Vol. 145, No. 5 — January 29, 2011

ARCHIVED — COMMISSIONS

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

Following a request from the charities listed below to have their status as a charity revoked, the following notice of intention to revoke was sent:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(a) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice.”

CATHY HAWARA
Director General
Charities Directorate

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Replacement class screening report — Small Scale Farm Infrastructure Projects — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) declares the report entitled Small Scale Farm Infrastructure Projects to be a replacement class screening report (RCSR) pursuant to the provisions of subsection 19(1) and paragraph 19(2)(a) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act).

Public consultation on the RCSR took place from November 17 to December 16, 2010. The Agency received no written submissions from the public concerning the RCSR during this period. In making the declaration proposed by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), the Agency has reviewed the RCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, meets the requirements of the Act for the environmental assessment of the particular class of projects. It is also the Agency’s opinion that the class of projects described in the RCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The declaration is effective January 14, 2011, and is subject to the following terms and conditions:

• Subject to subsection 19(8) of the Act, the declaration is valid until January 14, 2016;
• AAFC will notify the Agency, in writing, a minimum of six months prior to the date on which the declaration expires, of its intention to re-declare the RCSR or not to re-declare the RCSR and thereby allow the declaration to expire; and
• AAFC and the Agency will ensure that the RCSR is made available to the public in accordance with the requirements of the Act. As such, the Agency will place the RCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the Registry). On a quarterly basis, AAFC will post on the Registry Internet site at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca a statement of the projects for which the RCSR was applied, as required under the Act. The quarterly schedule for posting on the Registry is contained in section 1.5 of the RCSR.

For further information, the public may contact the Class Screening Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, 613-957-0507 or 1-866-582-1884 (telephone), 613-957-0946 (fax), ClassScreening@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission’s original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, 819-997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), 819-994-0218 (fax);

— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, 902-426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), 902-426-2721 (fax);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, 204-983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), 204-983-6317 (fax);

— 858 Beatty Street, Suite 290, Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 1C1, 604-666-2111 (telephone), 604-666-8322 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, 514-283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), 514-283-3689 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, 416-952-9096 (telephone), 416-954-6343 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 2220 12th Avenue, Suite 620, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 0M8, 306-780-3422 (telephone);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, 780-495-3224 (telephone), 780-495-3214 (fax).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2011-31

Call for comments on the addition of five non-Canadian Urdu-language services and one non-Canadian English-language service to the lists of eligible satellite services for distribution on a digital basis

The Commission calls for comments on Soundview Entertainment Inc. (Soundview) requests for the addition of five non-Canadian Urdu-language services and one non-Canadian English-language service to the lists of eligible satellite services for distribution on a digital basis. Parties submitting comments on the requests should also submit a true copy of their comments to the Canadian sponsor, Soundview.

Comments on Soundview’s requests must be received by the Commission no later than February 17, 2011. A copy of the comments must be received by Soundview no later than the deadline for receipt of comments by the Commission.

Soundview may file a written reply to any comments received concerning its request. This reply should be filed with the Commission, and a copy sent to the person who submitted the comments, by no later than March 4, 2011.

January 18, 2011

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2010-935-1

Notice of hearing

February 11, 2011
Gatineau, Quebec
Correction to item 15

Further to Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2010-935, the Commission announces the following:

The following item is amended and the change is in bold:

Item 15
Thamesville, Ontario
Application 2010-1510-8

Application by Gordon Peters, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated, for a broadcasting licence to operate an English- and Aboriginal-language FM Type B Native radio programming undertaking in Thamesville.

The applicant proposes to broadcast a minimum of 126 hours of station-produced programming per broadcast week, including a minimum of 20 hours of Lenape-language programming.

January 20, 2011

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2011-35 January 21, 2011

Association des Églises baptistes réformées du Québec
Saint-Jérôme, Quebec

Approved — Application to amend the broadcasting licence for the radio station CFOI-FM Québec in order to add an FM transmitter in Saint-Jérôme to rebroadcast the programming of CFOI-FM in its entirety.

2011-36 January 21, 2011

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Windsor, Ottawa and Toronto, Ontario; and Vancouver, British Columbia

Approved — Request for the revocation of the broadcasting licences for the transitional digital radio undertakings CBE-DR-1 and CBE-DR-2 Windsor; CBO-DR-1, CBOQ-DR-1, CBOF-DR-1 and CBOX-DR-1 Ottawa; CBU-DR-1, CBU-DR-2, CBUF-DR-1 and CBUX-DR-1 Vancouver; and CBLA-DR-1, CBL-DR-1, CJBC-DR-1 and CJBC-DR-2 Toronto.

2011-37 January 21, 2011

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Across Canada

Denied — Application to amend the broadcasting licence for the national specialty service CBC News Network in order to permit it to distribute news programming unique to British Columbia on a separate feed of CBC News Network.

[5-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on December 2, 2006, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6690 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on June 30, 2007, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 6929 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7165 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7175 to be the concentration of three ingredients and the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the concentration of three ingredients and the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7335 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7426 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7549 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7596 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7607 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7610 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7732 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients and concentration of seven ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients and concentration of seven ingredients.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid with the exception of the claim bearing Registry Number 7732 which was found to be partially valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7500, 7506, 7613, 7642, 7648, 7668, 7723, 7765 and 7814 were filed, complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7469, 7676 and 7677, being claims from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7633, being a claim from an employer in the province of Ontario, the screening officer found that the MSDS relating to this claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7675, being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS in respect of which the claim was filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In all cases where the material safety data sheet or the label was determined not to be in compliance with the relevant legislation, the screening officer offered the claimant the possibility of entering into an undertaking whereby the claimant would voluntarily make the changes necessary to bring the MSDS or the label into compliance. Pursuant to subsection 16.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the claimant was given 30 days to provide the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or the label amended as necessary.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER WAS SATISFIED THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD TAKEN THE MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet or label in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 6690

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1 and D2B.

Registry Number 6773

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and information relating to the progress of the claim;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 6929

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulfur to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate.

Registry Number 7197

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 28, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that 4,4′ - (methylenebis(diglycidyl aniline) has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7240

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7264

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 3, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 7273

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 7, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and the date of the decision granting the exemption;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 7274

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 7, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and the date of the decision granting the exemption;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 7294

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 26, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 7300

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 13, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that zinc 2-mercapto-4(5)- methylbenzimidazole has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals with systemic toxicity;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 7301

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 13, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose an acceptable concentration range for 2-mercaptobenzothiazole;

3. Disclose the flash point as well as its method of determination;

4. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 5 mg/m³ (skin) for 2-mercaptobenzothiazole;

5. Disclose the species applicable to the disclosed LD₅₀ value for 2-mercaptobenzothiazole;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

7. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause tumours in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7304

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 12, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7335

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 26, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open. Indicate that immediate medical attention should be obtained;

2. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, vapour, rat) value of 7 093 ppm for methyl methacrylate;

3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

4. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause behavioural effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7336

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7337

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7396

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 10 mg/m³ for propylene glycol;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient oxyalkylated alkylphenol in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be mutagenic, in vivo;

4. Disclose that chronic ingestion of the ingredient has been shown to cause tumours of the liver, kidneys and urinary bladder in laboratory animals and cause adverse effects on the bone marrow.

Registry Number 7413

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 19, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient anionic sulfosuccinate in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7435

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that modified ethoxylate in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye irritation in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 7436

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 7, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose that inhalation and ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 7439

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that inhalation and ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 7440

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that inhalation and ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 7441

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that inhalation and ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Numbers 7443, 7444, 7445 and 7446

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose that inhalation and ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 7447

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 7448

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry numbers and percent concentrations;

2. Disclose a recommended Exposure Limit Value for the controlled product as a whole or disclose available Exposure Limit Values for the hazardous ingredients;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

4. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7449

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration.

Registry Number 7450

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7451

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7452

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Remove the incorrect HMIRC registry number;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7453

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Remove the incorrect HMIRC registry number;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.49 mL/kg for epoxy resin.

Registry Number 7454

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Remove the incorrect HMIRC registry number;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.49 mL/kg for epoxy resin.

Registry Number 7455

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Remove the incorrect HMIRC registry number;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 500 ppm for acetone;

4. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7465

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 16, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and information relating to the progress of the claim;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of amorphous fumed silica in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 1 ppm with a skin notation for triethylenetetramine;

4. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 5mg/m³ with a skin notation for tetraethylenepentamine;

5. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value OSHA TWA = 20 mppcf for amorphous fumed silica;

6. Disclose the pH of the controlled product;

7. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 250 mg/kg for tetraethylenepentamine;

8. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells, in vitro;

9. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 0.56 mL/kg for triethylenetetramine;

10. Disclose a statement indicating that users should comply with all federal, provincial and local regulations when disposing of waste from the controlled product.

Registry Number 7482

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 10, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 7501, 7509, 7510 and 7511

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 30, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of chlorite in the controlled product, its CAS registry number and its percent concentration.

Registry Number 7542

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 27, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed.

Registry Number 7543

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 27, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7562

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 27, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7549

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 3, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add inhalation as a primary route of entry;

2. Disclose the generic chemical identity (polyalkylene oxide) as the additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with the actual concentration or an acceptable range value;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7596

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 3, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add inhalation as a primary route of entry;

2. Disclose the generic chemical identity (polyalkylene oxide) as the additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with the actual concentration or an acceptable range value.

Registry Number 7606

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 21, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals in the absence of maternal toxic effects.

Registry Number 7607

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 6, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7610

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity (alcohols, alkoxylated) as the additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with the actual concentration or an acceptable range value;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

3. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

4. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous combustion products;

5. Disclose a lower LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of <50 mg/m³ for alcohols, alkoxylated.

Registry Number 7614

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 5, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient identified with the generic chemical identity alkyl sulfide;

2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition or combustion products.

Registry Number 7615

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 2, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 6 500 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient olefin sulfide.

Registry Number 7616

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, vapour, rat) value of 2 620 ppm for diethylhydroxylamine;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7620

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

2. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 10 ppm for benzyl alcohol;

3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7621

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 27, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.5 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3 g/kg for ethoxylated alcohol.

Registry Number 7624

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 7, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product and disclose that the real chemical identity and the concentration are included in the claim for exemption;

2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 10 mg/m³ for aliphatic alcohol.

Registry Number 7633

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 27, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, modify or remove the statement to give one to two large glasses of water to drink.

Registry Number 7635

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product and disclose that the real chemical identity and the concentration are included in the claim for exemption;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 15–20 minutes;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin irritation in laboratory animals;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B and the pictogram.

Registry Numbers 7637 and 7638

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, vapour, rat) value of 2 620 ppm for hydroxyl amine;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7639

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Numbers 7646 and 7653

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 10, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7665

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 7, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statement to induce vomiting;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and oxides of nitrogen as hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 7676

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 10, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 60 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1 017.9 mg/kg for monoethanolamine;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should also have been shown on the label. The claimant has been ordered to amend the label as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 60 minutes or until the chemical is removed.

Registry Number 7677

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 10, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product.

In the opinion of the screening officer, certain information should also have been shown on the label. The claimant has been ordered to amend the label as indicated below.

1. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product.

Registry Number 7683

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 6, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is a regulated component of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

3. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7699

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 13, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption.

Registry Numbers 7713 and 7714

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 27, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and the date of the decision granting the exemption.

Registry Number 7715

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 10, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously at least 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7728

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, guinea pig) value of 0.47 g/kg for ethylenediamine;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 410 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2 510 mg/kg calculated for the product.

Registry Number 7731

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 100 mg/m³ for complex alcohol;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) range of 238–277 mg/kg for hydrogen chloride;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statements to give water to drink.

Registry Number 7732

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 4, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 100 mg/m³ for complex alcohol;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) range of 238–277 mg/kg for hydrogen chloride;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statements to give water to drink.

Registry Number 7813

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 29, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 60 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE CLAIMANT TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7165

Date of order: September 16, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient diamine;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose that diamine is a skin sensitizer;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7175

Date of order: September 20, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute ingestion and inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the kidneys and testes;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as non-classifiable as a human carcinogen (A4) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause death in humans;

5. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in laboratory animals in the absence of maternal toxic effects;

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D2A and D1B.

Registry Number 7426

Date of order: August 13, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose halides as hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, mouse) value of >500 mg/kg for inorganic salt.

Registry Number 7469

Date of order: September 30, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and C with the pictograms;

2. Disclose correct information concerning the proper storage conditions for the controlled product;

3. Disclose an Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL = 10 mg/m³) for aliphatic alcohol.

Registry Number 7559

Date of order: October 1, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 60 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 60 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with chlorinated solvents, aluminum and zinc;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1 976 mg/kg for aromatic ether sulphonate.

Registry Number 7663

Date of order: October 26, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product and disclose that the real chemical identity and the concentration are included in the claim for exemption;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statements to give water to drink and to induce vomiting.

CLAIM FOUND TO BE PARTIALLY VALID

In the case of the following claim, where the screening officer found that a portion of the claim was not valid, the option of an undertaking was not available as regards the disclosure of the information which was the subject of that portion. Pursuant to subsection 16(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the remainder of the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

Registry Number 7732

Date of order: September 20, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the chemical identity and CAS number of the ingredient called isopropanol.

Pursuant to paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Note: The following claims were cancelled after the issuance of the decisions and thus neither was a signed undertaking provided nor was an order issued. The screening officer has identified the following instances of non-compliance with the requirements of the relevant legislation.

Registry Number 7415

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of aromatic diester in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 10 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 15 ppm for vinyl acetate polymer;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.33 g/kg for aromatic diester;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.92 g/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.5 mL/kg (2 300 mg/kg), and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, mouse) value of 1 460 ppm for vinyl acetate polymer;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in human cells, in vitro;

8. Disclose that vinyl acetate polymer has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals;

9. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and D2B.

Registry Number 7625

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that xylene, naphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product and disclose that the real chemical identity and the concentration are included in the claim for exemption;

3. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse CNS effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7664

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.3 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 14.1 g/kg for toluene;

5. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, vapour, rat) value of 19.0 mg/L for toluene.

Pursuant to paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-998-2363.

G. BRUINS
Acting Chief Screening Officer

[5-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission and leave granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 114(4) of the said Act, to Catherine Sproule, Legal Counsel (LA-02A), Aboriginal Law Services, Prairie Region, Department of Justice, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, to allow her to seek nomination as, and be, a candidate before the election period in the provincial election that will be held on November 7, 2011, for the electoral district of Saskatoon Nutana, Saskatchewan.

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to subsection 114(5) of the said Act, also grants a leave of absence without pay during the election period, effective at close of business on the first day of the election period, to allow her to be a candidate during this election.

January 13, 2011

MARIA BARRADOS
President

[5-1-o]