Vol. 140, No. 5 — February 4, 2006

COMMISSIONS

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2003-036

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on January 26, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Roche Vitamins Canada Inc. from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on February 14 and 15, 2005, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was allowed in part.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (telephone), (613) 990-2439 (fax).

Ottawa, January 27, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU 
Secretary 

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DETERMINATION

Garlic

On August 26, 2005, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) issued a notice of expiry review to all parties advising them that it would initiate an expiry review (Expiry Review No. RR-2005-001), under section 76.03 of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), respecting

• its finding made on May 2, 2001, in Inquiry No. NQ-2000-006, concerning garlic, fresh or frozen, originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China (China) and Vietnam, excluding fresh garlic subject to the finding made in Inquiry No. NQ-96-002; and
• its order made on March 20, 2002, in Expiry Review No. RR-2001-001, continuing without amendment, its finding made on March 21, 1997, in Inquiry No. NQ-96-002, concerning fresh garlic originating in or exported from China, imported into Canada from July 1 to December 31, inclusive, of each calendar year.

On December 22, 2005, the President of the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) determined that, pursuant to subsection 76.03(7) of SIMA, the expiry of the finding and order was likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping of the subject goods.

The Tribunal's notice of expiry review gave interested parties until January 3, 2006, to file notices of participation in the expiry review. The notice also gave domestic growers until January 6, 2006, to reply to Part E of the domestic growers' expiry review questionnaire. As of January 25, 2006, the Tribunal has received no responses to the questionnaire and no notices of participation. In addition, the CBSA received no questionnaire responses from domestic growers, importers or foreign producers.

In view of the fact that there are no parties participating in the process and that no information has been filed on the factors to be considered by the Tribunal in an expiry review, it is not possible for the Tribunal to make a determination that a continuation or resumption of dumping will likely cause material injury to the domestic industry. Therefore, the Tribunal hereby determines, pursuant to subsection 76.03(10) of SIMA, that the expiry of the finding and order is unlikely to result in injury. The public hearing scheduled for March 13, 2006, is cancelled.

The Tribunal will issue orders, with reasons, rescinding the finding and order when they expire on May 1, 2006, and March 19, 2007, respectively.

Ottawa, January 25, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU 
Secretary 

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, (819) 997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), (819) 994-0218 (fax);

— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, (902) 426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), (902) 426-2721 (fax);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, (204) 983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), (204) 983-6317 (fax);

— 530-580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, (604) 666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), (604) 666-8322 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, (514) 283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), (514) 283-3689 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, (416) 952-9096 (telephone), (416) 954-6343 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, (306) 780-3422 (telephone), (306) 780-3319 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, (780) 495-3224 (telephone), (780) 495-3214 (fax).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General 

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2006-14 January 24, 2006

3553230 Canada inc.
Saint-Constant, Quebec

Renewed — Broadcasting licence for the French-language commercial radio programming undertaking CJMS Saint-Constant, from May 1, 2006, to August 31, 2006.

2006-15 January 26, 2006

CTV Television Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment of the broadcasting licence for the national, English-language specialty programming undertaking known as The Comedy Network, as noted in the decision.

2006-16 January 26, 2006

CHUM Limited
Across Canada

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking now known as Stampede, until November 16, 2006.

2006-17 January 26, 2006

MediaNet Canada Ltd.
Across Canada

Approved — Extension of the time limit to commence the operation of the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking, until December 5, 2006.

2006-18 January 26, 2006

The Winnipeg Campus/Community Radio Society Inc.
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Renewed — Broadcasting licence for the community-based campus radio programming undertaking CKUW-FM Winnipeg, from March 1, 2006, to August 31, 2006.

2006-19 January 27, 2006

MSNBC Canada Corp.
Across Canada

Complaints regarding comments made on the program Imus in the Morning on MSNBC Canada regarding Palestinians, Iraqis and Muslims

In the decision, the Commission addresses complaints respecting comments made on the program Imus in the Morning, aired on the now defunct MSNBC Canada Category 2 specialty television service. The Commission finds that, by airing comments made during the November 12, 2004 and November 19, 2004 episodes of the program, the licensee breached the provision of the Specialty Services Regulations, 1990 that prohibits the broadcast of abusive comment. The Commission will send a copy of this decision to the Chief Executive Officers of Rogers Broadcasting Limited, Shaw Communications Inc. and MSNBC Cable, LLC, and a copy will be placed on the public file of MSNBC Canada.

2006-20 January 27, 2006

Diffusion communautaire Baie-des-Chaleurs inc.
Carleton and Paspébiac, Quebec

Denied — Increase of the average effective radiated power and of the antenna height and relocation of the transmitter.

2006-21 January 27, 2006

Northern Native Broadcasting, Yukon
Whitehorse, Yukon Territory and Tsiigehtchic, Northwest Territories

Approved — New transmitter in Tsiigehtchic.

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC HEARING 2006-2-1

Further to its Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2006-2 dated January 19, 2006, relating to a public hearing which will be held on March 20, 2006, at 9:30 a.m., at the Convention Centre, 1000 René-Lévesque Boulevard E, Québec, Quebec, the Commission announces the following:

The Commission adds the following item to the March 20, 2006 public hearing:

The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is February 23, 2006.

45. 591991 B.C. Ltd.
Montmagny, Quebec

To amend the licence of radio programming undertaking CFEL-FM Montmagny.

The following item is amended and the change is in bold:

Correction to Item 18

Bedford Baptist Church
Bedford, Nova Scotia

Application by Bedford Baptist Church for a licence to operate an English-language low-power FM specialty radio programming undertaking in Bedford.

January 27, 2006

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-10

Call for comments on the proposed addition of ETV Bangla to the lists of eligible satellite services for distribution on a digital basis

Comments on the Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association's (CCTA) request must be received by the Commission no later than February 22, 2006. A copy of the comments must be received by the CCTA no later than the deadline for receipt of comments by the Commission.

The CCTA may file a written reply to any comments received concerning its request. This reply should be filed with the Commission and a copy sent to the person who submitted the comments by no later than March 9, 2006.

January 23, 2006

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-11

Viewing and expenditure incentives for English-language Canadian television drama

In the public notice, the Commission reviews the comments received in response to Viewing and expenditure incentives for English-language Canadian television drama — Call for comments, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2005-81, August 10, 2005 (Public Notice 2005-81), and sets out the targets for the viewing and expenditure components of the Commission's drama incentive program.

The Commission has decided to implement the proposals outlined in Public Notice 2005-81.

January 27, 2006

[5-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Haz-ardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the Screening Officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), listed below.

Claimant	Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)	Registry Number	MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS)	Date of Decision
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	METLBOND 329-7 Structural Adhesive formerly/ antérieurement MELTBOND+ 329-7 Structural Adhesive	5389	03/27/2002	November 15, 2005 le 15 novembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	METLBOND 1113 Structural Adhesive formerly/ antérieurement MELTBOND+ 1113 Structural Adhesive	5390	03/27/2002	November 15, 2005 le 15 novembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	METLBOND 2550 Structural Adhesive formerly/ antérieurement MELTBOND+ 2550 Structural Adhesive	5391	03/27/2002	November 15, 2005 le 15 novembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	METLBOND 1515-3M Structural Adhesive formerly/ antérieurement MELTBOND+ 1515-3M Structural Adhesive	5392	03/27/2002	November 15, 2005 le 15 novembre 2005
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	SECURON CD	5457	08/19/2002	December 8, 2005 le 8 décembre 2005
ITW Philadelphia Resins, Montgomeryville, Pennsylvania	PHILLYBOND TA-30 ADHESIVE HARDENER	5485	03/30/00	October 14, 2005 le 14 octobre 2005
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	Low Temperature Cement Set Enhancer D186	5487	15-October-2002	October 20, 2005 le 20 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 7714 Structural Prepreg	5489	10/18/2002	December 6, 2005 le 6 décembre 2005
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	SCOTCH-WELD (TM) AF 163-2 STRUCTURAL ADHESIVE FILM	5508	14/04/2004	October 27, 2005 le 27 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 985 on Fiberglass	5523	12/11/2002	December 19, 2005 le 19 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 985 on Aramid	5524	12/11/2002	December 19, 2005 le 19 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 985 on Graphite	5525	12/11/2002	December 19, 2005 le 19 décembre 2005
Cytec Surface Specialties Inc., formerly/ antérieurement UCB Chemicals Corporation, Smyrna, Georgia	Ebecryl® 3600	5529	01/30/2004	December 8, 2005 le 8 décembre 2005
Cytec Surface Specialties Inc., formerly/ antérieurement UCB Chemicals Corporation, Smyrna, Georgia	Ebecryl® 3703	5530	02/02/2004	December 8, 2005 le 8 décembre 2005
Cytec Surface Specialties Inc., formerly/ antérieurement UCB Chemicals Corporation, Smyrna, Georgia	Ebecryl® 81	5531	02/03/2004	December 8, 2005 le 8 décembre 2005
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. formerly /antérieurement Air Products & Chemicals Inc. - Chemicals Group, Allentown, Pennsylvania	SURFYNOL DF-62 Defoamer	5574	June 2002	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly/ antérieurement Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 5769 Performance Additive	5581	2 June 2004	January 6, 2006 le 6 janvier 2006
Octel Starreon, LLC, Littleton, Colorado formerly/ antérieurement Newark, Delaware	Octel Starreon 7000 CC1	5611	05/28/2003	November 3, 2005 le 3 novembre 2005
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	IRGANOX ML 820	5612	May 12, 2003	October 13, 2005 le 13 octobre 2005
Nalco Canada Company, Burlington, Ontario formerly/ antérieurement Ondeo Nalco Canada Co., Calgary, Alberta	EC9225A	5622	2004/03/02	October 3, 2005 le 3 octobre 2005
Nalco Canada Company, Burlington, Ontario formerly/ antérieurement Ondeo Nalco Canada Co., Calgary, Alberta	CORROSION INHIBITOR A262	5623	2004/03/02	October 3, 2005 le 3 octobre 2005
Nalco Canada Company, Burlington, Ontario formerly/ antérieurement Ondeo Nalco Canada Co., Calgary, Alberta	SULFA-CHECK® EC5493A	5625	2004/03/02	November 30, 2005 le 30 novembre 2005
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	DRYCRYL (TM) DP-2903 Dispersible Powder formerly/ antérieurement DRYCRYL (TM) DP-2903 Modifier	5626	09/26/2003	October 7, 2005 le 7 octobre 2005
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	PARALOID (TM) KM-346 Impact Modifier	5627	06/26/2003	October 28, 2005 le 28 octobre 2005
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	MONOMER QM-1458	5628	01/21/2004	December 6, 2005 le 6 décembre 2005
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	IRGANOX L 93	5629	July 14, 2003	November 8, 2005 le 8 novembre 2005
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	IRGANOX L 94	5630	July 14, 2003	November 8, 2005 le 8 novembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	BR® 127 Corrosion Inhibiting Primer, 10% Solids	5636	02/12/2004	December 13, 2005 le 13 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 985-1 Structural Resin	5637	02/26/2004	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	FM® 377U Adhesive Film	5640	05/10/2004	October 7, 2005 le 7 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	FM® 377S Adhesive Film	5641	05/10/2004	October 7, 2005 le 7 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	BR® 127 NC ESD Primer	5644	02/12/2004	December 13, 2005 le 13 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 985 Aramid Fiber Structural Resin	5651	02/26/2004	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	FM® 490A Adhesive Foam	5652	02/26/2004	October 7, 2005 le 7 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 759 Structural Resin	5672	07/28/2003	December 13, 2005 le 13 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 7934 Structural Prepreg	5675	07/01/2004	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	7934 Resin Solution	5676	07/28/2003	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	FM® 8130 Black Molding Compound	5677	11/19/2004	December 19, 2005 le 19 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	BR® 197 Paste Adhesive, Part A	5680	07/29/2003	December 19, 2005 le 19 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	BR® 197 Paste Adhesive, Part B	5681	07/29/2003	December 19, 2005 le 19 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 6102 Structural Resin	5686	11/22/2004	December 19, 2005 le 19 décembre 2005
Diversity Technologies Corp., Edmonton, Alberta	CEMENT DEFOAMER	5687	Apr. 23. 2004	October 6, 2005 le 6 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	MX 2600 Broadgoods	5689	08/13/2003	December 19, 2005 le 19 décembre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 937A Prepreg	5690	08/13/2003	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	HYE 934 Carbon Prepreg	5691	08/13/2003	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	HYE 937A Prepreg	5695	08/13/2003	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	HMF 934 Carbon Prepreg	5696	08/14/2003	October 4, 2005 le 4 octobre 2005
GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Niax® catalyst A-31	5806	2005.05.03	December 14, 2005 le 14 décembre 2005
GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Niax® catalyst A-575	5809	2004.02.17	December 22, 2005 le 22 décembre 2005
GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Niax® catalyst C-174	5810	2004.00.13	October 3, 2005 le 3 octobre 2005
GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Niax® catalyst C-211	5811	2004.09.13	December 22, 2005 le 22 décembre 2005
GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Niax® catalyst C-255	5812	2004.06.25	December 14, 2005 le 14 décembre 2005
GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Niax® catalyst C-262	5813	2004.09.13	October 3, 2005 le 3 octobre 2005
GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Niax® Silicone L-2125	5814	2005.03.15	December 14, 2005 le 14 décembre 2005
GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Niax® silicone U-2000	5823	2005.03.15	December 14, 2005 le 14 décembre 2005
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	MONOMER QM-1482	5834	11/05/2003	December 16, 2005 le 16 décembre 2005
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	MONOMER QM-833M	5835	11/05/2003	December 16, 2005 le 16 décembre 2005
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	MORLIFE ™ 3300 ASPHALT ADDITIVE	5844	12/01/2003	November 1, 2005 le 1er novembre 2005
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M SUPER WEATHERSTRIP ADHESIVE - BLACK, P.N. 08008	5856	04/11/2005	November 24, 2005 le 24 novembre 2005
ARKEMA Canada Inc., formerly/ antérieurement ATOFINA Canada Inc., Oakville, Ontario	THERMOLITE® 140	5858	04/08/05	October 21, 2005 le 21 octobre 2005
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	SCOTCH-WELD(TM) EC 2615 B/A LW EPOXY ADHESIVE (PART A) formerly/ antérieurement Scotch Weld (TM) EC 2615 B/A LW Epoxy Adhesive	5864	04/11/2005	November 29, 2005 le 29 novembre 2005
Hexion Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., formerly/ antérieurement Borden Chemical - Canada, Division of the Borden Company, Toronto, Ontario	Cascophen OS-50TS	5876	03/18/2005	December 20, 2005 le 20 décembre 2005
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M(TM) SCOTCH-WELD(TM) EPOXY ADHESIVE 460 OFF WHITE, (PART A)	5910	22/03/2004	November 29, 2005 le 29 novembre 2005
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M(TM) SCOTCH-WELD EPOXY ADHESIVE DP-460, OFF WHITE (PART A) formerly/ antérieurement SCOTCH-WELD EPOXY ADHESIVE DP-460, OFF WHITE (PART A)	5911	22/03/2004	November 29, 2005 le 29 novembre 2005
E.I. duPont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario	"ZONYL" 5180 FLUOROCHEMICAL DISPERSION/ DISPERSION FLUOROCHIMIQUE "ZONYL" 5180	5929	24-AUG-2004 (English/anglaise) 10 Septembre 2004 (French/française)	November 30, 2005 le 30 novembre 2005
E.I. duPont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario	"Zonyl" C701	5932	24-AUG-2004	November 30, 2005 le 30 novembre 2005
Acheson Colloids Company, Port Huron, Michigan	SLA 2020	5939	11/26/2003 (English/anglaise) 03/11/26 (French/française)	November 8, 2005 le 8 novembre 2005
Acheson Colloids Company, Port Huron, Michigan	EMRALON 309	5940	07/22/2004 (English/anglaise) 04/07/22 (French/française)	November 8, 2005 le 8 novembre 2005
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M(TM) THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE ADHESIVE TC-2810 (PART A)	5950	13/05/2004	November 29, 2005 le 29 novembre 2005
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	VISCALEX AT89 formerly/ antérieurement Viscalex AT89	5974	17-Sep-2004	October 13, 2005 le 13 octobre 2005
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	PARALOID™ BTA-730L Impact Modifier	5976	09/02/2005	December 28, 2005 le 28 décembre 2005
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	PARALOID™ K-400 Processing Aid	5977	09/20/2005	December 28, 2005 le 28 décembre 2005

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 20, 2002, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5391 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 14, 2002, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5457 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. Subsequent to the issuance of the decision on the claim for exemption, the claimant advised the Commission that it was voluntarily disclosing on the MSDS the chemical identity and concentration of the ingredient for which the exemption had been granted.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 14, 2002, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5487 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 14, 2002, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5508 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 26, 2003, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5574 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 26, 2003, described the claim bearing Registry Number 5628 as seeking exemption from the disclosure of supplier confidential business information in respect of a controlled product; such disclosure would otherwise be required under the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act.

It has since been established that the claim was seeking exemption from the disclosure of employer confidential information in respect of a controlled product which would otherwise be required to be disclosed by the provisions of the applicable provincial legislation relating to occupational health and safety. The Screening Officer issued the decision on that basis.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 26, 2003, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5629 and 5630 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claims on which the Screening Officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5910 and 5950 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claims on which the Screening Officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5929 and 5932 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claims on which the Screening Officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5974 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the Screening Officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid with the exception of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5205 and 5206 which were found to be invalid. The Screening Officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the Screening Officer found that the respective MSDS relating to the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5876 and 5976 complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 5487, being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the Screening Officer found that the MSDS relating to this claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5628, 5834 and 5835, being claims from an employer in the province of Ontario, the Screening Officer found that the respective MSDS relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario.

Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the Screening Officer found that the respective MSDS relating to the remaining claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

Registry Numbers 5389 to 5392, inclusive

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose storage precautions for the controlled product;

2. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

4. Registry Number 5391:

(a) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

(b) Disclose an LC₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

(c) Disclose that acute inhalation exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product have been shown to cause adverse CNS effects in laboratory animals;

(d) If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

5. Registry Number 5392:

(a) Disclose that exposure to epoxy resins similar to those in the controlled product has caused respiratory sensitization in workers;

(b) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity;

6. Registry Numbers 5390 and 5391: Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 570 mg/kg for diglycidyl resorcinol ether;

7. Registry Numbers 5389, 5390 and 5392: Add hydrogen cyanide to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 5457

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the sodium polycarboxylate in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the kidneys of laboratory animals.

Registry Number 5485

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of triethylenetetramine in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 5 mg/m³ for tetraethylenepentamine;

3. Revise the MSDS to show that crystalline silica has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A2) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

4. Disclose correct information concerning the potential for polymerization of the controlled product;

5. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the lungs of laboratory animals;

6. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 550 mg/kg for triethylenetetramine.

Registry Number 5487

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to induce vomiting and replace it with a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration. Seek medical advice;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 230 mg/kg for methylenediethanolamine.

Registry Number 5489

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 2 mg/m³ and OSHA PEL = 20 mppcf for talc;

2. Remove the concentration ranges shown for the ingredients fibreglass and aramid and disclose their actual concentrations or acceptable range values;

3. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;

4. Disclose that poly (aromatic glycidyl ether) and phenolic epoxy resins have caused respiratory sensitization in workers;

5. Disclose the LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 29 900 ppm for acetone.

Registry Number 5508

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Numbers 5523 to 5525, inclusive

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 5529

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove the concentration range shown for the confidential hazardous ingredient acrylated amine oligomer and disclose its actual concentration or an acceptable range value;

2. Correct the impression that the controlled product is severely irritating as opposed to being a merely mildly irritating material;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 1 mg/m³ for hexamethylene diacrylate;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3 600 mg/kg for hexamethylene diacrylate;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Number 5530

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be washed with water for 15–20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 15–20 minutes or until the chemical is removed. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 1 mg/m³ for hexamethylene diacrylate;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3 600 mg/kg for hexamethylene diacrylate;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1 190 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 118 mg/kg for hydroxypropyl acrylate;

6. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Number 5531

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove the statement that the controlled product is highly irritating to the skin.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Number 5574

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Disclose information on the irritancy of the controlled product in a consistent manner;

3. Disclose that chronic inhalation exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause neurotoxic effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 5581

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, modify or remove the statement to give water to drink.

Registry Number 5611

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Amend the MSDS so as to clearly indicate that the laboratory animal fetal injury attributable to xylene has been observed in the absence of maternal toxic effects.

Registry Number 5612

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Replace the percent concentration range for petroleum distillate with an acceptable WHMIS percent concentration range;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Numbers 5622 and 5623

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose that acute exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has caused necrosis and haemorrhaging in the brain;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused positive results in an in vivo screening test for germ cell mutagenicity;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

7. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded when transferring large quantities of the controlled product;

8. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 400 ppm for isopropanol;

9. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is incompatible with acetyl bromide, aluminum powder, magnesium metal and aluminum and zinc salts;

10. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (oral, male rat) value of 3.2 g/kg for formamide;

11. Disclose dermal LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDSs-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with copies of revised versions. These revised versions of the MSDSs were not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Number 5625

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

2. Disclose that subchronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the lungs and eyes of laboratory animals;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 5626

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 5627

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 5628

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, male rat) value of 7 093 ppm for methyl methacrylate.

Registry Numbers 5629 and 5630

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the information pertaining to the alkylated amine ingredient by disclosing that it is a sensitizer.

Registry Number 5636

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number, percent concentration and Exposure Limit Values;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.0005 mg/m³ for strontium chromate;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statements to give water to drink and add advice to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded when transferring large quantities of the controlled product;

5. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical.

Registry Number 5637

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;

2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Numbers 5640 and 5641

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;

2. Registry Number 5640: Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

3. Registry Number 5641:

(a) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused respiratory sensitization in one worker;

(b) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 5644

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 50 ppm (skin) and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 100 ppm (skin) for tetrahydrofuran;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statements to give water to drink and add advice to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

3. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded when transferring large quantities of the controlled product;

4. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in an in vivo screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 5651

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical.

Registry Number 5652

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical.

Registry Number 5672

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of amorphous silica in the controlled product, its CAS registry number and its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the presence of 2-butanone in the controlled product, its CAS registry number 78-93-3 and its percent concentration;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm, ACGIH TLV–STEL = 300 ppm and OSHA PEL = 200 ppm for 2-butanone;

4. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;

5. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the lungs of laboratory animals.

Registry Number 5675

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical.

Registry Number 5676

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose that grounded equipment be used when handling quantities of the controlled product;

3. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;

4. Disclose that acute ingestion of high doses of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system effects and that chronic ingestion has been shown to cause testicular and kidney effects in laboratory animals;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 5677

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable."

Registry Numbers 5680 and 5681

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";

2. Disclose a statement indicating that users should comply with all federal, provincial and local regulations when disposing of waste from the controlled product;

3. Registry Number 5680:

(a) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

(b) Disclose that phenolic epoxy resin No. 2 has caused respiratory sensitization in one worker;

4. Registry Number 5681:

(a) Disclose an Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 5 ppm with a skin notation for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

(b) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 30 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

(c) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 5686

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";

2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 5687

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.46 mL/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.38 mL/kg for 2-ethylhexanol;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be a moderate skin irritant in rabbits;

3. Disclose that exposure to vapours of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused effects on the central nervous system in laboratory animals;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Number 5689

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 400 ppm for isopropanol;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.05 mg/m³ (respirable) A2 and OSHA–PEL = 30 mg/m³ divided by the value "%SiO₂+2" (total particulate) and either 10 mg/m³ divided by the value "%SiO₂+2" or 250 mppcf divided by the value "%SiO₂+5" (respirable fraction) for silica, quartz;

4. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";

5. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Numbers 5690, 5691, 5695 and 5696

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;

2. Registry Numbers 5690 and 5695:

(a) Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

(b) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 5806

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

2. Disclose the lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 143 ppm for BDMAEE;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.

Registry Number 5809

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement "If patient is fully conscious, give two glasses of water";

2. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the bone marrow and liver as well as sperm effects in laboratory animals;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 4 000 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 9.53 mL/kg for ethylene glycol.

Registry Number 5810

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

2. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the sperm in laboratory animals;

3. Disclose the lower LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 4 g/kg for ethylene glycol;

4. Disclose the lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 143 ppm for BDMAEE;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.

Registry Number 5811

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

2. Disclose an LC₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 5812

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

2. Disclose the lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 143 ppm for BDMAEE;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 5813

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement "If patient is fully conscious, give two glasses of milk or water at once";

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes";

5. Disclose the lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 143 ppm for BDMAEE;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Numbers 5814 and 5823

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 5834 and 5835

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

2. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 5844

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information for skin and eye contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that medical attention be obtained immediately;

2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose an LC₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 5856

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Correctly identify the ACGIH TLV–TWA and TLV–STEL values for the ingredients methyl ethyl ketone and xylene;

5. Disclose the lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, female rat) value of 19.0 mg/L for toluene;

6. Disclose the lower LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for xylene;

7. Disclose that acute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused CNS and neurobehavioural effects and that chronic inhalation has caused colour vision loss;

8. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the testes of laboratory animals;

9. Disclose that chronic inhalation of ingredients in the controlled product has been shown to cause hearing loss in laboratory animals;

10. Disclose that acute oral exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause temporary visual disturbances in laboratory animals;

11. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause hearing loss as well as affect the immune system in laboratory animals;

12. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in in vivo screening tests for mutagenicity, and disclose that another ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in an in vitro screening test for mutagenicity;

13. Disclose that acetylsalicylic acid synergistically enhances the hearing loss caused by inhalation exposure to toluene in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 5858

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 5864

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. Disclose appropriate instructions for the safe handling and storage of corrosive materials;

4. Remove the ambiguity in the statements pertaining to an LC₅₀ value applicable to the hazardous ingredient 4,4'-isopropylidenediphenol-epichlorohydrin polymer;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Numbers 5910 and 5911

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Delete the statement that amorphous silica is not WHMIS regulated;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, modify or remove the statement to give water to drink;

5. Disclose appropriate instructions for the safe handling and storage of corrosive materials;

6. Remove the ambiguity in the statements pertaining to an LC₅₀ value applicable to the hazardous ingredient 4,4'-isopropylidenediphenol-epichlorohydrin polymer;

7. Disclose an LC₅₀ (1 hour, rat) range of 1.26 mg/L to 2.83 mg/L for amorphous silica;

8. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Numbers 5929 and 5932

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose methyl methacrylate as a hazardous thermal decomposition product.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDSs-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with copies of revised versions. These revised versions of the MSDSs were not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Numbers 5939 and 5940

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm for isopropanol;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm for n-butyl acetate;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is incompatible with aluminum and potassium tert-butoxide and that an explosion may result if these ingredients are mixed with the controlled product;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped. Also add that medical attention should be obtained immediately;

5. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition or combustion products;

6. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.71 g/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 16.4 mL/kg and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 16 970 ppm for isopropanol;

7. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 10.2 g/kg and an LC₅₀ (4 hour, aerosol, rat) value of 160 ppm for n-butyl acetate;

8. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product are considered to be fetotoxins;

9. Disclose that acute ingestion of ingredients of the controlled product has caused adverse CNS effects and gastrointestinal tract disturbances;

10. Disclose that acute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause irritation of the respiratory tract and adverse CNS and lung effects in laboratory animals;

11. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause testicular and kidney effects in laboratory animals;

12. Registry Number 5939:

(a) Disclose the presence of xylene in the controlled product, its CAS registry number 1330-20-7 and its percent concentration;

(b) Correct the contradictory information pertaining to the physical state of the controlled product;

(c) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that care should be taken during flushing not to rinse contaminated water into the unaffected eye or face and that medical advice should be obtained immediately;

(d) Disclose that a third ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDSs-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with copies of revised versions. These revised versions of the MSDSs were not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Number 5950

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Delete the statement that amorphous silica is not WHMIS regulated;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, modify or remove the statement to give water to drink;

5. Remove the ambiguity in the statements pertaining to an LC₅₀ value applicable to the hazardous ingredient 4,4'-isopropylidenediphenol-epichlorohydrin polymer;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 5974

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed. Also disclose that contaminated clothing, including contaminated footwear and leather goods, should be removed under running water;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

5. Correct the impression that the alkyl phenol ethoxylate is merely mildly irritating as opposed to being a severely irritating material;

6. Disclose a dermal LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.

Registry Number 5977

In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give a casualty large quantities of water to drink;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Having regard to the foregoing, and pursuant to section 17 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, notice is hereby given that the Screening Officer has, for each of the above-noted claims, with the exceptions of those claims bearing Registry Numbers 5487, 5628, 5834, 5835, 5876 and 5976, directed the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the Screening Officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5628, 5834 and 5835, the Screening Officer has ordered the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario, except that the information in respect of which the claims for exemption were made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide copies of the amended MSDSs to the Screening Officer, within the respective time period specified in the foregoing paragraph.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 5487, the Screening Officer has ordered the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Code of the Province of Alberta, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the Screening Officer within the respective time period specified in the foregoing paragraph.

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the Screening Officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a Screening Officer. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Acting Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, (613) 993-4472.

R. BOARDMAN 
Chief Screening Officer 

[5-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Filing of a claim for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 12(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the receipt of the claims for exemption listed below.

Claimant	Subject of the Claim for Exemption	Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)	Registry Number
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	Chemical identity of six ingredients	Corrosion Inhibitor A262	6306
Shell Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	Chemical identity of one ingredient	FORMAD05A	6411
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	Chemical identity of one ingredient	Developmental Gelling Agent XE119	6413

The above claims seek exemption from the disclosure of employer confidential information in respect of a controlled product which would otherwise be required to be disclosed by the provisions of the applicable provincial legislation relating to occupational health and safety.

Claimant	Subject of the Claim for Exemption	Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)	Registry Number
Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario	Chemical identity of two ingredients	Paraloid(TM) BTA-717 Impact Modifier	6275
The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	Chemical identity of one ingredient	ULTRAZOL (TM) 8219D	6276
Hexion Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., Oshawa, Ontario	Chemical identity of two ingredients	Fentak (TM) UR0269	6277
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity of three ingredients	ARMOLUBE (TM) 104 PG	6278
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	Chemical identity of one ingredient	OLOA ® 273	6279
CESI Chemical, Marlow, Oklahoma	Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients	FE-1	6280
Dow Corning Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Chemical identity of two ingredients	SYL-OFF® SL-7 CROSSLINKER	6281
Dow Corning Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Chemical identity of two ingredients	SYL-OFF ® SL 4 CROSSLINKER	6282
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	Chemical identity of two ingredients	LUBRIZOL ® 9690	6283
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	Chemical identity of one ingredient	3M (TM) BRAND SUPER TRIM ADHESIVE P/N 08090	6284
Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario	Chemical identity of one ingredient	EC9541A	6285
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	SPONTO ® 22	6286
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity of one ingredient	C-5777	6287
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity of one ingredient	MORWET ® B POWDER	6288
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity of one ingredient	MORWET ® D-425 POWDER	6289
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	SPONTO ® 300T	6290
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients	SPONTO ® 33	6291
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients	SPONTO ® 500T	6292
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	SPONTO ® AD-11-1A	6293
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of six ingredients	SPONTO ® 727	6294
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	SPONTO ® N-141B	6295
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	SPONTO ® N-500B	6296
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of five ingredients	SPONTO ® N-723	6297
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients	SPONTO ® AM-1-23C	6298
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients	SPONTO ® AM-1-23D	6299
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of five ingredients	SPONTO ® EC-300	6300
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	WITCOMUL (TM) 4050	6301
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity of one ingredient	ARMOHIB ® PC-105	6302
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	WITBREAK (TM) 770	6303
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	WITBREAK (TM) DRM-9510	6304
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	WITCOMUL (TM) 3158	6305
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	1857-262 26G WHITE	6307
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	COLORTREND ® 888-0018 KX TITANIUM WHITE	6308
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	COLORTREND ® C888-0055 KX TITANIUM WHITE	6309
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	61-617 KX WHITE	6310
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	COLORTREND ® C888-078 KX TITANIUM WHITE	6311
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	COLORTREND ® C817-0422 V MAGENTA	6312
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	COLORTREND ® C888-0424 V MAGENTA	6313
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	COLORTREND ® C888-0455 V55 MAGENTA	6314
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	COLORTREND ® C888-1075 F RED OXIDE	6315
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	COLORTREND ® C888-1055 F55 OXIDE RED	6316
Arkema Canada Inc., Oakville, Ontario	Chemical identity of three ingredients	THERMOLITE ® 176	6317
Arkema Canada Inc., Oakville, Ontario	Chemical identity of three ingredients	PA-1121	6318
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	1857-431 43Z PHTHALO GREEN	6319
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	1857-235 23D BLUE	6320
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	888-0426 COLORTREND® MAGENTA V	6321
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	888-0787 COLORTREND® FAST RED	6322
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	COLORTREND® RN RED	6323
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-0955 COLORTREND® Dinitro Orange	6324
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-2503 COLORTREND® HANSA YELLOW	6325
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-2555 COLORTREND® A55 YELLOW	6326
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-2573 COLORTREND® A Yellow	6327
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-5511 COLORTREND® PHTHALO GREEN D	6328
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-5555 COLORTREND® D55 PHTHALO GREEN	6329
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-5571 COLORTREND® D GREEN	6330
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	888-7255 COLORTREND® E55 BLUE	6331
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	888-7274 COLORTREND® E BLUE	6332
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients	888-0427 COLORTREND® MAGENTA V	6333
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	61-604 D GREEN	6334
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	61-605 E BLUE	6335
Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario	Chemical identity of one ingredient	NALCO ® EC5494A	6336
Octel Starreon LLC, Newark, Delaware	Chemical identity of two ingredients	Octel Starreon DDA-3565 ej8	6337
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-0001 COLORTREND®CLEAR TONER	6338
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-0716 COLORTREND®R Naphthol Red	6339
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-0755 COLORTREND® R55 Naphthol Red	6340
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-0801 COLORTREND®STRONG RED Z	6341
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-0836 COLORTREND®ORGANIC RED R	6342
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	COLORTREND® 888-0876 R Red	6343
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-0979 COLORTREND®PERMA CAL ORANGE GX	6344
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-4205 COLORTREND® CHROMIUM OXIDE K	6345
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-7214 COLORTREND®PHTHALO BLUE E	6346
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-8895 COLORTREND®J Carbazole Violet	6347
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-8895 COLORTREND® CARBAZOLE VIOLET J	6348
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	817-1035 COLORTREND® RED OXIDE F	6349
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-1045 COLORTREND® RED OXIDE F	6350
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	817-1065 COLORTREND®F Red Oxide	6351
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients	888-2040 COLORTREND®MEDIUM YELLOW T	6352
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-2501 COLORTREND®YELLOW	6353
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-2504 COLORTREND®PERMA CAL YELLOW AX	6354
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-2551 COLORTREND®ORGANIC YELLOW AXX	6355
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	1857-244 24E RED OXIDE	6356
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	817-2542 COLORTREND®SS ORGANIC YELLOW	6357
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	1857-565 MX HIGH STRENGTH MAGENTA	6358
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	61-621 V MAGENTA	6359
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	61-606 F RED OXIDE	6360
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	61-624-10 AXX YELLOW	6361
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	817-1870 COLORTREND®YELLOW OXIDE C	6362
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	817-2009 COLORTREND® Raw Umber	6363
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	1857-226 22C YELLOW OXIDE	6364
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	1857-217 21B BLACK	6365
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	817-1575 COLORTREND®I Brown Oxide	6366
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-0848 COLORTREND® RED SS	6367
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-1355 COLORTREND®U Burnt Umber	6368
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-1572 COLORTREND®BROWN OXIDE I	6369
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-1582 COLORTREND®I BROWN OXIDE	6370
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-1810 COLORTREND®YELLOW OXIDE C	6371
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-1855 COLORTREND® C55 Yellow Oxide	6373
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	888-2009 COLORTREND®RAW UMBER L	6374
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-2079 COLORTREND®L RAW UMBER	6375
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	8882529 COLORTREND® Permanent Yellow	6376
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-9907 COLORTREND®LAMP BLACK	6377
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-9955 COLORTREND® B55 BLACK	6378
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-9977 COLORTREND®B BLACK	6379
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	1857-397 U BROWN OXIDE	6380
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	1857-538 JX HIGH STRENGTH RED	6381
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	817-0021 COLORTREND®VV TITANIUM WHITE	6382
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	817-1066 COLORTREND® MM RED OXIDE	6383
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	817-1866 COLORTREND®JJ YELLOW OXIDE	6384
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	817-5546 COLORTREND®PP PHTHALO GREEN	6385
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	888-1870 COLORTREND®C YELLOW OXIDE	6386
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	1857-271 27H UMBER	6387
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	61-619 SS DURABLE RED	6388
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	61-609 I BROWN OXIDE	6389
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	61-603 C YELLOW OXIDE	6390
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	61-612 RAW UMBER	6391
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	61-602 B BLACK	6392
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	888-2055 COLORTREND® L55 Raw Umber	6393
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	802-0018 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) TITANIUM WHITE	6394
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	802-0426 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) MAGENTA	6395
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	802-0836 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) ORGANIC RED	6396
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	802-1045 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) RED OXIDE	6397
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	802-1572 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) BROWN OXIDE	6398
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	802-1811 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) YELLOW OXIDE	6399
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	802-2009 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) RAW UMBER	6400
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	802-2551 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) ORGANIC YELLOW	6401
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	802-5511 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) PHTHALO GREEN	6402
Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients	802-9907 COLORTREND®PLUS (TM) LAMP BLACK	6403
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	PHOTOMER 3215	6404
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient	WATERPOXY 1455	6405
Arr-Maz Products, L.P., Winter Haven, Florida	Chemical identity of one ingredient	AD-Here LOF 65-00	6406
Hexion Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., Oshawa, Ontario	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	Fentak(TM) F0306H	6407
Hexion Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc., Oshawa, Ontario	Chemical identity of three ingredients	Fentak (TM) CT0778	6408
Reichhold, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina	Chemical identity of four ingredients	EPOTUF ® 37-703	6409
BYK-Chemie USA, Wallingford, Connecticut	Chemical identity of one ingredient	BYK-9077	6410
Cansolv Technologies Inc., Montréal, Quebec	Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients	Cansolv® DC 101 Solvent	6412
Raybo Chemical Company, Huntington, West Virginia	Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients	Raybo 90 NoRust NF	6414
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	Chemical identity of one ingredient	Mining Liner ML-A100	6415
Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario	Chemical identity of two ingredients	J507 High-Temp Acid Gelling agent	6416
Hercules Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	Chemical identity of two ingredients	Zenix® DC3978 WET END DEPOSIT CONTROL AGENT	6417
BYK-Chemie USA, Wallingford, Connecticut	Chemical identity of one ingredient	BYK®-W-969	6418
Huntsman Corp., The Woodlands, Texas	Chemical identity of one ingredient	Rubinate ® 1790	6420
Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey	Chemical identity of three ingredients	CYCOM ® 7277 Glass Prepreg	6421
BASF Canada Inc., Toronto, Ontario	Chemical identity of one ingredient	Luttensol® XP 80	6422
Bio-Lab Canada Inc., Scarborough, Ontario	Chemical identity of two ingredients	Bellasol S60	6423
Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas	Chemical identity of one ingredient	TRETOLITE* RBW518 WATER CLARIFIER	6424

The above claims seek exemption from the disclosure of supplier confidential business information in respect of a controlled product; such disclosure would otherwise be required under the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act.

Subsection 12(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act requires that this notice contain a statement offering every affected party the opportunity to make written representations to the screening officer with respect to the claim for exemption and the material safety data sheet to which it relates.

Under the provisions of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, "affected party," for purposes of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, means, in respect of a controlled product that is the subject of a claim for exemption, a person who is not a competitor of the claimant and who uses, supplies or is otherwise involved in the use or supply of the controlled product at a work place, and includes

(a) a supplier of the controlled product;

(b) an employee at the work place;

(c) an employer at the work place;

(d) a safety and health professional for the work place;

(e) a safety and health representative or a member of a safety and health committee for the work place; and

(f) a person who is authorized in writing to represent

(i) a supplier referred to in paragraph (a) or an employer referred to in paragraph (c), or

(ii) an employee referred to in paragraph (b), except where that person is an official or a representative of a trade union that is not certified or recognized in respect of the work place.

Written representations respecting a claim for exemption cited in the present notice, or the material safety data sheet to which the claim relates, must cite the appropriate Registry Number, state the reasons and evidence upon which the representations are based and be delivered within 30 days of the date of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Screening Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3.

R. BOARDMAN 
Chief Screening Officer 

[5-1-o]

(Erratum)

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Filing of a claim for exemption

The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, Vol. 138, No. 29, dated Saturday, July 17, 2004, identified the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6016, 6017 and 6018 as having been filed by Degussa Canada Inc. of Brampton, Ontario.

Notice is hereby given that the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6016 and 6017 were, in fact, filed by Shlumberger Canada Limited of Calgary, Alberta, and the claim bearing Registry Number 6018 was filed by Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada, Inc. of Mississauga, Ontario.

Subsection 12(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act requires that this notice contain a statement offering every affected party the opportunity to make written representations to the screening officer with respect to the claim for exemption and the material safety data sheet to which it relates.

Under the provisions of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, "affected party," for purposes of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, means, in respect of a controlled product that is the subject of a claim for exemption, a person who is not a competitor of the claimant and who uses, supplies or is otherwise involved in the use or supply of the controlled product at a work place, and includes

(a) a supplier of the controlled product;

(b) an employee at the work place;

(c) an employer at the work place;

(d) a safety and health professional for the work place;

(e) a safety and health representative or a member of a safety and health committee for the work place; and

(f) a person who is authorized in writing to represent

(i) a supplier referred to in paragraph (a) or an employer referred to in paragraph (c), or

(ii) an employee referred to in paragraph (b), except where that person is an official or a representative of a trade union that is not certified or recognized in respect of the work place.

Written representations respecting a claim for exemption cited in the present notice, or the material safety data sheet to which the claim relates, must cite the appropriate Registry Number, state the reasons and evidence upon which the representations are based and be delivered within 30 days of the date of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Screening Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3.

R. BOARDMAN 
Chief Screening Officer 

[5-1-o]

NAFTA SECRETARIAT

COMPLETION OF PANEL REVIEW

Hard red spring wheat from Canada

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to subrule 78(b) of the NAFTA Article 1904 Panel Rules, that the binational panel review of the Final Determination of material injury to a domestic industry made by the United States International Trade Commission, concerning Hard Red Spring Wheat from Canada, is completed (Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-2003-1904-06).

On December 12, 2005, the binational panel affirmed the investigating authority's determination on remand, respecting Hard Red Spring Wheat from Canada.

No Request for an Extraordinary Challenge Committee has been filed with the responsible Secretary. Therefore, pursuant to subrule 78(b) of the NAFTA Article 1904 Panel Rules, this Notice of Completion of Panel Review is effective on January 24, 2006, the 31st day following the date on which the responsible Secretary issued the Notice of Final Panel Action.

Explanatory note

Chapter 19 of the North American Free Trade Agreement establishes a procedure for replacing domestic judicial review of determinations in antidumping and countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with review by binational panels.

These panels are established, when a Request for Panel Review is received by the NAFTA Secretariat, to act in place of national courts to review final determinations expeditiously to determine whether they are in accordance with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of the country that made the determination.

Under Article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement which came into force on January 1, 1994, the Government of Canada, the Government of the United States and the Government of Mexico established the Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews. These Rules were published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 1, 1994.

Requests for information concerning the present notice, or concerning the NAFTA Article 1904 Panel Rules, should be addressed to the Canadian Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Canadian Section, 90 Sparks Street, Suite 705, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B4, (613) 992-9388.

FRANÇOY RAYNAULD 
Canadian Secretary 

[5-1-o]

NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).