Skip to content | Skip to institutional links

Common menu bar links

This Web page has been archived on the Web.

Left hand menu

Canada Gazette
Consultation
- What is the consultation process?
- Current Consultations
Archives
Publishing Information
Resources
Stay in Touch
- RSS Feeds
Proactive Disclosure
- Proactive Disclosure

Vol. 140, No. 29 — July 22, 2006

COMMISSIONS

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2000-014

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Asia Pacific Enterprises Corporation from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated April 10, 2000, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 8, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2001-075

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by MilArm Co. Ltd. from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated September 27, 2001, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 6, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2002-003

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Bill Rampton from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated February 21, 2002, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 7, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2002-014

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Robert Koy from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated April 26, 2002, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 6, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2002-102

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Stanley T. Wong from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated October 4, 2002, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 8, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2002-114

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by MilArm Co. Ltd. from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated December 13, 2002, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 5, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2003-009

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Jencon Bits of Pieces from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated February 14, 2003, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 5, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2003-018

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Tom Pak from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated April 4, 2003, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 7, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2003-044

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Digital Canoe Inc. from a decision of the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency dated November 13, 2003, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 5, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2003-054

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Kenneth Lee from a decision of the President of the Canada Border Services Agency dated March 5, 2004, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 5, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DECISION

Appeal No. AP-2004-047

Notice is hereby given that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a decision on July 12, 2006, with respect to an appeal filed by Digital Canoe Inc. from a decision of the President of the Canada Border Services Agency dated September 28, 2004, with respect to a request for re-determination under subsection 60(4) of the Customs Act.

The appeal, heard on June 5, 2006, under subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act, was dismissed.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DETERMINATION

Electrical and electronics

Notice is hereby given that, after completing its inquiry, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) made a determination (File No. PR-2006-004) on July 11, 2006, with respect to a complaint filed by Mircom Technologies Ltd. (Mircom) of Vaughan, Ontario, under subsection 30.11(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, R.S.C. 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 47, as amended by the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, S.C. 1993, c. 44, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. W8482-054541/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC) on behalf of the Department of National Defence. The solicitation was for repair and overhaul services in support of the Damage Control System (DCS) of the Halifax-class frigates, the Fire Detection, Suppression, Alarm and Control System of the Iroquois-class destroyers and two shore-based DCS trainers.

It was alleged that PWGSC had improperly declared Mircom's proposal non-compliant.

Having examined the evidence presented by the parties and considered the provisions of the Agreement on Internal Trade, the Tribunal determined that the complaint was not valid.

Ottawa, July 13, 2006

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, 819-997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), 819-994-0218 (fax);

— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, 902-426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), 902-426-2721 (fax);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, 204-983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), 204-983-6317 (fax);

— 530-580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, 604-666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), 604-666-8322 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, 514-283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), 514-283-3689 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, 416-952-9096 (telephone), 416-954-6343 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, 306-780-3422 (telephone), 306-780-3319 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, 780-495-3224 (telephone), 780-495-3214 (fax).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2006-281 July 10, 2006

Telephone City Broadcast Limited
Brantford, Ontario

Approved — Increase of the power of the transmitter from 10 000 W to 25 000 W, daytime and nighttime, of the English-language commercial radio programming undertaking CKPC Brantford.

2006-282 July 10, 2006

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Edmonton, Alberta

Complaint concerning comments broadcast during "Radio Active."

In the decision, the Commission announces its determinations on a complaint by a radio listener about the broadcast of an interview on CBX Edmonton by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). The complainant alleged that the interview contained a misleading and undocumented statement that might create an anti-Palestinian sentiment in the Canadian public. The Commission finds that the CBC's broadcast of the interview in question, as a segment of the afternoon radio program "Radio Active," did not breach the prohibitions against the broadcast of abusive comment and false and misleading news contained in the Radio Regulations, 1986.

2006-283 July 11, 2006

Wawatay Native Communications Society
Sioux Lookout, Ontario

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for the Native-language television network, from September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2013.

2006-284 July 11, 2006

Riding Mountain Broadcasting Ltd.
Brandon, Manitoba

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for the English-language commercial FM radio programming undertaking CKLF-FM Brandon, from September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2013.

2006-285 July 11, 2006

Standard Radio Inc.
Hamilton, Ontario

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for the English-language commercial AM radio programming undertaking CHAM Hamilton, from September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2013.

2006-286 July 11, 2006

Blackburn Radio Inc.
Leamington, Ontario

Approved — Technical changes to the authorized contours of the English-language commercial radio programming undertaking CHYR-FM Leamington, as noted in the decision.

2006-287 July 11, 2006

Native Communication Inc.
Thompson and Swan Lake, Manitoba

Approved — New transmitter at Swan Lake.

2006-288 July 11, 2006

CJRN 710 Inc.
Niagara Falls, Ontario

Approved — Technical changes to the authorized contours of the English-language commercial radio programming undertaking CFLZ-FM Niagara Falls, as noted in the decision.

2006-289 July 11, 2006

Multivan Broadcast Corporation (the general partner), and 650504 B.C. Ltd., Douglas M. Holtby, Geoffrey Y. W. Lau, Robert H. Lee, Joseph Segal and RCG Forex Service Corp. (the limited partners), carrying on business as Multivan Broadcast Limited Partnership
Victoria, British Columbia

Approved — New transmitter in Victoria.

2006-290 July 11, 2006

Newcap Inc.
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island

Approved — Use of frequency 105.5 MHz by the new FM radio station in Charlottetown.

2006-291 July 12, 2006

CanWest MediaWorks Inc. and TVA Group Inc., partners in Men TV General Partnership
Across Canada

Approved — Addition of a condition of licence and replacement of the preamble of the condition of licence setting out the licensee's requirements for Canadian programming expenditures, as noted in the decision.

2006-292 July 12, 2006

O.K. Creek Radio Station Inc.
Okanese Indian Reserve, Saskatchewan

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for the English-language Type B community radio programming undertaking CHXL-FM Okanese Indian Reserve, from September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2013.

2006-293 July 14, 2006

Société de télédiffusion du Québec
Montréal, Quebec

Complaints about the broadcast of episodes of the program "Les Francs-tireurs" by Télé-Québec.

In the decision, the Commission addresses complaints about two episodes of the television program "Les Francs-tireurs," broadcast by the Société de télédiffusion du Québec. After reviewing the program segments in question, the Commission finds that the licensee did not breach the provision of the Television Broadcasting Regulations, 1987 that prohibits the broadcast of abusive comment. The Commission also finds that the licensee has respected the objectives of the broadcasting policy for Canada established in the Broadcasting Act whereby programming must be of high standard and must serve to strengthen the cultural and social fabric and the multicultural and multiracial nature of Canadian society.

2006-294 July 14, 2006

Native Communication Inc.
Thompson and Paint Lake, Manitoba

Approved — New transmitter in Paint Lake for the radio programming undertaking CINC-FM Thompson.

2006-295 July 14, 2006

Golden West Broadcasting Ltd.
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for the English-language, commercial FM radio programming undertaking CILG-FM Moose Jaw, from September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2013.

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC HEARING 2006-7

The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on September 11, 2006, at 9 a.m., at the Commission headquarters, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, to consider the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is August 17, 2006.

1. Vancouver Film School Limited
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national Category 2 English-language specialty programming undertaking to be known as Student Film Channel.

2. Prabhakaran Selvadurai, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national general interest third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as DMG Urdu.

3. Prabhakaran Selvadurai, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national general interest third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as DMG Arabic.

4. Prabhakaran Selvadurai, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national general interest third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as DMG Middle East.

5. Prabhakaran Selvadurai, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national general interest third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as DMG Polish.

6. Prabhakaran Selvadurai, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national general interest third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as DMG Russian.

7. Prabhakaran Selvadurai, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national general interest third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as DMG Ukrainian.

8. Prabhakaran Selvadurai, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national general interest third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as DMG Vietnamese.

9. TORO TV Corporation, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national niche third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as CANAL CORAZON.

10. Iranian TV Canada Inc.
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national general interest third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as Iranian TV Canada.

11. High Fidelity HDTV Inc., on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national English-language Category 2 high definition specialty programming undertaking to be known as BabyHD.

12. Maritime Broadcasting System Limited
Windsor, Nova Scotia

To convert radio station CFAB Windsor, Nova Scotia, from the AM band to the FM band.

13. Aurora Cable TV Limited
Aurora and Oak Ridges, Ontario

For a licence to operate a regional video-on-demand programming undertaking.

14. Câblevision du Nord de Québec inc.
Province of Quebec

For a broadcasting undertaking licence to operate a general-interest video-on-demand service to be marketed under the name Vidéo sur demande Fleximo.

15. Radio Drummond
Drummondville, Quebec

For a licence to operate a French-language FM Type B community radio programming undertaking in Drummondville.

16. MX Média inc.
Salaberry-de-Valleyfield, Quebec

For a licence to operate an French-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Salaberry-de-Valleyfield.

17. Club de solidarité du Bois-Joli inc.
Trois-Rivières, Quebec

For a licence to operate a commercial French-language FM specialty radio programming undertaking in Trois-Rivières.

18. 591991 B.C. Ltd. (Corus)
Gatineau, Quebec

To convert radio station CJRC Gatineau from the AM band to the FM band.

19. 591991 B.C. Ltd. (Corus)
Saguenay, Quebec

To convert radio station CKRS Saguenay from the AM band to the FM band.

20. 591991 B.C. Ltd. (Corus)
Sherbrooke, Quebec

To convert radio station CHLT Sherbrooke from the AM band to the FM band.

21. 591991 B.C. Ltd. (Corus)
Trois-Rivières, Quebec

To convert radio station CHLN Trois-Rivières from the AM band to the FM band.

22. S.S. TV Inc.
Brampton, Ontario

For a licence to operate an English-language AM commercial (ethnic) radio programming undertaking in Brampton.

23. Wawatay Native Communications Society
Sioux Lookout, Ontario

For a licence to operate a Native-language FM Type A community radio programming undertaking in Sioux Lookout.

24. Wawatay Native Communications Society
Timmins, Ontario

For a licence to operate a low-power Native-language FM Type B community radio programming undertaking in Timmins.

25. WhiStle Community Radio
Erin, Ontario

For a licence to operate an English-language FM Type B community radio programming undertaking in Whitchurch-Stouffville.

26. My Broadcasting Corporation
Napanee, Ontario

For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Napanee.

27. Rogers Broadcasting Limited
Edmonton, Fort McMurray and Grande Prairie, Alberta

To acquire the assets of the radio programming undertakings CHDI-FM and CKER-FM Edmonton, CJOK-FM, CKYX-FM and its transmitter CJOK-FM-1 Fort McMurray and CFGP-FM Grande Prairie and its transmitters CFGP-FM-1 Peace River and CFGP-FM-2 Tumbler Ridge, Alberta, from O.K. Radio Group Ltd., a corporation controlled by Mr. Roger Charest.

28. 912038 Alberta Ltd.
Bonnyville, Alberta

For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Bonnyville.

29. Prince George Community Radio Society
Prince George, British Columbia

For a licence to operate an English-language FM Type B developmental community radio programming undertaking in Prince George.

30. 0749943 BC Ltd. (Matthew G. McBride)
Pemberton, British Columbia

For a licence to operate an English-language commercial radio programming undertaking in Pemberton.

31. The Mountain Culture Collective Radio Society
Whistler, British Columbia

For a licence to operate an English-language FM developmental community radio programming undertaking in Whistler.

32. Jim Pattison Broadcast Group Ltd. (the general partner) and Jim Pattison Industries Ltd. (the limited partner), carrying on business as Jim Pattison Broadcast Group Limited Partnership (collectively the Pattison Group)
Victoria, British Columbia

To acquire the assets of the radio programming undertakings CKKQ-FM and CJZN-FM Victoria, British Columbia, and their related transmitters CKKQ-FM-1 and CKXM-FM-1 Sooke and their transitional digital radio undertakings CKKRDR-1 and CJZN-DR-1 Victoria from O.K. Radio Group Ltd., a corporation controlled by Mr. Roger Charest.

July 13, 2006

[29-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-84

The Commission has received the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is August 16, 2006.

1. Salt and Light Catholic Media Foundation
Across Canada

To amend the licence of the national ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking known as Salt and Light Television.

2. Coopérative Radio-Halifax-Métro limitée
Halifax, Nova Scotia

For the use of frequency 98.5 MHz (channel 253B1) with an effective radiated power of 2 350 W (non-directional antenna/antenna height of 195.6 m) for the operation of the new French-language FM radio programming undertaking approved in Community radio station in Halifax, Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2006-139, April 12, 2006.

3. Videotron Ltd.
Grand Montréal, Chicoutimi (Saguenay), Saint-Félicien, Québec (Donnacona), Sherbrooke, Victoriaville, and Cap-de-la-Madeleine, Quebec

Relating to the licences of its cable distribution undertakings serving the above-mentioned locations.

4. CF Cable TV Inc.
Grand Montréal, Lachute, Sorel, Gatineau, Thurso (Papineauville), Buckingham, Rivière-du-Loup, La Pocatière, Saint-Joachim (Côte-de-Beaupré), Sainte-Pétronille (L'Île-d'Orléans), Coaticook, Lennoxville, Cowansville, East Angus, Waterloo, Ascot Corner (Fleurimont), and Granby, Quebec; and Rockland, Ontario

Relating to the licences of its cable distribution undertakings serving the above-mentioned locations.

5. Native Communication Inc.
Kenora, Ontario

To amend the licence of the radio programming undertaking CINC-FM Thompson, Manitoba.

6. The Valemount Entertainment Society
Valemount, British Columbia

To amend the licence of the television programming undertaking CHVC-TV Valemount, British Columbia.

July 12, 2006

[29-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Claimant	Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)	Registry Number
Greensolv Inc., Baie d'Urfé, Québec	GREENSOLV 274A	5353
Greensolv Inc., Baie d'Urfé, Québec	GREENSOLV 273G	5355
Greensolv Inc., Baie d'Urfé, Québec	GREENSOLV 273C	5356
Greensolv Inc., Baie d'Urfé, Québec	GREENSOLV 247C	5441
Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly/antérieurement Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 317 Performance Additive	5498
Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly/antérieurement Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 2581 Performance Additive	5503
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	OLOA 59023 (CANADA)	5517
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	OLOA 59034 (CANADA)	5520
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	OLOA 59038 (CANADA)	5521
Bayer Inc., Toronto, Ontario	DESMOPHEN NH 1420	5620
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	970 Carbon Structural Prepreg	5669
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	DUSTREAT DC6109	5699
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	FERROQUEST LP7200	5700
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	FERROQUEST LP7202	5701
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	KLEEN MCT411	5702
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	LOSALT 53D	5703
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PETROFLO 20Y97	5704
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PETROFLO 20Y98	5705
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PETROFLO 20Y98N	5706
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PETROMEEN OS-16	5707
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PROSWEET S30	5708
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PETROFLO 21Y21	5712
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PHILMPLUS 5K7	5713
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	BETZ PETROMEEN OS-23B	5714
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	MAX-AMINE GT-741	5719
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PHILMPLUS 5K35	5722
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PHILMPLUS 5K5	5723
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PROSWEET OC2521	5725
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PROSWEET OC2522	5726
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	PROSWEET OC2542	5727
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	STYREX50	5730
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	REDICOTE® C-3082	5736
Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly/antérieurement Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 2585 Performance Additive	5755
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	STANTEX F 1624	5777
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	High-Temperature Corrosion Inhibitor A270 formerly/ antérieurement HIGH-TEMPERATURE CORROSION INHIBITOR A270	5839
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	High-Temperature Corrosion Inhibitor A270 formerly/ antérieurement HIGH-TEMPERATURE CORROSION INHIBITOR A270	5843
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M BRAND SUPER WEATHERSTRIP ADHESIVE PN 80010 formerly/ antérieurement 3M BRAND SUPER WEATHERSTRIP ADHESIVE PN 80036 AND 80010	5857
Synsil Products Inc., Easton, Pennsylvania	Composite Mineral Products - XW Series	5862
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc. Mississauga, Ontario	Lignostab 1198 formerly/ antérieurement LIGNOSTAB 1198	5866
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	AQUET ^® 942 ACID EMULSIFIER Inhibitor formerly/ antérieurement AQUET^®942	5880
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	MULTIPLEX^®811 Boiler Water Treatment formerly/ antérieurement MULTIPLEX^®811	5884
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	SCW2601 SCALE INHIBITOR	5885
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	BYK-W 966	5886
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	TOLAD® 9704 ADDITIVE	5897
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	HI-M-PACT™ 5186 KHI formerly/ antérieurement RE5186HIW	5904
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	HI-M-PACT™ 5458 LDHI formerly/ antérieurement RE5458HIW	5905
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	BPR 22650 EMULSIFIER formerly/ antérieurement BPR 22650	5913
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	BYK-W 965	5920
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	Disperbyk-101	5921
Recochem Inc., Brampton, Ontario	OAT-5X Super Concentrate (WIP-16350) formerly/antérieurement WIP-16350	5957
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	HI-M-PACT™ 5557 KHI Hydrate Inhibitor formerly/antérieurement HI-M-PACT™ 5557 KHI	5959
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	BYK-S750	5968
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc. Mississauga, Ontario	CHROMOPHTAL YELLOW 8882 DOA/CHROMOPHTAL JAUNE 8882 DOA	6018
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M (TM) PROCESS COLOR 8931 BLUE VIOLET formerly/ antérieurement 3M (TM) SCOTCHLITE(TM) PROCESS COLOR 8931 BLUE VIOLET	6019
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M(TM) AUTOMIX(TM) TRUCK LINE SMC/FIBREGLASS ADHESIVE - 90, ACCELERATOR, P.N. 08274	6025
Texaco Products Inc., Grimsby, Ontario	OLOA 19075	6028
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	PHOTOMER 5429	6058
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	ARBREAK 8206 DEMULSIFIER	6059
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	TRETOLITE* RBW6520Y WATER CLARIFIER formerly/antérieurement RBW6520Y WATER CLARIFIER	6083
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., formerly/antérieurement Air Products & Chemicals Inc. - Chemicals Group, Allentown, Pennsylvania	ANCAMINE 2264 Curing Agent	6088
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	TRETOLITE* RBW6520W WATER CLARIFIER formerly/antérieurement RBW6520W WATER CLARIFIER	6094
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	DEHYPOUND ST-15	6130

Claimant	MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS)	Date of Decision
Greensolv Inc., Baie d'Urfé, Québec	8/25/2003	June 23, 2006 le 23 juin 2006
Greensolv Inc., Baie d'Urfé, Québec	8/25/2003	June 23, 2006 le 23 juin 2006
Greensolv Inc., Baie d'Urfé, Québec	8/25/2003	June 23, 2006 le 23 juin 2006
Greensolv Inc., Baie d'Urfé, Québec	10/23/2003	June 7, 2006 le 7 juin 2006
Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly/antérieurement Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	7 June 2004	June 21, 2006 le 21 juin 2006
Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly/antérieurement Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	25 June 2004	May 5, 2006 le 5 mai 2006
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	03/18/2004	April 20, 2006 le 20 avril 2006
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	12/09/2002	April 20, 2006 le 20 avril 2006
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	12/09/2002	April 20, 2006 le 20 avril 2006
Bayer Inc., Toronto, Ontario	Mar05/04	June 26, 2006 le 26 juin 2006
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC., West Paterson, New Jersey	11/03/2004	May 8, 2006 le 8 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 1, 2006 le 1^er mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	19-JAN-2003	April 19, 2006 le 19 avril 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	23-OCT-2003	April 19, 2006 le 19 avril 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	June 15, 2006 le 15 juin 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	April 26, 2006 le 26 avril 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 31, 2006 le 31 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 31, 2006 le 31 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 31, 2006 le 31 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 10, 2006 le 10 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 9, 2006 le 9 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	April 11, 2006 le 11 avril 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 10, 2006 le 10 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 26, 2006 le 26 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	June 16, 2006 le 16 juin 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	June 27, 2006 le 27 juin 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 10, 2006 le 10 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	02-DEC-2003	May 16, 2006 le 16 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 16, 2006 le 16 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 16, 2006 le 16 mai 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	25-SEP-2003	May 25, 2006 le 25 mai 2006
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	4/26/2005	June 13, 2006 le 13 juin 2006
Afton Chemical Corporation, formerly/antérieurement Ethyl Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	16 June 2004	May 16, 2006 le 16 mai 2006
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	04/29/2005	May 26, 2006 le 26 mai 2006
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	19 September 2005	May 30, 2006 le 30 mai 2006
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	05 February 2005	May 29, 2006 le 29 mai 2006
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	08/05/2005	May 16, 2006 le 16 mai 2006
Synsil Products Inc., Easton, Pennsylvania	09/14/04	May 31, 2006 le 31 mai 2006
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc. Mississauga, Ontario	17-07-2005	May 12, 2006 le 12 mai 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	3/3/2005	June 8, 2006 le 8 juin 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	9/12/2005	May 26, 2006 le 26 mai 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	4/15/2005	May 31, 2006 le 31 mai 2006
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	01/01/2005	June 10, 2006 le 10 juin 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	5/26/2005	May 31, 2006 le 31 mai 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	7/14/2005	April 26, 2006 le 26 avril 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	7/14/2005	April 26, 2006 le 26 avril 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	9/7/2005	May 31, 2006 le 31 mai 2006
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	04/07/2004	June 27, 2006 le 27 juin 2006
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	04/07/2004	June 27, 2006 le 27 juin 2006
Recochem Inc., Brampton, Ontario	7/8/2004	June 8, 2006 le 8 juin 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	7/14/2005	April 26, 2006 le 26 avril 2006
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	06/30/2004	June 29, 2006 le 29 juin 2006
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Canada Inc. Mississauga, Ontario	02-Jul-2004 (English/anglaise) 02-juil.-2004 (French/française)	May 15, 2006 le 15 mai 2006
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	09/16/2005	April 27, 2006 le 27 avril 2006
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	09/16/2005	April 27, 2006 le 27 avril 2006
Texaco Products Inc., Grimsby, Ontario	07/28/2004	June 7, 2006 le 7 juin 2006
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	09/20/2004	June 15, 2006 le 15 juin 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	10/4/2004	June 26, 2006 le 26 juin 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	10/21/2004	June 27, 2006 le 27 juin 2006
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., formerly/antérieurement Air Products & Chemicals Inc. - Chemicals Group, Allentown, Pennsylvania	09/18/2005	June 7, 2006 le 7 juin 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	11/10/2004	June 27, 2006 le 27 juin 2006
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	01/11/2005	June 15, 2006 le 15 juin 2006

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 20, 2002, listed the subjects of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5353, 5355 and 5356 to be the chemical identities and concentrations of four ingredients. The subjects of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions are the chemical identities of nine, five and eight ingredients, respectively.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 14, 2002, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5441 to be the chemical identity and concentration of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of seven and the concentration of eight ingredients.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 14, 2002, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5503 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 1, 2003, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5700 and 5701 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 1, 2003, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5702 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 1, 2003, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5704 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 1, 2003, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5777 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subjects of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5904 and 5905 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient and the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient, respectively. The subjects of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions are the chemical identity of two and the concentration of one ingredient and the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients, respectively.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5920 and 5921 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5957 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 21, 2005, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6028 to be the "chemical identity, chemical name of a controlled product [and] information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product of two ingredients." The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient, the chemical name of a controlled product and information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5913, 6058, 6059 and 6130 were filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5839 and 5843, being claims from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 6028, being a claim from an employer in the province of Ontario, the screening officer found that the MSDS in respect of which the claim was filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario, while the label in respect of which the claim was filed did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the said act.

Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the remaining claims were filed did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

Registry Numbers 5353, 5355 and 5356

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an 8-hour exposure limit value with a skin notation for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

2. Disclose that acute exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression both in workers and in laboratory animals;

3. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression, atrophy and necrosis of the thymus, the spleen and the lymph nodes as well as hypoplasia of the bone marrow in laboratory animals;

4. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse kidney effects in laboratory animals;

5. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause a lowering of fertility in laboratory animals;

6. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals in the absence of maternal toxic effects;

7. Registry Number 5353:

(a) Disclose the presence of four additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product;

(b) Disclose dermal LD₅₀ values for four of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

(d) Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

8. Registry Number 5355:

(a) Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

(b) Add skin contact, inhalation and ingestion as routes of entry;

(d) Disclose dermal LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

(e) Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value in an acceptable manner for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients or the calculated value of 3 271 mg/kg for the controlled product;

9. Registry Number 5356:

(a) Disclose the presence of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product;

(b) Disclose dermal LD₅₀ values for three of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

10. Registry Numbers 5353 and 5356:

(a) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose statements to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes and that medical attention be obtained immediately;

(b) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes. Also disclose that contaminated clothing, footwear and leather goods should be removed under running water;

(c) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

(d) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin and eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

(e) If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E;

11. Registry Numbers 5355 and 5356: Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 5441

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product;

2. Disclose the presence of N,N-dimethylformamide in the controlled product and its CAS Registry Number 68-12-2;

3. Disclose the AIHA WEEL Exposure Limit Value with a skin notation for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

4. Disclose that acute exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression both in workers and in laboratory animals;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose statements to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes and that medical attention be obtained immediately;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

8. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 5.0 mL/kg for N,N-dimethylformamide;

9. Disclose dermal LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

10. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression, atrophy and necrosis of the thymus, the spleen and the lymph nodes as well as hypoplasia of the bone marrow in laboratory animals;

11. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse kidney effects in laboratory animals;

12. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause a lowering of fertility in laboratory animals;

13. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals in the absence of maternal toxic effects;

14. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

15. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin and eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

16. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.

Registry Number 5498

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product and disclose that the real chemical identities are included in the claim for exemption;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

5. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

6. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to be corrosive to the eyes of laboratory animals;

7. Disclose oral LD₅₀ values for four of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

8. Disclose dermal LD₅₀ values for three of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

9. Disclose an LC₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

10. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.

Registry Number 5503

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Delete the statement that alkaryl triazole is not WHMIS regulated;

2. Add eye contact as a route of entry;

3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for both the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Numbers 5517, 5520 and 5521

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 5620

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 5669

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove the statement indicating that the reader should look in section 2 for the exposure limits pertaining to the odour threshold;

2. Add oxides of sulfur to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 5699

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose LD₅₀ values for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces (60–240 mL) of milk or water to dilute the ingested material;

3. Disclose oxides of carbon and sulphur as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Numbers 5700 and 5701

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product;

2. Disclose LD₅₀ values for three of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces of milk or water to dilute the ingested material;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous decomposition products;

5. Registry number 5701:

(a) Disclose that skin contact can cause corrosion;

(b) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

(c) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes.

Registry Number 5702

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that immediate medical attention should be sought in all cases, and that flushing should continue for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement indicating one should give 3 to 4 glasses of water to drink;

6. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 5703

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose a dermal LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while removing contact lenses;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement indicating one should give 3 to 4 glasses of water to drink and replace it with a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces of milk or water to dilute the ingested material;

5. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Numbers 5704 to 5706, inclusive

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the liver of laboratory animals;

3. In relation to the first aid information for inhalation exposure and skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that medical attention be obtained immediately;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement indicating one should give 3 to 4 glasses of water to drink;

5. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

6. Registry Number 5704:

(a) Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

(b) Disclose LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

7. Registry Numbers 5704 and 5705: In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose that medical attention should be sought immediately;

8. Registry Numbers 5705 and 5706: Either disclose lower oral, rat and dermal, rabbit LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients or else disclose calculated values for the controlled product as a whole.

Registry Number 5707

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 15 minutes and that medical attention should be sought immediately;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces of milk or water to dilute the ingested material;

5. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 5708

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oral LD₅₀ values for the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner or disclose a calculated LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 860 mg/kg for the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration. Remove the statement indicating one should give 3 to 4 glasses of water to drink and replace it with a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces of milk or water to dilute the ingested material;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

6. Disclose hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, volatile amines and also oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity;

8. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 5712

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces of water to dilute the ingested material;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the issuance of the decision and order on the claim for exemption, the claimant advised the Commission that sales in Canada of the relevant controlled product have ceased. Consequently, the order issued by the screening officer has effect only if the controlled product is again offered for sale in Canada.

Registry Number 5713

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces of milk or water to dilute the ingested material;

5. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 5714

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes and that medical attention should be sought immediately;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement indicating one should give 3 to 4 glasses of water to drink and add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 5719

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion;

2. Amend the MSDS so as to clearly indicate that the laboratory animal fetal injury attributable to alcohol has been observed in the absence of maternal toxic effects;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement indicating one should give 3 to 4 glasses of water to drink and add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 5722

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes and that medical attention should be sought immediately;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

7. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

8. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.

Registry Number 5723

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces of milk or water to dilute the ingested material;

5. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Numbers 5725 to 5727, inclusive

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Have casualty drink 2–8 ounces (60–240 mL) of milk or water to dilute the ingested material;

2. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 5730

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 5736

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes";

2. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes";

3. Disclose LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 5755

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 5777

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 5839

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove or change contradictory statements concerning the hazards due to ingestion of the controlled product.

Registry Number 5843

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information for eye contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that medical attention be obtained immediately;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

Registry Number 5857

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion and inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

3. Correctly identify the ACGIH TLV–TWA and TLV–STEL values for the ingredient methyl ethyl ketone;

4. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 38 500 ppm for hexane;

5. Disclose the lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, female rat) value of 19.0 mg/L for toluene;

6. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 13.9 mg/L for cyclohexane;

7. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause testicular effects in laboratory animals;

8. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused colour vision loss in humans and has been shown to cause hearing loss in laboratory animals;

9. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause hearing loss as well as affect the immune system in laboratory animals;

10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity;

11. Disclose that acetylsalicylic acid synergistically enhances the hearing loss caused by inhalation exposure to toluene in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 5862

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient is corrosive in the presence of moisture;

2. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the lymph nodes and kidneys and lung and autoimmune diseases;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that material should be quickly and gently brushed away before flushing with water and that flushing should continue for at least 30 minutes while holding eyelid(s) open and taking care not to rinse contaminated water into the unaffected eye or face;

4. In addition to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose instructions to the effect that for contact with dry product, contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods should be removed as soon as possible. Then quickly and gently brush away excess chemical. Wash skin until the soapy feeling disappears from the skin. Obtain medical attention if necessary. Further disclose instructions to the effect that for contact with wet or moist product, excess chemical should be quickly and gently blotted away. Then remove contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods under running water. Wash skin until the soapy feeling disappears from the skin. Obtain medical attention if necessary;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Amend the statement concerning suitable extinguishing agents to advise that carbon dioxide should not be used;

7. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with strong acids;

8. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human and bacterial cells, in vitro;

9. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.

Registry Number 5866

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 5880

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the impression that naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. Disclose that sodium hypochlorite is incompatible with ethylene glycol and that acetaldehyde is incompatible with acetic acid.

Registry Number 5884

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 5885

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 5886

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS.

Registry Number 5897

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the impression that ethylbenzene, xylene and trimethylbenzenes are regulated components of the controlled product.

Registry Numbers 5904 and 5905

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

2. Disclose that the controlled product possesses an aspiration hazard;

3. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

4. Disclose the presence of isopropanol in the controlled product, its CAS registry number 67-63-0 and its percent concentration;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDSs-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with copies of revised versions. These revised versions of the MSDSs were not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Numbers 5920 and 5921

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

Registry Number 5957

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of sodium hydroxide in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 1310-73-2 and its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–STEL = 2 mg/m³ for sodium hydroxide;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 15 minutes. Also disclose that contaminated clothing should be removed under running water;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give a conscious casualty several glasses of water or milk to drink;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is incompatible with phosphorus pentasulfide;

6. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the bone marrow as well as sperm effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 5959

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

2. Disclose that the controlled product possesses an aspiration hazard;

3. Replace the percent concentration range for polyamide with an acceptable WHMIS percent concentration range;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 5968

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–STEL = 10 mg/m³ for distillates, petroleum, hydrotreated paraffinic.

Registry Number 6018

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin and eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 6019

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink;

3. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose the lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 2 639 ppm for cyclohexanone;

5. Correctly identify the ACGIH TLV–TWA and TLV–STEL values for the ingredient xylene;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6025

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1.

Registry Number 6028

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the label. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the label as indicated below.

1. Disclose more specific information on the eye protection requirements relative to the use, handling and storage of the controlled product.

Registry Number 6083

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 6088

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose more specific information on the eye protection requirements relative to the use, handling and storage of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the pH of the controlled product.

Registry Number 6094

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B;

2. Disclose a pH range of 9–11 for the controlled product.

Having regard to the foregoing, and pursuant to section 17 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, notice is hereby given that the screening officer has, for each of the above-noted claims, with the exceptions of those claims bearing Registry Numbers 5839, 5843, 5913, 6028, 6058, 6059 and 6130, directed the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5839 and 5843, the screening officer has ordered the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Code of the Province of Alberta, except that the information in respect of which the claims for exemption were made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer, within the respective time period specified in the foregoing paragraph.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 6028, the screening officer has ordered the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended label to the screening officer, within the respective time period specified in the foregoing paragraph.

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Acting Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-993-4472.

R. BOARDMAN
Chief Screening Officer

[29-1-o]

NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).

Common menu bar links

Left hand menu

Canada Gazette

Consultation

Archives

Publishing Information

Resources

Stay in Touch

Proactive Disclosure

COMMISSIONS

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION