR.

For further information, contact Robyn-Lynne Virtue, Class Screening Advisor, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, (613) 957-0826 (telephone), (613) 957-0941 (fax), robyn-lynne.virtue@ ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Replacement Class Screening Report for Water Well Construction and Decommissioning Projects — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) declares the report entitled Replacement Class Screening Report for Water Well Construction and Decommissioning Projects (the RCSR) to be a replacement class screening report pursuant to the provisions of subsection 19(1) and paragraph 19(2)(a) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act).

Public consultations on the RCSR took place from June 23 to July 22, 2005. The Agency received no written submissions from the public concerning the RCSR. In making the declaration proposed by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), the Agency has reviewed the RCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, will meet the requirements of the Act for the environmental assessment of the class of projects. It is also the opinion of the Agency that the class of projects described in the RCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The declaration is effective October 22, 2005, and is subject to the following terms and conditions:

• Subject to subsection 19(8) of the Act, the declaration period is valid until October 22, 2010.
• AAFC will notify the Agency, in writing, a minimum of six months prior to the date on which the declaration expires, of its intention to renew the RCSR, to renew the RCSR with modifications or additions or not to renew the RCSR and thereby allow the declaration to expire.
• To renew the RCSR, AAFC will submit the proposed class screening report to the Agency not less than three months prior to the expiration date of this declaration so that the Agency may initiate a new declaration process.
• AAFC and the Agency will ensure that the RCSR is made available to the public in accordance with the requirements of the Act, as it may be amended from time to time. As such, AAFC will place the RCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the CEAR) project file of its regional offices. AAFC will also post a statement of the projects in respect of which the RCSR was used on the CEAR Internet site, on a quarterly basis, as required under paragraph 55.1(2)(d) of the Act.
• Any amendments to the report will be developed and implemented in accordance with the provisions for amendment contained in section 6.0 of the RCSR.

For further information, contact Robyn-Lynne Virtue, Class Screening Advisor, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, (613) 957-0826 (telephone), (613) 957-0941 (fax), robyn-lynne.virtue@ ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2004-009

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on October 6, 2005, with respect to an appeal filed by Cherry Stix Ltd. from a decision of the President of the Canada Border Services Agency dated April 8, 2004, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on April 4, 2005, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2d Supp.), c. 1, was dismissed.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (telephone), (613) 990-2439 (fax).

Ottawa, October 6, 2005

HÉLÈNE NADEAU 
Secretary 

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

EXPIRY OF FINDING

Flat hot-rolled carbon and alloy steel sheet and strip

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice, pursuant to subsection 76.03(2) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), that its finding made on August 17, 2001, in Inquiry No. NQ-2001-001, concerning the dumping of certain flat hot-rolled carbon and alloy steel sheet and strip originating in or exported from Brazil, Bulgaria, the People's Republic of China, Chinese Taipei, India, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, South Africa, Ukraine and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and the subsidizing of certain flat hot-rolled carbon and alloy steel sheet and strip originating in or exported from India, is scheduled to expire (Expiry No. LE-2005-004) on August 16, 2006. Under SIMA, findings of injury or threat of injury and the associated special protection in the form of anti-dumping or countervailing duties expire five years from the date of the last order or finding, unless an expiry review has been initiated before that date. An expiry review will not be initiated unless the Tribunal decides that there is sufficient information to indicate that it is warranted.

The subject goods are defined as

flat hot-rolled carbon and alloy steel sheet and strip, including secondary or non-prime material, in various widths from 3/4 in. (19 mm) and wider, and

(a) for product in coil form, in thicknesses from 0.054 in. to 0.625 in. (1.37 mm to 15.875 mm) inclusive,

(b) for product that is cut-to-length, in thicknesses from 0.054 in. up to but not including 0.187 in. (1.37 mm up to but not including 4.75 mm),

excluding flat-rolled stainless steel sheet and strip and flat hot-rolled, cut-to-length alloy steel products containing no less than 11.5 percent manganese, in thicknesses from 3 mm to 4.75 mm.

Persons or governments requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review of the said finding should file 20 copies of written public submissions containing relevant information, opinions and arguments, with the Secretary of the Tribunal not later than November 3, 2005. Persons or governments should endeavour to base their submissions exclusively on public information; however, confidential information relevant to the issues before the Tribunal may be filed, if necessary, along with a comprehensive public summary or edited version thereof.

Submissions should address all relevant factors, including

• the likelihood of continued or resumed dumping and subsidizing of the goods;
• the likely volume and price ranges of dumped and subsidized imports if dumping and subsidizing were to continue or resume;
• the domestic industry's recent performance, including trends in production, sales, market share and profits;
• the likelihood of injury to the domestic industry if the finding were allowed to expire, having regard to the anticipated effects of a continuation or resumption of dumped and subsidized imports on the industry's future performance;
• any other developments affecting, or likely to affect, the performance of the domestic industry;
• changes in circumstances, domestically or internationally, including changes in the supply of or demand for the goods, and changes in trends in, and sources of, imports into Canada; and
• any other matter that is relevant.

Where there are opposing views, each person or government that filed a submission in response to the notice of expiry will be given an opportunity to respond in writing to the representations of other persons or governments. In these circumstances, the Tribunal will distribute copies of the public submissions to each person or government that filed a submission with the Tribunal. Persons or governments wishing to respond to the submissions must do so not later than November 14, 2005. If confidential submissions have been filed, the Secretary will notify persons or governments and instruct them on how they may access these submissions through qualified counsel.

The Tribunal will issue a decision on November 30, 2005, on whether an expiry review is warranted based on the submissions and representations received and the responses to them.

• If there is no request for a review, the Tribunal will not initiate a review and the finding will expire on its expiry date.
• If the Tribunal decides that a review is not warranted, the finding will expire on its expiry date. The Tribunal will issue its reasons not later than 15 days after its decision.
• If the Tribunal decides to initiate a review, it will issue a notice of expiry review.

The Tribunal's Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews can be found on its Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca. In addition to providing more detailed information on the proceeding whereby the Tribunal determines if an expiry review is warranted, the draft guideline explains how an expiry review is conducted if the Tribunal determines that one is warranted. In an expiry review, the President of the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) first determines whether the expiry of the order or finding is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping or subsidizing of the goods. If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the order or finding in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping or subsidizing, the Tribunal will then conduct an inquiry to determine if the continued or resumed dumping or subsidizing is likely to result in injury or retardation. The Tribunal's notice of expiry review will provide more information on the expiry review process.

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (telephone), (613) 990-2439 (fax), secretary@ citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Written and oral communication with the Tribunal may be in English or in French.

Ottawa, October 11, 2005

HÉLÈNE NADEAU 
Secretary 

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

SUBMISSION OF REPORT

Market disruption safeguard inquiry into barbeques originating in the People's Republic of China

On May 30, 2005, pursuant to subsection 30.22(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act (CITT Act), Onward Manufacturing Company Limited submitted a complaint requesting that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) initiate a safeguard inquiry (Safeguard Inquiry No. CS-2005-001) in respect of the People's Republic of China (China) into whether the importation of self-standing barbeques for outdoor use consisting of a metal lid, base and frame, fuelled by either propane or natural gas, with primary cooking space between 200 and 1 500 square inches (1 290 and 9 675 square centimetres), in assembled or knocked-down condition (barbeques) originating in China was causing or threatening to cause market disruption to the domestic producers of like or directly competitive goods.

On August 10, 2005, pursuant to subsection 30.22(7) of the CITT Act, the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Finance and the Minister for International Trade, referred to the Tribunal a matter concerning barbeques originating in China. The Referral Order directed the Tribunal to recommend, in the event that the Tribunal determined, under subsection 30.22(6) of the CITT Act, that the goods that were the subject of the complaint were being imported in such increased quantities or under such conditions that they caused or threatened to cause market disruption to the domestic producers of like or directly competitive goods, the most appropriate remedy to address such market disruption or threat thereof over a period not exceeding three years, in accordance with Canada's rights and obligations under international trade agreements.

The Tribunal hereby gives notice that it submitted its report to the Governor General in Council on October 11, 2005.

Ottawa, October 11, 2005

HÉLÈNE NADEAU 
Secretary 

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, (819) 997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), (819) 994-0218 (fax);

— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, (902) 426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), (902) 426-2721 (fax);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, (204) 983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), (204) 983-6317 (fax);

— 530-580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, (604) 666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), (604) 666-8322 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, (514) 283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), (514) 283-3689 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, (416) 952-9096 (telephone), (416) 954-6343 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, (306) 780-3422 (telephone), (306) 780-3319 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, (780) 495-3224 (telephone), (780) 495-3214 (fax).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General 

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2005-485 October 11, 2005

Multivan Broadcast Corporation (the general partner) and 650504 B.C. Ltd., Douglas M. Holtby, Geoffrey Y. W. Lau, Robert H. Lee, Joseph Segal and RCG Forex Service Corp. (the limited partners), carrying on business as Multivan Broadcast Limited Partnership
Vancouver, British Columbia

Denied — Replacement of the conditions of licence for the broadcasting licence for the multilingual ethnic television station CHNM-TV Vancouver, which is generally known as Channel M, that restrict the number of hours of programs it may broadcast in South Asian languages and in Chinese languages, with a condition of licence that restricts the number of hours of programs it may broadcast in any one third-language.

2005-486 October 12, 2005

Toronto Raptors Network Ltd.
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment of the broadcasting licence for the national Category 2 specialty programming undertaking known as Raptors TV.

2005-487 October 13, 2005

Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation
Wasaga Beach, Ontario

Denied — New English-language commercial FM radio station in Wasaga Beach, Ontario.

2005-488 October 13, 2005

The Haliburton Broadcasting Group Inc.
Haliburton, Ontario

Approved — New English-language commercial FM radio station in Haliburton, Ontario. The licence will expire August 31, 2012.

2005-489 October 14, 2005

Joule Media Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking, until November 14, 2006.

2005-490 October 14, 2005

Jamil Nowwarah, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking, until November 6, 2006.

2005-491 October 14, 2005

ResponseTV, Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking, until November 6, 2006.

2005-492 October 14, 2005

Get Safe! Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking, until November 9, 2006.

2005-493 October 14, 2005

The Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVOntario)
Ottawa, Ontario

Approved — Technical change of the transmitter CICO-TV-24 Ottawa, as noted in the decision.

2005-494 October 14, 2005

Metro Radio Group Inc.
Halifax, Nova Scotia

Approved — Technical change for the radio programming undertaking CKUL-FM Halifax, as noted in the decision.

2005-495 October 14, 2005

Golden West Broadcasting Ltd.
Estevan, Saskatchewan

Approved — Technical change for the radio programming undertaking CJSL Estevan, as noted in the decision.

2005-496 October 14, 2005

The Rainbow Lake Sporting Association
Rainbow Lake, Alberta

The Commission revokes the broadcasting licence issued to The Rainbow Lake Sporting Association for the undertaking serving Rainbow Lake.

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC HEARING 2005-8-3

The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on November 14, 2005, at 9:30 a.m., at the Holiday Inn Sélect Québec, 395 De la Couronne Street, Québec, Quebec, to consider the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is October 31, 2005.

33. Christian Channel Inc.
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a Category 2 national English-language specialty programming undertaking to be known as The Christian Channel.

October 7, 2005

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC HEARING 2005-9

The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on December 12, 2005, at 9 a.m., at the Commission headquarters, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, to consider the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is November 18, 2005.

1. The Family Channel Inc.
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a Category 2 national English-language specialty programming undertaking to be known as Boyz Own.

2. La Co-opérative Radio Richmond Limitée
Petit-de-Grat, Nova Scotia

For a licence to operate a French-language FM Type A community radio programming undertaking in Petit-de-Grat.

3. TVA Group Inc.
Montréal, Quebec

For a licence to operate a French-language transitional digital television programming undertaking associated with its existing TV station CFTM-TV in Montréal.

4. Radio Matagami
Lebel-sur-Quévillon, Quebec

For a licence to operate a French-language FM Type A community radio programming undertaking in Lebel-sur-Quévillon.

5. Radio Matagami
Chibougamau, Quebec

For a licence to operate a French-language FM Type A community radio programming undertaking in Chibougamau.

6. Radio CJFP (1986) ltée
Rimouski, Quebec

For a licence to operate a French-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Rimouski.

7. Fawcett Broadcasting Limited
Red Lake and Ear Falls, Ontario

To convert radio station CKDR-5 Red Lake from the AM band to the FM band.

8. Fawcett Broadcasting Limited
Sioux Lookout, Ignace, Hudson and Atikokan, Ontario

To convert radio station CKDR-2 Sioux Lookout from the AM band to the FM band.

9. Treana Rudock, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated (OBCI)
Tisdale, Saskatchewan

For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Tisdale.

10. McBride Communications & Media Inc.
Ucluelet, British Columbia

For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Ucluelet.

11. Douglas Malcolm McLean, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated (OBCI)
Abbotsford, British Columbia

For a licence to operate an English-language FM community-based campus radio programming undertaking in Abbotsford.

12. Multivan Broadcast Corporation (the general partner), and 650504 B.C. Ltd., Douglas M. Holtby, Geoffrey Y. W. Lau, Robert H. Lee, Joseph Segal and RCG Forex Service Corp. (the limited partners), carrying on business as Multivan Broadcast Limited Partnership
Vancouver, British Columbia

For a licence to operate a multilingual ethnic transitional digital television programming undertaking associated with its existing television station CHNM-TV.

13. CanWest MediaWorks Inc. (CanWest) and Prime Television Holdco Inc. (Prime TV Holdco), partners in a general partnership carrying on business as Prime TV (Prime TV GP), on behalf of Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI), to acquire a 33.3 percent partnership interest in Prime TV GP
Across Canada

The current partners of Prime TV GP, CanWest and Prime TV Holdco, are authorized to operate the national, English-language, specialty television service approved in Decision CRTC 96-604, dated September 4, 1996, and renewed in Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2004-18 (Decision 2004-18), dated January 21, 2004. Following this transaction, RCI will become partner with CanWest in Prime TV GP, with their respective partnership interest of 33.3 percent and 66.7 percent.

October 14, 2005

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2005-81-1

Viewing and expenditure incentives for English-language Canadian television drama — Extension of the deadline for receipt of comments

The Canadian Association of Broadcasters has requested that the Commission extend, by two weeks, the deadline for the receipt of comments in this proceeding. The Commission is satisfied that the request is reasonable. Accordingly, the Commission will now accept comments that it receives on or before October 25, 2005.

October 7, 2005

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2005-95

The Commission has received the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is November 14, 2005.

1. The Sports Network Inc.
Across Canada

To amend the licence of the national Category 2 specialty programming undertaking known as ESPN Classic Canada (ESPN Classic).

2. Sound of Faith Broadcasting
Woodstock, Ontario

Relating to the licence of the radio programming undertaking CJFH-FM Woodstock.

October 7, 2005

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2005-96

The Commission has received the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is November 17, 2005.

1. CTV Specialty Television Inc. (CTV), on behalf of The NHL Network Inc. - The NHL Network, CTV Television Inc. - CTV Travel, The Sports Network Inc. - ESPN Classic Canada, and 1163031 Ontario Inc. - Outdoor Life Network
Across Canada

To amend their respective specialty programming undertaking licences in order to implement the incentive program for English-language Canadian television drama set out in Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2004-93.

2. Eternacom Inc.
Little Current, Ontario

To amend the licence of the radio programming undertaking CJTK-FM Sudbury.

October 13, 2005

[43-1-o]

NAFTA SECRETARIAT

DECISION

Certain softwood lumber products

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to rule 70 of the NAFTA Article 1904 Panel Rules, that the panel established to review the Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination made by the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, respecting Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada, issued its decision on the fourth determination on remand on October 5, 2005 (Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-2002-1904-03).

In the October 5, 2005 decision, the binational panel affirmed in part and remanded in part the agency's fourth determination on remand respecting Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada.

The binational panel instructed the investigating authority to provide its fifth determination on remand by October 28, 2005.

Copies of the complete decision may be obtained from Government of Canada Publications, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0S5, (613) 941-5995 or 1-800-635-7943.

Explanatory note

Chapter 19 of the North American Free Trade Agreement establishes a procedure for replacing domestic judicial review of determinations in antidumping and countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with review by binational panels.

These panels are established, when a Request for Panel Review is received by the NAFTA Secretariat, to act in place of national courts to review final determinations expeditiously to determine whether they are in accordance with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of the country that made the determination.

Under Article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement which came into force on January 1, 1994, the Government of Canada, the Government of the United States and the Government of Mexico established the Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews. These Rules were published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 1, 1994.

Requests for information concerning the present notice or concerning the NAFTA Article 1904 Panel Rules should be addressed to the Canadian Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Canadian Section, 90 Sparks Street, Suite 705, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B4, (613) 992-9388.

FRANÇOY RAYNAULD 
Canadian Secretary 

[43-1-o]

NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).