ARCHIVED — COMMISSIONS

Warning This Web page has been archived on the Web.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Vol. 143, No. 40 — October 3, 2009

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

The registered charities listed below have consolidated or merged with other organizations and have requested that their registration be revoked. Therefore, the following notice of intention to revoke has been sent to them, and is now being published according to the requirements of the Income Tax Act:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(a) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice.”

Business Number

Name/Address

107358848RR0001

FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE NOTRE-DAME-DU-BEL-AMOUR ARCHIDIOCÈSE DE MONTRÉAL, MONTRÉAL (QC)

107362162RR0001

FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE ASSOMPTION DE NOTRE-DAME, SAINT-HYACINTHE, SAINT-HYACINTHE (QC)

107362550RR0001

LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE D’IMMACULÉE-CONCEPTION, DRUMMONDVILLE (QC)

107878654RR0001

RED DEER CATHOLIC SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 17, RED DEER, ALTA.

108197989RR0001

WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH, OTTAWA, ONT.

118810852RR0001

BISSEL MEMORIAL UNITED CHURCH-SPIRITWOOD, SPIRITWOOD, SASK.

118824184RR0001

CALGARY YOUTH ORCHESTRA, CALGARY, ALTA.

118882968RR0001

DAVIS ROAD KINGDOM HALL, PRINCE GEORGE, B.C.

118909456RR0001

FABRIQUE DE STE-PERPÉTUE (NICOLET), SAINTE-PERPÉTUE (QC)

119109817RR0008

ST. ANNE OF THE LAKES CHURCH, BLENHEIM, ONT.

119288918RR0780

NORTH BATTLEFORD CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, NORTH BATTLEFORD, SASK.

119288918RR1079

ONTARIO CIRCUIT NO 23-B OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, TORONTO, ONT.

130380223RR0001

FABRIQUE STE-BRIGITTE-DES-SAULTS, SAINTE-BRIGITTE-DES-SAULTS (QC)

130584220RR0001

LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE ST-LAZARE, SAINT-LAZARE-DE-VAUDREUIL (QC)

130905433RR0001

LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE ST-ODILE ARCHIDIOCÈSE DE MONTRÉAL, MONTRÉAL (QC)

135242261RR0001

LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINT-JOSEPH-DE-BORDEAUX ARCHIDIOCÈSE DE MONTRÉAL, MONTRÉAL (QC)

886945591RR0001

LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINT-CHARLES-BORROMÉE, SAINT-CHARLES-DE-DRUMMOND (QC)

889024568RR0001

PRINCE COUNTY GROUND SEARCH AND RESCUE, ST. LOUIS, P.E.I.

889337796RR0001

LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINTE-THÉRÈSE, DRUMMONDVILLE (QC)

890286248RR0001

LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINT-MAJORIQUE, DRUMMONDVILLE (QC)

892224049RR0001

MANITOULIN COMMUNITY HELP CENTRE, MINDEMOYA, ONT.

TERRY DE MARCH
Director General
Charities Directorate

[40-1-o]

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

The following notice of intention to revoke was sent to the charities listed below because they have not met the filing requirements of the Income Tax Act:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(b) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice.”

Business Number

Name/Address

100750165RR0001

CAMPING FAMILIAL COMMUNAUTAIRE C.A.F.A.C.O. INC., MONTRÉAL (QC)

101836278RR0001

FONDATION LES SORTILÈGES INC., MONT-ROYAL (QC)

103051215RR0001

LES SORTILÈGES DANSES DU MONDE, MONT-ROYAL (QC)

107761694RR0026

BOY SCOUTS OF CANADA FIRST PLENTY GROUP COMMITTEE, DODSLAND, SASK.

107890139RR0001

RETREAT AND CAMP CORPORATION OF ESSEX PRESBYTERY, ESSEX, ONT.

118847102RR0001

CENTRE FOR LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE-CENTRE D’ÉCHANGE LÉGISLATIF, OTTAWA, ONT.

118874486RR0001

CONSEIL DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DU LOGEMENT COMMUNAUTAIRE DE MONTRÉAL MÉTROPOLITAIN, MONTRÉAL (QC)

118932151RR0001

FRENCH IMMERSION ASSOCIATION OF GUELPH, GUELPH, ONT.

119021772RR0001

LIVING FAITH CHURCH OF GOD, NORTH YORK, ONT.

119032555RR0001

MARCELIN AND DISTRICT ATHLETIC CLUB, MARCELIN, SASK.

119050185RR0001

MY BROTHERS’ PLACE, TORONTO, ONT.

119087914RR0001

PEEL PARTNERS FOR A DRUG FREE COMMUNITY, MISSISSAUGA, ONT.

119139228RR0001

S.A.R.A. “SEXUAL ASSAULT RECOVERY ANONYMOUS” SOCIETY, SURREY, B.C.

119246890RR0001

THE NEW BRUNSWICK AUTISM SOCIETY INC./LA SOCIÉTÉ DE L’AUTISME DU NOUVEAU BRUNSWICK INC., FREDERICTON, N.B.

119265353RR0001

TOFIELD HOSPITAL AUXILIARY ASSOCIATION, TOFIELD, ALTA.

124440959RR0001

DOWNTOWN EASTSIDE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION HOUSING SOCIETY, VANCOUVER, B.C.

125593657RR0069

AIR CADET LEAGUE OF CANADA, #679 BLACKVILLE SQUADRON, BLACKVILLE, N.B.

129539516RR0001

PIONEER BIBLE CAMP INC., EDMONTON, ALTA.

131803686RR0001

COMITÉ DES PERSONNES ATTEINTES DU VIH DU QUÉBEC, MONTRÉAL (QC)

132347097RR0001

BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF THE PATRICIA REGION, DRYDEN, ONT.

132985243RR0001

UNIACKE UNION CHURCH TRUSTEE ASSOCIATION, MOUNT UNIACKE, N.S.

136164761RR0001

LLOYMINSTER REGIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION, LLOYDMINSTER, SASK.

138983796RR0001

GERMAN CULTURAL CENTRE FOUNDATION, VANCOUVER, B.C.

139644777RR0001

WINDSOR OPTIMIST YOUTH BAND, WINDSOR, ONT.

139998389RR0001

NEW HOPE CENTER, PEMBROKE, ONT.

140936451RR0001

IMAGE SACRED DANCE SCHOOL, THUNDER BAY, ONT.

857028641RR0001

LE KIOSQUE À MUSIQUE INC., MONTRÉAL (QC)

858036833RR0001

FONDATION ENFANTS VOS VACANCES.CA/FOUNDATION CHILDREN YOUR VACATIONS.CA, MONTRÉAL (QC)

863855656RR0001

FONDATION STEVE CHARBONNEAU, GRANBY (QC)

866444466RR0001

TAIWANESE CANADIAN COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCIATION, MARKHAM, ONT.

871100707RR0001

CHARTERABILITY CRUISING FOR THE DISABLED, OAKVILLE, ONT.

876353079RR0001

ST. ELIAS UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH SOCIETY OF BONNYVILLE, BONNYVILLE, ALTA.

886590991RR0001

L’ASSOCIATION DES POMPIERS VOLONTAIRES DE CAPLAN INC., CAPLAN (QC)

888238243RR0001

ST. JOSEPH’S (BRANTFORD) BENEVOLENT TRUST, BRANTFORD, ONT.

890690076RR0001

FONDATION DE SAINT-DENYS-GARNEAU, SAINTE-CATHERINE-DE-LA-JACQUES-CARTIER (QC)

891732844RR0001

FAMILY SUPPORT GROUP OF WEST END VILLA, OTTAWA, ONT.

892293960RR0001

PETERBOROUGH AND DISTRICT CHILDBIRTH ASSOCIATION, PETERBOROUGH, ONT.

892433848RR0001

CAPERCAILLIE PIPE BAND, HANOVER, ONT.

893159962RR0001

EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (EASNA) (CANADA) INC., NEPEAN, ONT.

895608982RR0001

CHINESE CANADIAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION, RICHMOND, B.C.

898388913RR0001

FRIENDS OF WESTDALE SECONDARY SCHOOL, HAMILTON, ONT.

TERRY DE MARCH
Director General
Charities Directorate

[40-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DETERMINATION

Information processing and related telecommunications services

Notice is hereby given that, after completing its inquiry, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) made a determination (File No. PR-2009-017) on September 21, 2009, with respect to a complaint filed by TELUS Communications Company (TELUS), of Ottawa, Ontario, under subsection 30.11(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, R.S.C. 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 47, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. EN869-068067/C) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC) on behalf of various government departments. The solicitation was for the provision of toll-free, intelligent contact management, interactive voice response and uninterrupted power supply services.

TELUS alleged that PWGSC improperly evaluated its proposal.

Having examined the evidence presented by the parties and considered the provisions of the Agreement on Internal Trade, the Tribunal determined that the complaint was valid.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Ottawa, September 21, 2009

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[40-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

FINDING

Waterproof footwear

Notice is hereby given that, on September 25, 2009, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the Special Import Measures Act, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal found that the dumping of waterproof footwear and waterproof footwear in nearly finished form (Inquiry No. NQ-2009-001), originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, has not caused injury or retardation and is not threatening to cause injury.

Ottawa, September 25, 2009

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[40-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission’s original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, 819-997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), 819-994-0218 (fax);

— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, 902-426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), 902-426-2721 (fax);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, 204-983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), 204-983-6317 (fax);

— 530–580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, 604-666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), 604-666-8322 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, 514-283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), 514-283-3689 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, 416-952-9096 (telephone), 416-954-6343 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, 306-780-3422 (telephone), 306-780-3319 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, 780-495-3224 (telephone), 780-495-3214 (fax).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2009-410-1 September 21, 2009

TVA Group Inc.
Across Canada

Correction — The Commission replaces paragraph 33 of Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2009-410, July 6, 2009.

2009-490-1 September 21, 2009

Sun TV Company
Toronto, Hamilton, London and Ottawa, Ontario

Correction — The Commission corrects the French version of Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2009-490, August 14, 2009, by amending the first paragraph of the summary as well as paragraph 19 of the decision.

2009-511-1 September 21, 2009

Various undertakings
Various locations

Correction — The Commission corrects the French version of Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2009-511, August 20, 2009, by setting the expiry date of the licences to March 31, 2010.

2009-590 September 22, 2009

Complaint by Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership against
Videotron Ltd. and TVA Group Inc. regarding advertising opportunities

The Commission finds that the sale of exclusive sponsorship opportunities by TVA Group Inc. to Videotron Ltd. (Videotron) did not result in an undue preference to Videotron or an undue disadvantage to the Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership (Bell TV), contrary to section 9 of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations. The Commission further finds that Videotron has not conferred an undue preference on itself or subjected Bell TV to an undue disadvantage, contrary to section 27(2) of the Telecommunications Act.

2009-551-1 September 22, 2009

BAF Audio Visual Inc.
Toronto, Ontario

Correction — The Commission corrects paragraph 1 of the French-language version of Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2009-551 by replacing the licence expiry date of March 30, 2010, with March 31, 2010.

2006-613-2 September 23, 2009

Videotron Ltd.
Montréal, Quebec

CF Cable TV Inc.
Montréal and Terrebonne, Quebec

Correction — The Commission corrects condition of licence 11 in the appendix to Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2006-613, by replacing the reference to Public Notice CRTC 2002-61 with Public Notice CRTC 2003-61.

2009-592 September 23, 2009

Club Social la Grande Camp
Sarcelle, Quebec

Approved — Broadcasting licence to operate a radiocommunication distribution undertaking to serve Camp Sarcelle.

2009-593 September 23, 2009

Radio Ville-Marie
Gatineau, Quebec

Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the French-language specialty FM radio programming undertaking CIRA-FM Montréal in order to operate an AM transmitter in Gatineau.

2009-594 September 23, 2009

Canyon.TV Incorporated
Across Canada

Approved — Broadcasting licence to operate Canyon TV, a national, English-language Category 2 specialty programming undertaking.

2009-595 September 24, 2009

Télévision régionale de Laval inc.
Laval, Sainte-Thérèse, Oka, Deux-Montagnes, Boisbriand, Saint-Eustache, Blainville, Rosemère, Lorraine and Bois-des-Filion, Quebec

Denied — Broadcasting licence to operate a low power community television programming undertaking in Laval.

[40-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-418-2

Notice of hearing

January 18, 2010
Gatineau, Quebec
Review of campus and community radio
Additional documents on the public file
Date of hearing: January 18, 2010
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: October 16, 2009

The Commission has placed aggregate financial summaries for the campus and community radio sector on its Web site for consideration as part of the review of campus and community radio. These summaries form part of the public record of the proceeding.

September 24, 2009

[40-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-589

Notice of application received

Montréal, Quebec; Toronto, Hamilton, London, St. Catharines, Ottawa and Pembroke, Ontario; Brandon and Winnipeg, Manitoba; Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta; Fort Nelson, Fort St. John, Vernon, Kitimat, Vancouver, Revelstoke, Kelowna, Penticton, Osoyoos, Summerland, Golden, Trail, Terrace, Prince Rupert, Dawson Creek, Princeton, Nelson and Salmon Arm, British Columbia
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: October 11, 2009

The Commission has received the following application:

1. Astral Media Radio Inc., on behalf of Astral Media Radio (Toronto) Inc. and 4382072 Canada Inc., partners in a general partnership carrying on business as Astral Media Radio G.P.
Montréal, Quebec; Toronto, Hamilton, London, St. Catharines, Ottawa and Pembroke, Ontario; Brandon and Winnipeg, Manitoba; Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta; Fort Nelson, Fort St. John, Vernon, Kitimat, Vancouver, Revelstoke, Kelowna, Penticton, Osoyoos, Summerland, Golden, Trail, Terrace, Prince Rupert, Dawson Creek, Princeton, Nelson and Salmon Arm, British Columbia

To address a Canadian content development contribution shortfall for the 2008 broadcast year relating to 65 of its commercial radio stations.

September 21, 2009

[40-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Haz-ardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Claimant

Product Identifier
(As shown on the MSDS)

Registry Number

MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS)

Date of Decision

Enthone, Inc.,
West Haven, Connecticut

ENPLATE® DSR-3241A-G

6433

8/10/2007

May 26, 2009
le 26 mai 2009

Enthone, Inc.,
West Haven, Connecticut

ENPREP® 146

6439

8/10/2007

June 18, 2009
le 18 juin 2009

Enthone, Inc.,
West Haven, Connecticut

ENPREP® 913

6442

4/22/2007

May 20, 2009
le 20 mai 2009

Enthone, Inc.,
West Haven, Connecticut

ENTEK® PLUS CU-106A (X) REPL

6444

4/22/2007

June 12, 2009
le 12 juin 2009

Enthone, Inc.,
West Haven, Connecticut

ENTEK® PLUS CU-106A ADDITIVE

6445

4/22/2007

June 12, 2009
le 12 juin 2009

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

COREAIT (R) EC9500A

6639

2008/08/20

April 8, 2009
le 8 avril 2009

Canyon Technical Services,
Calgary, Alberta

CAN-LTC

6662

April 1, 2009

May 22, 2009
le 22 mai 2009

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

NALCO(R) DVS4M005

6696

2008/08/20

April 8, 2009
le 8 avril 2009

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 552G Performance Additive formerly/ antérieurement HiTEC 552G

6701

7 August 2007

June 24, 2009
le 24 juin 2009

Chevron Oronite Company LLC,
Bellaire, Texas

OLOA 77022

6707

April 18, 2008

April 8, 2009
le 8 avril 2009

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

WP-2000 Water Based Primer

6883

2008/03/25

April 16, 2009
le 16 avril 2009

Univar Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia

Inflo 200

6896

19 February 2007(English/anglaise) 19 février 2007 (French/française)

May 20, 2009
le 20 mai 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

CYCOM® 5208 Structural Prepreg

6915

03/15/2007

April 17, 2009
le 17 avril 2009

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 512F Performance Additive

6928

27 February 2008

June 24, 2009
le 24 juin 2009

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

SELECT(R) EC9007G

6946

2008/08/20

April 8, 2009
le 8 avril 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

BR® 1009-08 Tack Primer

6958

04/25/2007

May 19, 2009
le 19 mai 2009

Momentive Performance Materials,
Pickering, Ontario

Niax® silicone SC-154

6989

2007.05.11

April 8, 2009
le 8 avril 2009

Momentive Performance Materials,
Pickering, Ontario

Silquest® A-1126 silane

6993

07/09/2008

May 29, 2009
le 29 mai 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

CYCOM® 919 Structural Resin

7018

05/23/2007

April 8, 2009
le 8 avril 2009

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

CRW5494 CORROSION INHIBITOR

7038

4/21/2008

May 15, 2009
le 15 mai 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

EBECRYL ® 3708 radiation curing resins

7076

08/14/2007

April 28, 2009
le 28 avril 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

EBECRYL ® 830 radiation curing resins

7078

05/08/2008

April 17, 2009
le 17 avril 2009

Hercules Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

REZOSOL® 1095 ADHESIVE AGENT formerly/ antérieurement REZOSOL® 1095 RELEASE AGENT

7086

17-Sep-2007

June 12, 2009
le 12 juin 2009

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4142C Fuel Additive

7090

12 July 2007

April 30, 2009
le 30 avril 2009

Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc.,
Houston, Texas

FENTAK™ FW0873

7107

29-AUG-2008

June 23, 2009
le 23 juin 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

BR® 6747-1 Water Based Primer, 20-40% Solids

7138

04/18/2006

April 9, 2009
le 9 avril 2009

Greensolv Inc.,
Baie-d’Urfé, Québec

Greensolv 935

7144

January 8, 2008 (English/anglaise) le 8 janvier 2008 (French/française)

April 23, 2009
le 23 avril 2009

Schlumberger Canada Limited,
Calgary, Alberta

Microemulsion Cleanup Additive B203

7153

05 October 2008 (English/anglaise) 05 octobre 2008 (French/française)

June 23, 2009
le 23 juin 2009

Chevron Oronite Company LLC,
Bellaire, Texas

OLOA 59055

7159

November 1, 2007

April 3, 2009
le 3 avril 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

CYCOM® 9250 Structural Prepreg

7166

11/06/2007

April 17, 2009
le 17 avril 2009

Hercules Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

HERCULES® PPDM-5054 COATING INSOLUBILIZER

7167

28-Nov-2007

May 15, 2009
le 15 mai 2009

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M(TM) AUTOMIX(TM) PANEL BONDING ADHESIVE, PART A (P.N. 08115)

7179

2008/03/25

April 16, 2009
le 16 avril 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

FM® 94 Adhesive Film

7224

10/23/2007

May 7, 2009
le 7 mai 2009

Chevron Oronite Company LLC,
Bellaire, Texas

OLOA 55411

7233

February 4, 2008

April 3, 2009
le 3 avril 2009

Chevron Oronite Company LLC,
Bellaire, Texas

OLOA 40000

7235

September 23, 2008

April 3, 2009
le 3 avril 2009

Innospec Fuel Specialties
Newark, Delaware

Oil Color IAR Liquid Dye

7255

24 March 2008

June 10, 2009
le 10 juin 2009

Thermphos Trading GmbH,
Zug, Switzerland

SPE 0001

7297

05/07/2008

May 12, 2009
le 12 mai 2009

Hercules Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

DETAC® DC735D CONTAMINANT CONTROL AGENT

7317

29-Apr-2008

June 19, 2009
le 19 juin 2009

Rohm and Haas Canada LP,
West Hill, Ontario

PARALOID(TM) KM-3450 Powder

7318

04/23/2008

June 15, 2009
le 15 juin 2009

Rohm and Haas Canada LP,
West Hill, Ontario

PARALOID(TM) KM-4100

7319

04/23/2008

June 15, 2009
le 15 juin 2009

Rohm and Haas Canada LP,
West Hill, Ontario

PARALOID(TM) KM-4400

7320

04/23/2008

June 15, 2009
le 15 juin 2009

Cytec Industries Inc., West Paterson, New Jersey

EBECRYL® 40 radiation curing resins

7324

11/05/2008

May 29, 2009 le 29 mai 2009

Anachem Ltée/Ltd., Lachine, Québec

ANASOL FX

7328

17-Apr-2008 (English/anglaise) le 17-Avr.-2008 (French/française)

June 5, 2009
le 5 juin 2009

Schlumberger Canada Limited,
Calgary, Alberta

Foaming Agent F109

7339

06 June 2008

June 12, 2009
le 12 juin 2009

SixOne Enterprises Inc., Calgary, Alberta

H20-C Aqueous Solution

7340

June 5th 2008

June 18, 2009
le 18 juin 2009

Arclin Canada Ltd., formerly/antérieurement Arclin Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Hardener Slurry for Phenol Resorcinol Formaldehyde

7395

August 7, 2008

June 5, 2009
le 5 juin 2009

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

SPEC-AID 8Q5771ULS

7495

09-JAN-2009

June 3, 2009
le 3 juin 2009

Dow Chemical Canada Inc.,
Calgary, Alberta

UCARSOL(TM) SOLVENT COMPONENT DHM(TM)

7522

2009.01.05

June 22, 2009
le 22 juin 2009

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

GENGARD GN8156

7544

07-DEC-2008

May 29, 2009
le 29 mai 2009

Hercules Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

INFINITY® PK7831 PULP MILL ADDITIVE

7577

12-Feb-2009

June 23, 2009
le 23 juin 2009

Momentive Performance Materials,
Pickering, Ontario

Niax® Silicone L-2105

7594

12/03/2008

May 22, 2009
le 22 mai 2009

Momentive Performance Materials,
Pickering, Ontario

Niax® Silicone L-2115

7595

12/03/2008

May 22, 2009
le 22 mai 2009

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on April 1, 2006, listed the subjects of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 6433, 6439 and 6442 to be the chemical identity of five, three and three ingredients, respectively. The subjects of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of three, four and two ingredients, respectively.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6639 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6662 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients and the concentration of one further ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the trade name and information which could be used to identify the supplier of a controlled product.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6696 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6701 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 24, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6896 to be the chemical identity and concentration of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6915 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6946 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6989 be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7038 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients.

11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 8, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7108 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

12. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 10, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7224 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

13. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 10, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7299 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The Notice also incorrectly listed the name of the company which filed the claim bearing Registry Number 7299 as Thermpos Trading GmbH. The correct company name is Thermphos Trading GmbH.

14. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 10, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7317 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

15. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7594 and 7595 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7086, 7167, 7235, 7318, 7319, 7320, 7328 and 7522 were filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 6662, being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS in respect of which the claim was filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2006 of the Province of Alberta while the label in respect of which the claim was filed did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the said act.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7153 and 7339, also being claims from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2006 of the Province of Alberta.

Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the remaining claims were filed did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In all cases where the material safety data sheet or label was determined not to be in compliance with the relevant legislation, the screening officer offered the claimant the possibility of entering into an undertaking to make the changes necessary to bring the MSDS or label into compliance. Pursuant to subsection 16.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the claimant was given 30 days to provide the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER WAS SATISFIED THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD TAKEN THE MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Haz-ardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet or label in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 6433

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 19, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of certain of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

3. Delete the exposure limit value for silica, amorphous, fumed, cryst.-free.

Registry Number 6442

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 12, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that eye protection equipment should be worn when working with this material.

Registry Numbers 6444 and 6445

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 18, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for at least 30 minutes;

2. Disclose that eye protection equipment should be worn when working with this material;

3. Add hydrogen chloride and oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6639

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 28, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 080 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient organic sulfonic acid salt;

3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1.62 mL/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 5.86 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient glycol ether;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give water to drink;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 6662

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 23, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the label. The claimant had been advised to amend the label as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the label for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink and replace it with a statement such as the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, is unconscious or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 6696

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 23, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Disclose that the fatty acid has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6701

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 18, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

3. Disclose an LD50 value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 6707

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 23, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

3. Disclose the AIHA WEEL Exposure Limit Value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

4. Disclose oral LD50 values for the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner or disclose a calculated LD50 (oral, rat) value of 993 mg/kg for the controlled product;

5. Disclose dermal LD50 values for the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner or disclose a calculated LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 920 mg/kg for the controlled product;

6. Disclose LC50 values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.

Registry Number 6883

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 23, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a chloroprene-methacrylic acid copolymer is not considered hazardous under WHMIS;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be mutagenic, in vivo;

4. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels. Add that ingestion of the product during pregnancy may cause birth defects.

The claimant had also been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below. This advice did not relate to an element of non-compliance.

5. Disclose the chemical identity and CAS registry number of the ingredient called rosin.

Registry Number 6915

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 20, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Delete the statement which indicates that the ingredient aniline derivative is a WHMIS confidential ingredient;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 6928

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 18, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product.

Registry Number 6946

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 28, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 689 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient fatty amine;

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1.6 g/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.3 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient oxyalkylated alcohol;

3. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as an oxyalkylated fatty acid was a part of the claim for exemption.

Registry Number 6958

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 23, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is incompatible with alkylaluminum solutions and magnesium;

3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 13.0 mL/kg for methanol;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A and D2B.

Registry Number 6989

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 30, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that Momentive Performance Materials is the supplier and manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as a polyalkylene oxide was a part of the claim for exemption;

3. Correct the implication that a second confidential ingredient known as a glycol ether is non hazardous;

4. Disclose the percent concentration of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in an acceptable manner;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

6. Disclose the lower Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 20 ppm for toluene;

7. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 4.3 g/kg, an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 14.1 mL/kg and an LC50 (4 hours, rat) value of 5 100 ppm for toluene;

8. Disclose LD50 values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

9. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause brain damage and damage to the ears as well as hearing loss in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6993

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 2, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and teratogenicity in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of 1,2-ethylenediamine in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statements to give water to drink and to induce vomiting. Disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2.81 g/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of >16 g/kg for the controlled product;

5. Disclose that 1,2-ethylenediamine has been shown to cause respiratory sensitization in workers;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in in vivo screening tests for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 7038

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 5, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

Registry Number 7076

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 7, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7078

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 24, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 1 mg/m3 (skin, DSEN) for hexamethylene diacrylate;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 1 mg/m3 for pentaerythritol tetraacrylate;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. Amend the MSDS to eliminate the conflicting information concerning the correct storage temperature for the controlled product;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 6.73 mL/kg for 2,2-dimethyltrimethylene diacrylate.

Registry Number 7090

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 1, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to induce vomiting and replace it with a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration and repeat the administration of water;

2. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, amend the disclosure to state that the controlled product is in class E rather than D2B.

Registry Number 7107

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 29, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7138

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 20, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 7159

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 900 mg/kg for zinc alkyl dithiophosphate.

Registry Number 7166

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 20, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentrations of alumina trihydrate, ethanol and formaldehyde in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose a lower LD50 (oral, rat) value of 340 mg/kg for phenol.

Registry Number 7179

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 27, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7224

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 8, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of 2-butanone in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 78-93-3 and its percent concentration;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 300 ppm for 2-butanone;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7233

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 900 mg/kg for zinc alkyl dithiophosphate.

Registry Number 7299

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 21, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7324

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 12, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7340

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 7, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large quantities of water to drink and replace it with a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration. Further disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be rinsed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7395

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 23, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of crystalline silica, quartz in the controlled product and its CAS Registry Number 14808-60-7;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.025 mg/m3 (respirable fraction) A2 for crystalline silica, quartz;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7495

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 8, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give three to four glasses of milk or water to drink.

Registry Number 7544

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 8, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, remove one of the two classifications of E and D2B.

Registry Numbers 7594 and 7595

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 9, 2009

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product by moving the ingredient referred to as a polyethoxylated fatty alcohol from the “non-hazardous” subsection of section 3 of the MSDS to the “hazardous” subsection and by clearly indicating that the chemical identity of that ingredient is included in the claim for exemption;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, modify or remove the statement to give one to three glasses of water to drink.

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE CLAIMANT TO
COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Haz-ardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6439

Date of order: August 5, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of certain of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to at least 30 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 60 minutes;

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to at least 15 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 60 minutes;

4. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with some chlorinated solvents (trichloroethylene, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol) and oxidizers (4-chloronitrilebenzene, 4-nitrobenzoic acid, 4-nitrophenol).

Registry Number 6896

Date of order: July 24, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product and disclose that the real chemical identity and the concentration are included in the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose LD50 values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in in vivo screening tests for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 7018

Date of order: May 20, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the presence of a second additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number, percent concentration, ACGIH TLV–TWA exposure limit value and the fact that it has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7144

Date of order: June 8, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Indicate that the flash point shown for the product is that for one of the ingredients of the product;

2. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

5. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in male laboratory animals.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7153

Date of order: August 5, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the oxyalkylated alkylalcohol in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm for propan-2-ol;

3. Remove the ACGIH TLV designation from the disclosed exposure limit value for particulates (not otherwise classified);

4. Disclose an LC50 (4 hours, rat) value of 16 970 ppm for propan-2-ol;

5. Disclose LD50 values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals in the absence of maternal toxic effects.

Registry Number 7255

Date of order: July 24, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the proper chemical identity for organic acid as follows: oleic acid, CAS Registry Number 112-80-1.

Registry Number 7317

Date of order: August 5, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.

Registry Number 7339

Date of order: August 5, 2009

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifications are to be stated on the MSDS, amend the disclosure to state that propan-2-ol has been placed in Group 3 — not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans.

Registry Number 7577

Date of order: August 5, 2009

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. Use consistent notation to refer to the hazardous ingredient with CAS Registry Number 14808-60-7;

3. Revise the MSDS to show that crystalline silica has been classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A2) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-941-2945.

R. BOARDMAN
Chief Screening Officer

[40-1-o]

NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD

APPLICATION TO EXPORT ELECTRICITY TO THE UNITED STATES

Twin Cities Power – Canada, ULC

By an application dated September 22, 2009, Twin Cities Power – Canada, ULC (the “Applicant”) has applied to the National Energy Board (the “Board”), under Division II of Part VI of the National Energy Board Act (the “Act”), to amend its existing permit EPE-323 to export firm power and energy and interruptible energy from Canada to the United States.

Currently the Applicant has authority to export up to 1 000 MW/2 000 000 MWh of firm power and energy, and up to 0 MWh of interruptible energy for a period of 10 years. The Applicant seeks authorization to increase its export capacity up to 1 000 MW/4 000 000 MWh of firm power and energy and up to 0 MWh of interruptible energy for the remaining time period of the existing permit.

The Board wishes to obtain the views of interested parties on this application before issuing a permit or recommending to the Governor in Council that a public hearing be held. The directions on procedure that follow explain in detail the procedure that will be used.

1. The Applicant shall deposit and keep on file, for public inspection during normal business hours, copies of the application at its offices located at Twin Cities Power – Canada, ULC, Stock Exchange Tower, Suite 1850, 300 5th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 3C4, 952-431-0407 (telephone), 952-431-8470 (fax), sgarrett@fairwaydairy.com (email), and provide a copy of the application to any person who requests one. A copy of the application is also available for viewing during normal business hours in the Board’s library, at 444 Seventh Avenue SW, Room 1002, Calgary, Alberta T2P 0X8.

2. Submissions that any party wishes to present shall be filed with the Secretary, National Energy Board, 444 Seventh Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 0X8, 403-292-5503 (fax), and served on the Applicant by November 2, 2009.

3. Pursuant to subsection 119.06(2) of the Act, the Board shall have regard to all considerations that appear to it to be relevant. In particular, the Board is interested in the views of submitters with respect to

(a) the effect of the exportation of the electricity on provinces other than that from which the electricity is to be exported;

(b) the impact of the exportation on the environment; and

(c) whether the Applicant has

(i) informed those who have declared an interest in buying electricity for consumption in Canada of the quantities and classes of service available for sale, and

(ii) given an opportunity to purchase electricity on terms and conditions as favourable as the terms and conditions specified in the application to those who, within a reasonable time of being so informed, demonstrate an intention to buy electricity for consumption in Canada.

4. Any answer to submissions that the Applicant wishes to present in response to items 2 and 3 of this notice of application and directions on procedure shall be filed with the Secretary of the Board and served on the party that filed the submission by November 17, 2009.

5. For further information on the procedures governing the Board’s examination, contact the Secretary of the Board, Claudine Dutil-Berry, at 403-299-2714 (telephone) or 403-292-5503 (fax).

CLAUDINE DUTIL-BERRY
Secretary

[40-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Luc Bertrand, Senior Analyst (IS-05), Intergovernmental Affairs, Privy Council Office, Ottawa, Ontario, to be a candidate before and during the election period for the position of Councillor for the Town of Saint-Ours, Quebec, in a municipal election to held on November 1, 2009.

September 15, 2009

MARIA BARRADOS
President

[40-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Gilles Boivin, Technical Services Coordinator (EG-06), Parks Canada Agency, Chambly, Quebec, to be a candidate before and during the election period for the position of Councillor in the Municipality of Sainte-Angèle-de-Monnoir, Quebec, in a municipal election to be held on November 1, 2009.

September 16, 2009

MARIA BARRADOS
President

[40-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Sylvie Gagnon-Breton, Regional Manager, Financial Services (FI-02), Department of Industry, Montréal, Quebec, to be a candidate before and during the election period for the position of Councillor for District No. 4 of the City of Saint-Rémi, Quebec, in a municipal election to be held on November 1, 2009.

September 18, 2009

MARIA BARRADOS
President

[40-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Sandra Gravel, Property Technician (EG-03), Department of National Defence, Valcartier, Quebec, to be a candidate before and during the election period for the position of Councillor for the District No. 6 of the City of Sainte-Catherine-de-la-Jacques-Cartier, Quebec, in a municipal election to be held on November 1, 2009.

September 15, 2009

MARIA BARRADOS
President

[40-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Benoît St-Jacques, Hydrographer (EG-05), Canadian Hydrographic Service, Maurice-Lamontagne Institute, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Mont-Joli, Quebec, to be a candidate before and during the election period for the position of Councillor for the Municipality of Saint-Octave-de-Métis, Quebec, in a municipal election to be held on November 1, 2009.

September 15, 2009

MARIA BARRADOS
President

[40-1-o]