Vol. 140, No. 43 — October 28, 2006

COMMISSIONS

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

The following notice of intention to revoke was sent to the charities listed below because they have not met the filing requirements of the Income Tax Act:

"Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(b) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette."

Business Number	Name/Address
100751361RR0001	CAMP QUATRE SAISONS INC., SAINTE-THÉRÈSE-DE-BLAINVILLE (QUÉ.)
107611535RR0001	LEMSFORD FERRY REGIONAL PARK AUTHORITY, KINDERSLEY, SASK.
107718835RR0001	MONTREAL CHINESE COMMUNITY COUNCIL/LE CONSEIL COMMUNAUTAIRE CHINOIS DE MONTREAL, MONTRÉAL, QUE.
118781004RR0001	ALBERTA PIONEER RAILWAY ASSOCIATION, EDMONTON, ALTA.
118807064RR0001	BETH MEYER SYNAGOGUE, NORTH YORK, ONT.
118836816RR0001	CANADIAN WORLDWIDE FILM FESTIVAL FESTIVAL CANADIEN DES FILMS DU MONDE, MONTRÉAL, QUE.
118874262RR0001	CONNAUGHT AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY, ZENON PARK, SASK.
118937960RR0001	GEYSIR COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY CLUB INC., ARBORG, MAN.
119123248RR0001	ROSEBUD COMMUNITY CLUB, DIDSBURY, ALTA.
119206456RR0001	SURPRISE LAKE SOCIETY, EDSON, ALTA.
119287803RR0001	WALDHEIM AND DISTRICT DONOR'S CHOICE, WALDHEIM, SASK.
124476466RR0001	SOOKE REGION HISTORICAL SOCIETY, SOOKE, B.C.
141349621RR0001	FESTIVAL INTERNATIONAL DU DUO-PIANO DU QUÉBEC/QUEBEC INTERNATIONAL DUO-PIANO FESTIVAL, MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.)
853957272RR0001	CAUSE INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH AND COMMUNITY, RICHMOND HILL, ONT.
854196771RR0001	MOTORCYCLISTS AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION, CURRAN, ONT.
860219641RR0001	THE SAFE ONLINE OUTREACH SOCIETY, MISSION, B.C.
861119204RR0001	THE DILLON FOUNDATION, GREENWOOD, ONT.
865002810RR0001	CWG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ALBERTA, FORT MCMURRAY, ALTA.
865352215RR0001	COMPUTERS SUPPORTING COMMUNITIES WINDSOR, WINDSOR, ONT.
865600928RR0001	SAFE HOUSE FOR GIRLS SOCIETY, TUSKET, N.S.
866960669RR0001	BATTLE HARBOUR LITERACY COUNCIL, MARY'S HARBOUR, N.L.
867385932RR0001	LOGEMENTS ADAPTÉS M.R.C. THÉRÈSE DE BLAINVILLE, SAINTE-THÉRÈSE (QUÉ.)
868051079RR0001	SOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, REGINA, SASK.
870631611RR0001	CROATIAN NATIONAL CENTRE NIAGARA PENINSULA, ST. CATHARINES, ONT.
872968557RR0001	COMITÉ DES FINANCES DE L'ÉCOLE SECONDAIRE L'HÉRITAGE, CORNWALL (ONT.)
876811316RR0001	FRIENDS OF THREE MILE BEND SOCIETY, RED DEER, ALTA.
877421164RR0001	FORT LAWRENCE/BEAUBASSIN HERITAGE ASSOCIATION, AMHERST, N.S.
886115096RR0001	CELEBRATE CANADA COMMITTEE (MANITOBA), WINNIPEG, MAN.
886230598RR0001	FESTIVAL INTERNATIONAL DU FILM DE QUÉBEC INC./INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL OF QUEBEC CITY INC., MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.)
887967446RR0001	HAROLD TOWN LEGACY TRUST, TORONTO, ONT.
888177649RR0001	RINA M. BIDIN FOUNDATION, VANCOUVER, B.C.
888733219RR0001	KOOTENAY LAKE FRESH WATER RESOURCE SOCIETY, CRESTON, B.C.
888812260RR0001	THE TIGNISH HISTORICAL PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC., TIGNISH, P.E.I.
889789327RR0001	CANADIAN NATIVE PLANT CENTRE, CALGARY, ALTA.
890038797RR0001	SHILOH TABERNACLE INC., SAINT JOHN, N.B.
890675341RR0001	DIABÈTE HOTEL-DIEU INC., MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.)
891610370RR0001	THE FOUNDATION FOR LEARNING AND SOCIAL ENHANCEMENT IN LONDON, LONDON, ONT.
892572264RR0001	ÉGLISE ORTHODOXE D'ANTIOCHE DE LA VIERGE-MARIE/ST. MARY'S ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH, MONTRÉAL (QUÉ.)
894178987RR0001	LEGION ROYALE CANADIENNE "ORTONA 42" "FONDS DU COQUELICOT", SHIPPAGAN (N.-B.)

ELIZABETH TROMP
Director General
Charities Directorate

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

APPEALS

Notice No. HA-2006-009

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal will hold public hearings to consider the appeals listed hereunder. The hearings will be held beginning at 9:30 a.m., in the Tribunal's Hearing Room No. 2, 18th Floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario. Interested persons planning to attend should contact the Tribunal at 613-990-2541 for further information and to ensure that the hearings will be held as scheduled.

Customs Act

Appellant v. Respondent (President of the Canada Border Services Agency)

December 2006

Date	Appeal Number	Appellant
5	AP-2006-004	Groupe Cabico Inc.
	Goods in Issue:	Furniture cabinet runners/slides
	Dates of Entry:	September 19, 2003, to September 16, 2004
	Tariff Items at Issue
	Appellant:	8482.80.90.29
	Respondent:	8302.42.00.90
12	AP-2006-016 and AP-2006-018	Pelco Worldwide Inc.
	Goods in Issue:	Digital video recorders and monitors
	Dates of Entry:	December 7, 2001, to February 14, 2005
	Tariff Items at Issue
	Appellant:	85.25, 84.71, 9948.00.00
	Respondent:	8521.90.90
19	AP-2006-002	Western RV Coach Inc.
	Goods in Issue:	1995 used Royal Coach Inc.
	Date of Entry:	September 27, 2002
	Tariff Items at Issue
	Appellant:	NAFTA tariff preferential rate
	Respondent:	Most-favoured-nation treatment

October 19, 2006

By order of the Tribunal

SUSANNE GRIMES
Acting Secretary

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DETERMINATION

Fabricated materials

Notice is hereby given that, after completing its inquiry, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) made a determination (File No. PR-2006-019) on October 17, 2006, with respect to a complaint filed by Pelican Products, Inc. (Pelican) of Edmonton, Alberta, under subsection 30.11(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, R.S.C. 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 47, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. W0002-07CS02/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC) on behalf of the Department of National Defence. The solicitation was for the provision of storage and transport cases.

Pelican alleged that PWGSC accepted an alternate product from the successful bidder that did not meet the specifications.

Having examined the evidence presented by the parties and considered the provisions of the Agreement on Internal Trade and the North American Free Trade Agreement, the Tribunal determined that the complaint was not valid.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Ottawa, October 19, 2006

SUSANNE GRIMES
Acting Secretary

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

Woven polyester/elastomeric stretch lining fabrics

Notice is hereby given that, on October 17, 2006, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal submitted to the Minister of Finance, pursuant to section 19 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a report, with a recommendation for tariff relief in respect of a request filed by Peerless Clothing Inc. regarding woven polyester/elastomeric stretch lining fabrics (Request No. TR-2006-001).

October 17, 2006

By order of the Tribunal

SUSANNE GRIMES
Acting Secretary

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, 819-997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), 819-994-0218 (fax);

— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, 902-426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), 902-426-2721 (fax);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, 204-983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), 204-983-6317 (fax);

— 530–580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, 604-666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), 604-666-8322 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, 514-283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), 514-283-3689 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, 416-952-9096 (telephone), 416-954-6343 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, 306-780-3422 (telephone), 306-780-3319 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, 780-495-3224 (telephone), 780-495-3214 (fax).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2006-594 October 16, 2006

Videotron Ltd.
Saint-Pascal, Quebec

Approved — Broadcasting licence to continue the operation of the Class 3 cable broadcasting distribution undertaking serving Saint-Pascal, subject to the conditions set out in this decision and in the licence. The licence will expire August 31, 2013.

2006-595 October 16, 2006

Videotron Ltd.
La Doré, Quebec

Approved — Broadcasting licence to continue the operation of the Class 3 cable broadcasting distribution undertaking serving La Doré, subject to the conditions set out in this decision and in the licence. The licence will expire August 31, 2013.

2006-596 October 16, 2006

Videotron Ltd.
Dolbeau, Quebec

Approved — Broadcasting licence to continue the operation of the Class 2 cable broadcasting distribution undertaking serving Dolbeau, subject to the conditions set out in this decision and in the licence. The licence will expire August 31, 2013.

2006-597 October 16, 2006

Metromedia CMR Broadcasting Inc.
Montréal, Quebec

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for the commercial radio programming undertaking CFQR-FM Montréal, from January 1, 2007, to August 31, 2010.

2006-598 October 16, 2006

Bell Aliant Regional Communications Inc., general partner, as well as limited partner with Bell Canada and 6583458 Canada Inc. (the limited partners), carrying on business as Bell Aliant Regional Communications Limited Partnership
Saint John/Moncton, New Brunswick; Halifax, Dartmouth, Bedford and Sackville, Nova Scotia; and St. John's, Paradise and Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador

Approved — Licence amendment to replace conditions of licence relating to the compliance with the Direction to the CRTC (Ineligibility of Non-Canadians).

2006-599 October 16, 2006

Aurora Cable TV Limited
Aurora, Ontario

Approved — Licence amendment to add a condition of licence relating to the use of local availabilities in non-Canadian satellite services.

2006-543-1 October 18, 2006

Radio Dégelis inc.
Dégelis and Rivière-du-Loup, Quebec

Erratum — The Commission replaces paragraph 2 of Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2006-543, September 21, 2006, as noted in the decision.

2006-600 October 20, 2006

Radio Nord Communications inc.
Québec, Quebec

Approved — New French-language FM radio programming undertaking in Québec, Quebec.

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC HEARING 2006-9-4

Further to its Broadcasting Notices of Public Hearing CRTC 2006-9 dated August 31, 2006, 2006-9-1 and 2006-9-2 dated September 11 and 20, 2006, and 2006-9-3 dated October 16, 2006, relating to a public hearing which will be held on October 30, 2006, at 9:30 a.m., at the Delta Regina, 1919 Saskatchewan Drive, Regina, Saskatchewan, the Commission announces the following:

The following items are withdrawn from the public hearing and will be rescheduled at a later date.

Item 31

Across Canada
Application No. 2006-0453-9

Application by Rogers Broadcasting Limited for a licence to operate a national pay audio programming undertaking to be known as Rogers Pay Audio.

Item 44

Carbonear, Newfoundland and Labrador
Application No. 2006-0523-0

Application by Newcap Inc. to convert radio station CHVO Carbonear from the AM band to the FM band.

Item 52

Powell River, British Columbia
Application No. 2006-0274-9

Application by CFCP Radio Ltd. to convert radio station CHQB Powell River from the AM band to the FM band.

October 20, 2006

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC HEARING 2006-11

The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on December 18, 2006, at 9 a.m., at the Commission headquarters, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, to consider the following applications. The deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments is November 23, 2006.

1. François Caron, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national English-language Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as The Canadian Public.

2. MyNRG Inc.
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national English-language Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as MyNRG TV.

3. TVA Group Inc.
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national French-language Category 2 pay programming undertaking to be known as Première Loge.

4. Davinder Jhattu, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as Joyt II TV.

5. Davinder Jhattu, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as Joyt News TV.

6. Cosmopolitan Television Canada Company
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national English-language Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as Cosmopolitan Television.

7. Black Walk Corporation
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national English-language Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as Total TV.

8. Hook Up TV Networks Inc.
Across Canada

For a licence to operate a national English-language Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as Hook Up TV.

9. Bragg Communications Incorporated
Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick

For a licence to operate a regional video-on-demand (VOD) programming undertaking.

10. Newcap Inc.
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia

To convert radio station CFDR Halifax from the AM band to the FM band.

11. Radio Humsafar Inc.
Montréal, Quebec

For a licence to operate an AM commercial ethnic radio programming undertaking in Montréal.

12. S. S. TV Inc.
Brampton, Ontario

For a licence to operate an English-language AM commercial (ethnic) radio programming undertaking in Brampton.

13. FormationPLUS, Centre de formation francophone pour adultes
Chapleau, Ontario

For a licence to operate a radiocommunication distribution undertaking to serve Chapleau.

14. Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation
Goderich, Ontario

For a licence to operate an English-language commercial FM radio programming undertaking in Goderich.

15. Neeti P. Ray, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Mississauga, Ontario

For a licence to operate a primarily third-language ethnic commercial AM radio programming undertaking in Mississauga.

16. Frank Thibault, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Niagara, Ontario

For a licence to operate a regional Category 2 English-language specialty programming undertaking to be known as Niagara News TV.

17. CHUM Limited
Kingston, Ontario

To convert radio station CKLC Kingston from the AM band to the FM band.

18. CHUM Limited
Peterborough, Ontario

To convert radio station CKPT Peterborough from the AM band to the FM band.

19. Education Alternative Radio Society
Prince George, British Columbia

For a licence to operate an English-language FM community-based campus radio programming undertaking in Prince George.

October 19, 2006

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-132

Amendment to the Exemption order respecting closed circuit video programming undertakings

The Commission amends the Exemption order respecting closed circuit video programming undertakings to ensure that such undertakings do not operate in a manner that prevents a hotel or motel guest, hospital patient or prison inmate from receiving any programming service listed in section 37 of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations, which sets out the television programming services that must be distributed by direct-to-home (DTH) broadcasting distribution undertakings as part of the basic service.

October 16, 2006

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-133

Determination with respect to the marketing and billing practice by which a broadcasting distribution undertaking treats the provision of service to separate dwellings owned by the same person as a single subscription

In Call for comments on the marketing and billing practice known as "account stacking" in the context of the Commission's regulatory framework for broadcasting distribution undertakings, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006-41, March 31, 2006, the Commission requested comments on the practice whereby a broadcasting distribution undertaking treats the provision of service to two separate residences owned by the same person as a single subscription and remits a wholesale fee to programming services on the basis that only one subscriber is being provided with service.

Having considered the record of the proceeding, the Commission determines that the practice described above is inconsistent with the objectives of the broadcasting policy for Canada as set out in the Broadcasting Act. In order to ensure that the practice ceases, the Commission is amending the applicable distribution and linkage rules, so that when a Class 1, Class 2 or direct-to-home licensee provides a Canadian programming service to a single subscriber at two or more separate dwellings owned or occupied by the same subscriber, the licensee must remit a wholesale fee to the Canadian programming service on a per-dwelling basis.

October 20, 2006

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-134

Linkage requirements for direct-to-home (DTH) satellite distribution undertakings

In this public notice, the Commission sets out revised linkage requirements for direct-to-home (DTH) satellite distribution undertakings. These requirements replace those contained in Linkage requirements for direct-to-home (DTH) satellite distribution undertakings, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2005-120, December 14, 2005. These revisions to the linkage requirements reflect the Commission's determinations set out in Determination with respect to the marketing and billing practice by which a broadcasting distribution undertaking treats the provision of service to separate dwellings owned by the same person as a single subscription, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006-133, October 20, 2006.

October 20, 2006

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-135

Distribution and linkage requirements for Class 1 and Class 2 licensees

In this public notice, the Commission sets out revised distribution and linkage requirements for Class 1 and Class 2 licensees. These requirements replace those contained in Distribution and linkage requirements for Class 1 and Class 2 licensees, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2005-119, December 14, 2005. These revisions to the distribution and linkage requirements reflect the Commission's determinations as set out in Determination with respect to the marketing and billing practice by which a broadcasting distribution undertaking treats the provision of service to separate dwellings owned by the same person as a single subscription, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006-133, October 20, 2006.

October 20, 2006

[43-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2006-136

Call for comments on proposed amendments to the Commission's policy on the distribution of previews, and to its regulations regarding the use of promotional channels by broadcasting distribution undertakings

In this public notice, the Commission requests comments on proposed amendments to its policy regarding free previews and to sections of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations related to the use of promotional channels by broadcasting distribution undertakings. The deadline for the filing of comments is November 20, 2006.

October 20, 2006

[43-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and the label (where applicable), listed below.

Claimant	Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)	Registry Number	MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS)	Date of Decision
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	MERCAPTAN TERMINATED POLYMER	5469	September 10, 2002	July 20, 2006 le 20 juillet 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	KLEEN MCT103	5710	25-SEP-2003	August 17, 2006 le 17 août 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	KLEEN MCT107	5716	25-SEP-2003	August 17, 2006 le 17 août 2006
GE Betz Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania	STYREX40	5729	25 SEP-2003	August 18, 2006 le 18 août 2006
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois	ARMOHIB® 28	5764	8/20/2003	August 16, 2006 le 16 août 2006
Floran Technologies, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	Floran Media Master	5846	03/30/5	September 1, 2006 le 1er septembre 2006
Synsil Products Inc, Easton, Pennsylvania	Composite Mineral Products - XD Series	5863	09/14/04	July 20, 2006 le 20 juillet 2006
Nacan Products Ltd., Brampton, Ontario	DUROFLEX® 37-988B	5872	14-January-2004	August 11, 2006 le 11 août 2006
Hercules Canada (2002) Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	PROSOFT® TQ218 DEBONDER	5898	18-Jan-2005	July 10, 2006 le 10 juillet 2006
Dow Chemical Canada Inc., Sarnia, Ontario	UCARSOL(TM) AP SOLVENT 804/ SOLVANT UCARSOL(MC) AP 804 formerly/ antérieurement UCARSOL (TM) AP Solvent 804	5901	2005.09.23	August 16, 2006 le 16 août 2006
Dow Chemical Canada Inc., Sarnia, Ontario	UCARSOL(TM) AP SOLVENT 806/ SOLVANT UCARSOL(MC) AP 806 formerly/ antérieurement UCARSOL (TM) AP Solvent 806	5902	2005.09.23	August 16, 2006 le 16 août 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	CRW9150 CORROSION INHIBITOR formerly/ antérieurement CRW9150	5917	6/22/2004	August 22, 2006 le 22 août 2006
Innovative Chemical Technologies Canada Ltd., Calgary, Alberta	BR 15	5924	November 2, 2004	September 1, 2006 le 1er septembre 2006
Innovative Chemical Technologies Canada Ltd., Calgary, Alberta	BR 28	5925	November 2, 2004	September 1, 2006 le 1er septembre 2006
Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey	AERO® 856 Promoter	5927	03/09/2006	July 11, 2006 le 11 juillet 2006
Brine-Add Fluids Ltd., Calgary, Alberta	DRILLING DETERGENT L	5954	November 2001	July 31, 2006 le 31 juillet 2006
Recochem Inc., Brampton, Ontario	HYBRID-5X Super Concentrate	5958	7/8/2004	September 22, 2006 le 22 septembre 2006
The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	LUBRIZOL® 5045	5964	16 February 2006	August 23, 2006 le 23 août 2006
Infineum USA LP, Linden, New Jersey	SYNACTO 406	5969	June 5, 2004	August 21, 2006 le 21 août 2006
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	DEHYPOUND HSC CONCENTRATE	5972	04/29/2005 (English/anglaise) 06/07/2004 (French/française)	August 29, 2006 le 29 août 2006
BYK-Chemie USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut	Aquamat 270	5979	06/17/2004	August 31, 2006 le 31 août 2006
Brine-Add Fluids Ltd., Calgary, Alberta	CANFREE	6024	October 2003	July 31, 2006 le 31 juillet 2006
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	OLOA 99470	6027	06/15/2005	August 23, 2006 le 23 août 2006
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	OLOA 4994S	6029	07/28/2004	July 31, 2006 le 31 juillet 2006
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Houston, Texas	OLOA 55402	6037	11/17/2004	August 23, 2006 le 23 août 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	TOLAD® 245 ADDITIVE	6050	9/2/2004	August 17, 2006 le 17 août 2006
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M(TM) AUTOMIX(TM) PANEL BONDING ADHESIVE - PART A, PN 08166	6051	08/09/2004	September 26, 2006 le 26 septembre 2006
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	CRONOX®247 ES Corrosion Inhibitor	6062	10/4/2004	August 22, 2006 le 22 août 2006
Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario	NALFLOTE® 9843	6080	2006/14/12	September 20, 2006 le 20 septembre 2006

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 13, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5846 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5917 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5924 and 5925 to be the chemical identity and concentration of six ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity and concentration of seven ingredients.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, incorrectly listed the product identifier for the controlled product associated with the claim bearing Registry Number 5958 as WIP-16750. The correct product identifier is HYBRID-5X Super Concentrate.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5969 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5972 to be the chemical identity and concentration of six ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of seven ingredients.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 17, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 5979 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 11, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6024 to be the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 11, 2004, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6062 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid with the exception of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5924 and 5925 which were found to be partially valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the MSDS in respect of which the claim bearing Registry Number 6029 was filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 5469, being a claim from an employer in the province of Ontario, the screening officer found that the MSDS and the label relating to the claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario.

Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the remaining claims were filed did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

Registry Number 5469

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the name, address and emergency telephone number of the user of the controlled product;

2. Add oxides of sulphur and hydrogen sulphide to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with strong acids;

4. Remove the LC₅₀ value for the controlled product;

5. Remove the statement in section 6 that the material is not expected to be harmful if absorbed;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink;

7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should administer artificial respiration if breathing has stopped and that a physician should be consulted;

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should also have been shown on the label. The claimant has been ordered to amend the label as indicated below.

1. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and the date of the decision granting the exemption;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the label for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should administer artificial respiration if breathing has stopped.

Registry Numbers 5710 and 5716

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, aerosol) value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement indicating one should give 3 to 4 glasses of water to drink;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products;

5. Registry Number 5710:

(a) Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

(b) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in laboratory animals;

6. Registry Number 5716:

(a) Disclose that chronic skin contact with an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause liver tumours in laboratory animals;

(b) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 5729

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused central nervous system depression;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement indicating one should give 3 to 4 glasses of water to drink;

3. Disclose hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, volatile amines and oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 5764

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Revise the MSDS to show that formaldehyde has been classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and reasonably expected to be a human carcinogen (R) by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) of the United States of America;

2. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes";

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes." Disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Add the "SEN" notation to the disclosed ACGIH CEIL value for formaldehyde;

7. Remove the vacated exposure limit value and disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 20 ppm for butanol;

8. Disclose the specific gravity of the controlled product;

9. Add phosphorus pentoxide to the list of incompatible materials;

10. Disclose that acute dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause irritation to the gastrointestinal tract and bleeding in laboratory animals;

11. Disclose a lower LC₅₀ (1 hour, female rat) value of 1 040 ppm for propargyl alcohol;

12. Disclose an LC₅₀ (1 hour, mouse) value of 5 620 ppm for acetic acid;

13. Disclose that formaldehyde has been shown to cause respiratory sensitization in workers, and dermal sensitization in laboratory animals;

14. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is considered to be a germ cell mutagen based on positive results in in vivo screening tests and that it has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human cells, in vitro;

15. Disclose that another ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

16. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals;

17. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A, D2A and D2B.

Registry Number 5846

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes and medical attention obtained immediately;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed for at least 30 minutes, taking care not to rinse contaminated water into the unaffected eye or face;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink;

6. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products;

7. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause developmental effects in laboratory animals;

8. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 5863

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient is corrosive in the presence of moisture;

2. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the lymph nodes and kidneys and lung and auto-immune diseases;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that material should be quickly and gently brushed away before flushing with water and that flushing should continue for at least 30 minutes while holding eyelid(s) open and taking care not to rinse contaminated water into the unaffected eye or face;

4. In addition to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose instructions to the effect that for contact with dry product, contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods should be removed as soon as possible. Then quickly and gently brush away excess chemical. Wash skin until the soapy feeling disappears from the skin. Obtain medical attention if necessary. Further disclose instructions to the effect that for contact with wet or moist product, excess chemical should be quickly and gently blotted away. Then remove contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods under running water. Wash skin until the soapy feeling disappears from the skin. Obtain medical attention if necessary;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Amend the statement concerning suitable extinguishing agents to advise that carbon dioxide should not be used;

7. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with strong acids;

8. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human and bacterial cells, in vitro;

9. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.

Registry Number 5872

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format, content and wording of the MSDS.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 5898

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 5901 and 5902

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients.

Registry Number 5917

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

2. Correct the impression that naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

3. Disclose the AIHA WEEL Exposure Limit Value with a skin notation for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

4. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is incompatible with alkylaluminum solutions and aluminum powder.

Registry Numbers 5924 and 5925

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;

2. If the reasons for WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B due to the property of mutagenicity;

3. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

4. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value and a lower LC₅₀ (mouse, aerosol) value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

6. Disclose a lower Exposure Limit Value ACGIH-C = 2.98 mg/m³ for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in an in vivo screening test for mutagenicity;

8. Disclose that hexane synergistically enhances the hearing loss caused by inhalation exposure to the aromatic hydrocarbon in laboratory animals;

9. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to fifteen minutes or until the product is removed and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes";

10. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes";

11. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

12. Disclose oxides of chlorine as hazardous decomposition products;

13. Add eye contact as a route of entry;

14. Registry Number 5924: Disclose the chemical identities and CAS numbers of the ingredients called alcohol 1, alcohol 2 and acid;

15. Registry Number 5925: Disclose the chemical identities and CAS numbers of the ingredients called alcohol 2 and acid.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDSs-of-Record respecting these particular claims, the claimant provided the Commission with copies of revised versions. These revised versions of the MSDSs were not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 5927

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 5954

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water or milk to drink.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 5958

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove the concentration range shown for ethylene glycol and disclose its actual concentration or an acceptable range value;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV-STEL = 2 mg/m³ for sodium salt of boric acid;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give a conscious person several glasses of water or milk to drink. Disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Add oxides of sodium and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

5. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient of the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse blood and circulatory effects;

6. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the bone marrow in laboratory animals and that chronic ingestion of another ingredient has been shown to cause adverse effects on sperm, the adrenal glands and the stomach in laboratory animals;

7. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have shown positive results in in vivo screening tests for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 5964

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one glass of water to drink.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 5969

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

2. Add carbon dioxide to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 5972

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

7. Add hydrogen cyanide and oxides of sulfur and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

8. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D2A and E.

Registry Number 5979

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 070 mg/kg for the alkyl ethoxylate;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rat) value of 5 g/kg for the alcohols, C9-11, ethoxylated.

Registry Number 6024

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that the petroleum hydrocarbon has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water or milk to drink;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6027

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6037

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of diphenylamine in the controlled product, its CAS registry number 122-39-4 and its percent concentration.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6050

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the impression that ethylbenzene and trimethylbenzenes are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. Disclose that hexane synergistically enhances the hearing loss caused by inhalation exposure to xylene in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6051

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes";

2. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to "fifteen minutes" and replace it with a time of "at least thirty minutes." Disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 612 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rat) value of 251 mg/kg and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, female rat) value of 157 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkyl amines;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 6062

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 6080

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Having regard to the foregoing, and pursuant to sections 16 and 17 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, notice is hereby given that the screening officer has, for the claims bearing Registry Numbers 5924 and 5925, directed the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, including disclosing the identities of three and two ingredients respectively which were included among the information in respect of which the claims for exemption were made, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

Having regard to the foregoing, and pursuant to section 17 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, notice is hereby given that the screening officer has, for each of the remaining above-noted claims, with the exceptions of those claims bearing Registry Numbers 5469 and 6029, directed the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 5469, the screening officer has ordered the claimant to comply with the provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide copies of the amended MSDS and the amended label to the screening officer, within the respective time period specified in the foregoing paragraph.

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the acting Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-993-4472.

R. BOARDMAN
Chief Screening Officer

[43-1-o]

(Erratum)

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions and orders on claims for exemption

In the notice of decisions and orders on claims for exemption published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, Vol. 140, No. 29, dated Saturday, July 22, 2006, on page 2199, the product identifier for the claim assigned registry No. 5441 was given as GREENSOLV 247C, and on page 2200, the product identifier for the claim assigned registry No. 5839 was given as High-Temperature Corrosion Inhibitor A270.

Notice is hereby given that the product identifiers were in fact GREENSOLV 274C and OilSEEKER Gelling Agent J570 respectively.

R. BOARDMAN
Chief Screening Officer

[43-1-o]

NAFTA SECRETARIAT

WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR EXTRAORDINARY CHALLENGE COMMITTEE

Softwood lumber from Canada

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Softwood Lumber Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America, that on October 12, 2006, the United States withdrew its Request for an Extraordinary Challenge Committee filed on April 27, 2006 (Secretariat File No. ECC-2006-1904-01USA). Therefore, the Request for an Extraordinary Challenge Committee to review the underlying panel decisions in the matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination (Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-2002-1904-03) is terminated on October 12, 2006.

Requests for information concerning the present notice, or concerning the NAFTA Extraordinary Challenge Committee Rules, should be addressed to the Canadian Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Canadian Section, 90 Sparks Street, Suite 705, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B4, 613-992-9388.

FRANÇOY RAYNAULD
Canadian Secretary

[43-1-o]

NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).