COMMISSIONS

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BOARD

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND ATLANTIC ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT

Call for Bids No. NL10-02 (Area “C” — Central Ridge/Flemish Pass)

The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board hereby gives notice of a call for the submission of bids in respect of two parcels in the Newfoundland and Labrador offshore area.

This notice of Call for Bids No. NL10-02 is made pursuant and subject to the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, S.C. 1987, c. 3, and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Newfoundland and Labrador Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. C-2.

The following is a summary of Call for Bids No. NL10-02:

(i) Sealed bids will be received by the Board prior to the time of closing of this call for bids. This call for bids will close at 4:00 p.m., Newfoundland Standard Time, on November 30, 2010, except as specifically provided for in Call for Bids No. NL10-02;

(ii) All bids must be submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of Call for Bids No. NL10-02;

(iii) The parcels are located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador and are described in Schedule I. An Exploration Licence may be issued for each parcel;

(iv) For the purpose of selecting a bid, the sole criterion to be used will be the total amount of money the bidder commits to expend on exploration on the parcel within Period I (“Work Expenditure Bid”);

(v) A minimum bid of $1,000,000 will be required for each parcel in the Central Ridge/Flemish Pass;

(vi) For each parcel, the Work Expenditure Bid must be accompanied by a bank draft or certified cheque in the amount of $10,000 (“Bid Deposit”) made payable to the Receiver General. Furthermore, the successful bidder will be required to provide, within 15 days of notification of being the successful bidder, a promissory note in the amount of 25% of the Work Expenditure Bid (“Security Deposit”). A credit against the Security Deposit will be made on the basis of 25% of allowable expenditures as described in the Exploration Licence (“Allowable Expenditures”);

(vii) The successful bidder will receive a refund, without interest, of the Bid Deposit when the Security Deposit is posted within 15 days. Failure to post the Security Deposit within 15 days will result in forfeiture of the Bid Deposit and disqualification of the bid.

Following the announcement of the bid results, the Bid Deposits of unsuccessful bidders will be returned, without interest, as soon as possible;

(viii) The interest owner may at its option extend Period I from six years to seven years by providing to the Board before the end of the sixth year of Period I either

(a) a description of 50% contiguous Licence Lands to be surrendered together with a refundable drilling deposit of $1,000,000, or

(b) a $5,000,000 refundable drilling deposit.

If a drilling deposit is posted in accordance with paragraph (a) or (b) above, it will be refunded in full if the Licence is validated for Period II by the drilling of a well on that licence. No interest will be paid on the drilling deposit.

If a validation well is not drilled, the drilling deposit will be forfeited to the Receiver General for Canada upon termination of the Licence at the end of Period I. Allowable Expenditures cannot be applied against the Drilling Deposit;

(ix) For each parcel, the licence requirement will be one well to be commenced within Period I and diligently pursued thereafter;

(x) For each parcel, rentals will be applicable only in Period II at the following rates:

1st year — $5.00 per hectare

2nd year — $7.50 per hectare

3rd year — $10.00 per hectare

When an Exploration Licence continues in force beyond Period II, rentals will be payable at the rates applicable during the last year of Period II.

Rentals will be payable annually, in advance, and are to be submitted by cheque payable to the Receiver General, except for rentals applicable to an Exploration Licence continuing beyond Period II, which will be payable monthly, in advance, at the rate of one-twelfth (1/12) of the applicable annual rates.

Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of 100% of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of Allowable Expenditures for that year.

Carry-forward provisions to reduce rentals otherwise payable in ensuing rental years will apply.

Rentals will apply to lands subject to a declaration of significant discovery during the term of the Exploration Licence at the rates and levels of refundability specified above;

(xi) An Allowable Expenditure schedule will have application throughout Period I of the Exploration Licence. The rates of Allowable Expenditures will be reviewed, and may be amended, at the expiration of Period I;

(xii) Rentals (Significant Discovery Licence)

Each Significant Discovery Licence shall be subject to the following rental regime after the expiration of the term of the Exploration Licence of origin:

(a) Rentals on Significant Discovery Licences, following the expiry date of the Exploration Licence, shall be at the following base rates:

Year 1 to 5 — $0.00 per hectare

Year 6 to 10 — $40.00 per hectare

Year 11 to 15 — $200.00 per hectare

Year 16 to 20 — $800.00 per hectare

The rental rates applicable to any Significant Discovery Licence resulting from Call for Bids No. NL10-02 will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2011 dollars.

(b) Rental rates of $800.00 will increase by $100.00 for each year beyond year 20, and will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2011 dollars until the Significant Discovery Licence is relinquished or converted to a Production Licence. For greater certainty, the interest owner may relinquish lands to reduce future rental payments.

(c) There shall be no carry forward of excess allowable expenditures from Exploration Licences.

(d) Rentals are to be submitted by bank draft or certified cheque payable to the Receiver General.

(e) For greater certainty, rentals shall be calculated on the basis of the total hectarage of lands held as part of the Significant Discovery Licence, as of the anniversary date.

(f) Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of one hundred percent (100%) of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of allowable expenditures for that year.

(xiii) A successful bidder will be required to comply with the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Benefits procurement, employment and reporting procedures as established by the Board;

(xiv) Each parcel will be subject to the payment of issuance fees and Environmental Studies Research Fund levies;

(xv) The Board is not obliged to accept any bid or issue any interest as a result of this call for bids;

(xvi) Any licence that may be issued shall be in the form of the Exploration Licence attached to the Call for Bids No. NL10-02;

The full text of Call for Bids No. NL10-02 is available at the Board’s Web site (www.cnlopb.nl.ca) or upon request made to the Registrar, Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, TD Place, 5th Floor, 140 Water Street, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 6H6, 709-778-1400.

MAX RUELOKKE, P.Eng.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

SCHEDULE I
LAND DESCRIPTION
CALL FOR BIDS NO. NL10-02
(Central Ridge/Flemish Pass)

*North American Datum 1927

*North American Datum 1927

[30-1-o]

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BOARD

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND ATLANTIC ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT

Call for Bids No. NL10-03 (Area “C” — Central Ridge/Flemish Pass)

The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board hereby gives notice of a call for the submission of bids in respect of one parcel in the Newfoundland and Labrador offshore area.

This notice of Call for Bids No. NL10-03 is made pursuant and subject to the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, S.C. 1987, c. 3, and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Newfoundland and Labrador Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. C-2.

The following is a summary of Call for Bids No. NL10-03:

(i) Sealed bids will be received by the Board prior to the time of closing of this call for bids. This call for bids will close at 4:00 p.m., Newfoundland Standard Time, on November 30, 2010, except as specifically provided for in Call for Bids No. NL10-03;

(ii) All bids must be submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of Call for Bids No. NL10-03;

(iii) The parcel is located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador and is described in Schedule I. A Significant Discovery Licence may be issued for this parcel;

(iv) For the purpose of assessing and selecting a bid, the sole criterion to be used for the parcel will be the highest total amount of money bid, in the form of a one-time non-refundable payment to the Receiver General (“Cash Bid”);

(v) A minimum Cash Bid of $1,000,000 will be required for this parcel in the Central Ridge/Flemish Pass;

(vi) Following notification of being the successful bidder, the designated representative shall make payment by certified cheque to the Receiver General of the bid amount no later than 10 days from the date of the notification. One cheque shall be submitted on behalf of all interest holders (Cheques from individual interest holders totalling the bid amount will not be accepted);

(vii) A default in submitting the requisite cheque will result in the forfeiture of the Bid Deposit, disqualification of the bid, and notification to the second place bidder, if one exists, that they are the successful bidder;

(viii) Following the announcement of the bid results, the Bid Deposits of unsuccessful bidders will be returned, without interest, as soon as possible;

(ix) Rentals

The Significant Discovery Licence shall be subject to the following rental regime:

(a) Rentals on Significant Discovery Licences, following the expiry date of the Exploration Licence, shall be at the following base rates:

Year 1 to 5 — $0.00 per hectare

Year 6 to 10 — $40.00 per hectare

Year 11 to 15 —$200.00 per hectare

Year 16 to 20 — $800.00 per hectare

The rental rates applicable to any Significant Discovery Licence resulting from Call for Bids No. NL10-03 will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2011 dollars.

(b) Rental rates of $800.00 will increase by $100.00 for each year beyond year 20, and will be payable in constant (inflation adjusted) 2011 dollars until the Significant Discovery Licence is relinquished or converted to a Production Licence. For greater certainty, the interest owner may relinquish lands to reduce future rental payments.

(c) There shall be no carry forward of excess allowable expenditures from Exploration Licences.

(d) Rentals are to be submitted by bank draft or certified cheque payable to the Receiver General.

(e) For greater certainty, rentals shall be calculated on the basis of the total hectarage of lands held as part of the Significant Discovery Licence, as of the anniversary date.

(f) Rentals will be refunded annually, to a maximum of one hundred percent (100%) of the rentals paid in that year, on the basis of a dollar refund for each dollar of allowable expenditures for that year.

(x) A successful bidder will be required to comply with the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Benefits procurement, employment and reporting procedures as established by the Board;

(xi) This parcel will be subject to the payment of issuance fees and Environmental Studies Research Fund levies;

(xii) The Board is not obliged to accept any bid or issue any interest as a result of this call for bids;

(xiii) Any licence that may be issued shall be in the form of the Exploration Licence attached to Call for Bids No. NL10-03;

The full text of Call for Bids No. NL10-03 is available on the Board’s Web site (www.cnlopb.nl.ca) or upon request made to the Registrar, Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, TD Place, 5th Floor, 140 Water Street, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 6H6, 709-778-1400.

MAX RUELOKKE, P.Eng.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

SCHEDULE I — LAND DESCRIPTION CALL FOR BIDS NO. NL10-03 (Area “C” — Central Ridge/Flemish Pass)

*North American Datum 1927

[30-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission’s original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, 819-997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), 819-994-0218 (fax);

— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, 902-426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), 902-426-2721 (fax);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, 204-983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), 204-983-6317 (fax);

— 530–580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, 604-666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), 604-666-8322 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, 514-283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), 514-283-3689 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, 416-952-9096 (telephone), 416-954-6343 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, 306-780-3422 (telephone), 306-780-3319 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, 780-495-3224 (telephone), 780-495-3214 (fax).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2010-475 July 14, 2010

Le Réseau des sports (RDS) inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Application to amend the broadcasting licence for the French-language specialty television service Le Réseau des sports in order to replace its current conditions of licence with the standard conditions set out in Broadcasting Regulatory Policy 2009-562.

2010-478 July 15, 2010

Canyon.TV Incorporated
Across Canada

Denied — Broadcasting licence to operate a new Category 2 specialty service Canyon Money.

2010-479 July 15, 2010

Canyon.TV Incorporated
Across Canada

Denied — Broadcasting licence to operate a new Category 2 specialty service Canyon Technology.

2010-480 July 15, 2010

Canyon.TV Incorporated
Across Canada

Denied — Broadcasting licence to operate a new Category 2 specialty service Canyon Extreme Sports.

[30-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2010-470

Call for comments on a review of the definitions for television program categories and related matters

To ensure that the definitions of Canadian program categories still accurately capture all of the types of programs enjoyed by Canadians, the Commission seeks comments on proposed amendments to the definitions for specific program categories, as well as on matters related to program length and advertising. The Commission is also seeking comments on the appropriate procedure for identifying and updating the specific award shows that will qualify as programs of national interest. The deadline for comments is August 10, 2010.

The Commission will not formally acknowledge comments. It will, however, fully consider all comments and they will form part of the public record of the proceeding, provided that the procedure for filing set out in the call for comments has been followed.

July 12, 2010

[30-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2010-477

Notice of applications received

Various locations Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: August 18, 2010

The Commission has received the following applications:

1. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Toronto, London and Ottawa, Ontario; Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta; and Vancouver and Victoria, British Columbia

To amend the broadcasting licences of its OMNI television programming undertakings CFMT-DT Toronto, CFMT-TV Toronto and its transmitters CFMT-TV-1 London and CFMT-TV-2 Ottawa, CJMT-DT Toronto, CJMT-TV Toronto and its transmitters CJMT-TV-1 London and CJMT-TV-2 Ottawa, CJCO-TV Calgary, CJEO-TV Edmonton, CHNM-DT Vancouver, and CHNM-TV Vancouver and its transmitter CHNM-TV Victoria.

2. Rogers Broadcasting Limited Toronto, Ontario; Portage la Prairie/Winnipeg, Manitoba; Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta; and Vancouver, British Columbia

To amend the broadcasting licences of its Citytv television programming undertakings CITY-TV Toronto and its transmitters CITY-TV-2 Woodstock and CITY-TV-3 Ottawa, CITY-DT Toronto, CHMI-TV Portage la Prairie/Winnipeg, CKAL-TV Calgary and its transmitter CKAL-TV-1 Lethbridge, CKEM-TV Edmonton and its transmitter CKEM-TV-1 Red Deer, and CKVU-TV Vancouver and its transmitter CKVU-TV-1 Courtenay.

July 14, 2010

[30-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

REGULATORY POLICY 2010-476

Amendments to the Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997

In the regulatory policy, the Commission announces that, with Treasury Board’s approval, it has amended the Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997, relating to Part II licence fees.

July 14, 2010

REGULATIONS AMENDING THE BROADCASTING LICENCE FEE REGULATIONS, 1997

AMENDMENTS

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief c) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claims bearing Registry Number 6723 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6942 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subjects of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7156 and 7157 to be the chemical identity of six and three ingredients, respectively. The subjects of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions are the chemical identity of seven and four ingredients, respectively.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7171 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the trade name of a controlled product and the information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7191 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7198 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 10, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7230 to be the chemical name, common name, generic name, trade name or brand name of a controlled product and information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the trade name of a controlled product and information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 10, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7245 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 20, 2008, incorrectly listed the name of the company which filed the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7344, 7345, and 7346 as Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. The correct company name is Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 20, 2008, listed the subjects of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7403 and 7404 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claims on which the screening officer issued the decisions is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7498 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

12. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7519 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

13. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7534 to be the concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

14. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7545 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

15. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7563 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

16. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7589 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid with the exception of the claim bearing Registry Number 7520 which was found to be partially valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7152, 7170, 7223, 7350, 7399, 7431, 7432, 7433, 7434, 7438, 7442 and 7552 were filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7171, being a claim from an employer with operations in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS in respect of which the claim was filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta, while the label in respect of which the claim was filed did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the said act.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7245 and 7467, being claims from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs in respect of which the claims were filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 6925, also being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS relating to this claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2006 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7468, also being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS relating to this claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7230, also being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS and the label relating to this claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In all cases where the material safety data sheet or the label was determined not to be in compliance with the relevant legislation, the screening officer offered the claimant the possibility of entering into an undertaking whereby the claimant would voluntarily make the changes necessary to bring the MSDS or the label into compliance. Pursuant to subsection 16.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the claimant was given 30 days to provide the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or the label amended as necessary.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER WAS SATISFIED THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD TAKEN THE MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet or label in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 6626

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should have been shown on the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.

Registry Number 6702

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the ingredient known as an epoxy resin - amine condensate is not considered hazardous under WHMIS and indicate that the chemical identity of that ingredient is included in the claim for exemption;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 6723

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product together with its percent concentration. Further disclose that this ingredient has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose the value of an upper bound for the LC₅₀ value for monoethanolamine;

3. Disclose the value of lower bounds for the oral and dermal LD₅₀ values for the controlled product;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A and D2B.

Registry Number 6782

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 24, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that the controlled product is corrosive to the eyes and skin;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 6925

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 50 ppm for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 250 ppm for the second confidential hazardous ingredient;

3. Disclose LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

4. Add carbon dioxide to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7084

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 14, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7115

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 22, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7158

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value for hydrochloric acid.

Registry Number 7168

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 12, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulfur to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 7169

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of dibutylhydrogen phosphite in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 1809-19-4 and its percent concentration;

2. Add a time frame to the washing recommendations for first aid measures to be employed in cases of skin contact;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 690 mg/kg for dibutylhydrogen phosphite;

4. Remove the statement that the controlled product does not meet the criteria for a classification of D2B as an eye irritant.

Registry Number 7171

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 27, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the label as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the label for skin contact, add that medical advice should be sought immediately.

Registry Number 7191

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Remove the concentration range shown for the confidential hazardous ingredient oxirane, polymer, monoalkyl ether and disclose its actual concentration or an acceptable range value. Note that on the MSDS amended as necessary for the screening officer to accept the undertaking, the claimant has chosen to rename that particular ingredient polyether;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 251–2 336 mg/kg for the controlled product;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.78 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient alcohols, alkyl, alkylated.

Registry Number 7198

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed.

Registry Number 7206

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 7, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose the presence of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 556-67-2 and its percent concentration;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Numbers 7227 and 7228

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7230

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 16, 2010 (both MSDS and label)

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation and ingestion, give clear indication as to when attention would be required.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should also have been shown on the label. The claimant has been ordered to amend the label as indicated below.

1. Include information concerning the supplier identifier as well as the statement to see the material safety data sheet within the portion of the label enclosed by the WHMIS hatched border;

2. Disclose the HMIRC Registry Number and the date of the decision granting the exemption;

3. Add a time frame of not less than 15 minutes to the washing recommendations for first aid measures to be employed in cases of skin contact.

Registry Number 7231

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 17, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 000 mg/kg for phenol, nonyl.

Registry Number 7238

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 17, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7243

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product under the generic chemical identity phosphoric acid esters, amine salt, disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption;

2. Remove the concentration range shown for the confidential hazardous ingredient olefin sulfide and disclose its actual concentration or an acceptable range value;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed with water for 20 minutes.

Registry Number 7266

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed for 20 minutes;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1.98 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.8 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkylphenol ethoxylate.

Registry Number 7269

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Revise the MSDS to show that crystalline silica has been classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A2) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

2. Disclose a consistent value for the lower bound to the dermal LD₅₀ value for Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether resin;

3. Qualify the information pertaining to eye irritation of DGEBPA as being a Draize score of 2 out of a possible 120;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human and non-human mammalian cells, in vitro;

5. Disclose that certain Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether resins have been shown to cause respiratory sensitization in workers.

Registry Number 7270

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients;

2. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption;

3. Add oxides of nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition or combustion products;

4. Disclose LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7287

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 25, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7293

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption.

Registry Number 7299

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 25, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Remove or change contradictory statements concerning the carcinogenic properties of the confidential hazardous ingredient mineral oil;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of methyl-2-mercaptobenzimidazole in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

Registry Number 7309

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Clarify the irritation potential of the controlled product as regards skin contact;

2. Clarify the irritation potential of the controlled product as regards eye contact;

3. Disclose the percent concentration of organic base in an acceptable manner;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

6. Add oxides of sulfur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 7321

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration and Exposure Limit Values;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of crystalline silica in an acceptable manner;

3. Revise the MSDS to show that crystalline silica has been classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A2) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

4. Disclose a consistent value for the lower bound to the dermal LD₅₀ value for Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether resin;

5. Remove or change contradictory statements concerning the eye irritation properties of the controlled product;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human and non-human mammalian cells, in vitro;

7. Disclose that certain Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether resins have been shown to cause respiratory sensitization in workers.

Registry Number 7322

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7331

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 7, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose the presence of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the controlled product, its CAS Registry Number 556-67-2 and its percent concentration;

3. Remove the inference from section 3 of the MSDS that polyalkylene oxide, CAS Registry Number 56090-69-8, is not a WHMIS hazardous ingredient;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 7343

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of phosphoric acid in an acceptable manner;

2. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption;

3. Disclose that the controlled product has been shown to cause skin irritation in laboratory animals;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open.

Registry Numbers 7344 and 7345

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7346

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 8, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 10 ppm for benzyl alcohol.

Registry Number 7353

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 6, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the kidneys and lungs of laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7360

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 6, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the kidneys of laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7362

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 5, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “Dilute contents of stomach using 2–8 fluid ounces (60–240 mL) of milk or water”;

3. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source;

4. Disclose that sources of ignition should be avoided or eliminated;

5. Disclose that the controlled product should be stored in a cool, dry and well-ventilated place;

6. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product;

7. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS;

8. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7364

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 17, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 4 000 mg/kg for ethylene glycol;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value and an LC₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give three to four glasses of milk or water to drink;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and nitrogen as hazardous thermal decomposition products;

5. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro;

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7369

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 17, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 678 mg/kg for 1,2-ethanediamine, N-(2-aminoethyl)-;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes and that medical attention should be obtained;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

5. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7384

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 18, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oral LD₅₀ values for the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner or disclose a calculated LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 5 049 mg/kg for the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to “20 minutes” and replace it with a time of “30 minutes”;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “Dilute contents of stomach using 2–8 fluid ounces (60–240 mL) of milk or water”;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7390

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition or combustion products.

Registry Numbers 7392 and 7393

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 17, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the lower LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 4 000 mg/kg for ethylene glycol;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS;

5. Registry Number 7392: Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient of the controlled product has been shown to cause cardiopulmonary effects.

Registry Number 7394

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “Dilute contents of stomach using 2–8 fluid ounces (60–240 mL) of milk or water”;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.

Registry Number 7397

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption.

Registry Number 7400

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 5, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Numbers 7403 and 7404

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be mutagenic, in vivo;

4. Registry Number 7403: Disclose the percent concentration of proprietary hydrofluorocarbon in an acceptable manner;

5. Registry Number 7404: If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7406

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 2, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Numbers 7409 and 7410

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 28, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

2. If the WHMIS pictograms are displayed on the MSDS, disclose the appropriate hazard symbol for a material causing immediate and serious toxic effects;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

Registry Number 7419

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption.

Registry Number 7464

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 26, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink.

Registry Number 7466

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 20, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause respiratory tract irritation in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 599 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient heterocyclic amine;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed continuously with gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

4. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7474

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “Dilute contents of stomach using 2–8 fluid ounces (60–240 mL) of milk or water”;

2. Remove the statement that there is “no data available” concerning toxicological information from section 11 of the MSDS;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7498

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose correct information concerning the use of gloves when handling the controlled product.

Registry Number 7515

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption.

Registry Number 7517

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption.

Registry Number 7518

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that certain information pertaining to the property of carcinogenicity is a part of the subject of the claim for exemption.

Registry Number 7519

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 24, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of polyalkylene glycol alkyl ether (1) in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7520

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 8, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “Give one cup (8 ounces or 240 ml) of water or milk if available”.

Registry Number 7523

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7524

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product.

Registry Number 7526

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product.

Registry Number 7527

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 8, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product.

Registry Numbers 7528, 7529, 7531 and 7532

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product.

Registry Number 7534

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product by replacing the words “Not available” in the column devoted to the CAS number in relation to the ingredient referred to on the MSDS as alkoxylated alcohol and by clearly indicating that the chemical identity of that ingredient is included in the claim for exemption;

3. Disclose the percent concentration of alkoxylated alcohol in an acceptable manner;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “Give one cup (8 ounces or 240 ml) of water or milk if available” and add advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7545

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product by clearly indicating that the chemical identity of the ingredient referred to on the MSDS as aminocarboxylate sodium salt (2) is included in the claim for exemption;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7547

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier of the controlled product;

2. Disclose LD₅₀ values for the confidential hazardous ingredient in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.7 g/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 12.9 g/kg and an LC₅₀ (8 hours, female rat) value of 19 000 ppm for isopropanol;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7563

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication in section 2 of the MSDS that the controlled product is not irritating to the skin as opposed to being a corrosive material;

2. Correct the implication in section 2 of the MSDS that the controlled product is merely irritating to the eyes as opposed to being a corrosive material;

3. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

4. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

6. Disclose LD₅₀ values and an LC₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.

Registry Number 7568

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 16, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication in section 2 of the MSDS that the controlled product is not irritating to the skin as opposed to being a corrosive material;

2. Correct the implication in section 2 of the MSDS that the controlled product is merely irritating to the eyes as opposed to being a corrosive material;

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of 30 minutes;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7589

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 303 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkylmercaptoester;

2. Disclose the specific gravity of the controlled product;

3. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Numbers 7608 and 7609

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 18, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3.1 g/kg for zinc alkyl dithiophosphate.

Registry Number 7643

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 599 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient heterocyclic amine;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “Dilute contents of stomach using 2–8 fluid ounces (60–240 mL) of milk or water”.

Registry Number 7729

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of alkoxyphosphate mixtures in an acceptable manner.

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE CLAIMANT TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 6942

Date of order: April 15, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 30 minutes;

3. Add oxides of sulfur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

5. Disclose LD₅₀ values and an LC₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.

Registry Number 7005

Date of order: June 28, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7085

Date of order: March 1, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7156

Date of order: April 15, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the controlled product is merely irritating to the skin as opposed to being a corrosive material;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

3. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 30 minutes;

4. Add oxides of sulfur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

6. Disclose LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.

Registry Number 7157

Date of order: April 15, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that the controlled product is merely irritating as opposed to being a corrosive material;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the skin with water should skin contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the period of time shown on the MSDS for flushing the eyes with water should eye contact occur, delete the current reference to 15 minutes and replace it with a time of at least 30 minutes;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

8. Disclose LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

9. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.

Registry Number 7289

Date of order: March 24, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7356

Date of order: February 22, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7468

Date of order: May 11, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7560

Date of order: April 29, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oxides of carbon and oxides of nitrogen as hazardous decomposition products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7565

Date of order: March 18, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously at least 30 minutes while taking care not to rinse contaminated water into the unaffected eye;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7566

Date of order: March 29, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with gently flowing, lukewarm water for at least 30 minutes. Also disclose that contaminated clothing, footwear and leather goods should be removed under running water;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously at least 30 minutes while taking care not to rinse contaminated water into the unaffected eye or face;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement such as the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, or is unconscious or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Acknowledgement: Subsequent to the review of the MSDS-of-Record respecting this particular claim, the claimant provided the Commission with a copy of a revised version. This revised version of the MSDS was not, however, reviewed by the screening officer.

CLAIM FOUND TO BE PARTIALLY VALID

In the case of the following claim, where the screening officer found that a portion of the claim was not valid, the option of an undertaking was not available as regards the disclosure of the information which was the subject of that portion. Pursuant to subsection 16(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

Registry Number 7520

Date of order: February 5, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the chemical identity and CAS registry number of the ingredient called glycol ether (2).

Pursuant to paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-998-2363.

D. CURLEY
Acting Chief Screening Officer

[30-1-o]