Canada Gazette
www.gazette.gc.ca
Common menu bar links
Vol. 142, No. 47 — November 22, 2008
COMMISSIONS
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
EXPIRY REVIEW OF FINDINGS
Stainless steel wire
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice that it will, pursuant to subsection 76.03(3) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), initiate an expiry review (Expiry Review No. RR-2008-004) of its findings made on July 30, 2004, in Inquiry No. NQ-2004-001, concerning the dumping of cold drawn and annealed stainless steel round wire, up to and including 0.300 inches (7.62 mm) in maximum solid cross-sectional dimension, originating in or exported from the Republic of Korea, Switzerland and the United States of America, excluding the products described in the appendix to this notice, and the subsidizing of such product originating in or exported from India, excluding the products described in the appendix to this notice.
Notice of Expiry No. LE-2008-002, issued on September 23, 2008, informed interested persons and governments of the impending expiry of the findings. On the basis of available information, including representations requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review and responses to these representations received by the Tribunal in reply to the notice of expiry, the Tribunal is of the opinion that an expiry review of the findings is warranted. The Tribunal has notified the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), as well as other interested persons and governments, of its decision.
The Tribunal has issued a Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews that can be found on the Tribunal’s Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca. In this expiry review, the CBSA must determine whether the expiry of the findings in respect of stainless steel wire is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing of the goods.
If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing, the CBSA will provide the Tribunal with the information that is required under the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules. The Tribunal will then conduct an inquiry to determine if the continued or resumed dumping and subsidizing is likely to result in injury or retardation. The Tribunal will issue its order and its statement of reasons no later than July 29, 2009.
If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is unlikely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing, the Tribunal will not consider those goods in its subsequent determination of the likelihood of injury or retardation and will issue an order rescinding the findings with respect to those goods.
The CBSA must provide notice of its determination within 120 days after receiving notice of the Tribunal’s decision to initiate an expiry review, that is, no later than March 12, 2009. The CBSA will also notify all persons or governments that were notified by the Tribunal of the commencement of an expiry review, as well as any others that participated in the CBSA’s investigation.
Letters have been sent to parties with a known interest in the expiry review providing them with the schedule respecting both the CBSA’s investigation and the Tribunal’s inquiry, should the CBSA determine that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing.
CBSA’s investigation
The CBSA will conduct its investigation pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and the administrative guidelines set forth in the Trade Programs Directorate’s publication entitled Guidelines on the Conduct of Expiry Review Investigations under the Special Import Measures Act. Any information submitted to the CBSA by interested persons concerning this investigation is deemed to be public information unless clearly designated as confidential. Where the submission is confidential, a non-confidential edited version or summary of the submission must also be provided which will be disclosed to interested parties upon request.
With respect to the CBSA’s investigation, the schedule specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies to the expiry review questionnaires, the date on which the CBSA exhibits will be available to parties to the proceeding, the date on which the administrative record will be closed and the dates for the filing of submissions by parties in the proceeding. Further information regarding the CBSA’s investigation can be obtained by contacting the CBSA officer as mentioned below.
Tribunal’s inquiry
Should the CBSA determine that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing, the Tribunal will conduct its inquiry, pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and its Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews, to determine if there is a likelihood of injury or retardation. The schedule for the Tribunal’s inquiry specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies by domestic producers to Part E of the expiry review questionnaire, the date for the filing of updated information from domestic producers, importers and exporters to the expiry review questionnaire replies, the date on which information on the record will be made available by the Tribunal to interested parties and counsel that have filed notices of participation and the dates for the filing of submissions by interested parties.
The Tribunal’s Guide to Making Requests for Product Exclusions, which can be found on the Tribunal’s Web site, describes the procedure for filing requests for specific product exclusions. The Guide includes a form for filing requests for product exclusions and a form for any party that opposes a request to respond to such requests. This does not preclude parties from making submissions in a different format if they so wish, provided all of the information and supporting documentation requested in the forms are included. Requests to exclude goods from the findings shall be filed by interested parties no later than noon, on May 7, 2009. Parties opposed or consenting or not opposed to the request for exclusion shall file written reply submissions no later than noon, on May 19, 2009. Should the request for a specific product exclusion be opposed, and if the interested party wishes to reply, it must do so no later than noon, on May 25, 2009.
Under section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must submit to the Tribunal, at the time the information is provided, a statement designating the information as confidential, together with an explanation as to why the information is designated as confidential. Furthermore, the person must submit a non-confidential edited version or non-confidential summary of the information designated as confidential or a statement indicating why such an edited version or summary cannot be made.
Public hearing
The Tribunal will hold a public hearing relating to this expiry review in the Tribunal Hearing Room, 18th Floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario, commencing on June 9, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., to hear evidence and representations by interested parties.
Each interested person or government wishing to participate at the hearing as a party must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before March 20, 2009. Each counsel who intends to represent a party at the hearing must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before March 20, 2009.
To allow the Tribunal to determine whether simultaneous interpretation will be required for the hearing, each interested person or government filing a notice of participation and each counsel filing a notice of representation must advise the Secretary, at the same time that they file the notice, whether they and their witnesses will be using English or French or both languages at the hearing.
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules govern these proceedings.
In order to observe and understand production processes, the Tribunal, accompanied by its staff, may conduct plant visits.
Communication
Requests for information, written submissions and correspondence regarding the CBSA’s investigation should be addressed to Mr. Pat Mulligan, Canada Border Services Agency, Anti-dumping and Countervailing Program, Urbandale Building, 11th Floor, 100 Metcalfe Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L8, 613-952-6720 (telephone), 613-948-4844 (fax), Pat.Mulligan@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca (email).
A copy of the CBSA’s investigation schedule and the expiry review investigation guidelines are available on the CBSA’s Web site at www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/sima-lmsi/er-rre/menu-eng.html.
Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding the Tribunal’s inquiry should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).
Parties and the public may file documents electronically with the Tribunal through its Secure E-filing Service. The service utilizes the Government of Canada’s epass system, which allows the secure transmission of confidential business information. The information is fully encrypted from the sender to the Tribunal.
However, parties must still file paper copies in the required number as instructed. Where a party is required to file hard copies, the electronic version and the hard-copy version must be identical. In case of discrepancies, the hard-copy version will be considered the original.
Written and oral communication with the CBSA and the Tribunal may be in English or in French.
Ottawa, November 12, 2008
HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary
APPENDIX
EXCLUDED PRODUCTS
- Nickel-coated stainless steel wire.
- Copper-coated stainless steel wire.
- Stainless steel wire for use in the manufacture of springs, per ASTM A313, matte finish, lubricant coated (all types), in all grades and in all diameters.
- Stainless steel wire in diameters of 0.032 inches (0.813 mm) and smaller.
- Stainless steel lashing wire.
- Type 27-7MO (trade name) stainless steel wire, also identified as UNS S31277, or equivalent.
- Types 302 and 430 stainless steel cold-heading wire for use in the manufacture of semi-tubular solid rivets.
- Types 308LHS, 309LHS, 387, 409CB and 430LCB stainless steel welding wire packaged in fibre-drum bulk packs, drum packs or barrel packs, known as “Tech Paks” or equivalent, in sizes of 250 lbs. (113.4 kg) or greater, for use in long-run welding applications.
- Type 439 titanium stabilized, solid stainless steel welding wire packaged in 500-lb. (226.8-kg) drums.
- Type A-286 stainless steel cold-heading wire, also identified as AISI No. 660, UNS K66286 DIN-1.4980, with the following composition: 0.08% max. carbon, 2.00% max. manganese, 1.00% max. silicon, 0.025% max. phosphorous, 0.025% max. sulfur, 13.50/16.00% chromium, 24.00/27.00% nickel, 1.00/1.50% molybdenum, 0.50% max. copper, 1.00% max. cobalt, 0.35% max. aluminum, 1.90/2.35% max. titanium, 0.10/0.50% vanadium and 0.003/0.010% boron.
- Type A286/A286SF stainless steel cold-heading wire.
- Type XM-19 stainless steel wire, also identified as UNS S20910.
[47-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
EXPIRY REVIEW OF FINDINGS
Wood slats
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice that it will, pursuant to subsection 76.03(3) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), initiate an expiry review (Expiry Review No. RR-2008-003) of its findings made on June 18, 2004, in Inquiry No. NQ-2003-003, concerning wood slats originating in or exported from Mexico and the People’s Republic of China.
Notice of Expiry No. LE-2008-001, issued on August 12, 2008, informed interested persons and governments of the impending expiry of the findings. On the basis of available information, including representations requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review and responses to these representations received by the Tribunal in reply to the notice of expiry, the Tribunal is of the opinion that an expiry review of the findings is warranted. The Tribunal has notified the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), as well as other interested persons and governments, of its decision.
The Tribunal has issued a Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews that can be found on the Tribunal’s Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca. In this expiry review, the CBSA must determine whether the expiry of the findings in respect of wood slats is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping of the goods.
If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping, the CBSA will provide the Tribunal with the information that is required under the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules. The Tribunal will then conduct an inquiry to determine if the continued or resumed dumping is likely to result in injury or retardation. The Tribunal will issue its order and statement of reasons no later than July 15, 2009.
If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is unlikely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping, the Tribunal will not consider those goods in its subsequent determination of the likelihood of injury or retardation and will issue an order rescinding the findings with respect to those goods.
The CBSA must provide notice of its determination within 120 days after receiving notice of the Tribunal’s decision to initiate an expiry review, that is, no later than March 6, 2009. The CBSA will also notify all persons or governments that were notified by the Tribunal of the commencement of an expiry review, as well as any others that participated in the CBSA’s investigation.
Letters have been sent to parties with a known interest in the expiry review providing them with the schedule respecting both the CBSA’s investigation and the Tribunal’s inquiry, should the CBSA determine that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping.
CBSA’s investigation
The CBSA will conduct its investigation pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and the administrative guidelines set forth in the Trade Programs Directorate’s publication entitled Guidelines on the Conduct of Expiry Review Investigations under the Special Import Measures Act. Any information submitted to the CBSA by interested persons concerning this investigation is deemed to be public information unless clearly designated as confidential. Where the submission is confidential, a non-confidential edited version or summary of the submission must also be provided which will be disclosed to interested parties upon request.
With respect to the CBSA’s investigation, the schedule specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies to the expiry review questionnaires, the date on which the CBSA exhibits will be available to parties to the proceeding, the date on which the administrative record will be closed and the dates for the filing of submissions by parties in the proceeding. Further information regarding the CBSA’s investigation can be obtained by contacting the CBSA officer as mentioned below.
Tribunal’s inquiry
Should the CBSA determine that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping, the Tribunal will conduct its inquiry, pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and its Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews, to determine if there is a likelihood of injury or retardation. The schedule for the Tribunal’s inquiry specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies by domestic producers to Part E of the expiry review questionnaire, the date for the filing of updated information from domestic producers, importers and exporters to the expiry review questionnaire replies, the date on which information on the record will be made available by the Tribunal to interested parties and counsel that have filed notices of participation and the dates for the filing of submissions by interested parties.
The Tribunal’s Guide to Making Requests for Product Exclusions, which can be found on the Tribunal’s Web site, describes the procedure for filing requests for specific product exclusions. The Guide includes a form for filing requests for product exclusions and a form for any party that opposes a request to respond to such requests. This does not preclude parties from making submissions in a different format if they so wish, provided all of the information and supporting documentation requested in the forms are included. Requests to exclude goods from the findings shall be filed by interested parties no later than noon, on April 23, 2009. Parties opposed or consenting or not opposed to the request for exclusion shall file written reply submissions no later than noon, on May 1, 2009. Should the request for a specific product exclusion be opposed, and if the interested party wishes to reply, it must do so no later than noon, on May 11, 2009.
Under section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must submit to the Tribunal, at the time the information is provided, a statement designating the information as confidential, together with an explanation as to why the information is designated as confidential. Furthermore, the person must submit a non-confidential edited version or non-confidential summary of the information designated as confidential or a statement indicating why such an edited version or summary cannot be made.
Public hearing
The Tribunal will hold a public hearing relating to this expiry review in the Tribunal Hearing Room, 18th Floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario, commencing on May 26, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., to hear evidence and representations by interested parties.
Each interested person or government wishing to participate in the hearing as a party must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before March 16, 2009. Each counsel who intends to represent a party at the hearing must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before March 16, 2009.
To allow the Tribunal to determine whether simultaneous interpretation will be required for the hearing, each interested person or government filing a notice of participation and each counsel filing a notice of representation must advise the Secretary, at the same time that they file the notice, whether they and their witnesses will be using English or French or both languages at the hearing.
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules govern these proceedings.
In order to observe and understand production processes, the Tribunal, accompanied by its staff, may conduct plant visits.
Communication
Requests for information, written submissions and correspondence regarding the CBSA’s investigation should be addressed to Mr. Michel Desmarais, Anti-dumping and Countervailing Program, Canada Border Services Agency, Urbandale Building, 11th Floor, 100 Metcalfe Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L8, 613-954-7188 (telephone), 613-954-2510 (fax), MichelD.Desmarais@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca (email).
A copy of the CBSA’s investigation schedule and the expiry review investigation guidelines are available on the CBSA’s Web site at www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/sima-lmsi/er-rre/menu-eng.html.
Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding the Tribunal’s inquiry should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).
Parties and the public may file documents electronically with the Tribunal through its Secure E-filing Service. The service utilizes the Government of Canada’s epass system, which allows the secure transmission of confidential business information. The information is fully encrypted from the sender to the Tribunal.
However, parties must still file paper copies in the required number as instructed. Where a party is required to file hard copies, the electronic version and the hard-copy version must be identical. In case of discrepancies, the hard-copy version will be considered the original.
Written and oral communication with the CBSA and the Tribunal may be in English or in French.
Ottawa, November 7, 2008
HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary
[47-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES
The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission’s original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:
— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, 819-997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), 819-994-0218 (fax);
— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, 902-426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), 902-426-2721 (fax);
— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, 204-983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), 204-983-6317 (fax);
— 530–580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, 604-666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), 604-666-8322 (fax);
— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, 514-283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), 514-283-3689 (fax);
— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, 416-952-9096 (telephone), 416-954-6343 (fax);
— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, 306-780-3422 (telephone), 306-780-3319 (fax);
— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, 780-495-3224 (telephone), 780-495-3214 (fax).
Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.
Secretary General
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
DECISIONS
The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.
2008-165-1 November 7, 2008
Encore Avenue Ltd.
British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nunavut, Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories
Correction — French-language version of Broadcasting Decision 2008-165, August 8, 2008, by replacing the second condition of licence in paragraph 20 as set out in the decision.
2008-238-1 November 7, 2008
Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Regina, Pilot Butte, White City, Saskatoon, Moose Jaw, Prince Albert, Yorkton, Estevan, Weyburn, Swift Current, North Battleford and Battleford, Saskatchewan
Correction — Broadcasting Decision 2008-238, August 28, 2008, by replacing condition of licence 6 of the French-language text as indicated in the decision.
2008-305 November 7, 2008
CTVglobemedia Inc., on behalf of its subsidiary 4358350
Canada Inc. Across Canada
Approved — Amendments to the broadcasting licence for the English-language specialty television service known as MuchMusic by adding to the list of program categories from which it may draw programming and by amending the condition of licence relating to Canadian content obligations.
2008-306 November 13, 2008
Movie Central Ltd.
British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nunavut, Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories
Approved — Amendments to the broadcasting licence for the English-language pay television service known as Movie Central.
2008-307 November 13, 2008
Encore Avenue Ltd.
British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nunavut, Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories
Approved — Amendments to the broadcasting licence for the English-language pay television programming undertaking known as Encore Avenue.
2008-308 November 14, 2008
Fairchild Radio (Vancouver FM) Ltd.
Vancouver, British Columbia
Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for CHKG-FM Vancouver.
Denied — Amendment to the conditions of licence to permit the broadcasting of programming in Mandarin.
2008-309 November 14, 2008
Newcap Inc.
Sudbury, Ontario
Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for the English-language commercial FM radio programming undertaking CHNO-FM Sudbury.
2008-310 November 14, 2008
Newcap Inc.
Camrose, Alberta
Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the English-language AM radio programming undertaking CFCW Camrose.
2008-311 November 14, 2008
CTVglobemedia Inc., on behalf of its subsidiary 4358350
Canada Inc.
Across Canada
Complaints regarding the broadcast prior to the watershed hour by MuchMusic of Spring Break ’08, a promotional spot for that program and an interview aired on Much on Demand.
[47-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING 2008-12-1
Notice of consultation and hearing — Review of English- and French-language broadcasting services in English and French linguistic minority communities in Canada — Additional documents placed on the public record of the proceeding
Further to the publication of Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing 2008-12, dated October 16, 2008, relating to a public hearing that will be held commencing on January 13, 2009, at 9 a.m., at the Conference Centre, Phase IV, 140 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, the Commission announces that additional documents have been placed on the public record of the proceeding.
Deadline for submission of comments: November 20, 2008
November 7, 2008
[47-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING 2008-14
Notice of consultation and hearing
January 26, 2009
Orillia, Ontario
Deadline for submission of interventions/comments:
December 18, 2008
The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on January 26, 2009, at 8:30 a.m., at the Best Western Mariposa Inn and Conference Centre, 400 Memorial Avenue, Orillia, Ontario, to consider the following applications:
Given the number of appearing items to be considered, the Commission would like to advise that it may have to sit on Saturday, January 31, 2009, to complete its consideration of these items.
Preamble
Items 1 to 16
On April 10, 2008, the Commission issued Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2008-30, calling for applications for a broadcasting licence to provide a commercial radio service to serve Orillia, Ontario.
On May 13, 2008, the Commission issued Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2008-42, calling for applications for a broadcasting licence to provide a commercial radio service to serve Bracebridge and Gravenhurst, Ontario.
In response to these calls, the Commission has received a number of applications for licences to serve these markets.
Some of these applications are technically mutually exclusive. These applications are
For Orillia
Items 1 to 7 are technically mutually exclusive proposing the use of the frequency 89.1 MHz.
These applications, along with item 8, will be treated as competitive radio applications for Orillia, Ontario.
For Bracebridge and Gravenhurst
Items 9 to 11 are technically mutually exclusive proposing the use of the frequencies 101.7 MHz and 101.9 MHz.
Items 13 to 15 are technically mutually exclusive proposing the use of the frequency 102.3 MHz.
These applications, along with items 12 and 16, will be treated as competitive radio applications for Bracebridge and Gravenhurst, Ontario.
Item 17
This involves the licence renewal application of the English-language commercial radio undertaking CJBQ Belleville, Ontario, whereby the station has been found to be operating in apparent non-compliance with the Radio Regulations, 1986.
Item 18
This involves the English-language commercial radio programming undertaking CHSC St. Catharines, Ontario, whereby the station has been found to be operating in apparent non-compliance with the Radio Regulations, 1986.
The Commission has also received complaints concerning allegations that CHSC has re-oriented a significant portion of its programming to serve the Italian community of Toronto.
Items 19 to 39
The Commission intends to consider, subject to interventions, items 19 to 39 during the non-appearance phase of the public hearing.
1. Nick Montague, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Orillia, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Orillia.
2. Larche Communications Inc.
Orillia, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Orillia.
3. Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation
Orillia, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Orillia.
4. Newcap Inc.
Orillia, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Orillia.
5. Debra McLaughlin, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Orillia, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Orillia.
6. Frank Torres, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Orillia, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Orillia.
7. Rock 95 Broadcasting Ltd.
Orillia, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Orillia.
8. Instant Information Services Incorporated
Orillia, Ontario
For a licence to operate a low power English-language tourist information FM radio programming undertaking in Orillia.
9. JOCO Communications Inc.
Gravenhurst, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Gravenhurst.
10. JOCO Communications Inc.
Gravenhurst, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Gravenhurst.
11. Instant Information Services Incorporated
Gravenhurst, Ontario
For a licence to operate a low power English-language tourist information FM radio station in Gravenhurst.
12. Muskoka-Parry Sound Broadcasting Limited
Huntsville, Ontario
Relating to the licence of the English-language commercial radio station CFBK-FM Huntsville.
13. Larche Communications Inc.
Bracebridge/Gravenhurst, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Bracebridge, Ontario.
14. Bill (William) Wrightsell, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Gravenhurst, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Gravenhurst.
15. Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation
Gravenhurst, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Gravenhurst.
16. Evanov Communications Inc., on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Gravenhurst, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Gravenhurst.
17. Quinte Broadcasting Company Limited
Belleville, Ontario
To renew the licence of the English-language commercial radio programming undertaking CJBQ Belleville, expiring August 31, 2009.
18. Pellpropco Inc.
St. Catharines, Ontario
The Commission has received complaints regarding Pellpropco Inc., licensee of the English-language commercial radio programming undertaking CHSC St. Catharines, concerning allegations that CHSC has re-oriented a significant portion of its programming to serve the Italian community of Toronto.
19. The Family Channel Inc.
Across Canada
For a licence to operate a national English-language Category 2 specialty television programming undertaking to be known as Family Extreme.
20. Fairchild Television Ltd.
Across Canada
For a licence to operate a national general interest, third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty television programming undertaking to be known as Fairchild Television II.
21. Fairchild Television Ltd.
Across Canada
For a licence to operate a national general interest, third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty television programming undertaking to be known as Talentvision II.
22. Surjit S. Gill, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Across Canada
For a licence to operate a national niche third-language ethnic Category 2 specialty programming undertaking to be known as Music India 2 Television.
23. Acadia Broadcasting Limited
Bridgewater, Nova Scotia
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Bridgewater.
24. Newcap Inc.
Elliot Lake, Timmins, Parry Sound, Bracebridge, Kapuskasing, Hearst, Iroquois Falls,
Bancroft, Cochrane, North Bay, Haliburton and Huntsville, Ontario
For authority to acquire from The Haliburton Broadcasting Group Inc. (Haliburton) the assets of several commercial radio programming undertakings.
25. Subanasiri Vaithilingam, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Scarborough, Ontario
For a licence to operate an AM commercial ethnic radio programming undertaking in Scarborough.
26. Five Amigos Broadcasting Inc.
Wallaceburg, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Wallaceburg.
27. Kumar Nadarajah, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated
Markham, Ontario
For a licence to operate an AM commercial ethnic radio programming undertaking in Markham.
28. Mornington Communications Co-operative Limited
Milverton, Ontario
For a licence to operate a regional video-on-demand programming undertaking to serve the villages and surrounding rural areas of Milverton, Gadshill, Newton, Millbank, Hesson, and portions of Listowel.
29. Hay Communications Co-operative Limited
Zurich, Ontario
For a licence to operate a regional video-on-demand programming undertaking to serve the villages and surrounding rural areas of Zurich, Grand Bend and Dashwood.
30. My Broadcasting Corporation
Brighton, Ontario
For a licence to operate an English-language FM commercial radio programming undertaking in Brighton.
31. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Windsor and Leamington, Ontario
To convert radio station CBE Windsor from the AM band to the FM band.
32. Touch Canada Broadcasting (2006) Inc. (the general partner), and 1188011 Alberta
Ltd. and Touch Canada Broadcasting Inc. (the limited partners), carrying on business
as Touch Canada Broadcasting Limited Partnership
Calgary, Alberta
For a licence to operate an English-language AM commercial radio programming undertaking in Calgary.
33. 3937844 Canada Inc.
St. Paul, Alberta
To convert radio station CHLW St. Paul from the AM band to the FM band.
34. 3937844 Canada Inc.
High Prairie, Alberta
To convert radio station CKVH High Prairie from the AM band to the FM band.
35. Merritt Broadcasting Ltd.
Merritt, British Columbia
To convert the English-language commercial radio station CJNL Merritt from the AM band to the FM band.
36. N L Broadcasting Ltd.
Merritt, British Columbia
To amend the licence of the English-language AM commercial radio programming undertaking CHNL Kamloops, British Columbia.
37. Cowichan Valley Community Radio Society
Lake Cowichan, British Columbia
For a licence to operate an English-language FM developmental community radio programming undertaking in Lake Cowichan.
38. Sun Country Radio Ltd.
Kelowna, British Columbia
To acquire the assets of the radio programming undertaking CKKO-FM Kelowna from Sun Country Cablevision Ltd.
39. Northern Lights Entertainment Inc.
Iqaluit, Nunavut
For authority to acquire from Nunavut Nalautinga Ltd. (Nalautinga) the assets of the English-language commercial radio programming undertaking CKIQ-FM Iqaluit.
November 13, 2008
[47-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2008-106
Notice of consultation
Applications received
Various locations
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: December 12, 2008
The Commission has received the following applications:
1. Astral Broadcasting Group Inc.
Across Canada
To amend the licence of the national French-language pay television service known as Super Écran.
2. Astral Broadcasting Group Inc.
Eastern Canada
To amend the licence of the regional English-language pay television service known as The Movie Network.
November 7, 2008
[47-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PUBLIC NOTICE 2008-107
Notice of consultation
Applications received
Various locations
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: December 18, 2008
The Commission has received the following applications:
1. Newcap Inc.
Elmira, Prince Edward Island
To amend the licence of the English-language commercial radio station CKQK-FM Charlottetown.
2. Newcap Inc.
Elmira, Prince Edward Island
To amend the licence of the English-language commercial radio station CHTN-FM Charlottetown.
3. Newcap Inc.
St. Edward, Prince Edward Island
To amend the licence of the English-language commercial radio station CKQK-FM Charlottetown.
4. Newcap Inc.
St. Edward, Prince Edward Island
To amend the licence of the English-language commercial radio station CHTN-FM Charlottetown.
5. Bruce Telecom
Tiverton, Paisley, Port Elgin, Kincardine and Southampton, Ontario
To amend the licence of the regional video-on-demand programming undertaking to serve Tiverton, Paisley, Port Elgin, Kincardine and Southampton, Ontario.
November 13, 2008
[47-1-o]
NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).
