Vol. 145, No. 24 — June 11, 2011

ARCHIVED — COMMISSIONS

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

The following notice of intention to revoke was sent to the charities listed below because they have not met the filing requirements of the Income Tax Act:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(b) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice.”

CATHY HAWARA
Director General
Charities Directorate

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Re-declaration of model class screening report — Commercial guiding activities in the Northern National Parks of Canada — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) re-declares that commercial guiding activities in the Northern National Parks of Canada contained in the Parks Canada model class screening report (MCSR) no longer need to undergo individual environmental assessments.

Parks Canada has conducted a model class screening for projects within a designated class, to account for location-specific or project-specific information and to record a conclusion on the significance of the environmental effects of that project. The details of this model class screening are provided in the MCSR on commercial guiding activities in the Northern National Parks of Canada.

Public consultation on the MCSR took place from February 10 to March 11, 2011. The Agency received no written submissions from the public during this period. The Agency has reviewed the MCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, meets the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) for the environmental assessment of this particular class of projects. It is also the Agency’s opinion that the class of projects described in the MCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The re-declaration is effective May 26, 2011, and is subject to certain conditions, including the following:

• The Agency agrees with Parks Canada that the re-declaration is valid until May 26, 2021;
• The Agency will place the MCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the Registry) at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca; and
• On a quarterly basis, Parks Canada will post on the Registry a statement of the projects for which the MCSR was applied, as required under the Act.

For further information, the public may contact the Class Screening Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, 613957-0507 or 1-866-582-1884 (telephone), 613-957-0946 (fax), ClassScreening@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Re-declaration of model class screening report — Hydrometric station projects in the Ontario region — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) re-declares that hydrometric station projects in the Ontario region contained in the model class screening report (MCSR) by Environment Canada (EC), the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and Transport Canada (TC) no longer need to undergo individual environmental assessments.

Environment Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and Transport Canada have conducted a model class screening for projects within a designated class, to account for location-specific or project-specific information and to record a conclusion on the significance of the environmental effects of that project. The details of this model class screening are provided in the MCSR on hydrometric station projects in the Ontario region.

Public consultation on the MCSR took place from February 23 to March 24, 2011. The Agency received no written submissions from the public during this period. The Agency has reviewed the MCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, meets the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) for the environmental assessment of this particular class of projects. It is also the Agency’s opinion that the class of projects described in the MCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The re-declaration is effective May 30, 2011, and is subject to certain conditions, including the following:

• The Agency agrees with EC, DFO and TC that the re-declaration is valid until May 29, 2016;
• The Agency will place the MCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the Registry) at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca; and
• On a quarterly basis, EC, as the federal environmental assessment coordinator, will post on the Registry a statement of the projects for which the MCSR was applied, as required under the Act.

For further information, the public may contact the Class Screening Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, 613-957-0507 or 1-866-582-1884 (telephone), 613-957-0946 (fax), ClassScreening@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Re-declaration of model class screening report —Small scale water quality and habitat improvement projects— Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) re-declares that small scale water quality and habitat improvement projects contained in the model class screening report (MCSR) by Environment Canada (EC), the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and Transport Canada (TC) no longer need to undergo individual environmental assessments.

Environment Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and Transport Canada have conducted a model class screening for projects within a designated class, to account for location-specific or project-specific information and to record a conclusion on the significance of the environmental effects of that project. The details of this model class screening are provided in the MCSR on small scale water quality and habitat improvement projects.

Public consultation on the MCSR took place from February 23 to March 24, 2011. The Agency received one written submission from the public during this period. The Agency has reviewed the MCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, meets the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) for the environmental assessment of this particular class of projects. It is also the Agency’s opinion that the class of projects described in the MCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The re-declaration is effective May 30, 2011, and is subject to certain conditions, including the following:

• The Agency agrees with EC, DFO and TC that the re-declaration is valid until May 29, 2016;
• The Agency will place the MCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the Registry) at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca; and
• On a quarterly basis, EC, as the federal environmental assessment coordinator, will post on the Registry a statement of the projects for which the MCSR was applied, as required under the Act.

For further information, the public may contact the Class Screening Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, 613-957-0507 or 1-866-582-1884 (telephone), 613-957-0946 (fax), ClassScreening@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Re-declaration of replacement class screening report — Aircraft landings in the Northern National Parks of Canada — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) re-declares that aircraft landings in the Northern National Parks of Canada contained in the Parks Canada replacement class screening report (RCSR) no longer need to undergo individual environmental assessments.

Parks Canada has conducted a replacement class screening which consists in a single environmental assessment of projects within a designated class. The details of this replacement class screening are provided in the RCSR on aircraft landings in the Northern National Parks of Canada.

Public consultation on the RCSR took place from February 10 to March 11, 2011. The Agency received no written submissions from the public during this period. The Agency has reviewed the RCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, meets the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) for the environmental assessment of the particular class of projects. It is also the Agency’s opinion that the class of projects described in the RCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The re-declaration is effective May 26, 2011, and is subject to certain conditions, including the following:

• The Agency agrees with Parks Canada that the re-declaration is valid until May 26, 2021;
• The Agency will place the RCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the Registry) at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca; and
• On a quarterly basis, Parks Canada will post on the Registry a statement of the projects for which the RCSR was applied, as required under the Act.

For further information, the public may contact the Class Screening Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, 613-957-0507 or 1-866-582-1884 (telephone), 613-957-0946 (fax), ClassScreening@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Re-declaration of replacement class screening report — Water well construction and decommissioning — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) re-declares that water well construction and decommissioning projects contained in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s (AAFC) replacement class screening report (RCSR) no longer need to undergo individual environmental assessments.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada has conducted a replacement class screening for projects within a designated class, to account for location-specific or project-specific information and to record a conclusion on the significance of the environmental effects of that project. The details of this replacement class screening are provided in the RCSR on water well construction and decommissioning.

Public consultation on the RCSR took place from November 24 to December 23, 2010. The Agency received no written submissions from the public during this period. The Agency has reviewed the RCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, meets the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) for the environmental assessment of the particular class of projects. It is also the Agency’s opinion that the class of projects described in the RCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The re-declaration is effective May 30, 2011, and is subject to certain conditions, including the following:

• The Agency agrees with AAFC that the re-declaration is valid until May 29, 2016;
• The Agency will place the RCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the Registry) at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca; and
• On a quarterly basis, AAFC will post on the Registry a statement of the projects for which the RCSR was applied, as required under the Act.

For further information, the public may contact the Class Screening Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, 613957-0507 or 1-866-582-1884 (telephone), 613-957-0946 (fax), ClassScreening@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

APPEALS

Notice No. HA-2011-007

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) has decided, pursuant to rule 36.1 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules, to consider the appeal listed hereunder by way of written submissions. Persons interested in intervening are requested to contact the Tribunal prior to the commencement of the scheduled hearing. Interested persons seeking additional information should contact the Tribunal at 613-998-9908.

Customs Act

VGI Village Green Imports v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency

Date of Hearing: July 5, 2011

Appeal No.: AP-2010-046

Goods in Issue: Neoprene oven mitts

Issue: Whether the goods in issue are properly classified under tariff item No. 6116.93.00 as gloves, mittens and mitts, knitted or crocheted, impregnated, coated or covered with plastics or rubber, of synthetic fibres, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency, or should be classified under tariff item No. 3926.20.92 as mittens or non-disposable gloves or, in the alternative, under tariff item No. 4015.90.10 as protective suits and parts thereof, to be employed in a noxious atmosphere, or, also in the alternative, under tariff item No. 4015.90.20 as diving suits, as claimed by VGI Village Green Imports.

Tariff Items at Issue: VGI Village Green Imports—3926.20.92, 4015.90.10 or 4015.90.20 President of the Canada Border Services Agency—6116.93.00

The Tribunal will hold a public hearing to consider the appeal referenced hereunder. This hearing will be held beginning at 9:30 a.m., in the Tribunal’s Hearing Room No. 2, 18th Floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario. Interested persons planning to attend should contact the Tribunal at 613-998-9908 to obtain further information and to confirm that the hearing will be held as scheduled.

Customs Act

9133-7048 Québec Inc v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency

Date of Hearing: July 7, 2011

Appeal No.: AP-2010-058

Goods in Issue: Certain women’s brassieres

Issue: Whether the goods in issue are entitled to the preferential tariff treatment (in accordance with the General Preferential Tariff and Least Developed Country Tariff) under the Market Access Initiative for least developed countries.

June 3, 2011

By order of the Tribunal
DOMINIQUE LAPORTE
Secretary

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

EXPIRY REVIEW OF FINDINGS

Copper pipe fittings

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice that it will, pursuant to subsection 76.03(3) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), initiate an expiry review of its findings (Expiry Review No. RR-2011-001) made on February 19, 2007, in Inquiry No. NQ-2006-002, concerning the dumping of solder joint pressure pipe fittings and solder joint drainage, waste and vent pipe fittings, made of cast copper alloy, wrought copper alloy or wrought copper, for use in heating, plumbing, air conditioning and refrigeration applications (copper pipe fittings), originating in or exported from the United States of America, the Republic of Korea and the People’s Republic of China and the subsidizing of copper pipe fittings originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China, restricted to the products enumerated in the Appendix (the subject goods).

Notice of Expiry No. LE-2011-001, issued on April 12, 2011, informed interested persons and governments of the impending expiry of the findings. On the basis of the information filed, the Tribunal is of the opinion that an expiry review of the findings is warranted. The Tribunal has notified the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), as well as other interested persons and governments, of its decision.

The Tribunal has issued a Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews that can be found on the Tribunal’s Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca. In this expiry review, the CBSA must determine whether the expiry of the findings in respect of the subject goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and/or subsidizing of the subject goods.

If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and/or subsidizing, the CBSA will provide the Tribunal with the information that is required under the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules. The Tribunal will then conduct an expiry review to determine if the continued or resumed dumping and/or subsidizing is likely to result in injury or retardation. The Tribunal will issue its order no later than February 17, 2012, and its statement of reasons no later than March 2, 2012.

If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is unlikely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and/or subsidizing, the Tribunal will not consider those goods in its subsequent determination of the likelihood of injury or retardation and will issue an order rescinding the findings with respect to those goods.

The CBSA must provide notice of its determination within 120 days after receiving notice of the Tribunal’s decision to initiate an expiry review, that is, no later than September 29, 2011. The CBSA will also notify all persons or governments that were notified by the Tribunal of the commencement of an expiry review, as well as any others that participated in the CBSA’s investigation.

Letters have been sent to parties with a known interest in the expiry review providing them with the schedule respecting both the CBSA’s investigation and the Tribunal’s expiry review, should the CBSA determine that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping and/or subsidizing.

CBSA’s investigation

The CBSA will conduct its investigation pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and the administrative guidelines set forth in the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate’s publication entitled Guidelines on the Conduct of Expiry Review Investigations under the Special Import Measures Act. Any information submitted to the CBSA by interested persons concerning this investigation is deemed to be public information unless clearly designated as confidential. Where a submission is confidential, a non-confidential edited version or summary of the submission must also be provided which will be disclosed to interested parties upon request.

With respect to the CBSA’s investigation, the schedule specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies to the expiry review questionnaires, the date on which the CBSA exhibits will be available to parties to the proceeding, the date on which the administrative record will be closed and the dates for the filing of submissions by parties in the proceeding. Further information regarding the CBSA’s investigation can be obtained by contacting the CBSA officer as mentioned below.

Tribunal’s expiry review

Should the CBSA determine that the expiry of the findings in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping and/or subsidizing, the Tribunal will conduct its expiry review, pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and its Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews, to determine if there is a likelihood of injury or retardation. The schedule for the Tribunal’s expiry review specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies by domestic producers to Part E of the expiry review questionnaire, the date for the filing of updated information from domestic producers, importers and exporters to the expiry review questionnaire replies, the date on which information on the record will be made available by the Tribunal to interested parties and counsel that have filed notices of participation and the dates for the filing of submissions by interested parties.

The Tribunal’s Guide to Making Requests for Product Exclusions, which can be found on the Tribunal’s Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca, describes the procedure for filing requests for specific product exclusions. This Guide also includes a form for filing requests for product exclusions and a form for any party that opposes a request to respond to such requests. This does not preclude parties from making submissions in a different format if they so wish, provided all of the information and supporting documentation requested in the forms are included. Requests to exclude goods from the findings shall be filed by interested parties no later than noon, on November 30, 2011. Parties opposed or consenting or not opposed to the request for exclusion shall file written reply submissions no later than noon, on December 7, 2011. Should a request for a specific product exclusion be opposed, and if the interested party wishes to reply, it must do so no later than noon, on December 14, 2011.

Under section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must submit to the Tribunal, at the time the information is provided, a statement designating the information as confidential, together with an explanation as to why the information is designated as confidential. Furthermore, the person must submit a non-confidential edited version or non-confidential summary of the information designated as confidential or a statement indicating why such an edited version or summary cannot be made.

Public hearing

The Tribunal will hold a public hearing relating to this expiry review in the Tribunal’s Hearing Room No. 1, 18th Floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario, commencing January 9, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., to hear evidence and representations by interested parties.

Each interested person or government wishing to participate at the hearing as a party must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before October 11, 2011. Each counsel who intends to represent a party at the hearing must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before October 11, 2011.

To allow the Tribunal to determine whether simultaneous interpretation will be required for the hearing, each interested person or government filing a notice of participation and each counsel filing a notice of representation must advise the Secretary, at the same time that they file their notice, whether they and their witnesses will be using English or French or both languages at the hearing.

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules govern these proceedings.

In order to observe and understand production processes, the Tribunal, accompanied by its staff, may conduct plant visits.

Communication

Requests for information, written submissions and correspondence regarding the CBSA’s investigation should be addressed to Mr. Peter Dupuis, Canada Border Services Agency, Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate, 100 Metcalfe Street, 11th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L8, 613-954-7341 (telephone), 613-948-4844 (fax), PeterC.Dupuis@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca (email).

A copy of the CBSA’s investigation schedule and expiry review investigation guidelines are available on the CBSA’s Web site at www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/sima-lmsi/er-rre/menu-eng.html.

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding the Tribunal’s expiry review should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Parties and the public may file documents electronically with the Tribunal through its Secure E-filing Service at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca/apps/index_e.asp. The information is fully encrypted from the sender to the Tribunal.

Parties must still file paper copies in the required number as instructed. Where a party is required to file hard copies, the electronic version and the hard-copy version must be identical. In case of discrepancies, the hard-copy version will be considered the original.

At the end of these proceedings, the Tribunal will issue a decision supported by a summary of the case, a summary of the arguments and an analysis of the case. The decision will be posted on its Web site and distributed to the parties and interested persons, as well as to organizations and persons who have registered to receive decisions of the Tribunal.

Written and oral communication with the CBSA and the Tribunal may be in English or in French.

Ottawa, June 1, 2011

DOMINIQUE LAPORTE
Secretary

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The Commission posts on its Web site the decisions, notices of consultation and regulatory policies that it publishes, as well as information bulletins and orders. On April 1, 2011, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure came into force. As indicated in Part 1 of these Rules, some broadcasting applications are posted directly on the Commission’s Web site, www.crtc.gc.ca, under “Part 1 Applications.”

To be up to date on all ongoing proceedings, it is important to regularly consult “Today’s Releases” on the Commission’s Web site, which includes daily updates to notices of consultation that have been published and ongoing proceedings, as well as a link to Part 1 applications.

The following documents are abridged versions of the Commission’s original documents. The original documents contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including the locations and addresses where the complete files for the proceeding may be examined. These documents are posted on the Commission’s Web site and may also be examined at the Commission’s offices and public examination rooms. Furthermore, all documents relating to a proceeding, including the notices and applications, are posted on the Commission’s Web site under “Public Proceedings.”

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PART 1 APPLICATION

The following application was posted on the Commission’s Web site between May 27, 2011, and June 2, 2011:

Salt Spring Island Radio Corp.

Saltspring Island, British Columbia

2011-0882-9

Addition of a transmitter for CFSI-FM

Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: July 4, 2011

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICES OF CONSULTATION

2011-353 May 30, 2011

Notice of application received

Manning, Alberta
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: July 4, 2011

The Commission has received the following application:

1. Peace River Broadcasting Corporation Ltd.
Manning, Alberta

Application to amend the broadcasting licence of the English-language AM radio station CKYL Peace River.

2011-354 May 31, 2011

Notice of application received

Wingham, Ontario
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: July 5, 2011

The Commission has received the following application:

1. Blackburn Radio Inc.
Wingham, Ontario

Application to amend the broadcasting licence for the English-language AM radio programming undertaking CKNX Wingham.

[24-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2011-357 June 1, 2011

7340362 Canada Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate BELLA TV, a national, French-language Category 2 specialty service.

2011-359 June 3, 2011

Haliburton Broadcasting Group Inc.
Timmins, Ontario

Approved — Application to change the technical parameters of the English-language commercial radio station CHMT-FM Timmins.

[24-1-o]

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

COMPETITION ACT

Application for an order

Notice is hereby given that on May 27, 2011, an application pursuant to section 79 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, was filed with the undersigned at the Competition Tribunal by the Commissioner of Competition, regarding certain rules, policies and agreements relating to the residential multiple listing service (MLS) of the Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB).

The particulars of the order sought are as follows:

• an order pursuant to subsections 79(1) and (2) of the Competition Act prohibiting TREB from directly or indirectly enacting, interpreting or enforcing any restrictions, including the TREB MLS restrictions, that exclude, prevent or discriminate against TREB member brokers who wish to use the information in the TREB MLS system to offer services over the Internet, such as through a virtual office Web site (VOW);
• an order directing TREB to implement such resources and facilities as the Tribunal deems necessary to ensure the operation of VOWs or similar services by, or on behalf of, member brokers;
• an order directing TREB to pay the costs and disbursements of the Commissioner and the Tribunal in relation to this application;
• all other orders or remedies that may be required to give effect to the foregoing prohibitions, or to reflect the intent of the Tribunal and its disposition of this matter; and
• such further and other relief as this Tribunal may consider appropriate.

Notice is hereby given that any motion for leave to intervene in this matter must be filed with the Registrar on or before July 21, 2011.

The notice of application and accompanying documents may be examined at the Registry of the Tribunal or a copy may be obtained using the Competition Tribunal Web site at www.ct-tc. gc.ca. Requests for information regarding this application should be addressed to the Deputy Registrar, Competition Tribunal, 600–90 Sparks Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B4, or by telephone at 613-954-0857.

June 1, 2011

RAYNALD CHARTRAND
Registrar

[24-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on February 2, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7172 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient and the identity of the supplier.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7329 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7416 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7430 to be the chemical identity and concentration of six ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of seven ingredients.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7484 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients and the identity of the supplier. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7546 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 18, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Numbers 7617, 7618 and 7619 to be the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients and the concentration of five ingredients.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 18, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7623 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 18, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7631 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients and the concentration of two ingredients.

10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 18, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7680 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7707 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

12. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Numbers 7705, 7706, 7708 and 7709 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

13. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 13, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7776 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

14. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 13, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Numbers 7766, 7792 and 7793 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity and the concentration of one ingredient.

15. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 13, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7816 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7330, 7427, 7470, 7502, 7629, 7630, 7666, 7669, 7722, 7736, 7774, 7805, 7806, 7837, 7852, 7866, and 8031 were filed, complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7172, 7480, 7484, 7573 and 7591, being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7326, being a claim from an employer in the province of Ontario, the screening officer found that the MSDS relating to this claim did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 8031, being a claim from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS in respect of which the claim was filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In all cases where the material safety data sheet or the label was determined not to be in compliance with the relevant legislation, the screening officer offered the claimant the possibility of entering into an undertaking whereby the claimant would voluntarily make the changes necessary to bring the MSDS or the label into compliance. Pursuant to subsection 16.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the claimant was given 30 days to provide the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or the label amended as necessary.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER WAS SATISFIED THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD TAKEN THE MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet or label in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 7172

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 22, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of the confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

2. Disclose the presence of 2-butoxyethanol in the controlled product and its CAS registry number and its percent concentration;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 20 ppm for 2-butoxyethanol;

4. Disclose the LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 530 mg/kg and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 470 ppm for 2-butoxyethanol;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity in laboratory animals;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A and B3.

Registry Number 7193

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 26, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 847 mg/kg for sodium salt of silicate and an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4 g/kg for sodium salt of nitrogen;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results in screening tests for mutagenicity;

4. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on sperm production in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7284

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Numbers 7285 and 7286

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7305

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 6, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7326

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 1, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink. Add a statement to the effect that fluid is to be administered only under medical supervision;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7329

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 22, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose a statement indicating that users should comply with all federal, provincial and local regulations when disposing of waste from the controlled product.

Registry Number 7366

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 5, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system depression in laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Disclose oxides sulphur as hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7416

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the percent concentrations of polyvinyl alcohol and “vinyl acetate polymers” in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.33 g/kg for confidential hazardous ingredient aromatic diester;

4. Disclose that chronic ingestion of the ingredient has been shown to cause adverse effects on reproductive system of laboratory animals;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7420

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 25, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 7421 and 7422

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 25, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7423

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7430

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity for the additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with the actual concentration or an acceptable range value;

2. Replace the percent concentration range for alkyl phosphates with an acceptable WHMIS percent concentration range;

3. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and information relating to the progress of the claim.

Registry Number 7437

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye irritation in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is considered to be a fetotoxin.

Registry Number 7458

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH STEL of 100 mg/m³ for ethylene glycol;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is considered to be a fetotoxin;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7459

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH STEL of 100 mg/m³ for an additional hazardous ingredient;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 10 mg/m³ for propylene glycol;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is considered to be a fetotoxin;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Numbers 7472 and 7473

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient (vinyl acetate polymers) in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.33 g/kg for aromatic diester;

4. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7475

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner;

2. Add oxides of sulphur and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of > 2 g/kg for the product.

Registry Number 7480

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 8, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add that medical attention be obtained should ingestion occur.

Registry Number 7484

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 13, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 20 ppm for 2-butoxyethanol;

2. Disclose that the skin and the eyes are target organs for aliphatic amino acid derivative;

3. Disclose that the ingredient aliphatic amino acid derivative has been shown to cause skin irritation in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7487

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 9, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7513

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7514

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the generic chemical identity (chlorinated polyester acrylate) of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

3. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition or combustion products.

Registry Numbers 7536 and 7538

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7540

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 19, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7546

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 21, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the correct name and address of the supplier and/or manufacturer of the controlled product;

2. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients (aminocarboxylate iron and aminocarboxylate sodium salt) in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry number and percent concentration;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that immediate medical attention should be sought in all cases, and that flushing should continue for at least 20 minutes;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in animal bone marrow in vivo screening test for mutagenicity;

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 7557

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose LD₅₀ values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7558

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 21, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7581

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 25, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Replace the percent concentration range for polysiloxane copolymer with an acceptable WHMIS percent concentration range;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 34.3 mL/kg (34 300 mg/kg) for propylene glycol ether.

Registry Number 7582

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 25, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA of 5 mg/m³ (skin) for tetraethylenepentamine;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7597

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 22, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 7617, 7618 and 7619

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 2, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA (respirable fraction) = 1 mg/m³ for portland cement containing less than 1% crystalline silica and no asbestos;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.025 mg/m³ for crystalline silica (quartz);

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 5 mg/m³ for alkaline earth compound;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 7.34 g/kg for alkaline earth compound;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7622

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has caused skin corrosion;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.

Registry Number 7623

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that immediate medical attention should be sought in all cases, and that flushing should continue for at least 20 minutes;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7631

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an additional confidential hazardous ingredient (glycol monoalkyl ether) in the controlled product, and disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption;

2. Disclose an additional confidential hazardous ingredient (polyalkylene glycol monoalkyl ether) in the controlled product, and disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner and disclose that the real chemical identity is included in the claim for exemption;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 384 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2 764 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀ (4 hour, rat) value of 72.5 mg/L for glycol monoalkyl ether.

Registry Number 7634

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 24, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the impression that ethylbenzene is a regulated component of the controlled product.

Registry Number 7636

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL (8 hours) TWA = 10 ppm for benzyl alcohol;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7641

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 2, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product causes blurred vision in humans.

Registry Number 7655

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the proper chemical identity for ingredient with CAS Registry Number 288-32-4;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7657

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an oral LD₅₀ value for ingredient (limonene) in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7658

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient (substituted alkylamine) in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7667

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 16, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the gastrointestinal tract as a target organ;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 6.7 mL/kg for ethoxylated alcohol;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 525 mg/kg for glycol ether;

4. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused damage to the gastrointestinal tract.

Registry Number 7679

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that subacute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause kidney damage in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose an oral LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (silicate) in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7680

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient (phosphoric acid esters/amine salt) in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7682

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 25, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 7686 and 7687

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 2, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add eye contact as a route of entry;

2. Add skin contact as a route of entry;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be rinsed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Either disclose lower oral, rat and dermal, rabbit LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients or else disclose calculated values for the controlled product as a whole.

Registry Number 7694

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 7705, 7706 and 7709

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink;

5. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous combustion products;

6. Disclose a dermal, rabbit LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (alcohol, alkyl, alkoxylated).

Registry Number 7708

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

4. Disclose a dermal, rabbit LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (alcohol, alkyl, alkoxylated).

Registry Number 7710

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 10, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) range of 4 100 mg/kg for tert-butyl acetate;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7717

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 18, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add ingestion as a primary route of entry;

2. Disclose that acute ingestion and dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause bleeding in laboratory animals;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1.0 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 5.0 g/kg for polyoxyalkylenes.

Registry Number 7718

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 16, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add ingestion as a primary route of entry;

2. Disclose that acute dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse CNS effects in laboratory animals;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL (TWA, 8 hours) = 0.2 ppm for sulphur compound.

Registry Number 7738

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that immediate medical attention should be sought in all cases, and that flushing should continue for at least 20 minutes;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Number 7755

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 23, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7757

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A with a pictogram;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give large quantities of water to drink;

3. Disclose first aid advice applicable to cases of ingestion similar to the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, is unconscious, or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have the casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be rinsed with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

6. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH–TWA = 0.05 ppm (skin) and ACGIH–STEL = 0.15 ppm (skin) for tertiary amine #2;

7. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value and an LC₅₀ (6 hours, rat) value for tertiary amine #2.

Registry Number 7760

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 18, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7764

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 18, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Add oxides of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient (tallow amine ethoxylate) in an acceptable manner.

Registry Numbers 7766, 7792 and 7793

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 2, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add eye contact as a route of entry;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 5.99 mL/kg (6 230 mg/kg) for ethanol, 2,2′-(methylimino) bis.

Registry Number 7767

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 17, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient (aluminum oxide) in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number (1344-28-1) and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of “aluminum salt” in an acceptable manner.

Registry Numbers 7775 and 7776

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statement “Drink 1 or 2 glasses of water”;

2. Clarify that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin sensitization in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7788

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 18, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Correct the implication that naphthalene is an ingredient of the controlled product;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient (tallow amine ethoxylate) in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7801

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 20, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Correct the implication that xylene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene are regulated components of the controlled product;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 8 400 mg/kg for naphtha (petroleum), light aromatic.

Registry Number 7804

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 18, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the pH of the controlled product.

Registry Numbers 7808 and 7809

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class B3.

Registry Number 7816

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 15, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 900 mg/kg for one of the hazardous ingredients in the controlled product.

Registry Numbers 7817 and 7824

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 25, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7820

Date of notice confirming acceptance: December 6, 2010

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. Disclose that acute exposure to an ingredient of the controlled product has caused adverse CNS effects in humans;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be mutagenic, in vivo;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and teratogenic effects;

7. Disclose that chronic exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse brain effects in humans.

Registry Numbers 7825, 7826 and 7827

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 25, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7836

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Number 7838

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7849

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 24, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose that immediate medical attention should be sought in all cases, and that flushing should continue for at least 20 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink.

Registry Number 7894

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 24, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient (organosilane).

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE CLAIMANT TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7553

Date of order: January 4, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open.

Registry Number 7573

Date of order: December 13, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose ingestion as a route of entry;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1A and D2A with the pictograms;

3. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with potassium tert-butoxide and magnesium;

4. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA (skin) for alkyl thiol;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1 350 mg/kg for ethoxylated alcohol;

6. Disclose that alkyl thiol has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7591

Date of order: December 13, 2010

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value OSHA PEL = 80 mg/m³ divided by the value “%SiO₂” amorphous silica;

3. Disclose the kidneys as target organs due to chronic exposure by crystalline silica.

Registry Numbers 7659and 7737

Date of order: January 4, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has caused skin corrosion;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkyl phosphate #1 in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose a dermal LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkyl phosphate #1 in an acceptable manner;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient alkyl phosphate #2 in an acceptable manner;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for light aromatic naphtha in an acceptable manner;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open;

7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

8. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.

Registry Number 7660

Date of order: January 4, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open.

Registry Numbers 7742 and 7743

Date of order: January 4, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has caused eye corrosion;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes while holding the eyelids open.

Registry Number 7884

Date of order: January 11, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7885

Date of order: January 11, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7888

Date of order: January 11, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ range value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients.

Registry Number 7889

Date of order: January 11, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Clearly identify the numerical ranges for the concentrations of the hazardous ingredients;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ range value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients.

NOTE: The following claim was cancelled after the issuance of the decisions and thus neither was a signed undertaking provided nor was an order issued. The screening officer has identified the following instances of non-compliance with the requirements of the relevant legislation.

Registry Number 7707

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be corrosive to the eyes of laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

4. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous combustion products;

5. Disclose a dermal, rabbit LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredient (alcohol, alkyl, alkoxylated).

Pursuant to paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-998-2363.

GERHARD BRUINS
Acting Chief Screening Officer

[24-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission and leave granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 114(4) of the said Act, to Dominador (Ted) Marcelino, Assessment Processing Clerk (SP-03), Canada Revenue Agency, Winnipeg, Manitoba, to allow him to seek nomination as, and be, a candidate before the election period in the provincial election for the electoral district of Tyndall Park, Manitoba, to be held on October 4, 2011.

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to subsection 114(5) of the said Act, has also granted a leave of absence without pay during the election period, effective at close of business on the first day of the election period, to allow him to be a candidate during the election.

June 2, 2011

MARIA BARRADOS
President

[24-1-o]