ARCHIVED — Vol. 147, No. 8 — February 23, 2013

Warning This Web page has been archived on the Web.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

COMMISSIONS

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of a charity

The following notice of proposed revocation was sent to the charity listed below revoking it for failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act as listed in this notice:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraphs 168(1)(b), 168(1)(c) and 168(1)(e) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the organization listed below and that the revocation of registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice.”

Business Number

Name/Address

893988261RR0001

ELDER CONNECTIONS, TORONTO, ONT.

CATHY HAWARA
Director General
Charities Directorate

[8-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

APPEAL

Notice No. HA-2012-022

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) will hold a public hearing to consider the appeal referenced hereunder. This hearing will be held beginning at 9:30 a.m., in the Tribunal’s Hearing Room No. 1, 18th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario. Interested persons planning to attend should contact the Tribunal at 613-998-9908 to obtain further information and to confirm that the hearing will be held as scheduled.

Customs Act

Curry’s Art Stores v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency

Date of Hearing: March 21, 2013

Appeal No.: AP-2012-031

Goods in Issue: Aluminum easels (Model Nos. TRI602, HAE 620, HAE 625 and A13217)

Issue: Whether the goods in issue are properly classified under tariff item No. 9403.20.00 as other metal furniture and under tariff item No. 7616.99.90 as other articles of aluminum, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency, or should be classified under tariff item No. 9403.10.00 as metal furniture of a kind used in offices, as claimed by Curry’s Art Stores.

Tariff Items at Issue: Curry’s Art Store—9403.10.00.
President of the Canada Border Services Agency—9403.20.00 and 7616.99.90

February 13, 2013

By order of the Tribunal
ERIC WILDHABER
Secretary

[8-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DETERMINATION

Construction services

Notice is hereby given that, after completing its inquiry, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) made a determination (File No. PR-2012-020) on February 14, 2013, with respect to a complaint filed by C3 Polymeric Limited (C3), of Brampton, Ontario, pursuant to subsection 30.11(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, R.S.C. 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 47, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. NGC 12-C011) by the National Gallery of Canada (NGC). The solicitation was for the replacement of the insulating glass units enclosing the Great Hall and the reconstruction of 13 small roofs.

C3 alleged that the NGC improperly and unfairly evaluated its proposal.

Having examined the evidence presented by the parties and considered the provisions of the Agreement on Internal Trade and the Agreement on Government Procurement, the Tribunal determined that the complaint was not valid.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, 333 Laurier Avenue W, 15th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Ottawa, February 14, 2013

ERIC WILDHABER
Secretary

[8-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The Commission posts on its Web site the decisions, notices of consultation and regulatory policies that it publishes, as well as information bulletins and orders. On April 1, 2011, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure came into force. As indicated in Part 1 of these Rules, some broadcasting applications are posted directly on the Commission’s Web site, www.crtc.gc.ca, under “Part 1 Applications.”

To be up to date on all ongoing proceedings, it is important to regularly consult “Today’s Releases” on the Commission’s Web site, which includes daily updates to notices of consultation that have been published and ongoing proceedings, as well as a link to Part 1 applications.

The following documents are abridged versions of the Commission’s original documents. The original documents contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including the locations and addresses where the complete files for the proceeding may be examined. These documents are posted on the Commission’s Web site and may also be examined at the Commission’s offices and public examination rooms. Furthermore, all documents relating to a proceeding, including the notices and applications, are posted on the Commission’s Web site under “Public Proceedings.”

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PART 1 APPLICATIONS

The following applications were posted on the Commission’s Web site between February 8, 2013, and February 14, 2013:

My Broadcasting Corporation
Brighton, Ontario
2013-0274-4
Technical amendment for CIYM-FM
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: March 13, 2013

Animal Planet Canada Company
Across Canada
2013-0294-2
Amendment of a condition of licence for Animal Planet
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: March 14, 2013

2953285 Canada Inc.
Toronto, Ontario
2013-0297-6
Amendment to the conditions of licence for Discovery World HD (formerly Discovery HD)
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: March 14, 2013

Odyssey Television Network Inc.
Across Canada
2013-0302-3
Addition of Greek Cinema to the list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: March 14, 2013

[8-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

INFORMATION BULLETIN

2013-62 February 15, 2013

Applications processed pursuant to streamlined procedures

The Commission sets out lists of applications that did not require a public process and that it processed from September 1 to December 31, 2012, pursuant to its streamlined procedures. These applications involve transfers of ownership and changes in the effective control of broadcasting undertakings, as well as applications for amendments or extensions of deadlines.

[8-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

ORDER

2013-61 February 15, 2013

Broadcasting licence fees — Part Ⅰ

The Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997 (the Regulations) provide for the payment of a Part Ⅰ licence fee by certain broadcasting undertakings. Subsection 9(1) of the Regulations sets out the components for the calculation of the regulatory costs.

Pursuant to section 10 of the Regulations, the Commission hereby announces in this public notice that the estimated total broadcasting regulatory costs of the Commission for the 2013–2014 fiscal year are $30.161 million.

The annual adjustment amount referred to in subsection 8(2) for the 2011–2012 fiscal year is $0.377 million.

A second adjustment pertaining to the 2012–2013 fiscal year in the amount of $0.005 million is being made following the revision of the Part Ⅰ billing for one broadcasting undertaking. Part Ⅰ broadcasting licence fees were recalculated and the adjustment is being invoiced to the other broadcasting undertakings.

The net billing for the Part Ⅰ licence fee for the 2013–2014 fiscal year, taking into account the adjustments in the paragraphs above, is $30.543 million. This is a slight decrease ($0.080 million) from the net billing of $30.623 million in the previous fiscal year.

[8-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2013-52 February 11, 2013

9262-8148 Québec inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate Télé Santé +, a national, French-language specialty Category B service.

2013-53 February 12, 2013

Ethnic Channels Group Limited
Across Canada

Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate Hindi Women’s TV, a national niche third-language ethnic specialty Category B service.

Approved — Application to devote up to 6 of the 12 minutes of advertising material permitted during each clock hour to local and regional advertising.

2013-55 February 13, 2013

Ethnic Channels Group Limited
Across Canada

Approved — Application to add HIGHTV 3D to the List of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution.

2013-56 February 13, 2013

Fairchild Television Ltd.
Across Canada

Approved — Application to add Now BNC to the List of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution.

2013-57 February 13, 2013

Canadian Hellenic Cable Radio Ltd.
Montréal, Quebec

Approved — Application to change the authorized contours of the ethnic specialty commercial radio station CKIN-FM Montréal.

[8-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Claimant

Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)

Registry Number

MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS)

Date of Decision

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

IRGALUBE® 2030 A

7867

2010/11/17

January 23, 2012

Blendco Systems, LLC, Bristol, Pennsylvania

Total Power

7906

5/13/2011

March 15, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 11105 Performance Additive

7914

7/7/2010

December 15, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

LUBAD 1729

7915

7/7/2010

December 15, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4045 Heating Oil Additive

7916

15 July 2010

January 6, 2012

Nalco Canada Co.,
Burlington, Ontario

Cleann Cor® EC1538A

7925

2010/07/27

March 15, 2012

3M Canada Company London, Ontario

3MÔ Scotch-WeldÔ Acrylic Adhesive DP-807, Part A

7930

2010/09/09

January 16, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ Scotch-WeldÔ Acrylic Adhesive DP-807, Part B

7931

2010/09/09

January 16, 2012

Trican Well Service Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

FC-1S

7948

November 18, 2010

January 27, 2012

Cansolv Technologies Inc.,
Montréal, Quebec

CANSOLV Absorbent DS

7963

2010/10/08

January 11, 2012

Ashland Canada Corp., Mississauga, Ontario

Infinity Ô WT1525

7967

03/02/2011

January 19, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

856 NEUTRAL OA FLUX

7986

1/10/2011

March 15, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ARMAKLEEN E2002

7989

1/5/2011

February 28, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ARMAKLEEN E2003

7990

2/18/2011

February 29, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

EF-6100 WAVE SOLDER FLUX

7992

2/15/2011

January 30, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

NEUTRAL FLUX 373

7994

2/18/2011

January 31, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

NR 205 NC FLUX

7996

2/16/2011

January 30, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ALPHA® OM-338 Paste Flux

7998

2/16/2011

December 16, 2011

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

SLS 65C FLUX

8001

2/16/2011

January 31, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ALPHA® UP-78-M Solder Paste 63Sn/37Pb 90-3-M13

8002

6/10/2011

January 27, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ALPHA® WS-600 Paste Flux

8003

4/22/2010

January 31, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ALPHA® WS-609 Flux

8004

6/10/2011

January 27, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ALPHA® PoP 707 BGA Flux

8005

6/10/2011

December 16, 2011

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

PROTECTOR CH-3

8008

6/11/2011

January 27, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

CENTRAL HEATING PROTECTOR F1

8009

6/13/2011

January 27, 2012

JBI Canada Inc., Thorold, Ontario

Traction-PakT Ô 3 in 1 Anti-Slip Floor Treatment

8021

November 4, 2010

February 15, 2012

Raybo Chemical Co.,
Huntington, West Virginia

RAYBO90 NORUST NF

8039

Nov08/10

December 22, 2011

Cytec Industries Inc.,
Woodland Park, New Jersey

AERO® XD-5002

8041

06/30/2011

February 29, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

NEMO 1123

8052

19 April 2011

February 22, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

GM6 top Treat

8053

30 November, 2010

February 23, 2012

Evonik Degussa Corp., Parsippany,
New Jersey

Protectosil® CIT

8054

02/04/2011

December 28, 2011

Evonik Degussa Corp., Parsippany,
New Jersey

Protectosil® CHEM-TRETE®BSM 400

8055

12/30/2010

December 28, 2011

UNIVAR Canada Ltd.,
Richmond,
British Columbia

VANFROTH 350

8057

08 September 2010

March 29, 2012

UNIVAR Canada Ltd.,
Richmond,
British Columbia

VANFROTH 702

8058

08 September 2010

March 28, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ Scotch-WeldÔ Structural Epoxy Adhesive 7260 B/A, Part A (XC-7261)

8060

2010/12/07

February 21, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ AutomixÔ SMC/Fiberglass Repair Adhesive PN 08243 Part A

8061

2010/12/07

December 30, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

TecGARD 740

8065

20 December 2010

March 29, 2012
L

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

TecGARD 712

8066

20 December 2010

March 21, 2012

Raybo Chemical Co.,
Huntington, West Virginia

RAYBO 5790 OPTISPERSE

8071

Mar14/11

December 29, 2011

Raybo Chemical Co.,
Huntington, West Virginia

RAYBO 85 RUSTIB

8072

Jan03/11

December 28, 2011

Nalco Canada Co.,
Burlington, Ontario

NALCO® EC7029A

8075

0000/00/00

March 15, 2012

Hach Company, Ames, Iowa

DPD Free Chlorine Reagent

8079

28 February 2011

February 24, 2012

Hach Company, Ames, Iowa

DPD Total Chlorine Reagent

8080

3 March 2011

February 24, 2012

Hach Company, Ames, Iowa

DPD Compound for Free and Total Chlorine Analyzers

8081

01 July 2011

February 24, 2012

Chevron Lummus Global, LLC, Richmond, Virginia

ISOTREATING® Catalyst ICR 179 (All)

8083

March 22, 2011

March 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ SMC/Fiberglass Repair Adhesive -3 PN 08271 Part A

8084

2011/03/21

February 29, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ Universal Adhesive Black-3 Part A

8085

2011/03/22

February 29, 2012

Chemtrade Logistics Inc., Toronto, Ontario

VIRWITE® POWDER (SERIES 100)

8088

March 11, 2011

January 31, 2012

Chemtrade Logistics Inc., Toronto, Ontario

VIRWITE® POWDER (SERIES 300)

8089

March 11, 2011

January 31, 2012

Chemtrade Logistics Inc., Toronto, Ontario

VIRWITE® POWDER (SERIES 300B)

8090

March 11, 2011

January 31, 2012

Chemtrade Logistics Inc., Toronto, Ontario

VIRWITE® POWDER (SERIES 400)

8091

March 11, 2011

January 31, 2012

Chemtrade Logistics Inc., Toronto, Ontario

VIRWITE® LIQUID (SERIES 100)

8092

March 11, 2011

January 31, 2012

Chemtrade Logistics Inc., Toronto, Ontario

VIRWITE® LIQUID (SERIES 200)

8093

March 11, 2011

January 31, 2012

Chemtrade Logistics Inc., Toronto, Ontario

VIRWITE® LIQUID (SERIES 300)

8094

March 11, 2011

January 31, 2012

Ashland Canada Corp., Mississauga, Ontario

ProsoftÔ TQ1003 Debonder

8097

03/25/2011

February 22, 2012

Rohm and Haas Canada LP,
West Hill, Ontario

MONOMER QM-1326AP

8098

02/10/2011

January 19, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ALPHA® WS-809 Solder Paste 63Sn/37Pb 89.8-3-M18

8101

6/10/2011

January 27, 2012

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield, New Jersey

ALPHA® WS-820 Solder Paste 96.5SN/3.0Ag/0.5Cu 88-3-M19

8103

6/10/2011

January 27, 2012

Cookson Electronics,
South Plainfield,
New Jersey

ALPHA® OM-5100 Solder Paste 62Sn/36Pb/2Ag 90-3-M13

8104

6/10/2011

January 30, 2012

Cookson Electronics,
South Plainfield, New Jersey

ALPHA® OM-338 Solder Paste 96.5Sn/3.0Ag/0.5Cu 88.5-3-M13

8105

6/10/2011

January 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ SMC/Fiberglass Repair Adhesive -Black-1 PN 08243 and 08251 Part A

8106

2011/03/22

February 29, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ V Magenta

8110

2011/03/11

January 25, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ F Red Oxide

8111

2011/03/11

February 13, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ C Yellow Oxide

8112

2011/03/11

February 7, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ RUL High Hide Red

8113

2011/03/11

February 7, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ B Lamp Black

8114

2011/03/11

March 27, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ I Brown Oxide

8116

2011/03/11

March 26, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ T Medium Yellow

8117

2011/03/11

March 19, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ R Red

8118

2011/03/11

March 20, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ AX Yellow

8119

2011/03/11

March 20, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptionsÔ DU Phthalo Green

8121

2011/03/11

March 30, 2012

Arclin Canada Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario

Catalyst for Ultra Low Emitting Resin

8126

March 7, 2011

January 31, 2012

Arclin Canada Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario

PF Lightener Solution

8128

March 7, 2011

January 31, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

LUBRIZOL® 560H

8129

02 September 2011

March 27, 2012

UNIVAR Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia
(formerly Innospec Fuel Specialities)

OLI-9101.x

8130

09 September 2011

March 28, 2012

UNIVAR Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia
(formerly
Innospec Fuel Specialities)

Stadis® 450

8131

23 February 2011

March 28, 2012

UNIVAR Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia
(formerly Innospec Fuel Specialities)

Stadis® 425

8132

22 November 2011

March 28, 2012

UNIVAR Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia
(formerly Innospec Fuel Specialities)

DCI 6A

8134

08 April 2011

March 29, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ Semi-Rigid Parts Repair Adhesive-3 PN 08237 Part A

8135

2011/04/21

February 29, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ SMC/Fiberglass Repair Adhesive -10 PN 08272 Part A

8136

2011/04/21

February 29, 2012

Kinetic Fuel
Technology, Inc., Youngstown, New York

K100G

8143

April 4, 2011

March 29, 2012

Kinetic Fuel
Technology, Inc., Youngstown, New York

K100MG

8144

April 4, 2011

March 29, 2012

Kinetic Fuel
Technology, Inc., Youngstown, New York

K100D

8145

April 4, 2011

March 29, 2012

Kinetic Fuel
Technology, Inc., Youngstown, New York

K100MD

8146

April 4, 2011

March 29, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation,
Wickliffe, Ohio

LUBRIZOL® 5708

8150

02 September 2011

March 27, 2012

Trican Well Service Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

PL-3

8151

March 28, 2011

January 3, 2012

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

ANTI-TERRA U 80

8152

03/29/2011

December 30, 2011

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

BYK-W 980

8153

03/29/2011

December 30, 2011

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

BYK-W 9077

8154

03/29/2011

December 30, 2011

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

BYK-W 9076

8155

03/29/2011

January 27, 2012

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

PETROFLO 2OY3423

8156

30 MAR 2011

February 24, 2012

Ashland Canada Corp., Mississauga, Ontario

ProsoftÔ TQ250 Softener

8157

4/26/2011

December 28, 2012

Diversity
Technologies Corp.,
Edmonton, Alberta

PVA-40

8160

Jan. 10, 2012

March 20, 2012

Taylor Technologies Inc., Sparks, Maryland

DPD REAGENT #2

8162

2011/09/30

February 24, 2012

Weatherford
Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

Wetsol 3

8165

September 16, 2010

February 29, 2012

Weatherford
Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

CA 5051

8167

September 16, 2010

March 29, 2012

Weatherford
Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

Wetsol 1 Mutual Solvent

8168

September 16, 2010

March 29, 2012

Weatherford
Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

Wetsol 2 Mutual Solvent

8169

September 16, 2010

March 29, 2012

Weatherford
Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

WC 5000 Paraffin Solvent

8170

September 16, 2010

March 29, 2012

Weatherford
Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

WC 6000 Asphaltene Solvent

8171

September 16, 2010

March 29, 2012

Weatherford
Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited,
Edmonton, Alberta

WC 7000 Paraffin/Asphaltene Solvent

8172

September 16, 2010

March 29, 2012

Munzing-Ultra
Additives LLC, Bloomfield, New Jersey

RM9203

8182

30 Nov 2011

January 23, 2012

Munzing-Ultra
Additives LLC, Bloomfield, New Jersey

RM91XX

8183

18 Apr 2011

January 23, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ SMC/Fiberglass Mat Adhesive PN 08277 Part A

8186

2011/05/03

February 29, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3MÔ Semi-Rigid Parts Repair Adhesive Black-1 PN 08235 Part A

8187

2011/05/03

February 29, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 2372 Performance Additive

8216

3 May 2011

February 24, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4045 NA Heating Oil Additive

8218

26 July 2011

March 21, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation,
Wickliffe, Ohio

LUBRIZOL® 5034A

8219

04 October 2011

March 27, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

NALCO® EC6697A

8223

2011/07/12

February 29, 2012

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

PROSWEET S30W

8224

17-MAY-2011

March 30, 2012

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

PROSWEET S1750W

8225

06-JUL-2011

March 30, 2012

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

PROSWEET S1760W

8226

17-MAY-2011

February 17, 2012

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

PROSWEET S1761W

8227

17-MAY-2011

February 17, 2012

Momentive
Performance Materials,
Markham, Ontario

Y-17503

8228

10/26/2011

February 2, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

BEROL® 505 SA

8230

10/27/2011

January 31, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

MORWET® EFW POWDER

8231

10/27/2011

February 21, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

PETRO® 22 LIQUID

8232

10/27/2011

February 21, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

PETRO®22 POWDER

8233

10/27/2011

February 21, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

PETRO® AA LIQUID

8234

5/24/2011

February 21, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

PETRO® BA LIQUID

8235

10/27/2011

February 21, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

PETRO® BAF LIQUID

8236

10/27/2011

February 21, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

PETRO® LBA LIQUID

8237

12/19/2011

February 21, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

PETRO® LULF LIQUID

8238

12/19/2011

March 30, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

PETRO® ULF LIQUID

8239

12/19/2011

March 30, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

REDICOTE® C-450-1

8240

5/25/2011

March 30, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

NALCOAL® 8881

8242

2011/06/03

February 29, 2012

R.T. Vanderbilt
Company Inc.,
Norwalk, Connecticut

VANLUBE® 672

8255

12/20/2011

March 14, 2012

Momentive Performance Materials,
Markham, Ontario

SPUR+ 1050 MM Prepolymer

8256

10/17/2011

March 20, 2012

Innospec Fuel Specialties,
Newark, Delaware

DC-11

8263

16 August 2011

March 29, 2012

Cansolv Technologies Inc.,
Montréal, Quebec

CANSOLV Ô Absorbent DC-103

8276

2011/07/01

March 27, 2012

BYK USA,
Wallingford, Connecticut

DISPERBYK-145

8282

07/26/2011

January 27, 2012

Rohm and Haas
Canada LP,
West Hill, Ontario

PARALOIDÔ KM-399 Impact Modifier

8283

07/26/2011

January 27, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation,
Wickliffe, Ohio

SOLSPERSEÔ 20000

8289

10 August 2011

January 27, 2012

Innospec Fuel Specialties,
Newark, Delaware

DCI-11 PLUS#

8311

18 August 2011

March 29, 2012

Hydro Technologies (Canada) Inc.,
Québec, Quebec

HY BRITE® WF-3011

8312

October 3rd, 2011

February 28, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation,
Wickliffe, Ohio

LUBRIZOL® 859

8313

30 September 2011

February 21, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc.,
Woodland Park,
New Jersey

EBECRYL® 171

8316

09/01/2011

March 27, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

EC9092A PROCESS ANTIFOULANT

8319

2011/08/31

March 29, 2012

Notes:

  1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, bearing Registry Number 7867 listed the Product Identifier as IRGALUBE 2030 A and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The Product Identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is IRGALUBE® 2030 A and the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7914 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7915 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7925 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.
  5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7963 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7986 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7989 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7990 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7994 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7998 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of six ingredients.
  11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8001 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  12. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8002 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  13. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8003 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of seven ingredients.
  14. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8004 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of six ingredients.
  15. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8005 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of six ingredients.
  16. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8009 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  17. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8041 to be AERO® XD5002 Promoter. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is for the product identifier AERO® XD-5002 Promoter.
  18. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8052 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  19. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8053 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  20. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8058 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  21. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8060 to be 3M™ Scotch-Weld™ Structural Epoxy Adhesive 7260 B/A, Part A. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is for the product identifier 3M™ Scotch-Weld™ Structural Epoxy Adhesive 7260 B/A, Part A (XC-7261).
  22. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8065 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.
  23. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8066 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  24. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8071 to be RAYBO 57 OPTISPERSE HS. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is for the product identifier RAYBO 5790 OPTISPERSE.
  25. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8075 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  26. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8083 to be Hydroprocess Catalyst ICR 179. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is for the product identifier ISOTREATING® Catalyst ICR 179.
  27. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8084 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  28. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8085 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  29. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8089 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.
  30. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8090 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.
  31. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8092 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.
  32. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8093 to be the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.
  33. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8094 to be the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.
  34. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8097 to be Prosoft® TQ1003 Debonder and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is for the product identifier Prosoft™ TQ1003 Debonder and the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  35. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8101 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  36. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8103 listed the product identifier as ALPHA® WS-820 Solder Paste 96.5Sn/3.0Ag/0.5Cu 86-3-M19 and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is ALPHA® WS-820 Solder Paste 96.5Sn/3.0Ag/0.5Cu 88-3-M19 and the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  37. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8104 listed the product identifier as ALPHA® OM-5100 Solder Paste 62Sn/36Pb/2Ag 9 0-3-M13 and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is ALPHA® OM-5100 Solder Paste 62Sn/36Pb/2Ag 90-3-M13 and the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  38. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8105 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  39. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8106 listed the product identifier as 3M™ SMC/Fiberglass Repair Adhesive Black-1 PN 08243 Part A and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SMC/Fiberglass Repair Adhesive Black-1 PN 08243 and 08251 Part A and the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  40. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8110 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  41. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8111 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  42. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8112 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  43. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8113 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.
  44. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8114 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  45. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8116 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  46. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8117 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.
  47. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8118 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  48. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8119 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  49. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8121 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  50. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8126 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients.
  51. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8134 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  52. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8135 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  53. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8136 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  54. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8150 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  55. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8151 to be the chemical name, common name, generic name, trade name or brand name of a controlled product. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  56. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8165 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients and the concentration of seven ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients and the concentration of five ingredients.
  57. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8186 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  58. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8187 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  59. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8216 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of six ingredients.
  60. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8218 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  61. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8219 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  62. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8223 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the trade name and information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product.
  63. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8224 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient.
  64. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8263 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  65. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8276 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient and the name of a toxicological study that identifies an ingredient of a controlled product.
  66. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 24, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8282 to be Disperbyk-145. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is for the product identifier DISPERBYK-145.
  67. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 24, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8311 listed the product identifier as DC-11 PLUS and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The product identifier and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision were DCI-11 PLUS and the chemical identity of one ingredient.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or labels.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations.

Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDSs in respect of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 8152, 8153, 8155, 8157, 8223, 8238, 8239, 8282, 8289, 8312 and 8319 which were filed, complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7948 and 8151, being claims from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 8098, being a claim from an employer in the province of Ontario, the screening officer found that the MSDS relating to the claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario.

In all cases where the material safety data sheet or the label was determined not to be in compliance with the relevant legislation, the screening officer offered the claimant the possibility of entering into an undertaking whereby the claimant would voluntarily make the changes necessary to bring the MSDS or the label into compliance. Pursuant to subsection 16.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the claimant was given 30 days to provide the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or the label amended as necessary.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER WAS SATISFIED THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD TAKEN THE MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet or label in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 7867

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 24, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional confidential hazardous ingredient “alkylated diphenylamines”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of >500 mg/kg for the ingredient “naphthylamine derivative”.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 1 554 mg/kg for the ingredient “acetic acid, (4-nonylphenoxy)”.
  4. Disclose that oral exposure to an ingredient has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7906

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 20, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose ingestion as a route of entry.
  2. Disclose the generic chemical identity and HMIRC registry number for confidential hazardous ingredient “oxirane, polymer, monoalkyl ether” from the upstream MSDS.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye and skin contact, add a statement to the effect that flushing should continue for at least 60 minutes.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  5. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
  6. Disclose a NIOSH REL–TWA Exposure Limit of 5 mg/m3 for the confidential hazardous ingredient “phosphoric acid salts”.
  7. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 847 mg/kg for the ingredient “disodium metasilicate”.

Registry Numbers 7914 and 7915

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 24, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “polyolefin amide alkyleneamine borate”, “polyolefin amide alkyleneamine” and “long chain olefin sulphides”, in the controlled product, together with their percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be rinsed with gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes.
  3. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
  4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is a skin irritant.

Registry Number 7916

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 6, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content, format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “long chain alkenyl amide” and “long chain alkenyl acid”, in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations, in an acceptable manner.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, ingestion and dermal exposure, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in a screening test for mutagenicity.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2.46 mL/kg for the ingredient “2-ethyl hexanol”, an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 58 mg/kg for the ingredient “methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl” and an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 337 mg/kg for the ingredient “alkyl amine”.
  5. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.38 mL/kg for the ingredient “2-ethyl hexanol”, an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 140 mg/kg for the ingredient “methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl” and an LD50 (dermal, female rat) value of 370 mg/kg for the ingredient “alkyl amine”.
  6. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 76 mg/m3 for the ingredient “methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl” and an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 890 ppm for the ingredient “alkyl amine”.

Registry Number 7925

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that dermal exposure to, ingestion of and/or inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals, and ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused central nervous system (CNS) effects in humans.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “fatty acid-amine condensate”, in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of >400 mg/kg, an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of >900 mg/kg and an LC50 (aerosol, rat, 4 hours) value of >0.5 g/m3 for the ingredient “quaternary phosphorus compound”.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6.24 g/kg for the ingredient “isopropanol”.
  5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.
  6. Disclose that the ingredient “methanol” is incompatible with aluminum and magnesium.
  7. Disclose that the ingredients “organic sulfur compound” and “quaternary phosphorus compound” in the controlled product are skin sensitizers.
  8. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A and D2B.

Registry Number 7930

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose oxides of nitrogen in the list of hazardous decomposition products.
  2. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 7 093 ppm for the ingredient “methyl methacrylate”.
  3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7931

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye and skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes and skin should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  3. Disclose oxides of sulphur in the list of hazardous decomposition products.
  4. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product.
  5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 10.2 g/kg for the ingredient “p-toluenesulfonyl chloride”, an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 134 mg/kg for the ingredient “cumene hydroperoxide”, an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 7 093 ppm for the ingredient “methyl methacrylate” and an LC50 (aerosol, rat, 4 hours) value of 7.1 mg/L for the ingredient “methacrylic acid”.
  6. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7948

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 2, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  2. Disclose a LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6.29 g/kg for the ingredient “isopropanol”.
  3. Disclose that the ingredient “isopropanol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic and embryotoxic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 7963

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 13, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional hazardous ingredient “cyclic amine (3)” in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional hazardous ingredient “ethylene glycol”, in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. Disclose that exposure to the ingredient “cyclic amine (3)” has been shown to cause respiratory sensitization in workers.
  4. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in the absence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7967

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 20, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient “amino tri(methylenephosphonic acid)” in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration.
  2. Disclose an AIHA WEEL–TWA value of 10 mg/m3 for the confidential hazardous ingredient “phosphonate derivative”.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 910 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “phosphonate derivative”.

Registry Number 7992

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient “4-methylpentan-2-one” in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration of 0.1–1%.
  2. Disclose the ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit = 20 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit = 75 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “4-methylpentan-2-one”.
  3. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “propan-2-ol”.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 10 600 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “ethanol”.
  5. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the hazardous ingredient “4-methylpentan-2-one”.
  6. Disclose that the ingredient “propan-2-ol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity.
  7. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “ethanol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause developmental effects in humans.

Registry Number 7996

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 5, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit = 20 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit = 75 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “4-methylpentan-2-one”.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 10 600 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “ethanol”.
  3. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “propan-2-ol”.
  4. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the hazardous ingredient “4-methylpentan-2-one”.
  5. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “propan-2-ol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity.
  6. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “methanol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the absence of maternal toxicity.
  7. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “ethanol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause developmental effects in humans.

Registry Number 7998

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 27, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “carboxylic acid derivative” together with its percent concentration.
  2. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “alkanediyl ester” together with its percent concentration.

Registry Number 8002

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 29, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.4 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “glycol ether”.

Registry Number 8005

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 27, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “carboxylic acid derivative” together with its percent concentration.
  2. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “alkanediyl ester” together with its percent concentration.

Registry Number 8008

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects, in vitro.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic/embryotoxic, developmental and reproductive effects in laboratory animals.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 680 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  5. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 180 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.

Registry Number 8009

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma and/or carcinoma in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects, in vitro.
  4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic/embryotoxic, developmental and reproductive effects in laboratory animals.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH/OSHA Exposure Limit of 5 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “molybdenum trioxide”.
  6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 680 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  7. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 180 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.

Registry Number 8039

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 11, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 8041

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional ingredient, “dibutyl carbonate”, in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and the concentration of 1–5%.
  2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 8052

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 19, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “polyolefin amide alkenamine” and “poly(oxyalkylene) alkaryl ether”, in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8053

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “alkyl ester”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8054

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes and that immediate medical attention should be obtained.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.26 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.

Registry Number 8055

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 8060

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 21, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be rinsed continuously with gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement such as the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, or is unconscious or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 8061

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an ACGIH TVL–TWA Exposure Limit of 3 mg/m3 and show that “carbon black” has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).

Registry Number 8065

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 11, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional hazardous ingredient “long-chain alkenyl amine”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of >500 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “long-chain alkenyl amine”.

Registry Number 8066

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 11, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional hazardous ingredient, “poly(oxyalkylene) alkyl ether”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Do not induce vomiting.
  3. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value for the hazardous ingredient, “zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 8071

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 8072

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 8075

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that acute oral exposure to a hazardous ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) and adverse blood effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose that inhalation of the hazardous ingredient “xylene” has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in humans and inhalation of the hazardous ingredients “2-butoxyethanol” and “isopropanol” has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose the hazardous ingredient, “fatty acid salt”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  4. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “diethanolamine”, in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of >400 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “substituted amino acid”.
  6. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6.24 g/kg for the hazardous ingredient “isopropanol”.
  7. Disclose that the controlled product should be stored in a cool, dry place.
  8. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 0.2 ppm (1 mg/m3) with a skin notation for the hazardous ingredient “diethanolamine”.

Registry Numbers 8079, 8080 and 8081

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 7, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 695 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “salt of N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine”.

Registry Number 8083

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 19, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 1 mg/m3 for the ingredient “aluminum oxide”.
  2. Remove the ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 0.2 mg/m3 with the A1 carcinogenicity notation for the confidential hazardous ingredient “organic acid, nickel salt”.
  3. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 689 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “molybdenum trioxide”.
  5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 000 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “organic acid”.

Registry Numbers 8084 and 8085

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the presence of “urethane prepolymer” as an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product.
  2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8088

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 5, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Remove the ACGIH PNOS designations for the exposure limit values shown for the confidential hazardous ingredient “carbonate salt”.
  2. Disclose that the controlled product may undergo spontaneous chemical reactions if exposed to humid air.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results for mutagenicity, in vivo and in vitro.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “sodium salt”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 8089

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 5, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Remove the ACGIH PNOS designations for the exposure limit values shown for the confidential hazardous ingredient “carbonate salt”.
  2. Disclose that the controlled product may undergo spontaneous chemical reactions if exposed to humid air.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results for mutagenicity, in vivo and in vitro.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “sodium salt”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 8090

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 5, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Remove the ACGIH PNOS designations for the exposure limit values shown for the confidential hazardous ingredient “carbonate salt”.
  2. Disclose that the controlled product may undergo spontaneous chemical reactions if exposed to humid air.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results for mutagenicity, in vivo and in vitro.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “sodium salt”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 8091

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 5, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Remove the ACGIH PNOS designations for the exposure limit values shown for the confidential hazardous ingredient “carbonate salt”.
  2. Disclose that the controlled product may undergo spontaneous chemical reactions if exposed to humid air.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results for mutagenicity, in vivo and in vitro.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “sodium salt”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 8092

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8093

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8094

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 6, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8097

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 27, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient “9-octadecenoic acid (Z)” in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and its percent concentration.
  2. Disclose that chronic exposure to an ingredient in the product has been shown to cause lactation failure in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose that the ingredient “9-octadecenoic acid (Z)” in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin sensitization in laboratory animals.
  4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 8098

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 27, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add that medical attention be obtained should ingestion occur.
  2. Disclose that the ingredient “phosphoric acid”, in the controlled product, has been shown to cause eye corrosion.
  3. Disclose that the ingredient “ethylene glycol dimethacrylate” in the controlled product is a skin sensitizer.

Registry Number 8101

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 13, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “substituted alkyl amine” together with its percent concentration.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 410 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic alcohol”.
  4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 8104

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8105

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8106

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the presence of “urethane prepolymer” as an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product.
  2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8110

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product, together with the percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “talc” in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “talc”.
  6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 8111

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product, together with the percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “iron oxide” and “fatty alcohol polyglycol ether”, in the controlled product, together with their percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2.77 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “fatty alcohol polyglycol ether”.

Registry Number 8112

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 22, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8113

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 20, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “diketo-pyrollo-pyrolle (1 or 2)” and “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product, together with their percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “talc” in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and its percent concentration.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “talc”.

Registry Number 8114

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “talc” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “talc”.
  6. Revise the MSDS to show that “carbon black” has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).
  7. Disclose an LC50 value for the hazardous ingredient “carbon black”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 8116

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 24, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “phosphate ester” and “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product, together with their percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “fatty alcohol polyglycol ether”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Revise the MSDS to show that “carbon black” has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).
  6. Disclose an LC50 value for the hazardous ingredient “carbon black”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 8117

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 18, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “pigment yellow (A/B)” and “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product, together with their percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredient “inorganic acid, isoalkyl ester, potassium salt”, in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8118

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 9, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional confidential hazardous ingredient “fatty alcohol polyglycol ether”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “talc” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “talc”.
  6. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “crystalline silica” in the controlled product has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A2) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).
  7. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2.77 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “fatty alcohol polyglycol ether”.

Registry Number 8119

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 9, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “pigment yellow” and “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product, together with their percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “talc” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “talc”.

Registry Number 8121

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 9, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “copper-phthalocyanine pigment, halogenated”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “talc” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “talc”.

Registry Number 8126

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 9, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is an eye irritant.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 1.22 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “ammonium salt”.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye and skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes and skin should be rinsed gently with water for at least 20 minutes.
  5. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8128

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 9, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that ingestion of the confidential hazardous ingredients “inorganic salt” and “inorganic acid” in the controlled product has been shown to cause effects on male reproductive organs in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose that oral exposure of the confidential hazardous ingredient “inorganic acid” in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in the absence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose an ACGIH TVL–STEL Exposure Limit of 6 mg/m3 (inhalable fraction) for the confidential hazardous ingredient “inorganic salt”.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 4 500 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “inorganic salt”.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TVL–STEL Exposure Limit of 6 mg/m3 (inhalable fraction) and an ACGIH TVL–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 (inhalable fraction) for the confidential hazardous ingredient “inorganic acid”.

Registry Number 8129

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 3, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “xylene”.

Registry Numbers 8135 and 8136

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the presence of “urethane prepolymer” as an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product.
  2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Numbers 8143, 8144, 8145 and 8146

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed and to remove contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  4. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “alkenoic acid” in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin sensitization in laboratory animals.
  5. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity in rats and teratogenicity in mice in the absence of maternal toxicity, and ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity effects in laboratory animals in the presence of maternal toxicity.
  6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes B3, D1A, D1B, D2A and D2B.

Registry Number 8150

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Remove the generic chemical ingredient “butylated phenol” from the MSDS.
  2. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient, “zinc, bis[O,O-bis(2-ethylhexyl)phosphorodithioato S,S-,(T-4)]”, in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) of 3.2 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “zinc, bis[O,O-bis(2-ethylhexyl)phosphorodithioato-S,S]-, (T-4)-”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 8151

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 2, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8154

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8156

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic alcohol amine” in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin sensitization in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 2 764 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “glycol ether”.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells.

Registry Number 8160

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 27, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 8162

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 25, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content, format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the concentration of the confidential hazardous ingredient “organic acid”, in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1 440 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “organic acid”, in an acceptable manner.
  3. Disclose that the confidential hazardous ingredient “organic acid” in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open.
  5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 8165

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 9, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause myocardial depression leading to hypotension.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1.12 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkoxykated alkylphenol”.
  3. Disclose that the LD50 (dermal, rabbit) values are not available for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkoxykated alkylphenol”.
  4. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “alkoxylated alkylphenol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in lymphoma cells, in the absence of metabolic activation, in vitro.
  5. Disclose that both oral exposure and inhalation of the hazardous ingredient “isopropanol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the presence of metabolic activation.

Registry Number 8167

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an OSHA (PEZ–TWA) value of 1 ppm with a skin notation for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alcohol solvent 2”.
  2. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause harmful effects to a developing fetus in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 8168

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic hydrocarbon”.
  2. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause reproductive toxins in laboratory animals.
  3. Remove the statement that “two ingredients in the controlled product have shown positive results in an in vivo Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test on mice”.
  4. Remove the statement that “methyl alcohol was shown to cause a significant increase in the rate of chromosome mutations in a Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test on n-hexane”.
  5. Disclose that both oral exposure and inhalation of the hazardous ingredient “isopropanol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the presence of metabolic activation.

Registry Number 8169

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause reproductive toxins in laboratory animals.
  2. Remove the statement that “two ingredients in the controlled product have shown positive results in an in vivo Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test on mice”.
  3. Remove the statement that “methyl alcohol was shown to cause a significant increase in the rate of chromosome mutations in a Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test on n-hexane”.

Registry Number 8170

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 28 710 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “n-hexane” and an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic hydrocarbon”.
  2. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause reproductive toxins in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 8171

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic hydrocarbon”.
  2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause reproductive toxins in laboratory animals.
  3. Remove the statement that “two ingredients in the controlled product have shown positive results in an in vivo Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test on mice”.
  4. Remove the statement that “Methyl alcohol was shown to cause a significant increase in the rate of chromosome mutations in a Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test on n-hexane”.
  5. Disclose that both oral exposure and inhalation of the hazardous ingredient “isopropanol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the presence of metabolic activation.

Registry Number 8172

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 1, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 28 710 mg/kg for hazardous ingredient “n-hexane” and an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic hydrocarbon”.
  2. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause reproductive toxins in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 8182

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Number 8183

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.

Registry Numbers 8186 and 8187

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the presence of “urethane prepolymer” as an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product.
  2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8216

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients “alkyl polysulfide” and “olefin copolymer” in the controlled product together with their percent concentrations, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1 689 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “long-chain alkenyl amine”.

Registry Number 8218

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 11, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, inhalation and skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2.46 mL/kg for the hazardous ingredient “2-ethyl hexanol”, an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 58 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl” and an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 337 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “alkyl amine”.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.38 mL/kg for the hazardous ingredient “2-ethyl hexanol”; an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 140 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl”; and an LD50 (dermal, female rat) value of 370 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “alkyl amine”.

Registry Number 8219

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 3, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “1H-benzotriazole, 4(or 5)-methyl”, in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number.
  2. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 5 mg/m3 for the ingredient “mineral oil”.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects, in vitro.

Registry Number 8224

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 30 minutes.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  3. Disclose that grounded equipment is to be used and sources of ignition avoided while handling the controlled product.
  4. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.
  5. Disclose a TWA Exposure Limit of 3 ppm or 11 mg/m3 for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohol”.
  6. Disclose a STEL Exposure Limit of 6 ppm or 22 mg/m3 for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohol”.

Registry Number 8225

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 762 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aliphatic aldehyde”.
  2. Disclose an LC50 (aerosol, rat, 4 hours) value of 2.41 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aliphatic aldehyde”.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  4. Disclose that grounded equipment is to be used and sources of ignition avoided while handling the controlled product.
  5. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.

Registry Number 8226

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 19, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 30 minutes.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 8227

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 19, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 30 minutes.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that the casualty should lean forward should vomiting occur in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  3. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.
  4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and D2A.

Registry Number 8228

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 7, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8230

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 12, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8231

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be rinsed with gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes.
  2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin sensitization.

Registry Numbers 8232, 8233, 8234, 8235 and 8236

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin sensitization.

Registry Number 8237

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 30, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the recommended protective clothing (fire).

Registry Number 8240

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 30, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  2. Correct the implication that the controlled product is not irritating to the skin.

Registry Number 8242

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add “methyl vinyl ether” to the list of incompatible materials.

Registry Number 8255

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose oxides of nitrogen as hazardous thermal decomposition products.
  2. Disclose the concentration of the solution used to determine the pH of the controlled product.

Registry Number 8256

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8276

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the flash point as well as its method of determination.
  2. Disclose the LD50 (oral, rat) and (dermal, rabbit) values of >1 000 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “cyclic amine”.

Registry Number 8283

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 27, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8313

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 7, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 5 mg/m3 for the ingredient “mineral oil”.

Registry Number 8316

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open.

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE
CLAIMANT TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7986

Date of order: April 27, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that chronic administration of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused central nervous system (CNS) depression, anemia, and male reproductive organ and submandibular gland effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  3. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  4. Disclose an acceptable generic chemical identity for the ingredient identified as “surfactant”.
  5. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “isopropanol”.
  6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 780 mg/kg for the previously identified confidential hazardous ingredient “surfactant”.
  7. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 1 610 mg/kg for the previously identified confidential hazardous ingredient “surfactant”.
  8. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 680 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  9. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 180 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  10. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7989

Date of order: April 27, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an acceptable generic chemical identity for the ingredient identified as “solvent”.
  2. Disclose differentiation between the three ingredients with the generic chemical identity “inorganic salt”.
  3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 7990

Date of order: April 27, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an acceptable generic chemical identity for the ingredient identified as “solvent”.
  2. Disclose an acceptable generic chemical identity for the ingredient identified as “surfactant”.
  3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 7994

Date of order: March 15, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add dermal contact as an additional route of entry.
  2. Disclose that chronic administration of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused central nervous system (CNS) depression, anemia, and male reproductive organ and submandibular gland effects in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  4. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  5. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “alkoxylated alcohols”.
  6. Remove the ingredient “surfactant”.
  7. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg for the ingredient “propan-2-ol”.
  8. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 680 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  9. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 180 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  10. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 780 mg/kg for the previously identified confidential hazardous ingredient “alkoxylated alcohols”.
  11. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 1 610 mg/kg for the previously identified confidential hazardous ingredient “alkoxylated alcohols”.
  12. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 8001

Date of order: March 15, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause decreased fertility in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional hazardous ingredient, “adipic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl)ester”, in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and a concentration of 0.5–1.5%.
  4. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg for the ingredient “propan-2-ol”.
  5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 8003

Date of order: May 9, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that chronic administration of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused central nervous system (CNS) depression, anemia, male reproductive organ and submandibular gland effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  3. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “alkoxylated fatty alcohol”.
  4. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “substituted alkyl amine”.
  5. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “long chain amine derivative”.
  6. Disclose the generic chemical ingredient “amine derivative”.
  7. Remove the ingredient “surfactant”.
  8. Disclose an ACGIH TVL–TWA Exposure Limit of 1 mg/m3 (inhalable fraction) for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  9. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 680 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  10. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 180 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  11. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 410 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “substituted alkyl amine”.
  12. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 689 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “long chain amine derivative”.
  13. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 8004

Date of order: March 15, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that chronic administration of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) depression, anemia, male reproductive organ and submandibular gland effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has tested positive in the Ames test for mutagenic effects in bacteria.
  4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause embryotoxic effects in laboratory animals.
  5. Disclose an acceptable generic chemical identity for the ingredient identified as “surfactant”.
  6. Disclose an acceptable generic chemical identity for the ingredient identified as “surfactant 1”.
  7. Disclose an acceptable generic chemical identity for the ingredient identified as “surfactant 2”.
  8. Disclose the chemical identity of the additional ingredient “alcohols, C 16-18, ethoxylated” in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and a concentration of 10–30%.
  9. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 680 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  10. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 180 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.
  11. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 410 mg/kg for the previously identified confidential hazardous ingredient “surfactant 1”.
  12. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 070 mg/kg for the previously identified confidential hazardous ingredient “surfactant”.
  13. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 8021

Date of order: March 20, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product can be corrosive to the eyes and skin.
  2. Disclose an additional hazardous ingredient, “tributoxyethyl phosphate”, in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye and skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes and skin should be flushed continuously with water for 60 minutes and to remove contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods and that medical attention be obtained immediately.
  4. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product are incompatible with organic acids, oxidizers, and chlorinated solvents.
  5. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
  6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 4 700 mg/kg for the ingredient “tributoxyethyl phosphate”; an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 7.46 mL/kg for the ingredient “diethanolamine”; an LD50 (dermal, female rabbit) value of 8.57 mL/kg for the ingredient “carbitol”; and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 10 mL/kg for the ingredient “propasol”.
  7. Disclose that oral and dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.
  8. Disclose that chronic oral exposure to an ingredient in the product has been shown to cause anemia, and brain and spinal cord, male reproductive organs, heart, and submandibular salivary gland effects in laboratory animals.
  9. Disclose that chronic dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause anemia and effects on the heart in laboratory animals.
  10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
  11. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects via oral and dermal exposure in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.
  12. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “tributoxyethyl phosphate” in the controlled product is a skin sensitizer.
  13. If the WHMIS classifications or pictograms are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes E, D1B, D2A and D2B.

Registry Number 8057

Date of order: May 8, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 400 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “glycol 1” and an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 739 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “glycol 2”.
  2. Disclose that dermal exposure of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in humans.
  4. Disclose that ingredients in the controlled product have been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 8058

Date of order: May 7, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Remove one of the generic chemical ingredients glycol from the MSDS.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 3 400 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “glycol 2”.

Registry Number 8103

Date of order: March 13, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient, “alcohols C16-18 ethoxylated”, in the controlled product together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration 1–5%.
  2. Disclose that the generic chemical ingredient “glycol ether(s)” represents only one ingredient.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 070 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alcohols C16-18 ethoxylated”.

Registry Number 8130

Date of order: May 7, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the flash point as well as its method of determination.

Registry Number 8131

Date of order: May 7, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6.29 g/kg for the ingredient “isopropyl alcohol”.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for physician, remove the statement to administer activated charcoal.
  3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8132

Date of order: May 7, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for physician, remove the statement to administer activated charcoal.
  3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 8134

Date of order: May 8, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8263

Date of order: May 8, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.

Registry Number 8311

Date of order: May 8, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 890 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine”.
  2. Disclose that the ingredient “alkyl dicarboxylic acid” in the controlled product is a skin sensitizer.
  3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.

Pursuant to paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-993-4331 (telephone).

GERHARD BRUINS
Acting Chief Screening Officer

[8-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Filing of a claim for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 12(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the receipt of the claims for exemption listed below.

Claimant

Subject of the Claim for Exemption

Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)

Registry Number

INEOS Oxide LLC, Houston, Texas

Chemical identity of one ingredient

GAS/SPEC* CS-2000* Additive

8774

INEOS Oxide LLC, Houston, Texas

Chemical identity of one ingredient

GAS/SPEC* CS-2010* Solvent

8775

INEOS Oxide LLC, Houston, Texas

Chemical identity of one ingredient

GAS/SPEC* CS-Plus* Solvent

8776

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

M2612

8777

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

Cromophtal® Yellow D1085

8778

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

SPEC-AID 8Q5701

8779

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

SPEC-AID 8Q5550

8780

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

DUSTREAT DC9138E

8781

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients

FERROQUEST LP7200

8782

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients

FERROQUEST LP7202

8783

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients

LOSALT 53D

8784

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

3M (TM) SCOTCH-WELD(TM) EPOXY ADHESIVE EC-2615 B/A (PART A)

8785

FC PRO, LLC, Waller, Texas

Chemical identity of one ingredient

FC-PRO Surfactant 400

8786

Arclin Canada Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

Arclin HP600 Liquid Phenol Formaldehyde Resin

8787

Momentive Performance Materials, Markham, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

Silquest* A-1126 silane

8788

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity of four ingredients

CRW9220 CORROSION INHIBITOR

8789

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

Chemical identity of three ingredients

BR® 127 Corrosion Inhibiting Primer

8790

Glori Canada Ltd., Houston, Texas

Chemical identity of three ingredients

MM 3000-A Series FR

8791

E.I. du Pont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of three ingredients

Resis Tech® 4

8792

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

Chemical identity of one ingredient

BYK-W 9010

8793

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity of four ingredients

SCW2600 SCALE INHIBITOR

8794

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients

MAX-AMINE GT741C

8795

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

DIMETALLIC 00U85

8796

E.I. du Pont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

DuPontÔ High Gloss Sealer & Finisher

8797

E.I. du Pont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

DuPontÔ Semi Gloss Sealer & Finisher

8798

E.I. du Pont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

DuPontÔ StoneTech® Professional Semi Gloss Finishing Sealer

8799

E.I. du Pont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

DuPontÔ StoneTech® Professional High Gloss Finishing Sealer

8800

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity of one ingredient

TOLADÔ 9715 ADDITIVE

8801

Momentive Performance Materials, Markham, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

NuWet® 237 hydrophilic finish

8802

Momentive Performance Materials, Markham, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

Niax® catalyst C-255

8803

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

Chemical identity of one ingredient

Disperbyk-2150

8804

Hydro Technologies (Canada) Inc., Québec, Quebec

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

HY BRITE® WM-1107

8805

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania

Chemical identity of one ingredient

DABCO® BA150 Additive

8806

Reichhold, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Chemical identity of one ingredient

BECKOSOL AQ ® 510

8807

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity of one ingredient

BPR 34363 ASPHALTENE DISPERSANT

8808

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity of three ingredients

BPR 81476 CORROSION INHIBITOR

8809

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

Scotchkote 6233P 4G, 8G, and 11G Fusion Bonded Epoxy Coating

8810

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

Chemical identity of six ingredients

HiTec 552G Performance Additive

8811

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

Chemical identity of four ingredients

HiTec 521F Performance Additive

8812

Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

Chemical identity of one ingredient

SULFRZOLÔ 54

8813

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity of one ingredient

PAO2349X PARAFFIN INHIBITOR

8814

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

InoterraÔ EM

8815

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

InoterraÔ DWE

8816

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity and concentration of six ingredients

XERIC(TM) 6005 SOLIDS CONDITIONING AID

8817

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

AHS-1517 bulk spray adhesive

8818

LANXESS Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Chemical identity of two ingredients

COLORTHERM YELLOW 20

8819

Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

Chemical identity of five ingredients

LUBRIZOL® 5056

8820

Dow Chemical Canada ULC, Calgary, Alberta

Chemical identity of two ingredients

SELEXOLÔ Solvent RD2

8821

Rohm and Haas Canada LP, West Hill, Ontario

Chemical identity of one ingredient

PARALOID(TM) KM-5450 IMPACT MODIFIER

8822

Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Bellaire, Texas

Chemical identity of one ingredient

OLOA 59034

8823

Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois

Chemical identity of five ingredients

AGENT 2517-74N

8824

Rohm and Haas Canada LP, West Hill, Ontario

Chemical identity of one ingredient

PARALOID CSM-751ER Impact Modifier

8825

Engenium Chemicals Corporation, Calgary, Alberta

Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients

CAN-2062

8826

Engenium Chemicals Corporation, Calgary, Alberta

Chemical identity and concentration of six ingredients

INTERPHONE SODA

8827

Engenium Chemicals Corporation, Calgary, Alberta

Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients

Blackstone Onyxmuls S

8828

MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina

Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients

EVOTHERMÔ R1

8829

MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

PERALÔ 417

8830

Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

Chemical identity of one ingredient

Lubrizol 9684

8831

Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

Chemical identity of one ingredient

Lubrizol 9680

8832

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

Chemical identity of one ingredient

3M(TM) FAST TRACK WATER BASED ADHESIVE 1000NF, PURPLE

8833

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

Chemical identity of one ingredient

3M(TM) FAST TRACK WATER BASED ADHESIVE 1000NF, NEUTRAL

8834

Univar Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia

Chemical identity of three ingredients

VANFROTH 820

8835

Dow Chemical Canada ULC, Calgary, Alberta

Chemical identity of three ingredients

UCARSOL(TM) LE SOLVENT 703

8836

Dow Chemical Canada ULC, Calgary, Alberta

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

UCARSOL(TM) HS SOLVENT 101

8837

Dow Chemical Canada ULC, Calgary, Alberta

Chemical identity of one ingredient

XUR201200116-60

8838

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

Chemical identity of five ingredients

HiTEC 2571 Performance Additive

8839

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

Inoterra(TM) EMD

8840

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania

Chemical identity of three ingredients

TOMADRY(R) DAB SURFACTANT

8841

Calfrac Well Services Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

Chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients

DHP-903

8842

MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina

Chemical identity of two ingredients

EVOTHERM(TM) Q1

8843

MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina

Chemical identity of six ingredients

INDULIN(R) 814D

8844

Hydro Technologies (Canada) Inc., Québec, Quebec

Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient

HYBRITE(R) WF-9020

8845

Baker Petrolite Corp., Sugar Land, Texas

Chemical identity of six ingredients

RE8270DMO DEMULSIFIER

8846

Stepan Company, Longford Mills, Ontario

Chemical identity of two ingredients

AGENT 3130-22

8847

Lonza Inc., Allendale,
New Jersey

Chemical identity of three ingredients

Sourban(R) PW

8848

The above claims seek exemption from the disclosure of supplier confidential business information in respect of a controlled product; such disclosure would otherwise be required under the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act.

Subsection 12(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act requires that this notice contain a statement offering every affected party the opportunity to make written representations to the screening officer with respect to the claim for exemption and the material safety data sheet to which it relates.

Under the provisions of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, “affected party,” for purposes of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, means, in respect of a controlled product that is the subject of a claim for exemption, a person who is not a competitor of the claimant and who uses, supplies or is otherwise involved in the use or supply of the controlled product at a work place, and includes

  • (a) a supplier of the controlled product;
  • (b) an employee at the work place;
  • (c) an employer at the work place;
  • (d) a safety and health professional for the work place;
  • (e) a safety and health representative or a member of a safety and health committee for the work place; and
  • (f) a person who is authorized in writing to represent
    • (i) a supplier referred to in paragraph (a) or an employer referred to in paragraph (c), or
    • (ii) an employee referred to in paragraph (b), except where that person is an official or a representative of a trade union that is not certified or recognized in respect of the work place.

Written representations respecting a claim for exemption cited in the present notice, or the material safety data sheet to which the claim relates, must cite the appropriate registry number, state the reasons and evidence upon which the representations are based and be delivered within 30 days of the date of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, to the screening officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3.

GERHARD BRUINS
Acting Chief Screening Officer

[8-1-o]

PARKS CANADA AGENCY

SPECIES AT RISK ACT

Description of critical habitat of the Maritime Ringlet in Forillon National Park of Canada

The Maritime Ringlet (Coenonympha nipisiquit) is a species listed in Schedule 1 to the Species at Risk Act as endangered. Critical habitat for the Maritime Ringlet is identified within the final Recovery Strategy for the Maritime Ringlet (Coenonympha nipisiquit) in Canada.

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to subsection 58(2) of the Species at Risk Act, critical habitat of the Maritime Ringlet (Coenonympha nipisiquit) in Forillon National Park of Canada is located within the following site, save and except any anthropogenic structures (e.g. roads, rights-of-way, piers) and any area that does not possess the biophysical attributes of a suitable salt marsh. The parcel number is based on the unique Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) species identification number for Maritime Ringlet (304), and critical habitat parcel number. Further details regarding Maritime Ringlet critical habitat (including maps) can be found at the Species at Risk Public Registry Web site.

Generally, critical habitat is located within the salt marsh located in the Baie de Penouille, as identified on the National Topographic Series (NTS) Map 22A/16 (Edition 5, printed 2001). Specifically, within the geographical boundaries identified below, critical habitat includes salt marsh habitat with the following biological and physical attributes:

  • the habitat is located within estuaries or harbours fed by one or more river and stream systems;
  • the habitat contains a mosaic of plants used as hosts for oviposition and larval development (Salt-meadow Grass) as well as nectar sources for adults (Salt-water Cord Grass, Seaside Plantain, Sea Milkwort, Sea Lavender, Seaside Goldenrod, and Eged’s Silverweed); and
  • the habitat is separated from adjacent sand dunes, fresh water marshes or forests by a narrow zone of marsh edge vegetation more typical of drier upland habitats, including Common Yarrow (Achillea millefolium), Sow-thistle (Sonchus sp.), Glasswort (Salicornia spp.) and Sweet Gale (Myrica gale).
Site 304-1
  • Commencing at the point of latitude 48.8586° N and longitude 64.4382° W;
  • Thence, northeasterly in a straight line to a point at latitude 48.8601° N and longitude 64.4327° W;
  • Thence, easterly in a straight line to a point at latitude 48.8560° N and longitude 64.4126° W;
  • Thence, southwesterly in a straight line to a point at latitude 48.8531° N and longitude 64.4199° W;
  • Thence, westerly in a straight line to a point at latitude 48.8547° N and longitude 64.4377° W;
  • Thence, northerly to the point of commencement.

February 7, 2013

STÉPHANE MARCHAND
Field Unit Superintendent
Gaspésie Field Unit

[8-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission and leave granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 114(4) of the said Act, to Mohamed Salih, Targeting Officer (FB-3), Canada Border Services Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, to allow him to seek nomination as a candidate before and during the election period and to be a candidate before the election period in the next provincial election for the electoral district of London-West, Ontario. The date of the provincial election has not been confirmed.

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to subsection 114(5) of the said Act, has also granted a leave of absence without pay during the election period, effective at close of business on the first day of the election period, to allow him to be a candidate during the election.

February 12, 2013

HÉLÈNE LAURENDEAU
Senior Vice-President
Policy Branch

[8-1-o]