Canada Gazette
www.gazette.gc.ca
Common menu bar links
Vol. 140, No. 19 — May 13, 2006
COMMISSIONS
CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BOARD
CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND ATLANTIC ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT
Call for Bids No. NL06-1 (Jeanne d'Arc Basin)
The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board hereby gives notice of a call for the submission of bids in respect of three parcels in the Newfoundland and Labrador offshore area.
This notice of the Call for Bids No. NL06-1 is made pursuant and subject to the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, S.C. 1987, c. 3, and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Newfoundland and Labrador Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. C-2.
The following is a summary of the Call for Bids No. NL06-1:
(i) Sealed bids will be received by the Board prior to the time of closing of this call for bids. This call for bids will close at 4 p.m., Newfoundland Standard Time, on November 15, 2006, except as specifically provided for in the Call for Bids No. NL06-1;
(ii) All bids must be submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Call for Bids No. NL06-1;
(iii) The three parcels are located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador and are described in Schedule I. Exploration Licences may be issued for each parcel;
(iv) For the purpose of selecting a bid, the sole criterion to be used will be the total amount of money the bidder commits to expend on exploration on the respective parcel within Period I ("Work Expenditure Bid");
(v) A minimum bid of $1,000,000 will be required for each parcel in the Jeanne d'Arc Basin;
(vi) For each parcel, the Work Expenditure Bid must be accompanied by a bank draft or certified cheque in the amount of $10,000 ("Bid Deposit") made payable to the Receiver General. Furthermore, the successful bidder will be required to provide, within 15 days of notification of being the successful bidder, a promissory note in the amount of 25% of the Work Expenditure Bid ("Security Deposit"). A credit against the Security Deposit will be made on the basis of 25% of allowable expenditures as described in Schedule III of the Exploration Licence ("Allowable Expenditures");
(vii) Each successful bidder will receive a refund, without interest, of the Bid Deposit when the Security Deposit is posted within 15 days. Failure to post the Security Deposit within 15 days will result in forfeiture of the Bid Deposit and disqualification of the bid.
Upon the announcement of the bid results, the Bid Deposits of unsuccessful bidders will be returned, without interest, as soon as possible;
(viii) For each parcel, an Exploration Licence will be issued for a term of nine years consisting of two consecutive periods of five years (Period I) and four years (Period II). Period I may be extended to six years by posting an additional deposit of $1,000,000 as security for drilling a well; Period II will comprise the balance of the nine-year term;
(ix) For each parcel, the licence requirement will be one well to be commenced within Period I and diligently pursued thereafter;
(x) For each parcel, rentals will be applicable only in Period II at the following rates:
1st year — $5.00 per hectare
2nd year — $10.00 per hectare
3rd year — $15.00 per hectare
4th year — $15.00 per hectare
When an Exploration Licence continues in force beyond Period II, rentals will be payable at the rates applicable during the last year of Period II.
Rentals will be payable annually, in advance, and are to be submitted by cheque payable to the Receiver General, except for rentals applicable to an Exploration Licence continuing beyond Period II, which will be payable monthly, in advance, at the rate of one-twelfth (1/12) of the applicable annual rates.
Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of 100% of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of Allowable Expenditures for that year.
Carry forward provisions to reduce rentals otherwise payable in ensuing rental years will apply.
Rentals will apply to lands subject to a declaration of significant discovery during the term of the Exploration Licence at the rates and levels of refundability specified above;
(xi) An Allowable Expenditure schedule will have application throughout Period I of the Exploration Licence. The rates of Allowable Expenditures will be reviewed, and may be amended, at the expiration of Period I;
(xii) Rentals (Significant Discovery Licence)
Each Significant Discovery Licence shall be subject to the following rental regime after the expiration of the term of the Exploration Licence of origin:
(a) Rentals on Significant Discovery Licences, following the expiry date of the Exploration Licence, shall be at the following base rates:
Year 1 to 5 — $20.00 per hectare
Year 6 to 10 — $80.00 per hectare
Year 11 to 15 — $200.00 per hectare
Year 16 to 20 — $800.00 per hectare
The rental rates applicable to any Significant Discovery Licence resulting from Call for Bids No. NL06-1 will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2007 dollars.
(b) Rental rates of $800.00 will increase by $100.00 for each year beyond year 20, and will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2007 dollars until the Significant Discovery Licence is relinquished or converted to a Production Licence. For greater certainty, the interest owner may relinquish lands to reduce future rental payments.
(c) There shall be no carry forward of excess allowable expenditures from Exploration Licences.
(d) Rentals are to be submitted by bank draft or certified cheque payable to the Receiver General.
(e) For greater certainty, rentals shall be calculated on the basis of the total hectarage of lands held as part of the Significant Discovery Licence, as of the anniversary date.
(f) Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of one hundred percent (100%) of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of allowable expenditures for that year;
(xiii) A successful bidder will be required to comply with the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Benefits procurement, employment and reporting procedures as established by the Board;
(xiv) The parcels will be subject to the payment of issuance fees and Environmental Studies Research Fund levies;
(xv) The Board is not obliged to accept any bid or issue any interest as a result of this call for bids;
(xvi) Any licence that may be issued shall be in the form of the Exploration Licence attached to the Call for Bids No. NL06-1; and
(xvii) The full text of Call for Bids No. NL06-1 is available on the Board's Web site (www.cnlopb.nl.ca) or upon request made to the Registrar, Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, TD Place, Fifth Floor, 140 Water Street, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 6H6, (709) 778-1400.
FRED WAY
Acting Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
SCHEDULE I
LAND DESCRIPTION
CALL FOR BIDS NO. NL06-1
(Jeanne d'Arc Basin)
Parcel No. 1
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote a) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 46°40' N, 47°45' W | 11-50, 51-56, 61-66, 71-76, 81-86, 91-96. | 24 838 |
| Total | 24 838 |
Parcel No. 2
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote b) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 46°30' N, 47°45' W | 89, 90, 99, 100. | 1 420 |
| 46°30' N, 48°00' W | 7-10, 17-20, 25-30, 35-40, 45-50, 55-60, 65-70, 74-80, 84-90, 94-100. | 20 984 |
| 46°40' N, 48°00' W | 71-73, 81-83, 91-95. | 3 905 |
| 46°40' N, 48°15' W | 3-5, 13-15. | 2 130 |
| 46°30' N, 48°15' W | 6-10, 20. | 2 133 |
| Total | 30 572 |
Parcel No. 3
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote c) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 46°30' N, 48°15' W | 2-5, 12-15, 22-25, 31-35, 41-45, 51-55, 61-65, 71-75, 81-85, 91-95. | 16 732 |
| 46°20' N, 48°15' W | 40, 50, 59, 60, 69, 70, 79, 80, 89, 90, 99, 100. | 4 277 |
| Total | 21 009 |
[19-1-o]
CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BOARD
CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND ATLANTIC ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT
Call for Bids No. NL06-2 (Sydney Basin)
The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board hereby gives notice of a call for the submission of bids in respect of three parcels in the Newfoundland and Labrador offshore area.
This notice of the Call for Bids No. NL06-2 is made pursuant and subject to the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, S.C. 1987, c. 3, and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Newfoundland and Labrador Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. C-2.
The following is a summary of the Call for Bids No. NL06-2:
(i) Sealed bids will be received by the Board prior to the time of closing of this call for bids. This call for bids will close at 4 p.m., Newfoundland Standard Time, on November 30, 2006, except as specifically provided for in the Call for Bids No. NL06-2;
(ii) All bids must be submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Call for Bids No. NL06-2;
(iii) The three parcels are located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador and are described in Schedule I. Exploration Licences may be issued for each parcel;
(iv) For the purpose of selecting a bid, the sole criterion to be used will be the total amount of money the bidder commits to expend on exploration on the respective parcel within Period I ("Work Expenditure Bid");
(v) A minimum bid of $1,000,000 will be required for each parcel in the Sydney Basin;
(vi) For each parcel, the Work Expenditure Bid must be accompanied by a bank draft or certified cheque in the amount of $10,000 ("Bid Deposit") made payable to the Receiver General. Furthermore, the successful bidder will be required to provide, within 15 days of notification of being the successful bidder, a promissory note in the amount of 25% of the Work Expenditure Bid ("Security Deposit"). A credit against the Security Deposit will be made on the basis of 25% of allowable expenditures as described in Schedule III of the Exploration Licence ("Allowable Expenditures");
(vii) Each successful bidder will receive a refund, without interest, of the Bid Deposit when the Security Deposit is posted within 15 days. Failure to post the Security Deposit within 15 days will result in forfeiture of the Bid Deposit and disqualification of the bid.
Upon the announcement of the bid results, the Bid Deposits of unsuccessful bidders will be returned, without interest, as soon as possible;
(viii) For each parcel, an Exploration Licence will be issued for a term of nine years consisting of two consecutive periods of five years (Period I) and four years (Period II). Period I may be extended to six years by posting an additional deposit of $1,000,000 as security for drilling a well; Period II will comprise the balance of the nine-year term;
(ix) For each parcel, the licence requirement will be one well to be commenced within Period I and diligently pursued thereafter;
(x) For each parcel, rentals will be applicable only in Period II at the following rates:
1st year — $2.50 per hectare
2nd year — $5.00 per hectare
3rd year — $7.50 per hectare
4th year — $7.50 per hectare
When an Exploration Licence continues in force beyond Period II, rentals will be payable at the rates applicable during the last year of Period II.
Rentals will be payable annually, in advance, and are to be submitted by cheque payable to the Receiver General, except for rentals applicable to an Exploration Licence continuing beyond Period II, which will be payable monthly, in advance, at the rate of one-twelfth (1/12) of the applicable annual rates.
Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of 100% of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of Allowable Expenditures for that year.
Carry forward provisions to reduce rentals otherwise payable in ensuing rental years will apply.
Rentals will apply to lands subject to a declaration of significant discovery during the term of the Exploration Licence at the rates and levels of refundability specified above;
(xi) An Allowable Expenditure schedule will have application throughout Period I of the Exploration Licence. The rates of Allowable Expenditures will be reviewed, and may be amended, at the expiration of Period I;
(xii) Rentals (Significant Discovery Licence)
Each Significant Discovery Licence shall be subject to the following rental regime after the expiration of the term of the Exploration Licence of origin:
(a) Rentals on Significant Discovery Licences, following the expiry date of the Exploration Licence, shall be at the following base rates:
Year 1 to 5 — $0.00 per hectare
Year 6 to 10 — $40.00 per hectare
Year 11 to 15 — $100.00 per hectare
Year 16 to 20 — $800.00 per hectare
The rental rates applicable to any Significant Discovery Licence resulting from Call for Bids No. NL06-2 will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2007 dollars.
(b) Rental rates of $800.00 will increase by $100.00 for each year beyond year 20, and will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2007 dollars until the Significant Discovery Licence is relinquished or converted to a Production Licence. For greater certainty, the interest owner may relinquish lands to reduce future rental payments.
(c) There shall be no carry forward of excess allowable expenditures from Exploration Licences.
(d) Rentals are to be submitted by bank draft or certified cheque payable to the Receiver General.
(e) For greater certainty, rentals shall be calculated on the basis of the total hectarage of lands held as part of the Significant Discovery Licence, as of the anniversary date.
(f) Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of one hundred percent (100%) of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of allowable expenditures for that year;
(xiii) A successful bidder will be required to comply with the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Benefits procurement, employment and reporting procedures as established by the Board;
(xiv) The parcels will be subject to the payment of issuance fees and Environmental Studies Research Fund levies;
(xv) The Board is not obliged to accept any bid or issue any interest as a result of this call for bids;
(xvi) Any licence that may be issued shall be in the form of the Exploration Licence attached to the Call for Bids No. NL06-2; and
(xvii) The full text of Call for Bids No. NL06-2 is available on the Board's Web site (www.cnlopb.nl.ca) or upon request made to the Registrar, Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, TD Place, Fifth Floor, 140 Water Street, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 6H6, (709) 778-1400.
FRED WAY
Acting Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
SCHEDULE I
LAND DESCRIPTION
CALL FOR BIDS NO. NL06-2
(Sydney Basin)
Parcel No. 1
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote d) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 46°40' N, 57°45' W | 6-10, 16-20, 26-30, 36-40, 46-50, 56-60, 66-70, 76-80, 86-90, 96-100. | 17 720 |
| 46°50' N, 57°45' W | 1-100. | 35 370 |
| 47°00' N, 57°45' W | 1-5, 11-15, 21-25, 31-35, 41-45, 51-55, 61-65, 71-75, 81-85, 91-95. | 17 650 |
| 46°40' N, 58°00' W | 6-10, 16-20, 26-30, 36-40, 46-50, 56-60, 66-70, 76-80, 86-90, 96-100. | 17 720 |
| 46°50' N, 58°00' W | 1-100. | 35 370 |
| 47°00' N, 58°00' W | 1-5, 11-15, 21-25, 31-35, 41-45, 51-55, 61-65, 71-75, 81-85, 91-95. | 17 650 |
| 46°50' N, 58°15' W | 1-100. | 35 370 |
| 47°00' N, 58°15' W | 1-5, 11-15, 21-25, 31-35, 41-45, 51-55, 61-65, 71-76, 81-86, 91-96. | 18 709 |
| 46°40' N, 58°15' W | 6-10, 16-20, 26-30, 36-40, 46-50, 57-60, 67-70, 78-80, 89, 90, 100 and includes all portions of sections 56, 66, 76, 77, 87, 88, 98 and 99 northeast of boundary line. | 15 136 |
| 46°40' N, 58°30' W | Includes all portions of sections 9, 10 and 20 northeast of boundary line. | 522 |
| 46°50' N, 58°30' W | 1-10, 12-20, 22-30, 33-40, 44-50, 55-60, 66-70, 76-80, 87-90, 98-100 and includes all portions of sections 11, 21, 31, 32, 42, 43, 53, 54, 64, 65, 75, 85, 86, 96 and 97 northeast of boundary line. | 26 020 |
| 47°00' N, 58°30' W | 1-6, 11-16, 21-26, 31-35, 41-45, 51-55, 61-65, 71-75, 81-85, 91-95. | 18 709 |
| 46°50' N, 58°45' W | 9, 10, 20, 30 and includes all portions of sections 7, 8, 18, 19, 29, 39, 40 and 50 northeast of boundary line. | 2 660 |
| 47°00' N, 58°45' W | 1-5, 11-15, 21-25, 31-35, 42-45, 53-55, 64, 65, 74, 75, 85 and includes all portions of 41, 51, 52, 62, 63, 73, 83, 84, 94 and 95 northeast of boundary line. | 13 237 |
| 47°00' N, 59°00' W | Includes all portions of section 5 northeast of boundary line. | 48 |
| Total | 271 891 |
Parcel No. 2
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote e) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 47°00' N, 57°45' W | 56-60, 66-70, 76-80, 86-90, 96-100. | 8 805 |
| 47°10' N, 57°45' W | 51-100. | 17 575 |
| 47°20' N, 57°45' W | 51-100. | 17 520 |
| 47°00' N, 58°00' W | 6-10, 16-20, 26-30, 36-40, 46-50, 56-60, 66-70, 76-80, 86-90, 96-100. | 17 610 |
| 47°10' N, 58°00' W | 1-100. | 35 150 |
| 47°20' N, 58°00' W | 1-100. | 35 040 |
| 47°00' N, 58°15' W | 6-10, 16-20, 26-30, 36-40, 46-50, 56-60, 66-70, 77-80, 87-90, 97-100. | 16 551 |
| 47°10' N, 58°15' W | 1-100. | 35 150 |
| 47°20' N, 58°15' W | 1-100. | 35 040 |
| 47°00' N, 58°30' W | 7-10, 17-20, 27-30. | 4 224 |
| 47°10' N, 58°30' W | 1-30, 33-40, 43-50. | 16 167 |
| 47°20' N, 58°30' W | 1-50. | 17 520 |
| Total | 256 352 |
Parcel No. 3
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote f) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 47°00' N, 59°00' W | 7-10, 18-20, 29, 30, 40 and includes all portions of sections 6, 16, 17, 27, 28, 38, 39, 49, 50 and 60 northeast of boundary line. | 5 091 |
| 47°10' N, 59°00' W | 1-50, 52-60, 63-70, 75-80, 86-90, 97-100 and includes all portions of sections 51, 61, 62, 72-74, 84, 85, 95 and 96 northeast of boundary line. | 30 766 |
| 47°20' N, 59°00' W | 1-100. | 35 040 |
| 47°10' N, 59°15' W | 8-10, 19, 20, 30 and includes all portions of sections 6, 7, 17, 18, 28, 29, 39, 40 and 50 northeast of boundary line. | 3 771 |
| 47°20' N, 59°15' W | 1-40, 42-50, 53-60, 64-70, 75-80, 86-90, 97-100 and includes all portions of sections 41, 51, 52, 62, 63, 73, 74, 84, 85, 95 and 96 northeast of boundary line. | 26 427 |
| 47°20' N, 59°30' W | 8-10, 19, 20 and includes all portions of sections 6, 7, 17, 18, 29, 30 and 40 northeast of boundary line. | 2 800 |
| 47°00' N, 58°45' W | 6-10, 16-20, 26-30, 36-40, 46-50, 56-60, 66-70, 76-80, 86-90, 96-100. | 17 610 |
| 47°10' N, 58°45' W | 1-100. | 35 150 |
| 47°20' N, 58°45' W | 1-100. | 35 040 |
| 47°00' N, 58°30' W | 36-40, 46-50, 56-60, 66-70, 76-80, 86-90, 96-100. | 12 327 |
| 47°10' N, 58°30' W | 31, 32, 41, 42, 51-100. | 18 983 |
| 47°20' N, 58°30' W | 51-100. | 17 520 |
| Total | 240 525 |
[19-1-o]
CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BOARD
CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND ATLANTIC ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT
Call for Bids No. NL06-3 (Western Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Region)
The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board hereby gives notice of a call for the submission of bids in respect of five parcels in the Newfoundland and Labrador offshore area.
This notice of the Call for Bids No. NL06-3 is made pursuant and subject to the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, S.C. 1987, c. 3, and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Newfoundland and Labrador Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. C-2.
The following is a summary of the Call for Bids No. NL06-3:
(i) Sealed bids will be received by the Board prior to the time of closing of this call for bids. This call for bids will close at 4 p.m., Newfoundland Standard Time, on November 15, 2006, except as specifically provided for in the Call for Bids No. NL06-3;
(ii) All bids must be submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Call for Bids No. NL06-3;
(iii) The five parcels are located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador and are described in Schedule I. Exploration Licences may be issued for each parcel;
(iv) For the purpose of selecting a bid, the sole criterion to be used will be the total amount of money the bidder commits to expend on exploration on the respective parcel within Period I ("Work Expenditure Bid");
(v) A minimum bid of $250,000 will be required for each parcel in the Western Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Region;
(vi) For each parcel, the Work Expenditure Bid must be accompanied by a bank draft or certified cheque in the amount of $10,000 ("Bid Deposit") made payable to the Receiver General. Furthermore, the successful bidder will be required to provide, within 15 days of notification of being the successful bidder, a promissory note in the amount of 25% of the Work Expenditure Bid ("Security Deposit"). A credit against the Security Deposit will be made on the basis of 25% of allowable expenditures as described in Schedule III of the Exploration Licence ("Allowable Expenditures");
(vii) Each successful bidder will receive a refund, without interest, of the Bid Deposit when the Security Deposit is posted within 15 days. Failure to post the Security Deposit within 15 days will result in forfeiture of the Bid Deposit and disqualification of the bid.
Upon the announcement of the bid results, the Bid Deposits of unsuccessful bidders will be returned, without interest, as soon as possible;
(viii) For each parcel, an Exploration Licence will be issued for a term of nine years consisting of two consecutive periods of five years (Period I) and four years (Period II). Period I may be extended to six years by posting an additional deposit of $250,000 as security for drilling a well; Period II will comprise the balance of the nine-year term;
(ix) For each parcel, the licence requirement will be one well to be commenced within Period I and diligently pursued thereafter;
(x) For each parcel, rentals will be applicable only in Period II at the following rates:
1st year — $2.50 per hectare
2nd year — $5.00 per hectare
3rd year — $7.50 per hectare
4th year — $7.50 per hectare
When an Exploration Licence continues in force beyond Period II, rentals will be payable at the rates applicable during the last year of Period II.
Rentals will be payable annually, in advance, and are to be submitted by cheque payable to the Receiver General, except for rentals applicable to an Exploration Licence continuing beyond Period II, which will be payable monthly, in advance, at the rate of one-twelfth (1/12) of the applicable annual rates.
Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of 100% of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of Allowable Expenditures for that year.
Carry forward provisions to reduce rentals otherwise payable in ensuing rental years will apply.
Rentals will apply to lands subject to a declaration of significant discovery during the term of the Exploration Licence at the rates and levels of refundability specified above;
(xi) An Allowable Expenditure schedule will have application throughout Period I of the Exploration Licence. The rates of Allowable Expenditures will be reviewed, and may be amended, at the expiration of Period I;
(xii) Rentals (Significant Discovery Licence)
Each Significant Discovery Licence shall be subject to the following rental regime after the expiration of the term of the Exploration Licence of origin:
(a) Rentals on Significant Discovery Licences, following the expiry date of the Exploration Licence, shall be at the following base rates:
Year 1 to 5 — $0.00 per hectare
Year 6 to 10 — $40.00 per hectare
Year 11 to 15 — $100.00 per hectare
Year 16 to 20 — $800.00 per hectare
The rental rates applicable to any Significant Discovery Licence resulting from Call for Bids No. NL06-3 will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2007 dollars.
(b) Rental rates of $800.00 will increase by $100.00 for each year beyond year 20, and will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2007 dollars until the Significant Discovery Licence is relinquished or converted to a Production Licence. For greater certainty, the interest owner may relinquish lands to reduce future rental payments.
(c) There shall be no carry forward of excess allowable expenditures from Exploration Licences.
(d) Rentals are to be submitted by bank draft or certified cheque payable to the Receiver General.
(e) For greater certainty, rentals shall be calculated on the basis of the total hectarage of lands held as part of the Significant Discovery Licence, as of the anniversary date.
(f) Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of one hundred percent (100%) of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of allowable expenditures for that year;
(xiii) A successful bidder will be required to comply with the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Benefits procurement, employment and reporting procedures as established by the Board;
(xiv) The parcels will be subject to the payment of issuance fees and Environmental Studies Research Fund levies;
(xv) The Board is not obliged to accept any bid or issue any interest as a result of this call for bids;
(xvi) Any licence that may be issued shall be in the form of the Exploration Licence attached to the Call for Bids No. NL06-3; and
(xvii) The full text of Call for Bids No. NL06-3 is available on the Board's Web site (www.cnlopb.nl.ca) or upon request made to the Registrar, Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, TD Place, Fifth Floor, 140 Water Street, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 6H6, (709) 778-1400.
FRED WAY
Acting Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
SCHEDULE I
LAND DESCRIPTION
CALL FOR BIDS NO. NL06-3
(Western Newfoundland and
Labrador Offshore Region)
Parcel No. 1
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote g) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 48°10' N, 58°45' W | 100 and includes all portions of sections 89, 90 and 99 in the offshore area. | 762 |
| 48°10' N, 59°00' W | 9, 10, 19, 20, 29, 30, 38-40, 47-50, 57-60, 66-70, 76-80, 86-90, 96-100 and includes all portions of sections 8, 18, 27, 28, 36, 37, 46 and 56 in the offshore area. | 14 093 |
| 48°10' N, 59°15' W | 6-10, 16-20, 26-30, 36-40, 46-50, 56-60, 66-70, 76-80, 86-90, 96-100. | 17 240 |
| 48°20' N, 58°30' W | All portions of sections 90, 99 and 100 in the offshore area. | 638 |
| 48°20' N, 58°45' W | 9, 10, 19, 20, 28-30, 37-40, 46-50, 55-60, 63-70, 73-80, 82-100 and includes all portions of sections 8, 17, 18, 26, 27, 35, 36, 44, 45, 53, 54, 62, 71, 72 and 81 in the offshore area. | 22 827 |
| 48°20' N, 59°00' W | 1-100. | 34 380 |
| 48°20' N, 59°15' W | 1-100. | 34 380 |
| Total | 124 320 |
Parcel No. 2
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote h) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 49°30' N, 58°45' W | 1-100. | 33 600 |
| 49°30' N, 59°00' W | 1-100. | 33 600 |
| 49°20' N, 58°45' W | 1-100. | 33 710 |
| 49°20' N, 59°00' W | 1-100. | 33 710 |
| Total | 134 620 |
Parcel No. 3
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote i) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 49°50' N, 57°45' W | 68-70, 77-80, 85-90, 92-100 and includes all portions of sections 49, 50, 57-60, 66, 67, 74-76, 82-84 and 91 in the offshore area. | 10 125 |
| 49°50' N, 58°00' W | 1-100. | 33 370 |
| 49°50' N, 58°15' W | 1-100. | 33 370 |
| 49°50' N, 58°30' W | 1-100. | 33 370 |
| 50°00' N, 57°45' W | 20, 27-30, 37-40, 42-50, 52-100 and all portions of sections 7-10, 15-19, 24-26, 34-36, 41 and 51 in the offshore area. | 25 768 |
| 50°00' N, 58°00' W | 1-100. | 33 260 |
| 50°00' N, 58°15' W | 1-100. | 33 260 |
| 50°00' N, 58°30' W | 1-8, 11-18, 21-26, 31-36, 41-44, 51-54, 61, 62, 71, 72. | 13 316 |
| Total | 215 839 |
Parcel No. 4
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote j) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 50°10' N, 57°30' W | 70, 78-80, 86-90, 93-100 and all portions of sections 50, 59, 60, 67-69, 75-77, 84, 85, 91 and 92 in the offshore area. | 7 485 |
| 50°10' N, 57°45' W | 2-100 and all portions of section 1 in the offshore area. | 33 149 |
| 50°10' N, 58°00' W | 1-100. | 33 150 |
| 50°10' N, 58°15' W | 1-56, 61-66, 71, 72, 81 and 82. | 21 885 |
| 50°20' N, 57°30' W | 38-40, 45-51, 53-100 and all portions of sections 20, 27-30, 35-37, 41-44 and 52 in the offshore area. | 21 386 |
| 50°20' N, 57°45' W | 1-100. | 33 030 |
| 50°20' N, 58°00' W | 1-98. | 32 370 |
| 50°20' N, 58°15' W | 1-8, 11-14, 21-24. | 5 289 |
| Total | 187 744 |
Parcel No. 5
| Latitude/ Longitude (see footnote k) |
Sections | Hectares |
|---|---|---|
| 50°30' N, 57°15' W | 100 and all portions of sections 89, 90 and 96-99 in the offshore area. | 1 218 |
| 50°30' N, 57°30' W | 7-10, 15-100 and all portions of sections 4-6 and 11-14 in the offshore area. | 30 685 |
| 50°30' N, 57°45' W | 1-100. | 32 920 |
| 50°30' N, 58°00' W | 1-46, 51-56, 61-66, 71, 72, 81, 82. | 20 416 |
| 50°40' N, 57°15' W | 40, 48-50, 58-60, 66-70, 73-80, 82-100 and all portions of sections 37-39, 47, 55-57, 62-65, 71, 72 and 81 in the offshore area. | 14 521 |
| 50°40' N, 57°30' W | 1-100. | 32 800 |
| 50°40' N, 57°45' W | 1-97. | 31 817 |
| 50°40' N, 58°00' W | 1-7, 11-14, 21-24. | 4 923 |
| 50°50' N, 57°15' W | 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 51, 55, 61, 64, 65, 71-75, 81-85, 91-95 and all portions of sections 4, 14, 24, 31-34, 42-44, 52-54, 62 and 63 in the offshore area. | 8 607 |
| 50°50' N, 57°30' W | 1-5, 11-15, 21-25, 31-35, 41-45, 51-55, 61-65, 71-75, 81-85, 91-95. | 16 350 |
| 50°50' N, 57°45' W | 1-5, 11-15, 21-25, 31-35, 41-45, 51-55, 61, 71, 81. | 10 791 |
| Total | 205 048 |
[19-1-o]
CANADA REVENUE AGENCY
INCOME TAX ACT
Revocation of registration of a charity
The following notice of proposed revocation was sent to the charity listed below revoking it for failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act as listed in this notice:
"Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraphs 168(1)(b), 168(1)(d) and 168(1)(e) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charity listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(b) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette."
| Business Number | Name/Address |
|---|---|
| 864148044RR0001 | KIDS INTERNATIONAL DISCOVERING SAFETY FOUNDATION, CALGARY, ALTA. |
ELIZABETH TROMP
Director General
Charities Directorate
[19-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
INQUIRY
Educational and training services
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) has received a complaint (File No. PR-2006-008) from Calian Ltd. (Calian), of Ottawa, Ontario, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. W0114-050005/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services. The solicitation is for the provision of training services relating to basic military driving and vehicle maintenance. Pursuant to subsection 30.13(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act and subsection 7(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations, notice is hereby given that the Tribunal has decided to conduct an inquiry into the complaint.
It is alleged that a competitor of Calian improperly used serving Canadian Forces (CF) personnel attached to the unit that developed the statement of work for Solicitation No. W0114-050005/A to serve as its recruiters and to screen résumés for it relating to the subject solicitation. Calian also alleged that the CF members actively attempted to convince personnel not to work with Calian and that the competitor received additional information not available to other bidders as a result of this arrangement.
Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (telephone), (613) 990-2439 (fax).
Ottawa, May 2, 2006
HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary
[19-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
INQUIRY
Professional, administrative and management support services
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) has received a complaint (File No. PR-2006-007) from International Safety Research Inc. (ISR), of Ottawa, Ontario, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. 0D160-064128/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC) on behalf of the Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. The solicitation is for professional services for the development of the National Emergency Response System and associated plans and procedures. Pursuant to subsection 30.13(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act and subsection 7(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations, notice is hereby given that the Tribunal has decided to conduct an inquiry into the complaint.
It is alleged that PWGSC incorrectly declared ISR's proposal non-compliant.
Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (telephone), (613) 990-2439 (fax).
Ottawa, May 1, 2006
HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary
[19-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
ORDER
Garlic
In the matter of an expiry review, under subsection 76.03(3) of the Special Import Measures Act, of the finding of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made on May 2, 2001, in Inquiry No. NQ-2000-006, and of its order made on March 20, 2002, in Expiry Review No. RR-2001-001, continuing without amendment its finding made on March 21, 1997, in Inquiry No. NQ-96-002, concerning garlic originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China and Vietnam.
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal, under the provisions of subsection 76.03(3) of the Special Import Measures Act, has conducted an expiry review (Expiry Review No. RR-2005-001) of its finding made on May 2, 2001, in Inquiry No. NQ-2000-006, and of its order made on March 20, 2002, in Expiry Review No. RR-2001-001, continuing without amendment, its finding made on March 21, 1997, in Inquiry No. NQ-96-002, concerning garlic originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China and Vietnam.
Pursuant to subparagraph 76.03(12)(a)(ii) of the Special Import Measures Act, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal hereby rescinds its finding made on May 2, 2001, in Inquiry No. NQ-2000-006 in respect of garlic, fresh or frozen, originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China and Vietnam.
Ottawa, May 4, 2006
HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary
[19-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION OF INJURY
Cross-linked polyethylene tubing
In the matter of a preliminary injury inquiry, under subsection 34(2) of the Special Import Measures Act, respecting the dumping of cross-linked polyethylene tubing originating in or exported from the United States of America
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal, under the provisions of subsection 34(2) of the Special Import Measures Act, has conducted a preliminary injury inquiry (Preliminary Injury Inquiry No. PI-2005-002) into whether the evidence discloses a reasonable indication that the dumping of single or multilayer cross-linked polyethylene tubing in nominal tubing sizes up to and including 1 inch or the metric equivalent, excluding cross-linked polyethylene tubing with an oxygen barrier layer, originating in or exported from the United States of America has caused injury or retardation or is threatening to cause injury.
This preliminary injury inquiry is pursuant to the notification, on March 3, 2006, that the President of the Canada Border Services Agency had initiated an investigation into the alleged injurious dumping of the above-mentioned goods.
Pursuant to subsection 37.1(1) of the Special Import Measures Act, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal hereby determines that there is evidence that discloses a reasonable indication that the dumping of the above-mentioned goods has caused injury or retardation or is threatening to cause injury.
Ottawa, May 4, 2006
HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary
[19-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES
The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:
— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, (819) 997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), (819) 994-0218 (fax);
— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, (902) 426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), (902) 426-2721 (fax);
— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, (204) 983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), (204) 983-6317 (fax);
— 530-580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, (604) 666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), (604) 666-8322 (fax);
— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, (514) 283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), (514) 283-3689 (fax);
— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, (416) 952-9096 (telephone), (416) 954-6343 (fax);
— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, (306) 780-3422 (telephone), (306) 780-3319 (fax);
— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, (780) 495-3224 (telephone), (780) 495-3214 (fax).
Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.
Secretary General
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
DECISIONS
The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.
2006-178 May 1, 2006
CanWest MediaWorks Inc. (the general partner) and GTNQ Holdings Inc. (the limited partner), carrying on business as Global Television Network Quebec Limited Partnership
Québec, Montréal and Sherbrooke, Quebec
Approved — Acquisition of the assets of the television station CKMI-TV Québec and its transmitters CKMI-TV-1 Montréal and CKMI-TV-2 Sherbrooke, following an intra-corporate reorganization.
2006-179 May 2, 2006
902890 Alberta Ltd., carrying on business as TAG Broadcasting
Wetaskiwin, Alberta
Approved — Technical change relating to the authorized contours of the radio programming undertaking CIHS-FM Wetaskiwin, as noted in the decision.
2006-180 May 3, 2006
Newcap Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario
Approved — Amendment of CILV-FM Ottawa's condition of licence that specifies its required expenditures on Canadian talent development, as noted in the decision.
2006-181 May 4, 2006
Wawatay Native Communications Society
Sioux Lookout, Ontario
Renewed — Broadcasting licence for the native radio network, from September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2007.
2006-182 May 4, 2006
Astral Media Radio inc.
Montréal, Quebec
Renewed — Broadcasting licence for the French-language radio network known as Radio Énergie, from September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2007.
2006-183 May 5, 2006
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
North Battleford, Saskatchewan
Approved — Technical change relating to the authorized contours of its transmitter CBKF-FM-5 North Battleford, as noted in the decision.
2006-184 May 5, 2006
Aliant Telecom Inc.
Halifax, Dartmouth, Bedford and Sackville, Nova Scotia; Saint John and Moncton, New Brunswick; and St. John's, Paradise and Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador
Approved — New Class 1 cable broadcasting distribution undertakings to serve various municipalities in the Maritimes. The licence will expire on August 31, 2012.
[19-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-41-1
Call for comments on the marketing and billing practice known as "account stacking" in the context of the Commission's regulatory framework for broadcasting distribution undertakings — Submission of reply comments
(Excerpt)
Pursuant to Public Notice CRTC 2006-41, March 31, 2006, and further to a request from Star Choice Television Network Incorporated, the Commission has decided to allow those eight parties who have filed a submission in response to that notice an opportunity to submit a reply comment to any of the other seven comments that have been filed with the Commission regarding this matter. Reply comments will be accepted on or before May 19, 2006.
May 5, 2006
[19-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-54-1
Further to its Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006-54 dated April 26, 2006, the Commission announces the following:
The following item is amended and the change is in bold:
Correction to Item 10
Iqaluit, Nunavut
Application No. 2005-1470-5
Application by Trust Communications Ministries to amend the licence of radio programming undertaking CJLF-FM Barrie, Ontario.
The transmitter would operate on frequency 105.5 MHz (channel 233A1) with an effective radiated power of 250 W (non-directional antenna/antenna height of -13.9 m).
May 1, 2006
[19-1-o]
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT
Decisions and orders on claims for exemption
Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the Screening Officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.
| Claimant | Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS) |
Registry Number | MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS) |
Date of Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | BR® 624 Potting Compound | 5328 | 01/30/2006 | January 20, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | BR® 626 Potting Compound | 5329 | 01/22/2004 | January 20, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CORFIL® 615 Potting Compound | 5330 | 01/24/2002 | January 20, 2006 |
| Nalco Canada Company, Burlington, Ontario formerly Ondeo Nalco Energy Services Canada Inc, Calgary, Alberta | EC5111A | 5488 | 2004/02/03 | January 19, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CYCOM® 7668 Structural Prepreg | 5490 | 10/18/2002 | January 26, 2006 |
| ARKEMA Canada Inc., formerly ATOFINA Canada Inc., Oakville, Ontario | THERMOLITE® 190 Stabilizer | 5494 | 10/08/02 | March 15, 2006 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | AMINE CURING AGENT | 5497 | October 25, 2002 | January 26, 2006 |
| Xypex Chemicals Corporation, Richmond, British Columbia | Xypex Concentrate | 5553 | February 14, 2003 (English/ anglaise) le 14 février 2003 (French/ française) |
March 30, 2006 |
| Xypex Chemicals Corporation, Richmond, British Columbia | Xypex Modified | 5554 | February 14, 2003 (English/ anglaise) le 14 février 2003 (French/ française) |
March 30, 2006 |
| Xypex Chemicals Corporation, Richmond, British Columbia | Xypex Patch'n Plug | 5555 | February 14, 2003 (English/ anglaise) le 14 février 2003 (French/ française) |
March 30, 2006 |
| Univar Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia | Merpol A | 5571 | 03/10/2003 | January 19, 2006 |
| Enthone Inc., West Haven, Connecticut formerly Enthone-OMI (Canada) Inc, Mississauga, Ontario | ENPLATE® PNI-1000B formerly ENPLATE (TM) PNI-1000B | 5579 | 5/18/2005 | January 24, 2006 |
| Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas | OLOA 933NS | 5583 | 03/23/2004 | March 16, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | BR® 623-1 Potting Compound | 5588 | 03/19/2003 | February 14, 2006 |
| Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicage, Illinois | REDICOTE® C-150AP | 5592 | 12/29/2003 | January 25, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | AERO® 5747 Promoter | 5596 | 01/08/2003 | February 16, 2006 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio | ANGLAMOL® 6043U | 5615 | 14 April 2005 | March 16, 2006 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio | ANGLAMOL® 6043 | 5616 | 14 April 2005 | March 16, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | FM® 404 NA Core Splice | 5639 | 02/26/2004 | January 24, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | FM® 300-2 HT Adhesive Film | 5646 | 02/26/2004 | February 6, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CYBOND® EF-9025 LVC Adhesive Film | 5647 | 02/26/2004 | February 6, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CYCOM® 5250-4 Structural Prepreg | 5648 | 04/13/2004 | February 7, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CYBOND® EF-9025 Adhesive Film | 5653 | 07/28/2003 | February 6, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | METLBOND® 2550B Structural Adhesive | 5656 | 07/28/2003 | February 7, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CYCOM® 799H Resin Solution | 5659 | 01/14/2005 | February 23, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | FM® 475 SYNTACTIC FOAM | 5661 | 07/28/2003 | February 7, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | METLBOND® 2550G Structural Adhesive | 5662 | 10/11/2004 | February 7, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CYCOM® CE-9000-9 Structural Prepreg | 5665 | 07/28/2003 | January 23, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | FM® 94-1 Adhesive Film | 5668 | 07/28/2003 | February 6, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CYBOND® EF-9032 Adhesive Film | 5670 | 07/28/2003 | February 6, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | CYCOM® 7238 Black Structural Prepreg | 5671 | 07/28/2003 | January 23, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | FM® 8130-E Black Molding Compound | 5673 | 11/19/2004 | February 23, 2006 |
| Nalco Canada Company, Burlington, Ontario formerly Ondeo Nalco Canada Co., Calgary, Alberta | EC1447WR | 5685 | 2004/03/02 | February 1, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | FM®404 NA Core Splice | 5692 | 08/13/2003 | January 24, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | HYE E773FR/Carbon Prepreg | 5693 | 08/13/2003 | January 23, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | MX 2600 Bias Tape | 5694 | 08/13/2003 | February 23, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | HMF 7714A/Carbon Prepreg | 5697 | 08/13/2003 | January 24, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | HYE E774 FR/Prepreg | 5698 | 08/13/2003 | January 23, 2006 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio | LUBRIZOL® 6705D | 5732 | 14 April 2005 | January 25, 2006 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio | LUBRIZOL® 9606 | 5733 | 14 April 2005 | January 25, 2006 |
| Hilti (Canada) Limited, Mississauga, Ontario | HVU Adhesive Capsules | 5756 | 04 March 2004 | February 14, 2006 |
| Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia | HiTEC 378 Performance Additive | 5760 | 6/18/2004 | January 31, 2006 |
| Air Products & Chemicals, Inc, formerly Air Products & Chemicals Inc. - Chemicals Group, Allentown, Pennsylvania | EnviroGem® AE01 SURFACTANT formerly ENVIROGEM® AE01 SURFACTANT | 5774 | 03/07/2005 | March 17, 2006 |
| Air Products & Chemicals, Inc, formerly Air Products & Chemicals Inc. - Chemicals Group, Allentown, Pennsylvania | EnviroGem® AE02 SURFACTANT formerly ENVIROGEM® AE02 SURFACTANT | 5775 | 03/07/2005 | March 17, 2006 |
| BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut | BYK-W 960 | 5784 | 10/10/2003 | February 28, 2006 |
| BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut | Disperbyk-111 | 5785 | 10/10/2003 | January 31, 2006 |
| BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut | BYK-W 9010 | 5786 | 10/10/2003 | January 31, 2006 |
| BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut | Disperplast 1150 | 5787 | 10/10/2003 | March 22, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | CoatOSil® 1301 | 5803 | 2004.09.13 | February 20, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | ALE-56 | 5804 | 2005.03.29 | February 8, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | Niax® silicone L-5770 | 5816 | 2005.03.15 | February 20, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | Niax® silicone L-603 | 5817 | 2005.05.03 | February 20, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | Niax® silicone L-635 | 5820 | 2005.05.03 | February 20, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | Niax® silicone L-6701 | 5821 | 2005.05.04 | February 8, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | Niax® silicone SC-154 | 5822 | 2005.04.15 | February 8, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | Silquest® PC-1A silane | 5824 | 2004.09.13 | February 16, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | Silquest® A-1126 silane | 5826 | 2005.02.07 | February 14, 2006 |
| GE Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | Niax® silicone L-5161 | 5827 | 2005.05.04 | February 20, 2006 |
| Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas | OLOA 933N (CANADA) | 5840 | 03/23/2004 | March 16, 2006 |
| FLORAN Technologies Inc, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | Floran™ Filter Fit™ formerly FLORAN FILTER FIT | 5845 | April 11, 2005 | February 2, 2006 |
| Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia | HiTEC 510 Performance Additive | 5860 | March 29, 2005 | January 31, 2006 |
| Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario | CAPCURE LOF | 5861 | 04/29/2005 | March 16, 2006 |
| Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario | CAPCURE 3-800 | 5874 | 04/29/2005 | March 24, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | AERO® 5100 Promoter | 5875 | 05/16/2005 | January 26, 2006 |
| BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut | BYKETOL-WS | 5887 | 05/17/2004 | February 28, 2006 |
| BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut | BYK-W 996 | 5888 | 01/01/2005 | February 28, 2006 |
| CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey | HMF 97714A Carbon Prepreg | 5892 | 02/25/2004 | January 24, 2006 |
| Univar Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia | Vanblend CC Eliminator Plus | 5909 | 19 March 2004 | March 21, 2006 |
| Icynene Inc., Mississauga, Ontario | GOLD SEAL 400® - COMPONENT "B" | 5918 | February 2004 | February 2, 2006 |
| Innovative Chemical Technologies Canada Ltd., Calgary, Alberta | Wetsol 3 formerly Wetsol | 5923 | March 25, 2004 | February 24, 2006 |
| E.I. duPont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario | "ZONYL" C700 | 5933 | 24-AUG-2004 (English/ anglaise) 13 Septembre 2004 (French/ française) |
January 23, 2006 |
| E.I. duPont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario | "ZONYL" 7950 | 5934 | 24-AUG-2004 | January 23, 2006 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | 3M(TM) DYE-SUBLIMATION TONER PREMIX 8760 YELLOW | 5943 | 12/05/2004 | January 24, 2006 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | 3M(TM) DYE-SUBLIMATION TONER CONCENTRATE 8860 YELLOW | 5944 | 12/05/2004 | January 24, 2006 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | 3M(TM) DYE-SUBLIMATION TONER CONCENTRATE 8861 MAGENTA | 5945 | 12/05/2004 | January 24, 2006 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | SCOTCH-WELD(TM) DYE-SUBLIMATION TONER PREMIX 8763 BLACK | 5946 | 12/05/2004 | January 24, 2006 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | 3M(TM) DYE-SUBLIMATION TONER CONCENTRATE 8862 CYAN | 5947 | 12/05/2004 | January 24, 2006 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | 3M(TM) DYE-SUBLIMATION TONER CONCENTRATE 8863 BLACK | 5948 | 12/05/2004 | January 24, 2006 |
| The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio | SOLSPERSE 13940 | 5952 | 5/17/2004 | March 30, 2006 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario | ADCOTE R972 | 5953 | 09/02/2005 | March 13, 2006 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey | FM® 123-2 Film | 5960 | 05/27/2004 | February 9, 2006 |
| Cytec Industries Inc, West Paterson, New Jersey | AERO® 875 Promoter | 5981 | 06/25/2004 | February 23, 2006 |
| Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta | ClearFRAC HT J566 | 6017 | 28 April 2005 | March 14, 2006 |
| Cytec Industries Inc, West Paterson, New Jersey | CYMEL® 1136 Resin | 6030 | 04/18/2005 | February 23, 2006 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey | AERO® 866 Promoter | 6061 | 07/26/2005 | March 21, 2006 |
Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 20, 2002, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5328 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.
2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 26, 2003, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5592 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 26, 2003, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5615 and 5616 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subjects of the claims on which the Screening Officer issued the decisions are the chemical identities of five and three ingredients, respectively.
4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 1, 2003, listed the subjects of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5732 and 5733 to be the chemical identities of three and two ingredients, respectively. The subjects of the claims on which the Screening Officer issued the decisions are the chemical identities of two ingredients and one ingredient, respectively.
5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 13, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5803 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 13, 2004, listed the subjects of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5821 and 5822 to be the chemical identities and concentrations of one ingredient and two ingredients, respectively. The subjects of the claims on which the Screening Officer issued the decisions are the chemical identities of two and four ingredients, respectively.
7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 13, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5845 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of six ingredients.
8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 13, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5860 to be the chemical identity and concentration of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of eight ingredients.
9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5934 to be the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5943 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5945 and 5946 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the Screening Officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
12. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5947 and 5948 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the Screening Officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
13. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5960 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
14. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6017 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the Screening Officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
There were no submissions from affected parties to the Screening Officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.
Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid with the exception of the claim bearing registry number 5923 which was found to be partially valid. The Screening Officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the Screening Officer found that the respective MSDS relating to the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5733, 5785, 5786, 5861, 5909, 5943 and 5944 complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.
In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 5497, being a claim from an employer in the province of Ontario, the Screening Officer found that the MSDS and the label relating to the claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario.
Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the Screening Officer found that the respective MSDS relating to the remaining claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.
Registry Number 5328
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be corrosive to the eyes of laboratory animals;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;
4. Remove the statement indicating that the reader should look in section 2 for the exposure limits pertaining to the odour threshold;
5. Disclose that chronic dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause systemic toxicity and death in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 5329
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Remove the statement indicating that the reader should look in section 2 for the exposure limits pertaining to the odour threshold.
Registry Number 5330
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose storage precautions for the controlled product;
2. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
3. Disclose an LD50 value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;
4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused respiratory sensitization in workers;
5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.
Registry Number 5488
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Correct the impression that naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 15 minutes or until the chemical is removed;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;
4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 200 mg/kg for heavy aromatic naphtha;
5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2.46 mL/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.38 mL/kg for 2-ethylhexanol.
Registry Number 5490
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the percent concentration of fiberglass in an acceptable manner;
2. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
3. Add oxides of bromine and fluorine to the list of hazardous decomposition products;
4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 24.6 g/kg for silica, siliconized.
Registry Number 5494
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format, content and wording of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.1 mg/m3 (skin)[as Sn] and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 0.2 mg/m3 (skin)[as Sn] for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkyltin (alkylmercaptoester);
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statements to give water to drink and to induce vomiting.
Registry Number 5497
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the percent concentrations of poly[oxy(methyl1,2-ethanediyl)], alpha-(2-aminomethylethyl)-omega-(2-aminomethylethoxy) and tetraethylenepentamine in an acceptable manner;
2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should also have been shown on the label. The claimant has been ordered to amend the label as indicated below.
1. Disclose the HMIRC Registry number and the date of the decision granting the exemption.
Registry Numbers 5553 to 5555, inclusive
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of crystalline silica, quartz in the controlled product and its CAS registry number 14808-60-7;
2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 10 mg/m3 for Portland cement. Specify that the values are applicable only if no asbestiform fibres are present and the material contains less than 1% crystalline silica;
3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.05 mg/m3 for crystalline silica, quartz;
4. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 2 mg/m3 for the alkaline earth compound;
5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;
6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that material should be quickly and gently brushed away before flushing with water.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 5571
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose oxides of carbon and phosphorus as hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 5579
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose an LC50 (4 hours, male mouse, dust) value of 2 000 mg/m3 for CAS 2451-62-9 1,3,5-tris(oxiranylmethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-(1h,3h,5h)-trione;
2. Disclose an LC50 (4 hours, female rat) value of 1 087 ppm for n-butyl acetate.
Registry Number 5583
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
Registry Number 5588
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry numbers and percent concentrations;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that flushing should continue for at least 30 minutes;
3. Disclose an LD50 value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;
4. Correct the impression that the ingredient substituted phthalic anhydride is merely severely irritating to the eyes as opposed to being a corrosive material;
5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.
Registry Number 5592
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 5596
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry numbers and percent concentrations;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for at least 20 minutes;
3. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
4. Disclose a lower LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 050 mg/kg for 2-ethylhexanol;
5. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the prostate and the immune system of laboratory animals.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Numbers 5615 and 5616
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink;
2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye irritation in laboratory animals;
3. Registry Number 5615: Disclose the generic chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, disclose their concentrations in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identities are included in the claim for exemption;
4. Registry Number 5616:
(a) If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B;
(b) Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDSs-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with copies of revised versions. These revised versions of the MSDSs were not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 5639
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
2. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Number 5646
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Number 5647
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have caused respiratory sensitization in workers;
4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human and bacterial cells, in vitro.
Registry Number 5648
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
2. Disclose a lower LC50 range value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients.
Registry Number 5653
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have caused respiratory sensitization in workers;
4. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Numbers 5656, 5661 and 5662
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
2. Disclose a lower LC50 range value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A and D2A;
4. Registry Number 5661: Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.05 mg/m3 (respirable) A2 for silica, quartz;
5. Registry Numbers 5656 and 5662:
(a) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for at least 20 minutes;
(b) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
Registry Number 5659
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.1 mg/m3 for silica, amorphous;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes, contaminated clothing, footwear and leather goods should be removed under running water, and medical attention obtained immediately. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;
4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statements indicating that the material is not expected to be harmful by ingestion and that no first aid measures are relevant and disclose those measures necessary in cases of ingestion;
5. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
6. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse lung effects in laboratory animals;
7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.
Registry Number 5665
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical.
Registry Numbers 5668 and 5670
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
2. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have caused respiratory sensitization in workers;
3. Registry Number 5670:
(a) Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
(b) Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Number 5671
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number, percent concentration and the fact that it as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);
2. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused respiratory sensitization in workers;
4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.
Registry Number 5673
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number, percent concentration and Exposure Limit Values;
2. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical.
Registry Number 5685
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;
4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose that flushing should continue for at least 30 minutes;
5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
6. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
7. Disclose LD50 values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;
8. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 5 628 mg/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 15 800 mg/kg for methanol;
9. Correct the information pertaining to the controlled product by disclosing that the organic sulfur compound is a sensitizer;
10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be mutagenic, in vivo;
11. Disclose that both acute ingestion of and acute dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product have caused necrosis and haemorrhaging in the brain;
12. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product are considered to be fetotoxins;
13. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused haemorrhaging in the stomach;
14. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A, D2A and E.
Registry Number 5692
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have caused respiratory sensitization in workers.
Registry Number 5693
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;
3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have caused respiratory sensitization in workers.
Registry Number 5694
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV-TWA = 200 ppm and OSHA PEL = 400 ppm for isopropanol;
3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV-TWA = 0.05 mg/m3 (respirable) A2 and OSHA PEL = 30 mg/m3 divided by the value "%SiO2+2" (total particulate) and either 10 mg/m3 divided by the value "%SiO2+2" or 250 mppcf divided by the value "%SiO2+5" (respirable fraction) for silica, quartz;
4. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
5. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Number 5697
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Amend the MSDS to describe the subheading Odour Threshold as "not applicable";
2. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have caused respiratory sensitization in workers.
Registry Number 5698
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;
3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have caused respiratory sensitization in workers.
Registry Number 5732
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause severe skin and eye irritation in laboratory animals;
2. Remove the statement that the controlled product does not meet the criteria for a classification of D2B as an eye irritant.
Registry Number 5756
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV-TWA = 0.05 mg/m3 (respirable) A2 for silicon dioxide (quartz sand);
2. Disclose an LC50 (1 hour, rat) range of 1.26 mg/L to 2.83 mg/L for silica filled polydimethylsiloxane;
3. Disclose the percent concentration of dibenzoyl peroxide in an acceptable manner;
4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink.
Registry Number 5760
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose flushing should continue for at least 30 minutes;
4. Add eye contact as a route of entry;
5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin and eye corrosion in laboratory animals;
6. Disclose an LC50 range value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.
Registry Numbers 5774 and 5775
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Remove the statement that no data is available pertaining to dermal exposure to the controlled product.
Registry Number 5784
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 8 400 mg/kg for naphtha (petroleum), light aromatic.
Registry Number 5787
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
Registry Number 5803
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
Registry Number 5804
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of >2 000 mg/kg for the controlled product;
2. Disclose an LC50 (4 hours, rat, aerosol) value of 36 mg/L for octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane;
3. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause testicular and kidney effects in laboratory animals.
Registry Numbers 5816, 5817 and 5820
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
Registry Number 5821
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement "If patient is fully conscious, give two glasses of water";
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.
Registry Number 5822
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;
2. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the immune system of laboratory animals;
3. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused neurotoxic effects and colour vision loss;
4. Disclose that acetylsalicylic acid and hexane synergistically enhance the hearing loss caused by inhalation exposure to toluene in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 5824
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;
2. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 1 mg/m3 for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 22.6 mL/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 14.1 mL/kg for alkoxysilylalkane ester.
Registry Number 5826
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement "If patient is fully conscious, give two glasses of water. Induce vomiting." Disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed.
Registry Number 5827
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
Registry Number 5840
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
Registry Number 5845
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of six confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product;
2. Disclose an LD50 value for three of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;
3. Disclose an LD50 value and an LC50 value for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;
4. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
5. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
6. Replace the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact with a statement such as the following: Wash with soap and water for at least 30 minutes. Obtain medical advice immediately;
7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;
8. Add chlorine and oxides of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;
9. Correct the impression that the controlled product is irritating as opposed to being a corrosive material;
10. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals in the absence of maternal toxic effects;
11. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A and D2A.
Registry Number 5860
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
4. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes";
5. Add eye contact as a route of entry;
6. Disclose that the long-chain alkyl amine is a skin sensitizer;
7. Disclose an LC50 range value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;
8. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.
Registry Number 5874
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement "Give large quantities of water followed by several glasses of milk if available."
Registry Number 5875
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the percent concentration of isobutanol and butanol in an acceptable manner;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;
3. Disclose that acute ingestion of ingredients in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system effects in laboratory animals;
4. Disclose that acute dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause CNS effects in laboratory animals;
5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 5887
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose a dermal LD50 value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;
2. Disclose that chronic dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin necrosis in laboratory animals;
3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, inhalation and skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
Registry Number 5888
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Remove the inference that the concentration of the confidential business ingredient was a part of the claim for exemption;
2. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause damage to the nasal cavity in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 5892
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
2. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause respiratory sensitization in workers;
3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity.
Registry Number 5918
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the percent concentration of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane in an acceptable manner;
2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 1.36 mL/kg, an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.37 mL/kg and an LC50 (4 hours, rat) value of 1 641 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkanolamine #1;
3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 1.62 mL/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 0.31 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkanolamine #2;
4. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to be corrosive to the eyes of laboratory animals;
5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be corrosive to the skin of laboratory animals;
6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for 30 minutes;
8. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;
9. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 1 000 ppm for 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 5923
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the chemical identities and CAS numbers of the ingredients called alcohols 1 and 2;
2. If the reasons for WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B due to the property of mutagenicity;
3. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the prostate and the immune system of laboratory animals;
4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be mutagenic, in vivo;
5. Disclose that hexane synergistically enhances the hearing loss caused by inhalation exposure to the aromatic hydrocarbon in laboratory animals;
6. Add eye contact as a route of entry.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 5933
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause irritation to the gastrointestinal tract in laboratory animals;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, add that care should be taken to ensure that contaminated water not be rinsed onto the other eye or face and that the eyelids should be held open during flushing;
3. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition or combustion products;
4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 438 mg/kg for sodium docecylbenzene sulfonate;
5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 5934
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, add that care should be taken to ensure that contaminated water not be rinsed onto the other eye or face and that the eyelids should be held open during flushing;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the Screening Officer.
Registry Number 5945
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Delete the statement that the ingredient disclosed as an anthraquinone red dye is not WHMIS regulated.
Registry Number 5946
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Delete the statement that the ingredient disclosed as ananthraquinone/quinoline black dye is not WHMIS regulated.
Registry Number 5947
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Delete the statement that the ingredient disclosed as ananthraquinone blue dye is not WHMIS regulated.
Registry Number 5948
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Delete the statement that the ingredient disclosed as ananthraquinone/quinoline black dye is not WHMIS regulated.
Registry Number 5952
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for at least 15 minutes.
Registry Number 5953
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
Registry Number 5960
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;
3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 250 ppm for methanol;
4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.
Registry Number 5981
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;
2. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
3. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression;
4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in an in vitro screening test for mutagenicity.
Registry Number 6017
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 6030
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;
2. Disclose the percent concentration of formaldehyde in an acceptable manner;
3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 250 ppm for methanol;
4. Disclose correct information concerning the odour threshold of the chemical;
5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and teratogenic effects.
Registry Number 6061
The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.
In the opinion of the Screening Officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.
1. Remove the entry for triethylene glycol, monobutyl ether in the hazardous ingredients section and disclose the presence of the hazardous ingredient tetraethylene glycol, monobutyl ether, CAS registry number 1559-34-8, instead;
2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 15–20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;
3. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression.
Having regard to the foregoing, and pursuant to sections 16 and 17 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, notice is hereby given that the Screening Officer has, for the claim bearing Registry Number 5923, directed the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, including disclosing the identities of two ingredients which were included among the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the Screening Officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.
Having regard to the foregoing, and pursuant to section 17 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, notice is hereby given that the Screening Officer has, for each of the remaining above-noted claims, with the exceptions of those claims bearing Registry Numbers 5497, 5733, 5785, 5786, 5861, 5909, 5943 and 5944, directed the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the Screening Officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.
In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 5497, the Screening Officer has ordered the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide copies of the amended MSDS and the amended label to the Screening Officer, within the respective time period specified in the foregoing paragraph.
Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the Screening Officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.
Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.
Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a Screening Officer. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the acting Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, (613) 993-4472.
R. BOARDMAN
Chief Screening Officer
[19-1-o]
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
North American Datum 1927
NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).
