COMMISSIONS

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DETERMINATION

Industrial equipment

Notice is hereby given that, after completing its inquiry, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) made a determination (File No. PR-2008-061) on August 5, 2009, with respect to a complaint filed by Neosoft Technologies Inc. (Neosoft), of Québec, Quebec, under subsection 30.11(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, R.S.C. 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 47, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. K8A01-080193/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services on behalf of the Department of the Environment. The solicitation was for the provision of a control system for a dynamometer.

Neosoft alleged that its proposal was improperly evaluated.

Having examined the evidence presented by the parties and considered the provisions of the Agreement on Internal Trade and the North American Free Trade Agreement, the Tribunal determined that the complaint was valid.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Ottawa, August 5, 2009

SUSANNE GRIMES
Acting Secretary

[33-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) listed below.

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on April 1, 2006, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6432 and 6443 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on April 1, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6530 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on April 1, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6546 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 15, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6563 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 15, 2006, incorrectly listed the product identifier for the controlled product associated with the claim bearing Registry Number 6597 as PARALOID (TM) BTA-717N Impact Modifier. The correct product identifier is PARALOID™ BTA-717 Impact Modifier.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 15, 2006, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6660 and 6661 to be the chemical identity of four and three ingredients, respectively. The subjects of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions are the chemical identity of eight and seven ingredients, respectively.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6668 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6703 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The Notice also incorrectly listed the name of the company which filed the claim bearing registry number 6703 as Marquis Fluids. The correct company name is Chemfax Products Ltd.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6708 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients and the chemical identity and concentration of one further ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients and the chemical identity and concentration of one further ingredient.

10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6720 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6728 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.

12. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6738 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

13. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6757 and 6760 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subjects of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions are the chemical identity of three and five ingredients, respectively.

14. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6765 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

15. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 24, 2007, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6789 and 6790 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

16. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 24, 2007, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6824 and 6862 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

17. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 24, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6867 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient.

18. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 24, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6869 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

19. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 24, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6878 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.

20. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6924 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient.

21. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6930 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.

22. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6938 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

23. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6947 to be the chemical identity of six ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

24. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6953 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

25. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6970 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

26. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subjects of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6984, 6985, 6987, 6995, 7000, 7001, 7004, 7009 and 7014 to be the chemical identity of three, four, four, two, two, two, one, four and three ingredients, respectively. The subjects of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions are the chemical identity of two, three, two, one, one, one, two, three and two ingredients, respectively.

27. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7021 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

28. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7026 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

29. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7040 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

30. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7048 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

31. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 8, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7069 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients and the concentration of one further ingredient.

32. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 8, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7070 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient and the concentration of one further ingredient.

33. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 8, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7108 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients and the concentration of two further ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients and the concentration of one further ingredient.

34. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7116 and 7117 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

35. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7120 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient.

36. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7131 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

37. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Number 7154 and 7164 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

38. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 10, 2008, incorrectly listed the product identifier for the controlled product associated with the claim bearing Registry Number 7248 as Coalbed Methan Foamer B271. The correct product identifier is Coalbed Methane Foamer B271.

39. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 10, 2008, incorrectly listed the name of the company which filed the claim bearing Registry Number 7256 as Thermpos Trading GmbH. The correct company name is Thermphos Trading GmbH.

40. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 10, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7279 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6588, 6589, 6597, 6617, 6655, 6708, 6855, 6860, 6904, 6936, 6954, 6968, 7023, 7035, 7041, 7093, 7094, 7095, 7114, 7121, 7150, 7164 and 7279 were filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7246, being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS in respect of which the claim was filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2006 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6529, 6530, 6738 and 7248, also being claims from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2006 of the Province of Alberta.

Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the remaining claims were filed did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In all cases where the material safety data sheet was determined not to be in compliance with the relevant legislation, the screening officer offered the claimant the possibility of entering into an undertaking to make the changes necessary to bring the MSDS into compliance. Pursuant to subsection 16.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the claimant was given 30 days to provide the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS amended as necessary.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE SCREENING OFFICER SATISFIED THE CLAIMANT HAS TAKEN MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 6443

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 3, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as carbonate compound was a part of the claim for exemption;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for at least 30 minutes;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 6546

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 2, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4 g/kg for ethylene glycol;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL ceiling = 5 mg/m³ for sodium phosphate, tribasic;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is incompatible with alkylaluminum solutions as well as aluminum and magnesium powders;

5. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 6563

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 11, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Correct the implication that naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

3. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the thymus and spleen in laboratory animals. Further disclose that subchronic ingestion of the ingredient has been shown to cause adverse effects on the lungs, liver and prostate of laboratory animals;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

5. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 mg/m³ for kerosene;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as a confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6584

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 6590

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6598

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 6625

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 6, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that calcium derivative is an ingredient of the controlled product.

Registry Number 6646

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 6, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose ingestion as a route of entry.

Registry Number 6652

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be washed with water for at least 15-30 minutes;

2. Remove any reference to a time frame of 15 minutes only for the flushing recommendation for first aid measures in cases of skin contact;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, modify or remove the statement to give one to two large glasses of water to drink;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and oxides of nitrogen as hazardous decomposition products;

5. Disclose the liver as a target organ;

6. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1 020 mg/kg for 2-aminoethanol.

Registry Number 6660

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of four additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat, aerosol) value of 2 180 mg/m³ for hydrotreated light naphthenic distillates;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. Disclose that the heterocycle is a dermal sensitizer in laboratory animals;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 6661

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of four additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Disclose LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

4. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause irritation to the gastrointestinal tract in laboratory animals;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.

Registry Number 6665

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of ethoxylated, propoxylated hexadecanol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 9087-53-0 and its percent concentration.

Registry Numbers 6692 and 6693

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 50 ppm for decanol;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.72 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3.56 mL/kg for decanol;

3. In relation to the first aid information for skin and eye contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that medical advice be obtained;

4. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6715

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink;

2. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose a statement indicating that users should comply with all federal, provincial and local regulations when disposing of waste from the controlled product.

Registry Number 6720

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 6730

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink;

3. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 6750

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 22, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that ethylbenzene and toluene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink;

5. Correctly identify the ACGIH TLV–TWA and TLV–STEL values for the ingredient xylene;

6. Revise the MSDS to show that formaldehyde has been classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

Registry Numbers 6757 and 6760

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 2, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Delete the statement that vinyl polymer is not WHMIS-regulated;

2. Correct the implication that ethylbenzene and toluene are regulated components of the controlled product;

3. Correct the implication that the controlled product is merely moderately irritating to the eyes as opposed to being a corrosive material;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

5. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

6. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 5 448 mg/kg for dipropylene glycol methyl ether acetate;

7. Correctly identify the ACGIH TLV–TWA and TLV–STEL values for the ingredient xylene;

8. Registry Number 6757: Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

9. Registry Number 6760: Delete the statements that the two organic pigments are not WHMIS-regulated.

Registry Number 6765

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 25, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredients known as fatty acids present at the concentration ranges of 30–60% and 1–5% were a part of the claim for exemption.

Registry Number 6784

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6785

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of titanium dioxide in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 13463-67-7, its percent concentration and the fact that it has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 10 mg/m³ for titanium dioxide.

Registry Number 6786

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of 2-butanone in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 78-93-3 and its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 300 ppm for 2-butanone;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

4. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 6787

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of silicon dioxide in an acceptable manner.

Registry Numbers 6788 and 6789

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes;

2. Registry Number 6788:

(a) Disclose the presence of 2-butanone in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 78-93-3 and its percent concentration;

(b) Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 300 ppm for 2-butanone.

Registry Number 6790

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of N, N′′-1,4-phenylene-bis(N′N′-dimethylurea in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 89305-77-1 and its percent concentration;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Numbers 6801 and 6802

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes;

2. Registry Number 6801: Disclose that acute exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6804

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 6810

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 2, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of 1-decanol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 112-30-1 and its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the presence of 1-octanol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 111-87-5 and its percent concentration;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 50 ppm for 1-octanol;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes. Also disclose that contaminated clothing, including contaminated footwear and leather goods, should be removed under running water;

5. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current time frame and replace it with a time of “at least thirty minutes”;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

7. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.72 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3.56 mL/kg for 1-decanol.

Registry Number 6811

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 2, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add skin contact as a primary route of entry;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 15 minutes. Also disclose that contaminated clothing, including contaminated footwear and leather goods, should be removed under running water;

3. Add a section for first aid advice pertaining to the measures to be taken in cases of ingestion and disclose that medical attention should be sought immediately;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6820

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose correct information concerning the proper storage conditions for the controlled product;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 500 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 750 ppm for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

3. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 71 000 mg/m³ for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 6824

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 6825

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 6835

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to “at least fifteen minutes” and replace it with a time of “at least thirty minutes”;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 20.6 g/kg for aliphatic glycol ether.

Registry Number 6841

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be corrosive to the eyes of laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to “at least fifteen minutes” and replace it with a time of “at least thirty minutes”;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 20.6 g/kg for aliphatic glycol ether.

Registry Number 6842

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 20.6 g/kg for aliphatic glycol ether.

Registry Number 6843

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 6844

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 27, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that aliphatic amine has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6845

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulfur to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 20.6 g/kg for aliphatic glycol ether.

Registry Number 6846

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 6862

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 6863

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and ethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. Remove the statement in section 3 indicating that the controlled product is merely mildly irritating to the eyes;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6865

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, female rat) value of 5 100 ppm for toluene;

2. Disclose either an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 4 328 mg/kg for toluene or a product LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 689 mg/kg;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration if breathing has stopped;

4. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product;

5. Disclose the lower Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 20 ppm for toluene;

6. Correct the information concerning the OSHA PEL values disclosed for toluene;

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6866

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and ethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6867

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 5, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of phosphoric acid in an acceptable manner;

2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products;

3. Identify the disclosed ACGIH TLV–TWA value of 1 mg/m³ as being applicable to phosphoric acid and further disclose a TLV–STEL value of 3 mg/m³ for phosphoric acid;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Numbers 6869 and 6870

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 20, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. Registry Number 6869:

(a) Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product by deleting the generic CAS registry number in relation to the ingredient referred to on the MSDS as amorphous silica, and by clearly indicating that the chemical identity of that ingredient is included in the claim for exemption;

(b) Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 1 mg/m³ (respirable fraction) for aluminum.

Registry Numbers 6884 and 6885

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as an alkyl-N-heterocycle was a part of the claim for exemption;

2. Correct the implication that naphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and ethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6886

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and ethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product.

Registry Numbers 6888 and 6889

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and ethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. Registry Number 6888: Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6903

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 13, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that flushing should continue for at least 30 minutes.

Registry Number 6907

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 21, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 1 mg/m³ (respirable fraction) for aluminum;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Numbers 6910 and 6911

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 20, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

3. Registry Number 6910:

(a) Remove the concentration ranges shown for the ingredients poly(aromatic glycidyl ether) and epoxy/phenolic resin and disclose their actual concentrations or acceptable range values;

(b) Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is incompatible with oxidizing agents and acids.

Registry Numbers 6913 and 6916

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

3. Registry Number 6913:

(a) Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

(b) Disclose the presence of a second additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number, percent concentration, ACGIH TLV–TWA exposure limit value and the fact that it has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

(c) Disclose the percent concentrations of acetone, ethanol and antimony trioxide in an acceptable manner;

(d) If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;

4. Registry Number 6916: Disclose the percent concentration of aromatic glycidyl derivative in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 6924

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that aliphatic amine has caused respiratory sensitization in one worker;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of >2 000 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of >2 000 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of >2 530 mg/L for an essentially similar controlled product.

Registry Number 6930

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.

Registry Number 6935

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 27, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6937

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 2, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove the concentration range shown for sodium phosphonate and disclose its actual concentration or an acceptable range value.

Registry Number 6938

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 13, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, modify or remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink;

2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Numbers 6940 and 6941

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 30, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 1 mg/m³ for pentaerythritol tetraacrylate;

2. Registry Number 6940: Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6944

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 28, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 901 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient substituted phenol present at the concentration range of 1–5%;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 265 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2 806 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient substituted aromatic amine;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, male rat) value of 2 190 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rat) value of 1 300 mg/kg and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, female rat) value of 2 620 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient substituted alkylamine;

4. Correct the implication that naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

5. Add ingestion as a primary route of entry;

6. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

8. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

9. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

10. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 6947

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statement to give water to drink.

Registry Number 6948

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 9, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B;

2. Correct the implication that ethylbenzene, naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for xylene;

6. Disclose that hexane synergistically enhances the hearing loss caused by inhalation exposure to xylene in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6951

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 21, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove the concentration range shown for the confidential hazardous ingredient aliphatic polymer diamine and disclose its actual concentration or an acceptable range value;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

5. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 6953

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 27, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a light petroleum distillate was a part of the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose that the (polyalkenyl)-carboxylic acid in the controlled product is a skin sensitizer.

Registry Number 6960

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Remove the “skin” notation from the disclosed OSHA PEL value and also remove the OSHA STEL exposure limit value of 250 ppm (skin) for the hazardous ingredient methanol.

Registry Number 6966

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of propylene glycol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 57-55-6 and its percent concentration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large quantities of water to drink;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4 710 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg and an LC₅₀ (8 hours, rat) value of 12 000 ppm for 2-propanol;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3.16 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkylphenol ethoxylate;

6. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat, aerosol) value of 48 mg/m³ for octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane.

Registry Number 6967

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 12, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose ingestion as a route of entry.

Registry Number 6970

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 2, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 6976

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D2A and E;

2. If the WHMIS pictograms are displayed on the MSDS, disclose the appropriate hazard symbol for a corrosive substance;

3. Disclose the presence of ethylene glycol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 107-21-1 and its percent concentration;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large quantities of water to drink and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

7. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV-C = 100 mg/m³ ppm for ethylene glycol;

8. Disclose LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

9. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1 045 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 235 mg/kg and an LC₅₀ (6 hours, rat) value of 117 ppm for bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl)ether;

10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenicity in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6977

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 20, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large quantities of water to drink and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

4. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.05 ppm (skin) and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 0.15 ppm (skin) for bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl)ether;

5. Disclose LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

6. Disclose LD₅₀ values and an LC₅₀ value for a second confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 6978

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 2, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large quantities of water to drink and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1 045 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 235 mg/kg for bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl)ether.

Registry Number 6980

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 27, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS pictograms are displayed on the MSDS, disclose the appropriate hazard symbol for a corrosive substance;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large quantities of water to drink and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

4. Remove any reference to a time frame of 15 minutes only for the flushing recommendation for first aid measures in cases of eye contact;

5. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

6. Disclose LD₅₀ values and an LC₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 6981

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that Momentive Performance Materials is the supplier and manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. Identify the information disclosed for “aminoalkoxy alcohol” in section 11 of the MSDS as pertaining to the hazardous ingredient dimethylaminoethoxyalcohol;

3. Amend the MSDS so as to clearly indicate that ethylene glycol has been shown to cause teratogenic and embryotoxic effects in laboratory animals, in the absence of maternal toxicity.

Registry Number 6983

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of polyalkylene glycol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 27252-80-8 and its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the presence of siloxane polyalkyleneoxide copolymer in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 68037-62-7 and its percent concentration;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two to four glasses of water to drink.

Registry Number 6984

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to three glasses of water to drink.

Registry Numbers 6985 and 6986

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as polyalkylene glycol was a part of the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose the presence of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 556-67-2 and its percent concentration;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to induce vomiting;

4. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

5. Registry Number 6985: In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink;

6. Registry Number 6986: In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 6987

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 30, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose the presence of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 556-67-2 and its percent concentration;

3. Correct the implication that one of the ingredients known as polyalkylene glycol is hazardous and also a part of the claim for exemption;

4. Correct the implication that the second ingredient known as a polyalkylene glycol was a part of the claim for exemption;

5. Correct the implication that the non-hazardous ingredient known as a polyalkylene oxide was a part of the claim for exemption;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statements to induce vomiting and to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 6988

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredients known as siloxane polyalkyleneoxide copolymer and polyalkylene glycol are not considered hazardous under WHMIS;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 6990

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of polyalkylene glycol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 27252-80-8 and its percent concentration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two to four glasses of water to drink.

Registry Number 6991

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that Momentive Performance Materials is the supplier and manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. Disclose, in section 2 of the MSDS, the presence of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 556-67-2 and its percent concentration;

3. Remove the misleading statements that the product contains toluene;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 6992

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 27, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that Momentive Performance Materials is the supplier and manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

3. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression in laboratory animals;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statements to give two glasses of water and to induce vomiting and replace it with a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration. Further disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

7. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

8. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

9. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 140 mL/kg for dibutyltin dilaurate;

10. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 8.3 mg/kg for vinyltrimethoxysilane;

11. Identify the information disclosed for “organosilane ester” in the subsection of section 11 of the MSDS dealing with significant data with possible relevance to human health as pertaining to the hazardous ingredient vinyltrimethoxysilane;

12. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and teratogenic effects in laboratory animals;

13. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, amend the disclosure to state that the controlled product is in class E rather than D2B.

Registry Number 6994

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format, content and wording of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 6995

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 20, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add eye contact as a route of entry;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statements to induce vomiting and to give two glasses of water to drink. Disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 10.6 g/kg for ethanol;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is considered to be a germ cell mutagen based on positive results in in vivo screening tests.

Registry Number 6996

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 21, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as polyalkene oxide is not considered hazardous under WHMIS;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink.

Registry Number 6997

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose the presence of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 556-67-2 and its percent concentration;

3. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as siloxane polyalkyleneoxide copolymer is not considered hazardous under WHMIS;

4. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a polyalkylene glycol was a part of the claim for exemption;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statements to induce vomiting and to give two glasses of water to drink.

Registry Number 6999

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 27, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 556-67-2 and its percent concentration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 7000

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

2. Remove the concentration range shown for methanol and disclose its actual concentration or an acceptable range value;

3. Identify the information disclosed for “organosilane ester” in section 11 of the MSDS as pertaining to the hazardous ingredient vinyltrimethoxysilane;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statements to induce vomiting and to give plenty of water to drink;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

7. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 133 mL/kg for dibutyltin dilaurate;

8. Disclose a lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 1.8 mg/L for vinyltrimethoxysilane;

9. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;

10. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7001

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that Momentive Performance Materials is the supplier and manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7002

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 1, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large amounts of water and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 30 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for 30 minutes;

4. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.05 ppm (skin) and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 0.15 ppm (skin) for bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl)ether.

Registry Number 7003

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format, content and wording of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose the presence of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 556-67-2 and its percent concentration;

3. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as polyalkylene oxide is not considered hazardous under WHMIS;

4. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a polyalkylene glycol was a part of the claim for exemption;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 7004

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 1, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two to four glasses of water to drink.

Registry Number 7008

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 13, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that Momentive Performance Materials is the supplier and manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for 20 minutes.

Registry Number 7009

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that Momentive Performance Materials is the supplier and manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a polyalkylene glycol was a part of the claim for exemption;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes while holding the eyelids open. Indicate that immediate medical attention should be obtained.

Registry Number 7010

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 27, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that tris(3(trimethoxysilyl)propylisocyanurate is a hazardous component of the controlled product;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 12.5 mL/kg for methyltrimethoxysilane.

Registry Number 7012

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 21, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of ethanol in an acceptable manner;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statements to give water to drink and to induce vomiting;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused positive results in an in vivo screening test for germ cell mutagenicity;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7014

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 27, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredients known as organoalkoxysilane heavies are not considered hazardous under WHMIS;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statements to give water to drink and to induce vomiting;

3. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hour, dust, male rat) value of 6 750 mg/m³ for carbon black;

4. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fibrosis in laboratory animals;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused positive results in an in vivo screening test for somatic cell mutagenicity;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

Registry Number 7015

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 27, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that Momentive Performance Materials is the supplier and manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of ethanol in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused positive results in an in vivo screening test for germ cell mutagenicity.

Registry Number 7021

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 18, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 13.0 mL/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 15 800 mg/kg for methyl alcohol;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in an in vivo screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Numbers 7022 and 7024

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse CNS effects in laboratory animals;

2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products;

3. Registry Number 7022: Add oxides of sulfur and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 7026

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 28, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to at least 15 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

5. Disclose that during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product, metal containers should be grounded, sources of ignition avoided and adequate ventilation assured;

6. Add that the controlled product should be stored away from ignition sources;

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and teratogenicity in laboratory animals and has been shown to cause behavioural abnormalities in offspring of laboratory animals;

8. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused positive results in an in vivo screening test for somatic cell mutagenicity;

9. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7030

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused positive results in an in vivo screening test for somatic cell mutagenicity.

Registry Numbers 7039 and 7040

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove the hazard symbol indicating that the controlled product is classified in WHMIS class D2B;

2. Registry Number 7040:

(a) Correct the implication in section 2 of the MSDS that the controlled product is merely irritating as opposed to being a corrosive material;

(b) In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

(c) In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

(d) In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7047

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 4, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2 000 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, female rat, aerosol) value of 0.8 mg/L for benzene-1,3-dimethaneamine;

2. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause hyperplasia and tumorous lesions in the forestomach of laboratory animals;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1.

Registry Number 7048

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a substituted phenol was a part of the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2 000 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, female rat, aerosol) value of 0.8 mg/L for benzene-1,3-dimethaneamine;

3. Disclose the lower LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 0.707 mL/ kg for diethylenetriamine;

4. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and postnatal developmental toxicity in laboratory animals;

5. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity;

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1.

Registry Number 7069

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 4, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

2. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its Exposure Limit Value and LD₅₀ and LC₅₀ values.

Registry Number 7070

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 13, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

2. Replace the LC₅₀ (4 hours, mouse, aerosol) value for hydrogen chloride with a value of either 0.4 mg/L or 400 mg/m³.

Registry Number 7071

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink;

2. Clarify that the OSHA Exposure Limit Value of 2 mg/m³ shown on the MSDS for the hazardous ingredient sodium hydroxide is a recommended time-weighted average, not a ceiling level;

3. Remove the OSHA STEL exposure limit value of 250 ppm and delete the notation “skin” from the OSHA PEL exposure limit value for the hazardous ingredient methanol;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7072

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.59 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3.56 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient aliphatic alcohol;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 5 750 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 20 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient ketone(1);

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 560 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 5.66 mL/kg for the first of the confidential hazardous ingredients known as an alcohol;

4. Disclose LD₅₀ values for the first of the confidential hazardous ingredients known simply as a “ketone” in an acceptable manner;

5. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat, aerosol) value of 14.2 mg/L for the second of the confidential hazardous ingredients known simply as a “ketone.”

Registry Number 7074

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 12, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the available CAS registry number for the disclosed hazardous ingredient ethoxylated alcohol;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7075

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication in section 2 of the MSDS that the controlled product is merely irritating as opposed to being a corrosive material;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

6. Remove the statement and the hazard symbol indicating that the controlled product is classified in WHMIS class D2B.

Registry Number 7083

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 30, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed. Also disclose that contaminated clothing, including contaminated footwear and leather goods, should be removed under running water and that medical advice should be obtained immediately;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7088

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 19, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

3. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients.

Registry Number 7108

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 13, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

2. Correct the implication that the concentration of hydrogen chloride was a part of the claim for exemption;

3. Add eye contact as a route of entry;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 7109

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 13, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that the confidential hazardous ingredient inorganic salt has been shown to cause fetotoxicity in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7110

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 28, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 440 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 7 450 mg/kg for the second of the confidential hazardous ingredients known as a substituted phenol;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2 806 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient substituted aromatic amine.

Registry Numbers 7116 and 7117

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 25, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 7120

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 19, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as sodium salt was a part of the claim for exemption.

Registry Numbers 7123 to 7125, inclusive

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 9, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink;

4. Registry Number 7124: Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused mutagenic effects in the lungs of laboratory animals;

5. Registry Number 7125: Disclose the percent concentration of dipropylene glycol methyl ether in an acceptable manner;

6. Registry Numbers 7124 and 7125: Disclose the percent concentration of silver (metallic) in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7131

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 25, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 7134

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 23, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-undecyl- omega -hydroxy- in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 34398-01-1 and its percent concentration;

2. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Numbers 7139 and 7140

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 13, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that ethylbenzene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink;

4. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product;

5. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source;

6. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3 400 mg/kg for isobutanol.

Registry Number 7143

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 17, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink;

2. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose a statement indicating that users should comply with all federal, provincial and local regulations when disposing of waste from the controlled product.

Registry Number 7146

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 13, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that ethylbenzene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink;

4. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product;

5. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source;

6. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3 400 mg/kg for isobutanol.

Registry Number 7151

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 13, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7154

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 1 mg/m³ for pentaerythritol tetraacrylate;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Numbers 7162 and 7163

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 13, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the lower Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL (TWA, 8 hours) = 50 ppm for 1-methoxy-2-propanol acetate.

Registry Number 7176

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 4, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Delete the statement that silane-treated amorphous silica is not WHMIS-regulated;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

3. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7177

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 22, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7178

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 4, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7186

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 21, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of methanol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 67-56-1 and its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the presence of titanium dioxide in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 13463-67-7 and its percent concentration;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7207

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 30, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7209

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 21, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 830 mg/kg for the controlled product.

Registry Number 7215

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 1, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 7216

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 13, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin and eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

2. If target organs are stated on the MSDS, disclose the gastrointestinal tract as an additional target organ;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes. Also disclose that contaminated clothing, including contaminated footwear and leather goods, should be removed under running water;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value for the confidential hazardous ingredient;

7. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.0 mL/kg for monoethanolamine;

8. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

9. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E;

10. If the WHMIS pictograms are displayed on the MSDS, disclose the appropriate hazard symbol for a corrosive substance.

Registry Number 7218

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 13, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose that acute dermal exposure to a second ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause necrosis to the liver in laboratory animals;

3. Disclose the presence of ethanol in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 64-17-5 and its percent concentration;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 60 minutes while holding the eyelids open;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 60 minutes. Also disclose that contaminated clothing, including contaminated footwear and leather goods, should be removed under running water;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration;

7. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

8. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.0 mL/kg for monoethanolamine;

9. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is a fetotoxin and a teratogen;

11. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;

12. If the WHMIS pictograms are displayed on the MSDS, disclose the appropriate hazard symbol for a material causing other toxic effects.

Registry Number 7219

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 30, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current time frame and replace it with a time of “at least 30 minutes.”

Registry Number 7222

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that aliphatic amine has caused respiratory sensitization in one worker;

2. In relation to the first aid information for eye contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that medical attention be obtained immediately;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of >2 000 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of >2 000 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of >2 530 mg/L for an essentially similar controlled product.

Registry Number 7232

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 3, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 10 ppm for benzyl alcohol;

2. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

6. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 750 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1 110 mg/kg for hexamethylenediamine.

Registry Number 7239

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Numbers 7241 and 7242

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that aliphatic amine has caused respiratory sensitization in one worker;

2. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to at least 15 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 30 minutes;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of >2 000 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of >2 000 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of >2 530 mg/L for an essentially similar controlled product.

Registry Number 7254

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 13, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Numbers 7267 and 7268

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of carbon black in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose the lower Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.025 mg/m³ for crystalline silica;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1 582 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient cyclic ester;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.45 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient alicyclic glycidyl ether.

Registry Number 7280

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 24, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and postnatal developmental toxicity in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of no greater than 1 700 mg/kg for benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl-.

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE CLAIMANT TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6432

Date of order: February 26, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for at least 30 minutes;

2. Disclose that eye protection equipment should be worn when working with this material;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes C, D2A and D2B.

Registry Number 6441

Date of order: March 27, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of certain of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose the chemical identity and CAS registry number of the confidential hazardous ingredient identified with the GCI proprietary silicates;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that flushing should continue for at least 60 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose that flushing should continue for at least 60 minutes;

5. Disclose that eye protection equipment should be worn when working with this material;

6. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with some chlorinated solvents (trichloroethylene, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol) and oxidizers (4-chloronitrilebenzene, 4-nitrobenzoic acid, 4-nitrophenol).

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6526

Date of order: May 6, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large quantities of water to drink.

Registry Number 6529

Date of order: February 26, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;

2. Remove the ACGIH TLV designation from the disclosed exposure limit value for nuisance dusts;

3. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in laboratory animals.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6530

Date of order: February 26, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D2A and D1B;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped. Also remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink;

4. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

5. Remove the ACGIH TLV designation from the disclosed exposure limit value for nuisance dusts.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6668

Date of order: May 1, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as a confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

3. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, female rat) value of 450 ppm for 2-butoxyethanol;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.

Registry Number 6703

Date of order: April 30, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier and/or manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

3. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A and D2A;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be corrosive to the eyes of laboratory animals;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

7. Add hydrogen chloride and oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6728

Date of order: May 4, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a proprietary component was a part of the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of 1-methoxy-2-propanol in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 20 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 739 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 14.1 mL/kg for 1-methoxy2-propanol;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6738

Date of order: February 26, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6796

Date of order: May 20, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6877

Date of order: March 27, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose hydrogen cyanide and oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 6878

Date of order: May 4, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a proprietary component was a part of the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, male rat) value of 3 086 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 870 mg/kg and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, vapour, mouse) value of 2 024 ppm for 2-propoxyethanol;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 6905

Date of order: May 20, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20-30 minutes or until the chemical is removed.

Registry Number 6906

Date of order: May 20, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 6965

Date of order: April 29, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink.

Registry Number 7037

Date of order: May 21, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

3. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and postnatal developmental toxicity in laboratory animals;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

5. If the WHMIS pictograms are displayed on the MSDS, disclose the appropriate hazard symbol for a very toxic poisonous substance.

Registry Number 7130

Date of order: April 14, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 20 minutes, contaminated clothing, footwear and leather goods should be removed under running water, and medical attention obtained immediately;

2. Add oxides of nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7160

Date of order: March 27, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

2. Delete the exposure limit values for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkyl halide #1.

Registry Number 7192

Date of order: March 10, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 4 g/kg for the controlled product.

Registry Number 7199

Date of order: April 30, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Delete the statement which indicates that the ingredient zinc alkyldithiophosphate is a WHMIS confidential ingredient and disclose its CAS Registry Number 68649-42-3;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products;

5. Correct the information pertaining to the subheading dermal sensitization by disclosing that the calcium sulfonate ingredient is a skin sensitizer.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7248

Date of order: May 1, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 20 ppm for 2-butoxyethanol;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm for propan-2-ol.

Registry Number 7256

Date of order: April 30, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7282

Date of order: May 4, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products.

NOTE: The following claim was cancelled after the issuance of the decisions and thus neither was a signed undertaking provided nor was an order issued. The screening officer has identified the following instances of non-compliance with the requirements of the relevant legislation.

Registry Number 7025

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink;

3. Disclose LD₅₀ values for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenicity in laboratory animals and has been shown to cause behavioural abnormalities in offspring of laboratory animals;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-941-2945.

R. BOARDMAN
Chief Screening Officer

[33-1-o]

NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD

APPLICATION TO EXPORT ELECTRICITY

Manitoba Hydro

By an application dated August 13, 2009, Manitoba Hydro (the “Applicant”) [Manitoba Hydro, P.O. Box 815, 820 Taylor Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 2P4, Attention: K. Jennifer Moroz, 204-360-4539 (telephone)] has applied to the National Energy Board (the “Board”), under Division II of Part VI of the National Energy Board Act (the “Act”), for authorization to export energy to Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. of the United States. The export will be for the period of October 1, 2009, to September 30, 2014, up to a maximum of 3 MW.

The Board wishes to obtain the views of interested parties on this application before issuing a permit or recommending to the Governor in Council that a public hearing be held. The directions on procedure that follow explain in detail the procedure that will be used.

1. Written submissions in respect of the application shall be filed with the Secretary, National Energy Board, 444 Seventh Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 0X8, 403-292-5503 (fax), and served on the Applicant by September 14, 2009.

2. Any answer to submissions that the Applicant wishes to present shall be filed with the Secretary of the Board and served on the party that filed the submission by September 29, 2009.

3. For further information on the procedures governing the Board’s examination, contact the Secretary of the Board, Claudine Dutil-Berry, at 403-299-2714 (telephone) or 403-292-5503 (fax).

CLAUDINE DUTIL-BERRY
Secretary

[33-1-o]